Original source · versioned page text
Ecological Assessment
Attached to the e-mail Ecological assessment - 4 of 4 MCU16/0081.
The original of this document is very large (16.4 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
steep mountain ranges, unsuitable habitats or
treeless areas more than 1 kilometre wide. Artificial
barriers may include infrastructure (such as roads,
rail, mines etc.) that have ineffective mitigation to
facilitate movement or high traffic volumes or other
developments that create treeless areas more than
1 km wide”. While barriers exist to the north and
immediate east and west, Eenie Creek is unlikely
to represent an insurmountable barrier (i.e. koalas
are capable of swimming the creek). Given this,
and given Walter Hay Drive includes koala
mitigation structures further to the south (i.e.
bridges and underpasses), the extent of
contiguous habitat is >500ha.
+1 Area is part of a -
contiguous
(medium)
landscape < 500
ha, but ≥ 300 ha.
0 (low) None of the above -
Key Existing +2 (high) Little or no -
evidence of koala
Threats
mortality from
vehicle strike or
dog attack at
present in areas
that score 1 or 2
for koala
occurrence
+1 Evidence of The Koala Tracker website (Harris, 2013) shows +1
infrequent or evidence of Koala mortality from car strike (as
(medium)
irregular Koala reported by the general public) from 2009 – 2013
mortality from along Walter Hay Drive and Eenie Creek Road.
vehicle strike or
dog attack at
present in areas
that score 1 or 2
for Koala
occurrence
0 (low) Evidence of -
frequent or regular
koala mortality
from vehicle strike
or dog attack in
the study area at
present, or Areas
which score 0 for
koala occurrence
and have a
significant dog or
vehicle threat
present
Recovery +2 (high) Habitat is likely to -
be important for
Value
achieving the
interim recovery
objectives for the
relevant context,
as outlined in
Table 1.
+1 Uncertainty exists -
as to whether the
(medium) habitat is
important for
achieving the
interim recovery
objectives for the
relevant context,
as outlined in
Table 1.
0 (low) Habitat is unlikely Table 1 identifies the interim recovery objectives as 0 (low)
to be important for “Protect and conserve large, connected areas of
achieving the koala habitat, particularly large, connected areas
interim recovery that support koalas that are:
objectives for the -genetically diverse/distinct; or
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.