Skip to the record
Search everything, all in one place.

Council archive · source document

planning report 20 William st · MCU25/0054

of 16

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

South side
The driveway to the basement is setback 0.7m rather than 1.5m as shown in Figure 8 below.




                               Figure 5 - Portion of driveway encroaching shown in red.

This considered an insignificant encroachment given it is slightly below ground level with sufficient space
for soft landscaping and no different to an at grade driveway located in the same place. In fact, being
located slightly below NGL, will help to mitigate vehicle noise, better than an at grade driveway. It is
considered the driveway fully complies with PO9.
Rear setback
A portion of the spiral staircase and eave encroach into the setback as shown below in Figure 9.




                                        Figure 6 - Encroachment in shown red




                                                                                           Page 12 of

Used in these records

About this file

File size
2.2 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

planning report 20 William st.pdf · 2.2 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.