Original source · versioned page text
2021-01-27 Special Meeting Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
AGENDA
Special Meeting
Wednesday, 27 January 2021
commencing at 2.00pm
Council Chambers, 9 Pelican Street, Tewantin
Crs Clare Stewart (Chair), Karen Finzel, Joe Jurisevic, Amelia Lorentson,
Brian Stockwell, Tom Wegener, Frank Wilkie
“Noosa Shire – different by nature”
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.
Full text of the other 40 sections
Section 2
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 27 JANUARY 2021
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM PAGE
ATTENDANCE & APOLOGIES -
REPORTS 3
1 MCU20/0012 & MCU20/0013 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR TRANSPORT
TYPE 2 CAR PARK AT 4 - 8 AND 16 LOWER MILL ROAD, COOROY AND OPEN
SPACE TYPE 1 SPORT AND RECREATION AT 1, 3 AND 9 MAPLE STREET,
COOROY 3
MEETING CLOSURE -
Page 2 of 41
Section 3
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 27 JANUARY 2021
REPORTS
1 MCU20/0012 & MCU20/0013 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR TRANSPORT TYPE 2
CAR PARK AT 4 - 8 AND 16 LOWER MILL ROAD, COOROY AND OPEN SPACE TYPE
1 SPORT AND RECREATION AT 1, 3 AND 9 MAPLE STREET, COOROY
Author Coordinator Planning, Patrick Murphy
Environment and Sustainable Development Department
Index ECM/ Application/ MCU20/0012 and MCU20/0013
Attachments 1. Proposal Plans - Playground
2. Proposal Plans - Car park
APPLICATION DETAILS
Applicant Noosa Shire Council
Proposal MCU20/0012 - Material Change of Use - Transport - Type 2 Car
Park
MCU20/0013 - Material Change of Use – Open Space Type 1
Sport and Recreation (Playground)
Properly Made Date 12 February 2020
Information Request Date 11 March 2020
Information Response Date 26 August 2020
Decision Due Date 29 January 2020
Number of Submissions No submissions
PROPERTY DETAILS
Property Address 4 - 8 and Lower Mill Road Cooroy Qld 4563
1, 3 and 9 Maple Street Cooroy Qld 4563
RP Description Lot 5 SP 213104
1 RP153299
2 RP153299
Lot 3 SP230055
Land Area 9942m²
1471m²
849m²
5108m²
Existing Use of Land Open Space and vacant Industrial Zoned Land
STATUTORY DETAILS
SEQRP Designation Urban Footprint
Locality Cooroy
Zone Industry Zone
Community Services Zone
Page 3 of 41
Section 4
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 27 JANUARY 2021
Overlays Biodiversity Overlay – Environment Protection and Riparian Buffer
Natural Hazard Overlay – Flood Hazard
Heritage Overlay – Queensland Register
Assessment Type Car Park - Impact
Playground - Code
RECOMMENDATION
That Council note the report by the Coordinator Planning to the Special Meeting dated 27 January
2021 regarding Application No. MCU20/0012 for a Development Permit for Material Change of Use
- Transport - Type 2 Car Park situated at 4-8 Lower Mill Road, Cooroy and MCU20/0013 for a
Development Permit for Material Change of Use – Open Space Type 1 Sport and Recreation
(Playground) at 1, 3 and 9 Maple Street, Cooroy and:
A. Approve Applications MCU20/0012 and MCU20/0013 in accordance with the following
conditions:
MCU20/0012 – Car park
PLANNING
When Conditions must be Complied With
1. Unless otherwise stated, all conditions of this Decision Notice must be complied with
prior to the use commencing, and then compliance maintained at all times while the
use continues.
Approved Plans
2. Development undertaken in accordance with this approval must generally comply with
the approved plans of development. The approved plans are listed in the following table
unless otherwise amended by these conditions.
Plan No. Re Plan/Document Name Date
v.
500557 – DA00 A Project Cover Sheet prepared by Noosa 22 October 2020
Council
500557 – DA01 A Design and Existing Legends prepared 22 October 2020
by Noosa Council
500557 – DA02 A Typical Sections prepared by Noosa 22 October 2020
Council
500557 – DA03 A Maple Street - Carpark Area 1 prepared 22 October 2020
by Noosa Council
500557 – DA04 A Design Features - Carpark Area 2 22 October 2020
prepared by Noosa Council
500557 – DA05 D Design Features – Pathway Connection 22 October 2020
prepared by Noosa Council
Carparking
3. Carparking must be provided and sealed in accordance with the approved plans. All
carparking, must be provided prior to the commencement of the use of the playground
approved under development application MCU20/0013.
4. The concrete driveway on drawing DA04 Rev. A Design Features Carpark Area 2 is
not to be constructed as part of these works.
5. All car parking shall be kept maintained and line-marked in a condition fit for use.
6. Appropriate signs shall be provided indicating the site as a Council Car park.
Page 4 of 41
Section 5
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 27 JANUARY 2021
Pathways
7. Concrete pedestrian pathways, detailed on the plans, must be provided in accordance
with Council’s standard drawing RS-065 and any associated addendum. The works
must include:
a. Any reinstatement of verge area must smoothly match the new pathway,
b. The provision of topsoil, turf and any necessary stormwater drainage measures
to prevent ponding and excessive runoff over the pathways.
Stormwater Drainage Management
8. In conjunction with the development application for operational works, provide an
updated Stormwater Quality Management Plan and engineering drawings which are
based on a revised model which addresses the following:
a. Only include those sub-catchments which form part of the proposed works or
which contribute flow to the devices proposed to treat the proposed works;
b. Only include treatment devices which actually exits or which are proposed to be
built or refurbished as part of the proposed works;
c. Existing GPTs are not to be modelled as receiving and treating roofwater unless
this physically occurs on site; and
d. Additional treatment devices are to be provided as necessary within the car
parking area in order to meet the pollutant load reduction design objectives
specified by the Water Sensitive Design Code.
9. Proposed and refurbished bioretention devices are to be designed generally in
accordance with the Bioretention Technical Design Guidelines (Water by Design, 2012)
and IPWEAQ standard drawings
10. Permanent educational signage must be erected to educate the public about the
function of the bioretention device(s). The dimensions, standard, presentation and
location of the educational signage must be in accordance with an Operational Works
approval.
Public Services
11. All necessary approvals from external service providers and external parties on which
the development works are proposed or impacted on must have been obtained and a
copy of approval/s supplied to Council prior to the commencement of the works.
Easements
12. Where required, any public or third party infrastructure located on the subject site must
be placed within an easement registered against the title of the property and in
accordance with the requirement of the public service provider.
13. All easements must be designed in accordance with the planning scheme and granted
at no cost to the Grantee. Where the Grantee is Council or a service authority, the
easement documentation must be in accordance with the Grantee’s standard
easement terms. Draft easement documentation must be submitted to Council for
endorsement.
Landscaping Works
14. The development site must be landscaped. The works must be undertaken in
accordance with the Noosa Plan 2020 Planning Scheme Policy 2 – Landscaping for
that specific area and must include in particular:
a. Carpark shade trees in a minimum pot size of 45L for every four carparks
Page 5 of 41
Section 6
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 27 JANUARY 2021
b. Carpark shade trees must have sufficient structured soils to allow for proper root
growth
15. All landscape works must be established and maintained in accordance with the
approved design for the life of the development, and in a manner that ensures healthy,
sustained and vigorous plant growth. All plant material must be allowed to grow to full
form and be refurbished when its life expectancy is reached.
MCU20/0013 – Playground
PLANNING
When Conditions must be Complied With
1. Unless otherwise stated, all conditions of this Decision Notice must be complied with
prior to the use commencing, and then compliance maintained at all times while the
use continues.
Approved Plans
2. Development undertaken in accordance with this approval must generally comply with
the approved plans of development. The approved plans are listed in the following table
unless otherwise amended by these conditions.
Plan No. Rev. Plan/Document Name Date
2.1 - Masterplan 11.12.2020
Hinterland Playground, Cooroy Noosa Council prepared
by Form Landscape Architects + Robinson Architects
2.2 - Entry Detail Plan 11.12.2020
Hinterland Playground, Cooroy Noosa Council prepared
by Form Landscape Architects + Robinson Architects
2.3 - Frog Pond Detail 11.12.2020
Hinterland Playground, Cooroy Noosa Council prepared
by Form Landscape Architects + Robinson Architects
2.4 - Water Detail Plan 11.12.2020
Hinterland Playground, Cooroy Noosa Council prepared
by Form Landscape Architects + Robinson Architects
2.5.1 - Detail Plan 1 11.12.2020
Climbing Zone Detail Plan
Hinterland Playground, Cooroy Noosa Council prepared
by Form Landscape Architects + Robinson Architects
2.5.2 - Detail Plan 2 11.12.2020
Hinterland Playground, Cooroy Noosa Council prepared
by Form Landscape Architects + Robinson Architects
2.5.3 - Detail Plan 11.12.2020
Event Precinct Detail Plan
Hinterland Playground, Cooroy Noosa Council prepared
by Form Landscape Architects + Robinson Architects
500557 – A Project Cover Sheet prepared by Noosa Council 22 October
DA00 2020
500557 – A Design and Existing Legends prepared by Noosa 22 October
DA01 Council 2020
500557 – A Typical Sections prepared by Noosa Council 22 October
DA02 2020
500557 – A Maple Street - Carpark Area 1 prepared by Noosa 22 October
DA03 Council 2020
Page 6 of 41
Section 7
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 27 JANUARY 2021
500557 – A Design Features - Carpark Area 2 prepared by Noosa 22 October
DA04 Council 2020
500557 – D Design Features – Pathway Connection prepared by 22 October
DA05 Noosa Council 2020
500557 – A Library Carpark Reconfiguration Plan prepared by 22 October
DA06 Noosa Council as annotated by Council 2020
500557 – A Design Features - Carpark Area 3 prepared by Noosa 6 October
DA07 Council as annotated by Council 2020
Currency Period
3. This development approval lapses if the use has not happened by 29 January 2027,
unless an application to extend the currency period is approved by Council.
Stormwater Drainage Management
4. Stormwater must be treated in accordance with the recommendations of the
Stormwater Quality Management Plan Revision 1 prepared by Callaghan and Toth
dated July 2020.
Flood Risk
5. All infrastructure with potential to be impacted by flood waters, including electrical and
plumbing fixtures and pump-room plant and equipment is to be located above 1%AEP
flood level corresponding to year 2100 planning period.
6. An automatic flood warning system incorporating both an audible and visual alarm is
to be provided to alert visitors to evacuate the site as soon as flood waters begin to
impact the playground and with sufficient warning time to ensure full site evacuation
prior to evacuation routes becoming inundated.
7. The playground design is to be amended to eliminate the risk of isolation of all site
areas by rising flood waters. This may involve either modification to site levels or
provision of linking elevated walkways and evacuation routes which remain flood-free
until each area of the site which the evacuation routes service is itself inundated.
8. The playground design and associated flood model is to be amended to eliminate any
increases in the flood levels affecting over-floor flooding at adjacent buildings for all
flood events.
9. Provide an updated flood emergency preparedness and management plan which
incorporates the above changes and which includes RPEQ certification that the
proposed final playground design achieves an acceptable and tolerable level of flood
risk. This plan must be completed and certified prior to commencing works on site.
Car parking
10. 56 additional car spaces must be provided prior to the commencement of the use of
the playground. The car parking is to be provided in the following manner:
a. Lower Mill Road (22 additional formally sealed and line-marked spaces)
b. Maple Street road reserve (12 formally sealed and line-marked spaces)
c. Southern side of Mary River Road west of the tennis courts (22 spaces) be
constructed as an overflow parking area.
