Council archive · source document
Information Request MCU26 0089 · MCU26/0089
Furthermore, no sectional drawings have been submitted to demonstrate the relationship
between the proposed development, the existing natural ground levels and adjoining
properties, particularly those lots that have not been subject to filling works to achieve flood
immunity. Based off the information provided, Council is unable to verify the nominated
building height or assess the extent of any filling relative to the surrounding land.
Information Required
1. Provide written confirmation of the methodology used to determine existing natural
ground level across the site, including any assumptions and reference survey data relied
upon.
2. Provide a detailed survey plan prepared by a suitably qualified surveyor showing existing
contours, spot levels and natural ground levels across the site sufficient to corroborate
the nominated ground levels shown on the architectural plans.
3. Provide sectional plans through the development clearly identifying natural and finished
ground levels, and the relationship between the proposed development and adjoining
properties.
Item – Front Fence and Gateway
The proposed pedestrian entrance and front fencing present as a hard-surfaced element
within the streetscape and impact landscaping. While it is acknowledged that the site has a
relatively narrow frontage, opportunities exist to improve the streetscape presentation by
increasing landscaping within the front setback and reducing the visual dominance of built
form along the frontage in compliance with Performance Outcome PO17 of the Medium
Density Residential Zone Code.
Information Required
4. Provide amended plans, including variation to the front fence alignment and consider
opportunities to consolidate the pedestrian entrance and gateway to increase landscape
opportunities along the frontage.
Item – Retaining Wall and Fencing Treatments, Amenity
The earthworks plans indicate retaining walls ranging from approximately 0.5m to 1.2m in
height along common boundaries to facilitate filling of the site. However, it is unclear whether
fencing is proposed above the retaining walls and, if so, the resulting overall height. As a
consequence, Council is unable to fully assess the visual and physical relationship between
the development and adjoining properties, particularly with respect to impacts on private open
space areas, outlook and amenity.
Information Required
5. Provide a retaining and fencing plan and provide supporting information to greater
understand the site’s relationship with adjoining properties areas of private open space
and habitable rooms.
Item – Site Cover
The outdoor area-built form is to be included in site cover calculations. Site cover is to remain
compliant with 40%.
Page 2 of 4
Document Set ID: 25255973
Version: 3, Version Date: 20/10/2026
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Information Request MCU26 0089.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 933 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.