PM Submission Object - Carolyn Scott - MCU18/0019

    •• NOOSA COUNCIU
    111: .•                                                   ,

                                 -   ------------_._-                                                                                                  -,
     To ensure your submission Is property made you must ensure that
     1. be made to the assessment manager
     2 be In writing
                                                                                                                                                                I
     3. be signed by each person who made the submission unless the submission is made el         tell
     4. state the name and residential or business address of each person who made the submission                                                               I
     5.' state what aspects of the plan or proposed development your support or oppose and why
     6. be received by Council during the formal public notification pertod
                                                                                                                                                                II
                                                                                                                                                                I

    As required by the Planning Act 2016, all submissions, including individual details, are published on Council's website
    and therefore will be accessible to internet search engines. All submissions are published, Irrespective of whether or not
    they are property made.
    '1. Application details
I File No. MCU18/ 0019
    Postal address of Land (as advertised) 52-62 Goodchap Street & 3-11 Val Crescent Nooseville
I Nature of Proposed Development - Housing Type 3 Reti-rement and Special Needs (Aged Care Facility)

i Full name of Submitter                     lol_c(V\. _6.f'1'f1_L_               Co~ _~.                 ._. __
[Postaladdress             I""   . KO>J""}";'"           'g,'-;€:.. ((';-'                   i                   ,,'-.,                                         I
I   Suburb            I'"\O<.M       LO_ol.UvV\           .                                  i State         ~     la.t .      Postcode      1:'Sl3---i
~.Slgnature(s)w                  w~~CJ{~
                                      .~~~~~~                                                                             ~


i I (!Ne), make the following submission:                                                                                I
f----------~---.                                                                                                         ,
 1. I object to the proposed development because It will impact on the amenity of the surrounding neighbourhood which is I
1 Zoned Detached housing. The size and bulk of the proposed development (which Is basically one continuous building
I taking up 11 lots) will look totally out of place on the site which is surrounded by modest residential houses.
                                                                                                                                                               J
12. The residential character of the area will be substantially diminished in nature as a result of the development.                                           J
! 3. This site is currently zoned Detached Housing. Having a 90 bed aged care facility on this site Is in direct conflict with                                  I
; the Noose Plan. The Noose Plan was drafted based on extensive community consultation. The community expects that                                              I
  the Council adheres to the Plan and does not allow development which blatantly contravenes It, such as the proposed                                           I
I development. Development that would be consistent with the planning scheme would be 11 dwellings over the 11 lots,
I which Is very different to a 90 bed aged care facility, which Is commercial In nature.
I
i4. A 90 bed aged care facility is excessive and is an overdevelopment of the site.
i
15. I understand that the Sunshine Coast will need more aged care facilities in the future, however, they should be located
 in more appropriately zoned areas. Val Crescent is not an appropriate site for such a development.

  6. The section of Goodchap Street near the hospital and Val Crescent are already under a lot of strain in terms of car
  parking, with them being used as an overflow car park for hospital staff, patients and visitors. A 90 bed facility directly
I across the road from the hospital which has up to 35 staff, visitors and commercial vehicles will exacerbate this problem
i with more and more people parking on Goodchap SI, Val Crescent and nearby side streets.
r
I

    Privacy
    Council will U$8 any parsonallnformatlon  provided for tha intended purpose only end for remaining In contact with you. Council I. euthorlsed to collect
    this information in accordance with the Local Government Act 2009 and other Local GovammentAcls. Your paraenallnformatlon Is only accesaed by
    paraens authorised to do so. Your parsonallnformatlon Is dad with in accordance with counclrs privacy policy.


    www.noosa.gld.qQv.au                      I   [email protected]                     T 07 5329 6500
    PO Box 141 TewanUn Old 4565
                                                                                           I ABN 97 969 214 121
                                                                                                                                                  Page 1 of 1