11. The overflow parking area must be monitored for a full week in school holidays and a
full week outside of school holidays after the playground has been fully operational for
three months (and again at six months). The results of the surveys must be provided
to Council’s Manager Development Assessment.
12. The overflow parking area must be formally sealed and line-marked if regular use is
identified at either period of monitoring referred to in Condition 11.
Page 7 of 41
Section 8
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 27 JANUARY 2021
13. The parking on the southern side of Marara Street must be amended as follows:
a. The three (3) parking spaces closest to the existing disabled parking spaces must
be signed as being for 15 minute parking.
b. Three (3) months after that change has been implemented, usage should be
reviewed to determine whether the number of 15 minute spaces (for short
duration library trips) should be increased or decreased to meet demands.
c. The remaining four (4) parking spaces in that existing 2 hour parking zone be
clearly signed as being for library use only.
Soil Contamination
14. Prior to the commencement of the use of the playground:
a. A Remediation Action Plan must be prepared and submitted to Council which
includes the following actions:
i. Provision of a Waste Acceptance Letter from an approved waste
management facility
ii. Excavation of approximately 30 m3 of impacted TCDD/PCDD/F in the
vicinity of BH27 for temporary stockpiling and disposal.
iii. Following excavation/remedial excavation works, at least of 8 validation
samples (including Quality Assurance/Quality Control) must be collected
from base of the excavation and stockpile of excavated material.
iv. Validation samples must be analysed for presence of TCDD/PCDD/F by
an approved laboratory analyst.
v. A Quality Assurance/Quality Control program must be implemented as part
of the laboratory analysis.
vi. Quality Control field samples must include collection of one field duplicates,
at a ratio of 1 in every 20 primary samples analysed.
b. The contamination report must be updated and submitted to Council to include
the remediation and validation testing results.
c. The site must be removed from the Environmental Management Register.
15. No contaminated material, including but not limited to fill and timber, is to be used in
the construction of the playground.
Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities
16. Pedestrian and bicycle facilities must be provided for the development. The works must
be undertaken in accordance with an Operational Works approval and must include in
particular:
a. Internal pedestrian footpaths in accordance with the approved plans
b. a total of 20 bicycle parking spaces
Damage to Services and Assets
17. Any damage caused to existing services and assets as a result of the development
works must be repaired at no cost to the asset owner at the following times:
a. where the damage would cause a hazard to pedestrian or vehicle safety,
immediately; or
b. where otherwise, upon completion of the works associated with the development.
18. Any repair work which proposes to alter the alignment or level of existing services and
assets must first be referred to the relevant service authority for approval.
Page 8 of 41
Section 9
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 27 JANUARY 2021
Landscaping Works
19. The development site must be landscaped. The works must be undertaken in
accordance with the Noosa Plan 2020 Planning Scheme Policy 2 – Landscaping for
that specific area and must include in particular:
a. the works shown on the Approved Plans
b. Control of all weeds species listed in the following standards and legislation:
i. declared plants under the Land Protection (Biodiversity Act 2014 and sub-
ordinate Regulation 2016).
ii. Noosa Local Government Area Pest Management Plan 2015-2019.
iii. Undesirable Plant Species listed in Table SC6.3.5.1 of the Noosa Plan
2020 Planning Scheme Policy 2 – Landscaping
20. All landscape works must be established and maintained in accordance with the
approved design for the life of the development, and in a manner that ensures healthy,
sustained and vigorous plant growth. All plant material must be allowed to grow to full
form and be refurbished when its life expectancy is reached.
Lighting
21. The development must be undertaken and operated in a manner that causes no
detrimental effect upon the amenity of the neighbourhood by reason of lighting
nuisance.
B. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.
REPORT
1. PROPOSAL
The proposal is to develop a large playground on a site in Cooroy with additional car parking spaces
proposed in proximity to the playground for patrons. Two separate development applications have
been lodged to facilitate the proposal including:
MCU12/0013 for the playground itself
MCU12/0012 for the associated car parking
Both applications were lodged under The Noosa Plan 2006 and so must be assessed against the
Noosa Plan 2006 with regard had to the Noosa Plan 2020.
MCU12/0013 – Playground
This application seeks to establish a playground at 1, 3 and 9 Maple Street Cooroy and accordingly
seeks approval from Council for a Development Permit for a Material Change of Use for Open
Space – Type 1 Sport and Recreation.
The applicant advises that the playground includes a number of different play areas including frog
pond, water play, climbing and event precincts. An amenities building is proposed along the Marara
Street frontage with picnic shelters located around the site. These structures include pitched roof
forms, green roofs and timber screening.
The playground features timber towers, slides, and walkways within a landscaped setting. A sketch
of indicative features is provided below:
The playground and associated pathways link into the existing pathways to the north and south.
The following images detail a Locality Plan for the playground and layout plan of the proposed
playground. Plans of the development are available at Attachments 1 and 2.
Page 9 of 41
Section 10
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 27 JANUARY 2021
Figure 1: Locality Plan (playground)
Figure 2: Site Plan
Page 10 of 41
Section 11
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 27 JANUARY 2021
MCU12/0012 – Car park
The application seeks approval to utilise 4 – 8 Lower Mill Road Cooroy for Transport Type 2 -
Carpark.
22 car spaces are to be provided within Lower Mill Road area. These are proposed to the northern
side of the site and are in addition to the existing car parking spaces to the front of the community
buildings.
The carpark within Lower Mill Road will be complemented by an additional 34 car parking spaces
within the surrounding road reserve. No development approval is required for the establishment
of car parking within the road reserve under The Noosa Plan 2006. This involves 12 new parking
spaces on the western side of Maple Street (as well as a new zebra crossing on Maple Street) and
22 new parking spaces on the southern side of Mary River Road west of the existing tennis courts.
This results in a total of 56 new parking spaces to service the car parking demands of the
playground.
The 22 new Mary River Road parking spaces are proposed initially to be grassed, and defined
using log fencing, reflective indicators, and signage. If they are found to be well used then those
Mary River Road parking spaces are proposed to be sealed and line-marked in the future.
The following images detail the location of the additional car parking again noting that only the 22
spaces opposite the community buildings at 4 – 8 Lower Mill Road require approval and are subject
to this application.
Figure 3: Car parking plan
Page 11 of 41
Section 12
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 27 JANUARY 2021
The following image details the relevant zoning for the proposed development area:
Figure 4: Noosa Plan 2006 - Zone Map
2. SITE DETAILS
2.1. Background
The applicant has provided the following timeline in relation to the site and project history
associated with the Hinterland Playground at Cooroy.
2000 - Queensland Government closed the Cooroy Mill in accordance with the Regional Forest
Agreement.
2002 - Queensland Government handed over the Lower Mill Site to Noosa Council for community
purposes
2003 – Cooroy Forest Park Concept Master Plan developed for Lower Mill site. The scaled
drawings were of an Adventure Playground surrounded by an Arboretum of trees.
2004 - Cooroy Lower Mill Community Board formed by Council to oversee site development
2006 - Board commissioned consultants to develop a Concept Master Plan and support the
development of the Lower Mill Site and the Butter Factory Precinct.
The vision for the site had been realised by a focus on "Design for Living" activities. The intent of
the Master Plan was to propose uses and activities to improve access and connectivity within
Cooroy and improve the sites visitation and utility by providing recreational infrastructure. Roofed
and open areas were described as particularly useful for events and activities.
The Timber Yard Playground descriptions as referenced in the Master Plan were:
“a multi-node playground experience, incorporating the creek, bridges, interpretation, picnic
facilities and fenced areas of high quality playground equipment.”
“The playground is designed to be an all abilities playground, attracting visitation from across
the district.”
Page 12 of 41
Section 13
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 27 JANUARY 2021
“Timber use is a theme throughout the playground, particularly in the design of ancillary
shelter structures and furniture.”
Extensive community consultation was conducted by a contracted consultant to engage and report
on community comments and concerns.
The reports from this community consultation relevant to the 2019 design include:
support for the development of the Lower Mill Site for community use;
support for the landscaping and trail design that links the overflow parking on the northern
side of the river to the town centre;
appreciation of the BBQ and picnic facilities to be provided;
encouragement to providing meeting spaces; support for the protection of the riparian zone
and related vegetation buffer;
encouragement to remove weed species from the riparian zone;
support for open green space provided;
concern for the limited size of the space to include buildings;
the need to consider the flood prone nature of the site;
the need to ensure that the development does not cause an increase in upstream flood
levels; and
the need of additional parking spaces.
2006 – Works & Community Services Committee Report published. The publically available Noosa
Council Works & Community Services Report 2006 discussed the implementation of the Design
for Living Lower Mill Masterplan concept.
2008 March - Noosa Council merger with Shire of Maroochy and City of Caloundra to form
Sunshine Coast Region.
2010 – New Cooroy Library Built Community consultation was conducted with the regard to the
design features and location of the Cooroy Library, adjacent to the Lower Mill site.
2014 January - Noosa Council re-established
2015 – Council reviewed Town Centre infrastructure priorities prior to the merger and recognise
the identification of an iconic nature based playground to be constructed in the Noosa hinterland.
2015/16 – Funding approved in 2015/2016 Capital Works Budget for Planning & Design for a
Hinterland Playground
2016 – Council Meeting Hinterland Playground Concept Presentation
Staff presented the options for the location of a nature based, all-abilities Hinterland playground.
The evaluation for a playground space within the townships of Cooroy, Cooran, Pomona and Kin
Kin included:
Available space;
minimisation of environmental impacts;
existing facilities;
connectivity to services
parking; and
economic development.
Cooroy was chosen as the preferred location due to the site assessments and historical nature of
the site relating to its proposed development as a community use facility.
Councillors provided positive feedback on the proposal of a nature based playground at Cooroy.
Page 13 of 41
Section 14
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 27 JANUARY 2021
The Hinterland Playground project then moved into the research and design phase. Research
found that natural playgrounds provided children with more opportunities to develop a greater
range of skills compared to typical pre-formed playgrounds.
2017/18 – Architectural concept drawings for the Hinterland Playground, by Majstorovic
Architecture
March 2018 – Capital Works Project Brief developed for 2018/2019 budget process for the
playground
April 2018 – Council officer met with Cooroy Chamber of Commerce, Cooroy Futures Group and
CARA (Cooroy Area Residents Association) individually to present and discuss Hinterland
Playground concept plan.
May 2018 – Council Executive Team Meeting
Agreement that that a Project Control Group (PCG) should be established to oversee the project
with the first role of the PCG being define the project scope.
Planning phase commences with internal and external consultation and an Invitation to Quote
issued to a select list of experienced Landscape Architects to undertake the detailed design.
July 2018 – Form Architects engaged to design Cooroy Hinterland Playground
3 July 2018 – Media Release - Announces $1.25M for iconic hinterland playground Council’s draft
2018/19 budget includes $1.25M to finalise a design and break ground on a new nature-based
hinterland playground at Cooroy.
9 July 2018 – Media Release - $5.4 million worth of infrastructure projects for the Noosa Hinterland
in Noosa Council's 2018/19 capital works budget.
2018 – Grant Application made to State Government to support cost
October 2018 – Services & Organisation Committee Report. This report to Council provided an
update on the progress of the planning phase for the Hinterland Playground. Endorsement for the
establishment of a dedicated internal Working Group and a separate External Reference Group
for the duration of the Cooroy Hinterland Playground was also requested and approved.
