Original source · versioned page text
2020-05-18 General Committee Meeting Notes
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
RECOMMENDATIONS ONLY – NOT THE FINAL DECISION OF COUNCIL
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING 18 MAY 2020
2. The proposed development is not consistent with the Overall Outcomes 14.44.2
b) & h) and Specific Outcomes O13 & O16, as the proposed development is not
designed and sited to maintain the visual privacy of neighbouring properties and
does not minimise the need for cut and fill.
3. The approval for the Operational Works is not consistent with the current
standards required by the Engineering Works Codes under The Noosa Plan:
3.1. Stormwater works conditioned is not consistent with Specific Outcomes O8
and O9 of the Transport, Roads and Drainage Code;
3.2. Frontage works conditioned is not consistent with current Council Standard
Drawing requirements under the Transport, Roads and Drainage Code;
3.3. Erosion and sediment control measures conditioned are not consistent with
current requirements of the Transport, Roads and Drainage Code;
3.4. The access driveway is not consistent with current Council Standard
Drawing requirements under the Driveways and Carparking Code; and
3.5. Earthworks conditioned is not consistent with current Council Standard
Drawing requirements under the Earthworks Code.
4. The development approval was designed in conjunction with 7 Park Crescent,
Sunshine Beach, which has now lapsed and accordingly has the potential to
adversely impact on the future amenity of 7 Park Crescent, Sunshine Beach.
5. The contributions payable towards trunk infrastructure under this approval are
not consistent with the current Infrastructure Charges Resolution.
6. The proposed development is contrary to the outcomes sought for the site under
the draft Noosa Plan, with duplex dwellings identified as inconsistent for the area
in order to accommodate the projected housing needs for Shire.
B. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.
Carried unanimously.
7 RAL19/0008 - DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR RECONFIGURING A LOT (1 LOT
INTO 2 LOTS) AT 216 BLACK MOUNTAIN ROAD, BLACK MOUNTAIN
Committee Recommendation
Moved: Cr Stockwell
Seconded: Cr Jurisevic
That Council note the report by the Development Planner to the General Committee Meeting
dated 18 May 2020 regarding Application No. RAL19/0008 for a Development Permit for
Reconfiguring A Lot (1 Lot into 2 Lots), situated at 216 Black Mountain Road, Black Mountain
and:
A. Refuse the application for the following reasons:
1. The proposal does not comply with Overall Outcome 14.181.2a), c) and g) and
Specific Outcomes O1 & O5 of the Reconfiguring a Lot Code, as proposed lot 2
does not meet the minimum lot size required, is not suitable for its intended use,
with the proposed house site and access located on steeply sloping land.
Page 4 of 6
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.