Original source · versioned page text
Minor Change Report 51983 3225 15 [As Published]
a) provide a high level of amenity to users of the subject site and adjoining premises,
including provision of visual and acoustic privacy;
b) not unreasonably obstruct views or cause overlooking of private open space or habitable
areas of adjoining premises;
c) provide adequate distance from adjoining land uses;
d) preserve existing vegetation that will help buffer development;
e) allow for space and landscaping to be provided between buildings including adequate area
at ground level for landscaping with trees, shrubs, outdoor living and utilities;
f) be consistent with the predominant character of the surrounding area, maintaining the visual
continuity and pattern of buildings and landscape elements within the street; and
g) protect the natural character and avoid adverse impacts on ecologically important
areas such as the beach, Noosa River, national parks and other parklands.
Preserving amenity for users of the premises and preserving landscaping between buildings is
most relevant to this site, as the multiple dwelling units currently have various separation distances
between each dwelling unit and some mature vegetation exists on site.
The existing units are all sited relatively close together and staggered in terms of their orientation
throughout the site. Existing decks are generally located in a northerly or easterly orientation. For
example the upper deck on neighbouring Unit 18 is orientated east, in line with the existing northern
deck on Unit 17. Some decks have privacy screens which is common throughout the development
as is the orientation of the decks, where some face each other.
As per the previous approval, it is noted that the corner of the balcony of Unit 16 encroaches on
the Lot 17 by 0.575 metres, which results in some built form in close proximity to each other. At
some point this encroachment will be rectified, through a building modification. The majority of the
new building footprint is setback enough to allow for landscaping between buildings and preserve
amenity.
A site inspection with the architect who modelled the changes as shown in the below Figures 6 &
7 demonstrated that the changes in setbacks do not introduce new impacts with regard to privacy
or bulk and scale from that previously approved, or the ability to provide for meaningful
landscaping. The applicant’s architect indicated that the setback of the corner of the spa area
creates structural issues and provided some modelling around the proposed setback. The
modelling demonstrated that the spa area on the upper floor which intrudes further into the setback
does not introduce new impacts with regard to bulk and scale as the corner area (previously
setback) presents as 1.3 high lightweight screen. The change does not create an overlooking
issue, due to the proposed screening.
Page 9 of 15
Document Set ID: 22053825
Version: 6, Version Date: 03/08/2022
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.