November 2018 – Establishment of monthly internal and external working groups for the Cooroy
Hinterland Playground
Jan 2019 – Councillor Workshop - to provide an informal update on the project and obtain feedback
April 2019 – Communications contractor engagement to support project.
May 2019 – Council receives 60% of the required playground budget being $2,788,770.60 of grant
funding from the Queensland Government’s 2019-21 LGGSP Local Government Grants and
Subsidies Program.
Media release sent out by Council announcing the Hinterland Playground State grant funding.
Ongoing monthly internal and external working group meetings
2.2. Site Description
The playground site is located to the north of the main commercial area of Cooroy township and
comprises three irregular shaped lots that together form a triangular shaped site. Lots 1 and 2 on
RP153299 have areas of 1,471.93m2 and 849.m2 respectively and are vacant. Lot 3 on SP23005
has a total area of 10,532m2 and is separated into two parcels by Marara Street with the northern
parcel of Lot 3 being the subject to this application. The southern parcel of Lot 3 currently contains
the Cooroy library and is not part of this application. The subject area of lot 3 is currently vacant
and includes a pathway and easement to the Lower Mill site on the northern side of Cooroy Creek.
Page 14 of 41
Section 15
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 27 JANUARY 2021
Maple Street forms the south-western boundary of the site and includes a wide road reserve and
associated footpath area. Cooroy Creek Bushland Reserve forms the northern boundary of the site
and is well vegetated with a range of mature native trees. Marara Street extends through Lot 3 and
forms the south-eastern boundary of the subject site.
The car park site is similarly located to the north of the Cooroy township and is known as being
part of the Cooroy Lower Mill Site. The lot has an area of 9,946m2 and currently contains the State
Heritage listed kiln complex comprising a boiler shed and associated equipment and buildings as
well as the Cooroora Woodworkers club and Cooroy Camphor Laurel building. The site also
contains formal and informal carparking areas and connects to the Cooroy township via a
pedestrian pathway over Cooroy Creek.
Cooroy Creek forms part of the southern boundary whilst industrial lots and Lower Mill Road form
the western boundaries.
2.3. Surrounding Land Uses
Playground
North: Cooroy Creek
South: Marara Street and Cooroy Library
East: Marara Street and train line
West: Maple Street and associated road reserve
Car park
North: Privately owned industrial land
South: Cooroy Creek
East: Cooroy Creek Bushland Reserve and Lower Mill Road Park
West: Lower Mill Road and privately owned land beyond
3. ASSESSMENT
3.1. Instruments for Statutory Assessment
Under the Planning Act 2016 the application must be assessed against each of the following
statutory planning instruments to the extent they are relevant to the development:
State Planning Policy;
South East Queensland Regional Plan;
Planning Regulation 2017;
The Noosa Plan 2006.
3.2. State and Other Statutory Instruments
State Planning Policy
The State Planning Policy has been deemed by the Minister for Local Government and Planning
as appropriately reflected in the Planning Scheme and therefore does not warrant a separate
assessment.
South East Queensland (SEQ) Regional Plan
The site is located within the Urban Footprint area of the SEQ Regional Plan. The proposal is
consistent with the regional policies of the SEQ Regional Plan.
Planning Regulation 2017
The proposal is for urban activities within the Urban Footprint and is consistent with the assessment
benchmarks contained in the Planning Regulation 2017 for the SEQ Region.
Page 15 of 41
Section 16
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 27 JANUARY 2021
3.3. Statutory Instruments – Planning Scheme
The applications were made under and are to be assessed against the superseded planning
scheme, being The Noosa Plan 2006.
The playground application is code assessable and must be assessed against each of the following
codes to the extent they are relevant to the development:
Cooroy and Lake Macdonald Locality Code
Community Uses Code
Landscaping Code
Engineering Works Code
The car park application is impact assessable and accordingly must be assessed against the whole
of the Noosa Plan to the extent the provisions are relevant to the development.
Locality Provisions
The playground site is located in the Cooroy Locality and is zoned Community Services. The
proposed use is identified as a consistent use with the zone.
The car park site is located in the Cooroy Locality and is zoned Industry. The proposed use is
identified as a consistent use with the zone.
The issues pertinent to the assessment of both applications are discussed below.
Use
Land zoned community services is intended to provide for a range of community services, including
recreational activities to meet the needs of residents. This is reflected in the following overall
outcomes of the Cooroy and Lake Macdonald Locality:
x) The town of Cooroy provides a range of community services, schools, medical facilities,
sporting and recreational facilities, which service the hinterland and beyond;
oo) For the Community Services Zone—land committed or planned for community purposes—
iv. is protected and managed to enable the efficient and timely delivery of community
services; and
v. is consistent with the indoor recreation, education, health, social and safety needs of
the local community, including people with special needs, such as the elderly, children,
low-income earners and disabled persons;
The proposed playground accords with these outcomes as it provides an area where people of all
ages and abilities can socialise and recreate furthering the health and wellbeing outcomes for the
local and broader community. Furthermore, the playground site is currently undeveloped open
space and suitably located within close proximity of the township for a community asset such as
the playground. The playground has also been designed to be inclusive of persons of all abilities.
The car park is to be located on land which is zoned industry. The purpose of this land is to
accommodate the principal industrial centre of the hinterland including businesses associated with
manufacturing, production, storage, repairs and the like to the exclusion of inconsistent uses such
as residential or community uses.
Whilst the car park is located on industry zoned land it is located in an area which currently includes
some hardstand and gravel areas on which informal car parking currently occurs. The proposed
use of this industry zoned land is suitable as it is proposed in association with an existing driveway
and car park for existing industrial uses, and clear of the existing raised building platform,
maintaining a suitable area for future industrial development.
Page 16 of 41
Section 17
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 27 JANUARY 2021
Car parking
The planning scheme does not prescribe a car parking rate for a playground. Accordingly, in
support of the application the applicant provided a peak parkland demand assessment and a traffic
report prepared by an external traffic consultant.
The traffic report has adopted a conservative approach and generally assumed that parking
demands generated by the proposed new park facilities would all need to be satisfied by new
parking areas and not rely on the use of the existing parking opportunities.
To determine the likely car parking demand for the playground, other local councils were contacted
to learn from their experience and a survey of car parking provided for similar-sized playground
developments were reviewed including:
Forest Green playground, Pimpama (Gainsborough Green development by Mirvac)
The Heights park, Pimpama (The Heights land development by Sunland)
Splash ‘n’ Play playground, South Ripley (Providence Estate development by Simonds)
Bob Gamble park, Ipswich (Ipswich City Council and State Government)
Hidden World playground, Fitzgibbon (Brisbane City Council)
Skippy Park, Landsborough (Sunshine Coast Regional Council)
Burnett Park and Bicycle Park, Caloundra South (Aura land development by Stockland)
Brightwater Park, Brightwater (Brightwater land development by Stockland
Frew Park, Milton (Brisbane City Council)
Rocks Riverside Park, Seventeen Mile Rocks (Brisbane City Council)
South Bank and Roma Street Parkland playgrounds (South Bank Corporation and State
Government, managed by Brisbane City Council)
Based on this review the external traffic consultant concluded that the provision of 56 additional
car parking spaces would likely be sufficient to cater for additional car parking demands generated
by users of the playground.
However, the external traffic consultant also noted that:
……..the provision of 56 additional parking spaces would potentially be excessive in practice,
and lead to a waste of scarce Council resources. For example, it may well be the case that the
provision of the 12 additional parking spaces in Maple Street together with the 22 additional
spaces opposite the existing community building parking area off Lower Mill Road could prove
to be sufficient to satisfactorily accommodate peak parking demands in a typical week.
A recommended compromise to address the above issues would be to fully construct the new
parking areas in Maple Street (12 spaces) and the additional spaces opposite the existing
community building parking area off Lower Mill Road (22 additional spaces), and to construct
the other new parking area proposed on the southern side of Mary River Road, west of the
tennis courts (22 spaces) as an overflow parking area. This would be in conjunction with a
requirement that use of the overflow parking area be monitored for a full week in school holidays
and a full week outside of school holidays after the playground has been fully operational for
three months (and again at six months), and for the overflow parking area be formally sealed
and line-marked if regular use is identified at either period of monitoring. Funds should be set
aside in the Council budget to complete those works, but if the monitoring indicates that
formalisation of the carpark is not necessary, then those funds could then be used for other
more worthy purposes.
The traffic report also acknowledges that there is potential for conflict between users of the
playground and patrons of the library with regards to the use of the existing library car park within
Marara Street. It is noted that there are 9 existing parking spaces, including 2 disabled parking
spaces, on the southern side of Marara Street fronting the library building. There are no time
restrictions on the disabled parking spaces, and there is a 2 hour limit on the remaining 7 spaces.
Page 17 of 41
Section 18
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 27 JANUARY 2021
In order to reserve this parking for library users the external traffic consultant has recommended
that the 3 parking spaces closest to the existing disabled parking spaces be signed as being for
15 minute parking, and that the remaining 4 parking spaces in that existing 2 hour parking zone be
clearly signed as being for library use only. Three months after these changes have been
implemented, usage should be reviewed to determine whether the number of 15 minute spaces
(for short duration library trips) should be increased or decreased to meet demands.
The external traffic consultant proposed measures are supported, including the proposal to monitor
the car parking demands for the playground before fully sealing the 22 car parking spaces to the
west of the tennis court.
The Community Uses Code requires 1 bicycle parking space per 200m2 or part thereof of site area.
The site area for the playground is 7,430m2 in area, due to the significant area of the site this results
in a requirement for 37 bicycle parking spaces. It is unlikely that the Community Uses Code
contemplated such a significant area and accordingly 37 bicycle space appears to be excessive.
In this instance it is considered that 20 bicycle spaces would be adequate to service the bicycle
parking demands of users of the site.
Traffic
The external traffic consultant advises that the traffic flow impacts associated with the proposed
park improvement works would be less than 5% of existing peak hour traffic flows at the Garnett
St / Maple Street / Myall Street roundabout, such that impacts on the broader road network would
be insignificant and do not need to be considered further as:
i. While the proposal is to provide an additional 56 parking spaces to service the park
improvements, the turnover of parking spaces associated with playground users would be
lower than for parking spaces associated with use of the existing Cooroy township which has
in the order of 600-700 parking spaces.
ii. Some of the playground users would combine their trip to the playground with a trip to the
Cooroy town centre area, so those shared trips would not create additional traffic loadings
on the broader network.
iii. In addition to traffic flows introduced to the roundabout by the 600-700 existing town centre
parking spaces, there is also additional through traffic using the roundabout to/from areas
west along Garnett Street and Mary River Road and south along Maple Street.
iv. The road traffic peaks occur in the weekday 8-9am and 3-4pm periods. Playground
generated traffic flows at those road traffic peak times would be expected to be relatively low,
with the playground expected to be busiest on weekends and less busy on weekdays (and
weekdays being busier in the middle of the day than in the AM or PM road peaks).
Flooding
Both the proposed car parking area and the playground site are subject to the Flood Hazard
Overlay. Flooding in these areas occurs due to the rising waters within the Cooroy Creek and
overland flows. The overland flow is caused by short and intense rainfall events within the local
3.4-hectare catchment and subject to rapid flooding with limited warning time.
The applicant provided the following documents in support of the application:
Flood Risk Assessment and Emergency Management Plan (Bligh Tanner, January 2021);
and
Cooroy Hinterland Park Flood Assessment – IR Response (HWMC, July 2020)
The application material has been reviewed by a consulting hydraulic engineers and it has been
identified that the car park location is not inundated by flooding in the 1%AEP (year 2100) event
so there is no issues around either flood immunity or flood impacts associated with this part of the
proposal.
