Skip to the record
Accept no imitations.

Original source · versioned page text

Attachment C_R.B23636.001.02.SEMP_final_lowres

of 172

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file (26.6 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.

Noosa Spit SEMP Final Report                                                                             71
Shoreline Erosion Mitigation Options




4.2.1.1 Rapid Assessment Results
        The following options considered likely to gain agency support with a positive score following the
        rapid assessment include:

        • No Regrets / Preliminary Actions:

            ○ Ongoing monitoring of shoreline position, scarp location and recession rates so that triggers
              for escalating the management strategy can be identified

            ○ Review and update erosion hazard studies (such as this SEMP) and recommended strategies
              every 5 to 10 years.

            ○ Investigate joint funding arrangements to implement the preferred strategy

            ○ Provide the community with information regarding coastal hazards, risks, monitoring and
              strategy implementation

            ○ Support dune care/shoreline habitat management programs

            ○ Seek to avoid unnecessary or informal beach access that may cause damage to shoreline
              habitat by maintaining public access points.

        • Planned Retreat Options:

            ○ Allowing Dog Beach to recede without intervention, potentially leading to a breakthrough. It is
              noted that the reputational, political and legal risks associated with this option may be
              unacceptable.

        • Protect – Local Management Options:

            ○ Seawall along the entire length of Dog Beach to protect land-based assets and avoid a
              breakthrough

            ○ Construct a field of short groynes to deflect currents and stabilise the shoreline

            ○ Extend the existing training wall at the western end of Dog Beach to provide benefit to a longer
              section of the updrift shoreline

            ○ Nourish the shoreline and/or infill the Dog Beach channel to offset erosion and improve beach
              amenity.

        The following sections describe the detailed analysis of the shortlisted options. As noted above, the
        outcomes of the SEMP and rapid assessment of options should be reviewed and updated every 5 to
        10 years in response to changes to physical environment, new information gained through monitoring
        and/or community expectations.




G:\Admin\B23636.g.mpb.NoosaSpit_SEMP\R.B23636.001.02.SEMP_final.docx
Log in to download the original file

Attachment C_R.B23636.001.02.SEMP_final_lowres.pdf · 26.6 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.