Original source · versioned page text
Attachment C_R.B23636.001.02.SEMP_final_lowres
Very large file (26.6 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
Noosa Spit SEMP Final Report 102
Proposed Implementation Pathway
5.3 Legislative Framework & Approvals
The management actions proposed for the area consist of the following elements:
• Low impact works, focused primarily on dune management
• Beach nourishment, likely through use of dredging
• Potential construction of a seawall.
Table 5-2 provides a summary of the approvals and legislative framework associated with these
different works. Note that while part of the Noosa River is a fish habitat area (FHA) no works are
proposed to occur in the boundaries of this area. Additionally, the Noosa River sand shoals are likely
to be an important habitat for migratory shorebirds based on the criteria set out in EPBC Policy
Statement 3.21 – Industry guidelines for avoiding, assessing and mitigation impacts on EPBC Act
listed migratory shorebird species (Commonwealth Government, 2015). This is because of the
diversity of shorebird species known to occur throughout the lower Noosa River.
Table 5-2 Approval Considerations for Shoreline Erosion Management Actions
Works Approvals Other considerations
Low impact Development Permit for marine Works interfering with dunes are expected to meet
works plant disturbance – applies for the Code for Accepted Development for tidal works or
any works that disturb >50 m2 work completely or partly in a coastal management
of marine plants (including district (EPP/2017/3930). However, where this is not
dune vegetation) the case, works will require a Development Permit for
disturbance of state coastal land.
If works will impact on a breeding place for an animal
or a protected plant, further permits under the Nature
Conservation Act 1992 will be required.
Beach Allocation of Quarry Material Works need to be kept at least 50 m from boundary of
nourishment – Environmental Authority for FHA to prevent turbidity impacts.
dredging Environmentally Relevant EPBC Referral recommend due to potential for
Activity 16(1) significant impact; however, no EPBC Permit
Development Permit for tidal expected. Recommended that works occur outside of
works migratory shorebird season.
Development Permit for marine Works will need to be accompanied by a Dredge
plant disturbance – applies if Management Plan, including measures for managing
dredging disturbs seagrass or environmental, amenity and navigability impacts.
macroalgae
Beach Development Permit for tidal If works will impact on a breeding place for an animal
nourishment - works – applies if nourishment or a protected plant, further permits under the Nature
placement volume exceeds 5,000 m3 per Conservation Act 1992 will be required.
beach compartment per year EPBC Referral recommend due to potential for
Development Permit for marine significant impact; however, no EPBC Permit
plant disturbance – applies for expected. Recommended that works occur outside of
any works that disturb >50 m2 migratory shorebird season.
of marine plants (including
dune vegetation)
Seawall Development Permit for tidal Works will need to be accompanied by engineering
construction works assessments and understanding of potential impact
on surrounding geomorphology.
G:\Admin\B23636.g.mpb.NoosaSpit_SEMP\R.B23636.001.02.SEMP_final.docx
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.