Page 18 of 41
Section 19
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 27 JANUARY 2021
However, flooding within the playground is characterised by higher flow rates and greater depth.
The site is extremely flood constrained and could be characterised as being part of the floodway
(i.e. an area of active flood conveyance during a flood event). The flooding characteristics at the
site can be summarised as follows:
The majority of the site floods for even the 50% AEP event (i.e. 50% chance of flooding each
year). Floods more frequent than this have not been modelled
Flooding reaches unsafe conditions over much of the site in even the most frequent flood
modelled (50% AEP)
Flooding occurs rapidly, with as little as 13 minutes from the start of the event until the site
begins to inundate, while the time from the start of the event until the southern-most pathway
(evacuation route) begins to inundate is 39 minutes
The applicant’s flood modelling concludes that
Proposed flood depths for the 50% AEP range from 0.25 m along the western boundary up
to 2m within the vegetated open channel in the middle of the site.
Proposed flood depths for the 1% AEP in the year 2100 range from 0.5 m along the western
and over 2m within the vegetated open channel in the middle of the site.
A maximum rate of lateral spread (velocity) of approximately 0.05m/s
These characteristics present clear issues for both infrastructure located in the park and also the
safety of park users. The applicant has addressed infrastructure lifecycle costs by advising that
they accept and have budgeted for the likely cost burden associated with this frequent flooding, so
the remainder of this review focuses on the safety of people.
Council’s consulting hydraulic engineer is of the view is that…..
the proposed use as a playground is incompatible with the nature of the sites flood constraints,
as the proposal will actively encourage people (including children) to congregate in an area with
known flood risks. For all flood events modelled, the majority of the site will have a degree of
hazard which makes it unsafe for children and the elderly. This includes events as frequent as
the 50%AEP (i.e. 50% chance of occurring in any given year).
To put it simply, if a child or an elderly person remains on site during even a minor (50%AEP)
flood event, in the majority of locations on the site they will be at risk of serious injury or death.
It is therefore incumbent on Council as both the proponent and assessment manager to be
confident that there is no reasonably foreseeable likelihood that the public will remain on the
site during a flood event.
Elimination of the flood hazard at the site is not possible, as filling the site to eliminate the hazard
would cause off-site flood impacts (i.e. worsen flooding conditions elsewhere).
To address the risk to people, the applicant has submitted a revised Flood Risk Assessment
and Emergency Management Plan (FRAEMP) (Bligh Tanner, January 2021) which includes
proposed marked-up modifications to the playground design (refer Figure 18). These proposed
modifications have also been incorporated into the flood modelling results presented by HWMC
(July 2020).
The risk to people has been addressed in the FRAEMP through the following strategies:
Discretionary visitation to the site (i.e. relying on people not attending or staying at the
park during rain)
Signage
Self-evacuation
Page 19 of 41
Section 20
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 27 JANUARY 2021
In terms of the first point, it is likely that visitation numbers drop to playgrounds during wet
weather though it is clearly not the case that no visits occur. It is easily foreseeable that a break
in the weather could see visitors come to the playground and be there when the flood event
commences.
In terms of evacuation, the FRAEMP relies on people to identify the risk and then take logical
and appropriate actions within a short space of time in order to avoid the flood hazard. The
timeframe from the start of the design flood event until the site begins to inundate is as little as
13 minutes, while the time from the start of the event until the southern-most pathway begins
to inundate is 39 minutes.
The FRAEMP calculates that the lateral spread of flood water is slow enough that people can
easily walk to safety ahead of advancing flood waters. What the FRAEMP does not consider is
the possibility of people not taking immediate action and becoming isolated in higher areas of
the site (e.g. climbing tower or amenities block) by rising flood waters. If people then try to
evacuate once isolated they risk being exposed to unsafe flood conditions.
If Council decide to approve the playground in this location then it is strongly recommended that
conditions are applied that would actively alert visitors of the flood threats and need for
immediate evacuation and improve the evacuation pathways such that areas of isolation cannot
occur.
Due to the very low level of flood immunity of the site, it is likely that any automatic flood warning
system would trigger frequently (i.e. likely more than once per year).
The following tables, provide an assessment against the relevant assessment benchmarks of both
the State Planning Policy 2017 Natural Hazards, Risk and Resilience State Interest (SPP2017)
and the Noosa Plan 2006 Natural Hazards and Natural Resources Overlay Code. Benchmarks
which are not relevant are not included. It is noted that neither the SPP2017 nor the Noosa Plan
2006 codes were specifically envisioning a stand-alone park application so interpretation of the
code provisions is necessary in some instances.
Natural Hazards and Natural Resources Overlay Code
Assessment Benchmark Assessment
Overall Outcome 13.30.2(a) - development in See below response to O17
areas at risk from natural hazards is compatible
with the nature of the natural hazard so as not to
place people, property, economic activity, social
wellbeing and the natural environment at risk
Overall Outcome 13.30.2(a) - development is See below response to O17
resilient to natural hazard events by ensuring siting
and design accounts for and minimises potential
risks of natural hazards to people and property
O17 Development provides that for all flood The Natural Hazards and Natural Resources
events up to and including the defined flood Overlay Code lacks specific detail on the required
level of flood immunity for public parks.
event—
However, the expected flood immunity for parks is
a) the safety of people on the site is protected;
stated in the LGIP Standards of Service for Public
b) the capacity to use land in the flood plain is Parks as:
not adversely affected; and
Well drained land above the 1:5 Average
c) the risk of damage to property on the site is Recurrence Interval level (Q5 flood level) with at
avoided or minimised as far as practicable. least 10% above the 1:100 ARI level or the highest
known flood level, whichever is the greater
The 1:5yr ARI (20%AEP) flood immunity criteria is
not achieved for the park, with most of the park
inundated in only a 50% AEP event, which equates
to very frequent inundation.
Page 20 of 41
Section 21
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 27 JANUARY 2021
Natural Hazards and Natural Resources Overlay Code
Assessment Benchmark Assessment
In even the 50%AEP flood event, the majority of the
site is mapped as flood hazard category H3 or
greater – which corresponds to unsafe conditions for
children and the elderly.
There are higher areas of the site which are
proposed to be filled to be flood free in the 1% AEP
event. However, these higher areas are surrounded
by floodwaters (i.e. isolated) in only the 20% AEP
event and at risk of being inundated in extreme
events, so are not an appropriate location to shelter
in place.
An evacuation plan and emergency management
procedures have been submitted by the applicant,
however are completely reliant on visitors identifying
the hazard and taking logical and appropriate steps
to self-evacuate within a short space of time. The risk
is further compounded by the possibility of visitors
sheltering within higher areas of the site and
becoming isolated (cut-off) by rising flood waters.
Conditions are provided aimed at reducing these
risks by requiring an active warning system plus
eliminating areas of potential isolation.
In addition to the safety issues, there may be
significant whole-of-lifecycle costs associated with
the impact to park infrastructure from this frequency
of flood inundation that have not been quantified by
the applicant. The applicant has however stated they
are prepared to budget for these costs.
O19 Development is undertaken in a manner Filling of the site to achieve an appropriate level of
that ensures— flood immunity is not possible and has not been
proposed, due to the likelihood of causing
a) natural hydrological systems are protected;
unacceptable off-site flood impacts.
b) natural landforms and drainage lines are
As such, relatively minor earthworks only are
maintained to protect the hydraulic
proposed. Cut/fill is generally limited to around 0.5m
performance of waterways; and
except for a significant mound (fill >2.0m) for the
c) development integrates with the natural facilities block.
landform rather than modifying the landform
to suit the development
O20 Development does not compromise the safety Conditions within the site are unsafe for children in
of people resulting from residual flood risk even the most frequently occurring events, so are
associated with events that exceed the defined only higher hazard in rarer events. Again, safety in
flood event, up to and including the probable these flood events relies entirely on evacuation.
maximum flood. No actual mapping or assessment of the PMF event
has been provided in the Flood Assessment Report.
Conditions are provided aimed at reducing these
risks by requiring an active warning system plus
eliminating areas of potential isolation.
Flood impacts Minor impacts are predicted external to the site –
O22 Development does not directly, indirectly or mostly in the range of 10-50mm increases in peak
cumulatively alter the flood characteristics external flood depths (though higher localised impacts on
to the development site for all flood events up to road reserve were noted).
and including the defined flood event based on— The most concern is in relation to increases in the
a) current climate conditions; and flood level of over-floor flooding at buildings adjacent
to the park. Complete elimination of impacts is not
Page 21 of 41
Section 22
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 27 JANUARY 2021
Natural Hazards and Natural Resources Overlay Code
Assessment Benchmark Assessment
b) incorporating an appropriate allowance for the realistic, however a condition relating to over-floor
predicted impacts of climate change. flood level impacts is provided.
Disaster Management It is reasonably foreseeable that children
O24 Development supports, and does not unduly congregating in a park located in a floodway could
burden, disaster management response or cause significant additional burden to disaster
recovery capacity or capabilities management services during a flood event.
Conditions are provided aimed at reducing these
potential burdens by providing an active warning
system and eliminating areas of potential isolation.
SPP2017 – State Interest Natural Hazards Risk and Resilience
Assessment Benchmark Assessment
(3) Development avoids natural hazard areas, or See above response to O17
where it is not possible to avoid the natural
hazard area, development mitigates the risks
to people and property to an acceptable or
tolerable level.
(4) Development supports and does not hinder See above response to O24
disaster management response or recovery
capacity and capabilities.
(5) Development directly, indirectly and See above response to O22
cumulatively avoids an increase in the
severity of the natural hazard and the
potential for damage on the site or to other
properties.
(7) The natural processes and the protective See above response to O19
function of landforms and the vegetation that
can mitigate risks associated with the natural
hazard are maintained or enhanced.
It is clear that use of the site for the purpose of a playground presents a potential risk to users as
a result of the flooding, noting that many of the users will be young children. Whilst it is preferred
that a new playground of this scale and regional significance would be placed in an area which is
not subject to flooding in this instance the use of the site for the purpose of a playground is
supported based on the inclusion of conditions designed to mitigate the risk associated with
flooding. Specifically these conditions will require:
An automatic flood warning system incorporating both an audible and visual alarm is to be
provided to alert visitors to evacuate the site as soon as flood waters begin to inundate the
playground and with sufficient warning time to ensure full site evacuation prior to evacuation
routes becoming inundated
The playground design to be amended to eliminate the risk of isolation of all site areas by
rising flood waters. This may involve either modification to site levels or provision of linking
elevated walkways and evacuation routes which remain flood-free until each area of the site
which the evacuation routes service is itself inundated
Page 22 of 41
Section 23
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 27 JANUARY 2021
Furthermore it is acknowledged human behaviour will also reduce the risk as people will be less
likely to use the park when it is raining and likely to leave the site once rain commences. Whilst it
would be preferable for there to be additional time to allow for the evacuation of the site the 26
minutes between when the site starts to be inundated and when the southern-most pathway
(evacuation route) begins to inundate is considered to provide an adequate timeframe for a person
to leave the site.
It is also noted that the applicant’s estimate of the lateral spread (velocity) of the water at
approximately 0.05m/s is significantly slower than the estimated average walking velocity for a 3 -
6-year-old which is 0.84m/s.
