Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Council archive · source document

07/2552 - MCU - Detached House [As Published] · 132007.2522

of 35

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checkhst, Version 21 0, 3 September 2007

 

(g) Does the application involve an urban activity as defined under the SEQ Regional Plan Regulatory Provisions?

[] Yes

If yes, is every urban activity in the application excluded from being assessable for the purposes of the SEQ
Regional Plan in the investigation Area?

[} Yes

[ } No- The SEQ Regional Pian makes this use assessable under the planning scheme. (Ensure Questions 2.1 in this
checkiist is answered yes’. This requires Questions 2.1.1 — 2.1.13 to be answered also) Each urban activity that is
assessable in the Investigation Area requires assessment by the Office of Urban Management (OUM) as
Concurrence Agency.

[ ] No

If no, does the application involve residential development involving a rural residential purpose as defined under
the SEQ Regional Plan Regulatory Provisions?

[] No
[] Yes
lf yes, are the premises located in the Mt Lindesay/North Beaudesert Study area?

[_] No - The SEQ Regional Plan makes this use assessable under the planning scheme. (Ensure Questions 2.1 in this
checklist is answered yes’. This requires Questions 2.1.1 — 2. 1.13 to be answered also) This application must
be referred to the Office of Urban Management (OUM) as Concurrence Agency.

[] Yes
lf yes, are the premises in a zone or equivalent designated area mentioned in a notice published by the
regional planning Minister?

[] Yes

[] No - The SEQ Regional Plan makes this use assessable under the planning scheme. (Ensure Questions 2.1
in this checKist is answered ‘yes’. This requires Questions 2. 1.1 — 2.1.13 to be aniswered also) This
application must be referred to the Office of Urban Management (OUM) as Concurrence Agency.

SEQ Regional Plan 2005-2026, Amendment 1, Regulatory Frovisions, division 2
IP Regulation, schedule 2 table 3, item 13
IPA, section 2.54 12 {3)

 

 

 

CONSERVATION ESTATE
2.12 | Is the proposal for urban purposes, as defined under the IPA?
i No
[-] Yes
lf yes, is the use proposed on a fot situated in, or within 100m of, any of the following?
ee area pest eae to or area of major interest CI No Ces
e A State forest or timber reserve under the Forestry Act 1959 {_} No ] Yes
e Amarine park under the Marine Parks Act 2004 [_] No [_] Yes
e Arecreation area under the Recreation Area Management Act 1988 ["] No [_} Yes
e Aworld heritage area listed under the World Heritage Convention [_] No [] Yes
e Brisbane forest park under the Brisbane Forest Park Act 1977 [-] No C] Yes

if yes fo any one - This application must be referred fo the chief executive under fhe relevant Act mentioned as Advice Agency.
IP Regulation, schedule 2. table 2 ifem 40

 

 

 

Used in these records

About this file

File size
2.0 MB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

07_2552 - MCU - Detached House [As Published].pdf · 2.0 MB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.