Council archive · source document
MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object - Nadine Love
Very large file (10.5 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
•
..-•
benzene particulates to separation distance alone is more than sufficient to neutralise I
such a degree and to be dilute any minor trace benzene particulates to such a degree and
undetectable. to be undetectable." This assertion is no more than an
unsubstantiated opinion and insufficient grounds on which to
approve the Development given that the setback distances
proposed in this development do not come close to meeting best
practice either here, in Australia, or overseas.
The Precautionary Principle demands that, particularly in relation
to young children, we address possible risks where scientific
understanding is yet incomplete in a way that is not harmful. In the
absence of scientific consensus that the Development is not
harmful, the burden of proof that it is not harmful falls on the
Developer and the Property Owner. The Applicant provides no
such evidence or assurance and in all the circumstances the
Development must be rejected.
Conclusion
The Noosa Biosphere Reserve is sought after and special because of its natural beauty, range
of plants and animals, the committed groups who look after it - and the community that strives
towards becoming a healthy community in a healthy environment that can be enjoyed for
generations.
As parents we have chosen this environment in which to raise and school our children because
of the specific nature and life-style the Noosa Biosphere has to offer. It ill behoves a Developer,
from outside of our community, with very different values, to pillage our prized neighbourhood
and strip our children of the clean, green, safe privilege we have sought out for them.
A petrol station does not belong adjacent to our school.
Indeed our children have raised concerns for the frogmouth owls, possums, grey egrets,
whistling tree frogs, rosella, plovers, green tree snakes, ducks and lizards that frequent the
Good Shepherd Lutheran College's grounds, should there be an increase in traffic and a
hazardous increase in air pollution and poisonous fumes.
For all these reasons the proposed development application is NOT Compatible with other uses
and works. It:
a. DOES NOT Maintain the safety of people, specifically children and works;
b. DOES NOT Avoid significant adverse impacts on the amenity enjoyed by users of other
premises, specifically children, including acoustic and health and well being qualities;
c. DOES NOT Avoid significant adverse effects on the natural environment, including
native habitat removal, fragmentation and attrition and
d. DOES NOT avoid significant adverse impacts on, and compromises, the amenity
enjoyed by the users of other premises in the adjoining Community Services, Housing
and Open-space Recreations Zones.
26
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object - Nadine LoveRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object - Nadine LoveRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 10.5 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.