Additionally it is not uncommon for facilities such as parks and playgrounds to be located in areas
subject to flood risk noting that the skate-park and tennis courts on the opposite side of Maple
Street are also subject to flooding.
Water quality
Both applications were referred to a consulting hydraulic engineer for review.
With regards to the car park it is proposed that the new areas of car parking would drain to an
existing bioretention device which would be refurbished as part of this application.
The existing bioretention device is 144m2 and the complete catchment draining to this device is
1.921ha. This corresponds to a size of 0.7% of the contributing catchment. This is slightly below
the expected size for this landuse, however there are also significant sections of swales included
in the treatment train which will be effective at reducing Total Suspended Solids (TSS) which is
often the limiting pollutant.
The consulting hydraulic engineer notes that a MUSIC model has been provided with the
application which contains issues so cannot be relied upon. The issues include:
The model and results include other discharge points and catchments in vicinity of the
development but which are not part of it. This has the effect of masking the results from the
application areas
The model includes ‘existing’ devices which in the admission of the Storm Water
Management Plan (SWMP) authors may not actually exist
The modelling of the existing Gross Pollutant Traps as receiving roofwater overflow may not
reflect reality
Council’s consulting hydraulic engineers recommends that an updated Stormwater Quality
Management Plan and engineering drawings based on a revised model be provided noting that
there is ample opportunity to incorporate additional stormwater treatment measures if required.
Accordingly conditions are recommended, for the car park application, incorporating the advice of
the consulting hydraulic engineer.
The playground application has been supported by a SWMP and various small-scale treepits and
bioretention devices are proposed. To trigger the pollutant load reduction SPP targets, the
playground would need to be >2500m2 in area and result in >25% imperviousness. While the area
threshold is exceeded, the figures presented in the SWMP show the playground as only 24%
impervious, so the playground does not need to demonstrate compliance with the load reduction
targets. The measures provided can therefore be considered as a best-practice addition rather
than a statutory requirement.
Riparian Buffer
Both the car park and the playground are located almost fully within the Riparian Buffer. The
superseded planning scheme seeks to avoid any new development within the Riparian Buffer area
for the purpose of protecting the biodiversity and ecosystems values. However, it is noted that in
this area there are many instances of intrusion into the riparian buffer by a range of historical
developments including:
Page 23 of 41
Section 24
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 27 JANUARY 2021
Sporting fields and open space
Buildings and associated car parking areas
Residential properties
Railway line
To ensure that stormwater runoff associated with the car park and playground is appropriately
treated, the applicant has proposed to install water treatment devices. The treatment
methodologies have been reviewed and supported by Council’s consulting hydraulic engineer.
It is also noted that existing vegetation on the 3 lots associated with the playground is to be retained
with additional planting provided throughout the playground whilst the area proposed for the new
car park does not contain vegetation. Accordingly the development provides for an improved
outcome with regards to vegetation within the Riparian Buffer.
Furthermore, despite proposing development within the Riparian Buffer the proposal provides for
a significant community resource which will be used by many residents within the Shire and
surrounding areas.
Contamination
One of the 3 lots on which the playground is proposed to be located, Lot 3 on SP 230055, was part
of the formal Boral Timber Mill and is listed on the Department of Environment and Science (DES)
Environmental Management Register (EMR) for the following Notifiable Activities:
Wood Treatment and Preservation
Petroleum Product or Oil Storage
Lot 1 and 2 on RP153299 to the north east of the road reserve are not listed on the EMR.
Accordingly an analysis of the soil was taken at a total of 16 locations across the 3 lots.
Concentrations of dioxins and furans were reported exceeding the available guidelines (US EPA
Regional Screening Levels and remediation of soil values in Germany) at three of the sixteen
samples analysed. The three samples relate to differing depths at borehole 27. Based on the
findings from this investigation, the site is considered to pose a potential health risk to site users
based on the results of the dioxin assessment undertaken at the site if left untreated.
To address these potential health risks remedial works are proposed to address the dioxin impact
identified within the vicinity of borehole 27. The approximate extent of impact is approximately
30m3. Further investigations, after the remedial work has been undertaken, is recommended in
order to facilitate the removal of Lot 3 on SP230055 off the EMR. It is recommended that conditions
are included to ensure that the site is suitably remediated.
Extent of playground within the road reserve
The proposal plans detail that the extent of the playground extends beyond the boundaries of the
lots for which the application has been made and includes land within the Maple Street road
reserve. The works within the existing road reserve include part of the event precinct, picnic shelter,
pathways/access and landscaping. In this regard, a Permanent Road Closure application has
been made to the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy (DNRME). On 11
December 2020 DNRME provided letters of offers to Council in relation these applications.
Acceptance of these offers allows for Council to purchase the land and develop the area for the
playground as detailed on the proposal plans. This will result in the land being amalgamated into
the adjoining freehold land and may possibly be completed by early February 2021.
A soil assessment of the road reserve was carried out, and results from sample locations indicate
the proposed development in this area is suitable and does not pose unnecessary risk to
playground users. The assessment of car parking demand was undertaken based on the full extent
of the playground, including the land within the road reserve.
Page 24 of 41
Section 25
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 27 JANUARY 2021
As the application does not include the land within the road reserve a change application would be
required to amend the approval to incorporate development within the road reserve. The following
image details the extent of the playground proposed within the existing road reserve.
Figure 5: Extent of works within existing road reserve
4. NEW PLANNING SCHEME
Under the new Noosa Plan the playground would be defined as a Park and would be Accepted
Development, however approval would be provided for works associated with the development
due to the Riparian Buffer and Flood Hazard Overlay applying to the site.
The car park would be categorised as an inconsistent use subject to impact assessment, this differs
from the superseded scheme which categorises a car park as a consistent use.
5. CONSULTATION
5.1. Referral Agencies
The application was referred to the following Referral Agencies:
Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning (SARA) and Energex.
Energex is an advice agency.
The Department is a referral agency in accordance with Schedule 10, Part 9, Division 4,
Subdivision 2, Table 4, Item 1 of the Planning Regulation 2017:
Development application for a material change of use within 25m of a railway corridor.
The Department has responded advising that they do not object to the application and provided
conditions relating to stormwater management.
Energex is an advice agency in accordance with Schedule 10, Part 9, Division 2 of the Planning
Regulation 2017.
Energex has responded advising that they do not object to the application and provided conditions
relating to easements and the protection of Energex assets.
Page 25 of 41
Section 26
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 27 JANUARY 2021
5.2. Other Referrals
The application was forwarded to the following internal Council officers:
Coordinator, Development Engineering
Environment Officer – Planning
Coordinator, Environmental Health
The application was also reviewed by an external hydraulic consultant with regards to water quality
and quantity and flooding.
5.3. Public Notification
The application for the car park was publicly notified for 15 business days in accordance with the
Planning Act 2016. No submissions were received.
6. CONCLUSION & REASONS FOR DECISION
This report relates to two separate applications for the development of a new playground and
associated car parking in Myall Street and Lower Mill Road areas of Cooroy. The applications raise
issues with regards to flooding, stormwater, car parking, contaminated land and development
within the Riparian Buffer.
There are concerns with the risk associated with the frequency and extent of flooding of the site
particularly noting young children will regularly use the site. In order to mitigate this risk it is
recommended that conditions be included which include requirements for the installation of an
automatic flood warning system (both visual and audial) to alert visitors to evacuate the site and
for the playground design to be amended to reduce the risk of isolation of all site areas by rising
flood waters.
Car parking has been provided at a suitable rate, noting that of the 56 required car spaces 34 are
to be provided within the road reserve and do not require planning approval. A section of the
playground site is to be remediated to remove the risk associated with contamination caused by
previous land uses on the site. Development within the Riparian Buffer is supported based on the
preservation of existing vegetation, the provision of new planting and the existing pattern of
development within the surrounding area.
Accordingly, it is recommended that the application be approved subject to conditions.
Departments/Sections Consulted:
Chief Executive Officer x Community Services Corporate Services
Executive Officer Community Development Financial Services
Executive Support Community Facilities ICT
Libraries & Galleries Procurement & Fleet
Local Laws Property
x Waste & Environmental Health Revenue Services
Executive Services x Environment & Sustainable Development x Infrastructure Services
Community Engagement Building & Plumbing Services Asset Management
Customer Service x Development Assessment Buildings and Facilities
Governance Economic Development Civil Operations
People and Culture Environmental Services Disaster Management
Strategic Land Use Planning x Infrastructure Planning,
Design and Delivery
Page 26 of 41
Section 27
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 27 of 41
1.2 Site Boundary Diagram ATTACHMENT 1
= —_ --——
=
nt ‘ | a ! : i bas
- \ i a= : ~ : ; ee be a nt yi a
\ ’ ash st + = ; * eau @ /. ss
= SP us Doe? | i
a ! t ‘ea We 7
Saar >}
oa bal : % 2) oper
} Megat ) 1 |
Legend . i Gax © yy 4
ER oDT™A Property } AS fe ue ‘
Cooroy Creek Easement } — ae ad th, aS a
El Noosa Council Property / ie oa nt a ee TIES
El Lower Mili Property / ‘ f oe od )
Page 27 of 41Section 28
Page 28 of 41
2.1 Masterplan Pry Se SEER ote
2a cL - i ft
pen 33 rote iG = tes =i ita 3 ene a
. ae dhe 2 OR 4 ah Poe 2 2 S pe eat ee oJ yas ek 4 Find 4 >
| Me ee dn Dg gee ee ae ge
; he ote
<5 ol rey a am ~~ En a mo ars: Pia ee Le ae a - a ~* ; Kee:
» Set “ge 7 a = a . ‘o- * aha ~ = ae ee 3 eats . _ : oni
See a” 3s gor ite & See Sones a Siac BERS wee
go ete a lata A Sime eS ee PMs mA a
eee Ets ae sa aggre a et ee ae ee <3 ae ees ie
St Sealine ie ye A eS eine 7 3 é el
eerie a ie eae | ey. : < par | =
a 2 pe g Bas) fox > . A) ‘ 4 pe ais
aed : ; oe ‘ AS a 2 — f Vhs
’ ae y be Kaa ete al 7 ~ ’ ; ; i
a Rag ull 50 ! . oP in
FS a Eh Ie aa) 7
ahaa a ie A _ 4 . s wT = .
Man 2 “lh ey “es i Pa sw) y ~ 2
te eas = e wf 2. . got Be )
a ae . ao D) rms a F
fi ied <¥ Pa - } SS a c 7 an .
cP ee BN x ? = | "alll, age \
ee lt PY oy pee 4
See TS . ay y mi? a
So DME
~ . « —— > ie \ 8 P: Ma a e }
+ S aes Sy ® ye *
<~\ i ‘é 2 > _ , i ‘ J
Zo SN oe i Ae
OR BR 4 aie (3
a \ We i SN } | Ns a
eS we ig |
a SN ~ a. 2 Wy
‘aut . SS k oH NX oN 7 : - eo
= . > . aa js = By eS i ~ . :
fem =~ aA
ee or Pak a>) 5 \ K Qe By \ ’
S Pw uesr pene Ee ° ys <a $ ;
Amenities = t é Nod CURR S
: oe ee ) |
ee, Jexit point. f ae a yi & . y a
caine ons SEEN 7 as
o Library carpark K / a. ee —
EX Gimbing precinct ; os NEL 5 Ny
Propose oe [noe ng a) \
d on street parking ah Lyon \ iN F
Hi Maintenance/servicea cae 3 f ax gee i ,
Event precinct | Fa sexy ype u > 1
Mr see aces pa ce ee SaaS a a) Page 28 of 4
Future works picnic shelter {3 Ne FO
{in DTMR road reserve) ra OF -
A772 3Section 29
Page 29 of 41
2.2 Entry Detail Plan
mK ree Tse tf Fd | i |
. e | ? a ah ata | p ted “igs ; i iy : oe f ;
‘ a ; , ey ae a : SP ae tp
Wes , Ld ~ Mg FE, Sr ae \ hea = BA : ey \ : A ee a
a | La AE cS ea hide pba Z , 13 ae Fe oe
eee s rN iD F ny Y oq) ~ | ; By a ek ae y\ , a page a 7 ey
aie bs PON AN pag aN yt Be ie ge Fe
A Stn? nie > RNS 2 ea ya. ot Es OL,
we a iy oy Ly ‘ \ y- ae o / . AS 7 \al § ~ . ¢ é BS iy .
te » -, . 4 BS aes f a x ag rd Pa <x, ~~ RY)
‘ \ ws ‘ N ; j ; a \ . .
ne 2 ASH Span , ea *
by aS ae el iy a | be ae 1 )
Th > OES a a | ee | " : ; be |
a Dy bs ay aN pe pes’ :
“a S of . . * Po . es s , ores a { i] me
a = ae * a f “i i a eed
S ; Rear : ee om ud a ¥ ? ~<a
. L NUS ee ww z .
o NY : » ‘ ‘ To. S Eh “1 2 = fe me re 4 a ae * / 4 aa
aX ~ “Se >) oi Se = aa 2 "a S Legend
. Ni SS r “ 4 ; : . ~~ S4 \ = 2 =e EE Existing entry statement
‘ S ‘ ; " N : ‘ < 5-3 y Ri Pa Major pedestrian entry & gate
ha x ex » ‘3 be Sean . Ss f eS El. Sculptural typha reeds
~ BES NG » y iN ; , "pag ed PS, ( Vee Gs Steppers to water's edge
X Ne : % , ‘ ty aN eon Elevated timber log crossing
We SS a. % < m s Nye El Platform seating
f AG ie YS : 3 a be YA ¢- te ys Primary intemal access path
j SOSA . 3 : Sat a eee M EI Fallen tree climbing installation
‘ ss SN ‘i Re % v , . Bg ras nN a Boundary fence
; - q SN ‘\ nN .: % aS . . ~ Secondary intemal access
I a ® NN a we a4 » be noi Mounded & vegetated buffer
— < SUES SO \ 5 Mi Te ins g Existing car park
~ bs SS » - n Dae ¥ I 7 - ee
Y AN nt s Mate ete S <3 4 7 New trees to existing carpark
/ 3p WS x Nib ar Whee. Pg = pase », interface planters
NSE nt RS \ Mf Ni é ie y “ee >) x ez
S 2 “ b YN a ‘ n * 9 \ iy vs ‘ fj / = > \ J x
. p b y r M NO, \ ’ oe es , oleate | aie a : o
o Y. ' N . ne Ma LS ’ ; ' a7 ; f j ~ es » \ ‘% 4
XA " N a 4 . ‘ ; ] y. 4 J P \ ~
> iB) SER es \ OR sy ic ae ee rf
an : BORED N n , aac ; eT i a }
4 \ : . . ‘ i th ‘ /
\ Gey Na ee
\ LL Nien an re x Sue & < \ 4 ys
, = SAS bs N Ba ye Np f
| ee. a iy DEN OS ure f
, ; a it 4 % “hr rs
‘ ; SA NY bey YS - i
, a, pe bs
‘ O bm ~! / e \ i ON at ee | 4
; Re X , \ ee ~ re
XN na PY \ Nati 0 ) \
X \7 o XN ci r ' \ a \S Ke aN = \
ee wy Bx x o , ie ‘ : « x
Page 29 of 41Section 30
Page 30 of 41
2.3 Frog Pond Detail Plan
F (sn m Ne Peak WOK wey st
eo “aT rare rn es ’
fy \ a 4) ~ J hpi Re Sys pee, 3 GA . , ; f ; F ae . mtr 2 . Ps ae a
. «, oot: Ok a seer % a5 Et aA a a: ee, , é v. : ae
RG TS (0 XE a 7 ; l ied ors - i La
, at aN OMG y | I 5 a a a ae
’ ey / >. aa P r Y ie “a: » . ;*
uo ie Peer at ae ee eae rs a Wee | : ey) ~~ ‘é oI ay
Seba ws y po ie \! ne / : L + | ; -
be Ake aame SEs es + ia i ae if : r : oY z, et
4 4 i aaa pe Ee: Pa ae i / : i J _ ey? fm
. eee ae —_ r d P , i ‘ ;
. ry ee os ws a ra ys 4 / } ri , A ” “ i X ’ + ~ .
f ge OM ras a (aS a me : 5 1
es i : ry < re a \ ) cg Q on} ¥
ave at /| a is Fide a i oa a a ee mn c
SRIINNY \ S{ eS age. wor #8 (|
XY ‘ \ a oN . WW, ry ie ey " / ar — ! / Key Plan
SN A Ot heal Shae / Cerone ers °. . £ {
Se _" a Ni <= oy i aly j ig d
PES ON NE aor Le J
i Se BAS 3s Hoy Py D a i “% Ry : ey eh eas
re ol — /?2Se ae ere ate { i iy “o> wa 2” =e ee
a * a. Wee ; yi « \) eel ’ sae
ae Ban \ AYP als Ae aS y eee ‘en oo a \ EE Sculptural typha reeds
ray \ pee. ey [ oF ‘ | i Va Val \\ Elevated timber log crossing
O38, may td be es * " re i, ge ad 2 Ny) re’ se Steppers to water's edge
x A NRE: 3 ay ’ y PNR S AX ay, His Sculptural climbing boulders
me oper Yu Pry ¥ ae : Fallen tree climbing installation
A ae ! | A ey | | a | ae ae Sry = 4, "a
ee Y i 4 yy DS i " a ~ e if ae \ fe / hy aD ee Platform seating
. “OD a's | | ev ie & i, Tag \> i, De 4 XO ‘ : ey ye pas Edge planting to waterway
ae (AN Sy Aad ke ete | ee re ae ‘4 oO ‘
TP ft y AS es Ra ' Map 4 | Berta Primary intemal access path
. 1 fie wee Ye <=, Pe Nagy Yu, tod El Picnic shelter
9% 7 TaN wa yi ‘ 4 i Ae Nas Log and net climbing structure
\ NS os Stead 4 x i P if a Tension net traversing installation
\\ ~S ee . Se , em ' [Hs Swale bridge crossing
‘ A . its ray } \ v7 th , fan Log check climbing path
} { - Fs { a? é . "
eee oe a f Be ar Stone boulder seatng edge
bat. | % ae a a , ‘ — Rn bi F Aa Se @ Sand pit
a +, Pe) > ; a ,
Ve RRS Be a Re , . La Access to mounded landform
} a ba certei ab > 2am
ae (2 eee NE fr e @ ssa
Dia ae ae}. i mr | @@ Rubbish bins
r oan | 4
™~ 4 CaN r" @ . \ Me 4 },
a \ Pe Si i BY ¢ : 4 / lS : + :
ad = ay oo ~~ +: 7 , “i Portada a
Ca F 4 4 ae aN * 4 bs
a ha a 2 ANE een ol ia *, of +
ee ok ES
“i a ~~ =): m — ‘| Ys
: » Shey es f, ey : a Re, ys *
oP Fe, PRES 4 oe ie stapticae Zan So s Ca
aN ; bs oo ye ee - ve
‘Ss ee + es ae Ks lf % y %y
bao a Pa Se
Page 30 of 41Section 31
Page 31 of 41
2.4 Waterplay Detail Plan
cj D om a Tu - a ro - <— at rr aks ¥ 7 . =r r
, - ah) ft VR SS ‘ =. ee 4 r a , eG C$ x » \ \w : ' : x
ee | OE at ad ; ms Sak awe
ye. ae nt : a A MOR J
: PERS, Soe. Sri ya tp.) Sa pee eee Sk \ : :
: =A b-7 S We % y 7 rw Ne vot eR a a x
Sar Sipe ies eh ae ‘ a a .. tea Saree orm © SS
P. a Sihiea] . + ee eG ae _ i. a =e ~ p BP il es, SR . By yy
= roy >t). Oe ye 4 Li J > as % Peer a Bt. so ee : > 4. ¥
Ne , RR ps ny ee 2 y > — l/ N > S a f. a 2
oe fa fa “— <3 ’ — Tika t y “a %, ‘v . &: ‘ — Fea , oe ee we , oS ee a0" 43 :
pe G- &@ = oe mae i (a } aN LRT
oe ay © ae Pa 4 oe 5 . ie X: ~ Se Ba ie a
Mt | MD. wo a 2 Mas Ok 1, RS aS a, ~ ao,
awe dol ee teh 5 ig, mn go ¥
a G: , " | am ; Si Pe CQ heat .;! CTY: sf ion! Ce Fea
aah: > . wo ae ey ee ae BASEN key Pian
mT ae A , | of hae. EE vce Cc Ly en SS ad, at ey: een a
a BS ao) es ay is > = a) ff pe 17 ~ bt aS iT y — Ww see | ee t= hgh eae . ba sey
ae ee cae 7 Ahi a no eee # eis Bod >
oA BS ¥ ws y ey Mee. a vee ee ee } | e
tines Yea re <a \ PM ae sj ror ~ ee
aE Bi P| yo ae 5 ete A eC ta f a Ss aa
ee a és ee “ ay : eons Same \ |, Ss a ass in ~ se fs
‘ SS ra eu gE n My ye J rE} i es ire J 4 \ Se a ta P | Legend
ie 5 ' nt m 4 Ge A 6 a OE ee ae) ——— i i Ya Wh Picnic shetter
% 4 , , bed) | y we) ia ; Pa = ae 2 mes tS , " i |_| Rie ee eer ecaree
>. SHIM! | VS 3 Cae “TaN ) 7 - re 1 ee ae Amenities buildin
ear a omen, a ' Send Y an as by is | (—/- —_—
RG ea pea ot a Tee ; Se x % ame . =~ ,, aie - ie Gs Feature arbours to amenities block
ea b ee - £ 4 sa Do bee * fe ous ws ee P in
[a Yorn ce 4 es 3 Coe Ss OY ee pis” rea | Ee ar * Ei Feature blade wall
Bs) Mata cag , a ae Ee ern ON ey — : 3s er , . Ste es We, a: Gl Boundary fence
bs 4 bang ‘ *—> res a | = —— ‘Se yay Cee Cito i rain, | , ail HZ Slide connection from
tN 5 | ‘ ¥ A Ys PAP Sf i 7, _ m ; °
BW oo bo ] ra é x > : ' en STEN Lae ee A eae + . We8 wee oa < Ene aati ; /
SSSR i yey wilt: a Dp, a LE Eien Gs rag ee Hee rs Dlacovery paths witht ert inetaia dors
: me ‘ VA 7 - Fone hs fs ad og iS A Se eh) i <q 19 ta Decomiive aravel pockets
ae aes 23 @ F : bac ; iL nm ear & % i Vb, fs 3 y f , ; a 7 Ny rs Z ae with SORE settings
‘ 4 - ; ai is - % Py f pe Ay fs i be Abd ‘ " aa :
oo aD, j : cette: > H/ 2. A we <q Oy J . A , hallow water play and spring
Saat | cs ay i tt " aa f eS ws Me) Oey ee a , at - iv Sand pit to waters edge
Se | a 7 tl a > ta ss SA FT ‘ “a : ~
Le |e n Sl! ae ay ea BA Sa —_ < iz , Swale bridge crossing
v7 ; / ee ay. e. 2 — x oy =) 7 - - WTeraced dry creek bed
ta F vay y A di Ae Ny ee. oe >| i {3 eS oie . “4 A Water damming play
CF)! OF oS ae A Bt eee a ee fg, Ore Sets, p a vr q
, i ee a . Ye p f SS ee } = a td Bi /, “an 4 / gl a “id 7 Northern entry/exit to path
Rete t 4 ee YS I iii ———£-> F len 5 Pa. as oy é Stick building zone
ba eae FA tore pe a pret A (pm St OE 5 eee 3 a A ae Hs Slide exit point
Mee sl AEE Ah: ee 6 any! ae Service access gate
a oe § a F al i? ? 4a ng 7 hes ye é 4 : :
i ; \ | y * / y ' a a . & . yi a ‘ a, oh whey awe ; om + bo New trees to existing carpark
; <r f - i a i NS - aS is ( P interface planters
at et Bio Ss bo a ee | |
y : Pees om peers) SY tT Ps ha. y <. f ~ ‘End of day’ storage for
) F orm re. (age ; i WRK tei cs . Se F 1 stick building zone
asset / | . ee ») Ey RES 7 aa 4 "End of day’ storage for
hey oN : a Se ES ee / ; Fe
POAT Ley pe ; heat 18 > a, GRE RR ay ro g é a rock stacking zone
tie rr, . A ie a att 1 S Se ey, ; Jaan y Wheel chair access to
. “i ce wet ; eee rg ae a : ae \. 74 i ee “ y shallow water play
i 1 F A a Ni 2 P ih + \ A a. aa S ee a S ~ Fa es Py, Rubbish bin
4 . a y ba Nee Ya ™ 4 eo . ue a ESS as = <a a4 1 \\ Y
ae: 4 as AN | et ae ates a 4 ae ee . 4
y a SOI S$ oa 5; ’ yy
A : re ry | , we FGA ae S ef 2 e ee , / é- ee Z
Page 31 of 41Section 32
Page 32 of 41
. a tail Plan Er ¥
2.5 Climbing Zone De wha | Cee eR
a a ae “yy ay ae at FF , a F ce! % 4 - ‘ae : Gums . era
-_ . a 5 * a : oa se 7 - a \ +) A _ oy A oR 5 ey a
ai as « " nae) ao sy
eee = we - 4% . take + Coe 5 m1 2 28: 2 ot rn ; : Ss =
y ah i 30% * ho yo eae is A a ee . ' =, y 2 f AP.
Hees . Se *
TR ee tx . oe. / a ae a tee See ee) te & ; ~ 3 7 were
ee . : Y O . J “ - om 5 Fa . __ . & .
es Pa rt J Can = a ot Ae - , ae 4 b/g 33
— Ms 7 . A y - F be? Ee OF, ay
Fi 2: : vs peg . te al ce ad . wy, * yee
| 4 ds Sct ta Sees gy
he io aS 5 os . 2 Gee ee >
“g = - , - 2 - ‘ =. Sao on ey ra 5 = wt
en at 7 re SE key Pian
head A TS e a ‘| \ rv ; _ AS => 6g
: ives PT Pag Plate Sneek sf, ra a eat g ial a ng pe bes z=
Lh ? ~ RG eee > " ‘\ j > Pe.) 1 q
Mf 3 i . pe - z G re 5 - Eg aT ge Ss ef | a ae fe , = =a -
Bae, wy a et ans PSA oT ‘ Spee oo) oY, Sess yl : ae pi aR US
Paige = ; i x ales tae . r : aa ) ‘ ee a Sm Ne, At aa Legend
ed A>. A> Sas. AS ‘ ea - yar 5 ant “" \ , Ps SE} et a5 Le »
i: ., ae Pcp James Sener ys aig a aan re ee hed : ing installation
came : A A iG : : ee Meta Ss F ’ , SAP ‘ bs ae : EE. Tension net traversing ins
ees a eae e tec Ate Tas nes : ea bt! j d net climbing structure
See Sou owe tee t Sh FEES eS mm ya EA logandn
i. Ser oe a) : neg at \ | in| ¥ Cireulation petty
oe Es — 2 J bes —e lee — eo | if Me s
ie Sf i og ue Fe pg at ~ Ere N f ON RAG SS (a
ar a Sas Mees. Seg a = ae ip te athena anny Be aN , ae ns i Bins
SR Sa NBR Ss Bee Cee TONS” eas PIN 1 220:80e510) ounce
ee ae AG Oe eee Ci). My So a Se ti Se - Sa SRD 2 £ ‘ es
Regeeater eee » Bb ie ie | lites ae ie ies pied, ore eee hey 7 ' A Boulder seating edge to sand pit
Uae i" ae Ate REN on ode Jr Wine eee ee ae ir Aen t ha eee ina. \ av > @ ;
(ce. ae ao ay oF ie ea er Neg) Ce \ ne & ® * Stainless steel cork screw slide
Me ‘wih > _ ce h om Jae 7 . - \ S Ni a S a2 ?
aoa Es. ao = i ge TRS ois eR arn r hod awe Timber climbing tower
ease | pe SEA Da i, . 1 Sinan eaNuys pS ST ||} \ Wn fim Na 1 Elevated net crossing to flying fox
af tc wre e poe } 7 += / ; Ta ki 2 ee % % fe a re i ‘ i ‘ ; Ca i i aS ‘
ee a ee By NA Dyan 6 ges es oe Bey Oe
a hc “6M * XS RAS < ate, ee az Wat ‘ ip 410) Waee Ti \ ne: 4 “lee a} } 7 ae de — % ’ f we Bridge crossing
Fa fm hes } “ae >the Bee ers ee ty me 4 : , * ie i : s
Rae - . ne Tih al Sm 4: “s5 “4 . A eg Vales Seen een
Sail pn é “3 ve rt f ‘ a Se Ce » TL a oo ei sans " a \ ba Co a gO Swings
De” eee a ? tae y "ated RP Se ei eo - 7 ; r ad .
aK pas ey a Ue: Vag re 5S se? aT ea , ie a, : Balancing logs
N= ae, ng cle SD wa a Nee Climbing boulders
* a ; 1, 4 Ps ee . Ween. 9; wel. es Pa ena z Steppers to side of mound
eS ne ry fa oF ve _ Y. a aS is ' oe ;
a NS pe J a> r 4 . ‘ : } Nar Pelt wh, ‘| ) n
Sees a ; “4 d \a ree My be Y y “a oon By ad : as Flying fox platform
i A , LT pe ey. A a i Tee eae ness meee
— fp | : fea f pee | v4 < \ Ne) EY Kickand throw lawn
, i y oa : f Gi PN a Ee “ | eee, nA Bsr le ; th
Ne , PROT po ; | ~ A
, D of c LY a SA he. aes i eee y AN ni ctadlceme
a (—" : Sg bee aaa Me y oe ga a oy Ry, WW) EJ Sand tobaseo'
eae , é ee YS EE & | PS NY 2 Smee
i ae ae dé os . Ee mae j NY tp aay Ph ek i am i fees DB) "End of day’ storage for
- ' EN 2a ¥ a 5 mets rs Poy ‘ ae Se, PA A | Pe i ire y Mea , és - of) stick building zone
aoe NS fe a ws Be ; ak’ 2 Co gem a pga - ; re ret 4 i yes hy {
; ae eT) 1 Ca Cel in oo So Md ¢3 ? ’ ty abe > P a"), 6 Way
>t a 1 : te . is Me ng: S < £eh gem a7, | ee U / ‘ pets ; 7 ; { Keay
si a : Da geet: ae ej ie Sx Ah, ae ‘ " A i os f ot \ X )
ere hh ponds? pan a0 eae Me ee gS oe: ey mA Ss
eet vt * var Xo 7a A ts) eae re : TA Ge its say ] “ , ee D ae f ad} A,
RS Be 2a we ae Mee a 4 5 ay a ae oes (PS *
5 tS a = eo e Nee bY, oN { Po oki BR ee i . Pe (pti /
46 al | cS ae See hea \ \. s - ” " ¥ i rd , (2a om | "A : =) A 4
Py % y YS of he ea ) SANs a Ba Ne is } a if 7 , _ te a: ; EA A
a> vor “ARR ats Rane) ; Page 32 of 41
“eS , ’ neSection 33
Page 33 of 41
2.5.2 DETAIL PLAN 2
f rt 2 "= 7 i = 2. bf : ‘ Pos
. i A y pe OTe) se a P ty Yan
5 ste TIE LB ies WET: iB nea GS
a - + At BD Shi OSA hm aS a Nena <
: | 7 fe7 ; / _ a Dk, 8 " —/
, PS osc b ; = OZ be yf i ai ig An a te ; y y ) Onn 4 ae a
: ad ee ee LS Se re ; : a Oat e Via
p ; A : fe an . . Sty | y J 2 id : } 1 vi t a - . a oe
Cy — ug om 0 ye Ae i a ee y r y | | . a a
\ L B o ee om — Ts S r Na lay } kas a F , i P fi } = +r e
; Md ey ~ 7 is Di a on ee ] vd v4 } ah ‘ an 4 oe MWh o/ a
h. =) Sees rh: hie Ae Se ag | 2 F 7 KE? ies A vite
ae f ( y i ’, i hee: te D4 gy J , rf ; rt I | f
- Gd * i We! / a] Fiabe be emg ' Ps \ » Need -
. r ~ } | ff Pig tae ; - se F i a. J
Pe ies S’ ‘OAS ai ‘tat ae : yl { os ”
Say DE. ge SERN PN Ses j : yx, ; 5 3
va i) Wes aN: ¥ ie 1 { ; ye . ~ 4 , a f cae 2 t
Ton re 9 ; St e aN “ f 7 ; f S ae {' ! ‘A Key Plan
x oe ~ : » i a oa * yey . aye - , id a ,
ve AER ~_ Bo. a aN % Sa \\ al ee le - 2, . cy F Fi MA
“A - = MOS et, EAL | a” y
Ode oa ; By 7 SSP aaee ee ks ee Ri / : j i N
Care re | a) 4 q a.) a A Vite m ‘ \
Ne ry i 4 ft E vas { 2 -E ay ‘ ' <, a j . ; a Legend
alr _* 4 } YY ~ 4 .
oe ; . oF f AY Decca yet a : Sw ag EE Sculptural typha reeds
Ss co " Mo Ran Ae ee
a 7 B a , eiche >! ia r ’ * Fj Elevated timber log crossing
a SS . vf a} 2 a i " } : i \ \ { / a j wy: ME = : A Steppers to water's edge
te Rar im = ; ft ¢ . «€ \ Pe e iy ) Swell y \ > iat aa ey F sen ER Sculptural climbing boukers
hg ON as oe vs Fy," Di eee, f : N\A , Yaya. } Fallen tree climbing installation
ores "7 w , Yee y VOX 7 YE j Fes eae =
S FS 2 . 4 Se "4 j \ ES | : ry ee ss a ¢ . 5 xisting trees to be retained
4 oO } z € ar “a LA , > v¢ . ae ; Nes? ; , Edge planting to waterway
“ok, bed a. ", | " SN are - fy 2) ' ee i ’ ‘a ny sas 4 ER Primary intemal access path
Ak n > i ; | ° x: ak WV i } { : Nee / oO Picnic shelter
“ Nog. Pj s =o Soteh a ee : ; > a Log and net climbing structure
= , 8, 5 £ Y ; ‘ie =
a y . , + £ i ; " p ete Tension net traversing installation
~ ou aN = Thy , ei : , , Swale bridge crossing
Bio te, B N oN, Be P 28:5 Log check climbing path
_ Oy — 3 shi sy cA /2am . in Stone boulder seatng edge
< : a é aay i i ROM ae " 3 Bey) OD
RS ea & La i: , Tat ‘ i p : @ Sand pit
bX ge = ae . , a , ‘ Z . (Access to mounded landform
SS 2 4 “I in af i \ Nie Pica Ss ’ Fire pit
ie 2 ets SEs \ ; WW es
AS : ake | LAN ’ a ee
x NGS be Ad cae : ry he fe 1) Sculptural item
. Sed N _— - , " j a =] BBO
bes S : s ’ BY a! , :
~ a f,_ Pr : a . 7 ; | Rubbish bin
AY ~ . % LZ . e ; a r E i ‘a :
» ~s \ a ro . { L ~*~ “ry an / Future works picnic shelter
are a “N x Lk * s ae ry y i {in DTMR road reserve)
. r ~X = a . - , ty
\ S aN ~ . yy “ — K p
“ 4 ~ . eer
aN i 4 SX “Sh A 4 . P ne i
a ates No ‘ Jute oY Rod a ie
. tay or r , ~
‘ an ey : a ee A
A mm) s \ \ * Os . : , ~ =f ’ X
‘ >< |
. we . : Da Sed , as (2
Page 33 of 41Section 34
Page 34 of 41
2.6 Event Precinct Detail Plan
2.5.3 DETAIL PLAN
we 5 eat 7 = e * = — _ =
"A : : S AN y oF Le oy even a % be" a $7 — ov ee aes = « ne rg: Seer
. 7 * oe ~ eh ee ae A” ie ee at
- a \? - F a oe _* / A” - an See ; ; . eS
“a be a al ~~ Roy og Ss fe . _ ee EL Pr on tae t-«s, ‘2 a ‘ mead - ae os
. yg j ae 2) » SS > ee 8 ay ’ ‘
* ”, Ve ‘ y ro ee A “ iP 4. y ¢ ae > v4) .< 7s ht
-_ aa y i= a | tee at af
Ae: PE aa ee Se yates
of x ‘ is oy a AR EYL
ft a ; a a
r : F * }
ow eee an ye
PP ts o8 i Neue = Sn . . Led
rn & oy MS Lk yer a . ; ; -
5 fi > vite ote . 5 . - Key Plan
hn or oN i" = a NX Cag erga be. nee Ree : b 3
<— Ra oo Serie. 4. Se MER So) bese ee} % =
i me N Sey : oe th a 6 \ tr Bet ats ae pa : 8 j Ren area *
“ype ee ae) ae Neer 7" ea - s : - > os
a ‘ da . Bees =— ‘ LA ow a es Pie Ean ant Pat OE . .
2 ve ar. Se ; ace as “Nba asm Raa Neral free pk =} a ek, aS . ; ee
—_—n evo ne Sah elton) weed Ce D> i? ter bg / er eer =: USES hs
a mie ays ee pata eae 5 sete | . one p Steric Raeeteeeey = bosend
ae Be | pink SEN Aaa 2s : ae os Ba 2 oe
QO Pee NOR aS “ort Ne gee airy | 2, Fae hag, : OS - > eee
Pv it ‘ Bet aitckoeie a om Ne ane Bila ets ul! 7a sakes Wr, x. 5 : ee Le ay tt Decomposed granite surface
a got : - ars eer! ee fe meer esd uy a - , oe S Sy :
ren Rar). Sake pm neS eeRe Barnet ee ea eas er <SFES EI Pedestrian access path
aoe rio ae sie = ths ED Soe te Sl A ES a ee ee. Yn ' by 7
4 = Hae 8 os eS ; eee hs e a ae > = HE Open lawn
, ~ * S/S. b * + Saree _ ee ‘ ad ‘ . os = :
FIRS Se = pe VaR eer te OR po Si ae Ee aed okey SS CPE A, EI Vehicle access path
= a! aay SN Se Se ae had aa ae ae , f , Rs = Wig Ds saa eae Cet Retained/rejuvenated landscape
. j , ey A SPCR AS See ees, le yn ant} — ; ’ eh Pi . - -
’ oP y i) } * sos Se a “w = ae io Brot aa wh Ce Ne a ron, e eB - y Fah ae ieee = oa 7 Hd Access gate
TOE f Bae ete I Dn SI Lee Se oa i sa es a Ai SS Flying fox
me : / Ma cag ee SAM ee tes.» Ne | brat: OB coy sre a et
o Bi es >. Sa pees ok af} oH : ) ps _ f we ee ~ ist hee ad PT, Toddler play
a Nisei em LEN ye a. RCM teat: Hl Toddermondrs
. i a i SMe REP iste, Ne = a : — AU IE oad te , Sandpit to tower slide
: Rs. ee: Bees ote ie asa oe . a |! es | B Firepit
; > s ee Try ll ONS ee Rr ae : A Ree ee ee ‘ Traversion structure
al ee tees aN | LS Se 4S Noe
> . I fet ow = ee ics, NS el a ys g 7 pnp nS
Te ~ Mad 4 ip ea are rd : : ate Y mm i”
i} _ ae . Ba ee “ Po "
Jan y | a et Ne wal ? el oe
_ sh o pea = 4 | . RRS:
a eae = ; Ss c & 7 a |
“ , Pras : ; n a i ae Rae ‘an
— NS > m “ " Ms : /
a v = Ge ae ? i Ss,
‘ . 42 > _ , igen Cis were ‘ at 7 Pa . See eS « fi ~ : oy 7, Wg \
Se ee A . = i Re 1 \ pa <i - ae Bie:
s — : 9 ec e : = hes! vn ic aha ‘ : ; ho vb -. L » a Het sty Rn ‘ % ap
= SS a i | a a aS ee ’ Sey Jt : ee 4
ee . a | ss ea J as pent Oy ; " ey LS OOS ee OI
os ~ SOR | . a : | Wigs cy pa,
_— a > r | ray a8 O = = z CO gene cme ee
el — ere . a ow rane ~ e ~) hae NG iy ee ee
a 7. a! en Y - ' ~— x de fi ae’ Saas 7
St ) / : a een SORES. : Ve
Z . cet ) \ er ~ é en as | , : T
2 8 Wein Coa). Wine ae tian
a y ls! en of ” ‘ Wet ats . f (, hv ae
Page 34 of 41Section 35
Page 35 of 41
bs NOGA: .- P . e Ss > | Let | | KS
Ai al. t — v — “eee ,p) Va, |
Le fe A ; so on oe te PROPOSED = of - ri ee a > . ye ae wh =
. hy PLAYGROUND ; y Cae. \\ | 1, ©) is
Sar . on oY a ; we — b a Pens : ye , Pe
ey Bis | tan , ve é y’
ca ae we Pai .
Neh | Z | GO i
5 me C j Pe ' % ; S
at * [carina concRETE PAT=WAY | ee uy % See i y/ a
' a yo eS) oP Ab yy) wn Y§
, as - y Kon Y/ ~ ey ee eo. > iy F
—_ : ; o a JA + See al i i a : 5
“ sar oen| a a . 7
: : / oH wieeats ~ Vist al
) sy ee ' | 7 Gee 4
. Bar OA BA. = ea
WN eH. a 1 Oy Sa Be
Ms OMY ag , pal ‘ ow a a ie
4 ae — . es ~ ere ; ssa FO a ' < te | . et;
oy \oes ey SE
a , | \ - “ eh Pe »¥ ae fiji Niet ___ LOPERATION 19 DECOMMISSIONED ee m | aan ~~
Fo : a Bel} i om eg Zo = mit eek b
YA ae s BARN oe _ = Ura Se: .
ay ==) er. < eeer< Sas
| A 1X EXISTING DISABLED 2 ™d Jae FOR TWO (2) SPACES a at aw
7 F Pie CARPARKING oie ave oe ns 7
Cc Vf a eo = Fy ee &
’ ie | a ra 5 a” y -% ' - a F Ps ‘ Ae =) 7 ; g » -
| ~: 7S” oS a will MS
| é % Zo ~o ~~. aa = fea
y SD ty tee “ \ | uy
‘gf (| Bary Pe. | en
. SN a iy > was wr, A +S % :
yo a ™ 7 - = * on - - “ CARPARKING (RETAIN 3) Pi |
ff \ ae a Ni . - - be oe - /
yo a a > a . " ~~ ‘ -. f Ps : -
a Y i a P a - ~~. ak ee - | : a)
y “aon 00 & ay
As a A ~_- COOROY LIBRARY ae | at
5 2 4 em oh a (i . ; . ye ca .. rr ~ 4
— ca a, . See ie "lie | 2,
A: Lf , le ae ys _ : ; : >|
a NOOSA COUNCIL INFRASTRUCTURE ~~ MAPLE STREET - COORO See Pres te
Bl lee lel ee PLANNING, DESIGN & DELIVERY x a NOOSA Fe eee ia
22/10/2020 | ISSUED FOR APPROVAL MT. | oRAWN| SUMUNLLIER oe/2019 | PO Box 141 Tewantin, TEWANTIN QLD 4565 mom COUNCIL UPGRADE WORKS Shest Ne. Revision Na
Page 35 of 41Section 36
Page 36 of 41
; : 7 rT 2 a - [ne Sh
ay * is yi f | wa) ; ” “s _—e " \ ' ; oe
— : ) Y Se” | UL . ~ ; 4 Vv
|_v[ SERVICE LOCATIONS lagi f D oe] Loo |
ts the responsbilty of the Contractor to ee eh. 54 ; | + i
comact the relevant service authorizes to | ila. on : \ : ;
ee eee Ps my rc ; ; ~ wer ‘
f ieee a ee Pe & a hs er
es a ee ae | Wee ee Camel
DIAL) aan s | pl
he i a ee ar | ee Se ,lC(
- FE cegee ee -% 2 fs 300m a
ils | ¥ aa vie ~— " 9 — -~ oo - ans = . oe
WRT es } ee — a el , s a
a s S 7 : V7
SBEE ABE — or ae —" * en ntss ' HINTERLAND PLAYGROUND ~
: aK —_ Phe eet Ss
PROVIDE NEW 50 kmite SPEED - 7 ee! ~
SIGN LOCATED 50m WEST OF = — ; pa —aeew
ee aoe ! ae —
rs -; a MARY RIVER ROAD npeamngnae ta = : |
a Ls NSS _ enn nna . 2 =e)
= me 38] [eV [35] fExistavs Swace ORAIN]
p , yy ile Ves) [az |Z [427 [40/7 129) ;
LEE OOK ———— nee a eee Me - a.
ne ee ee eae eee ak ees 2 eran tC fet Pe EP
a enh pe ae "
- ro > ~ [eusTiNG 1 sm WIDE PATHWAY cory ~ J s a af
a | 2) omit if ” ie) Veen
a parton TO DELINEATE CAR PARKS —-lan + x ee y 3 eas
: | aS - we : ae imam] ie i
cS Sees ’ earn 2. ae . alam comme 7 Cae oe
Ge FUTURE ADDITIONAL CARPARKING _ - COOR TEN! ; y d
~~. en a . Re. wh a ee wes .—7% pot rt : *. s : ’ - o
oa noe aber a ~ | ris Sm ae ee YY ¢ r i}
BY 7 o ne a a” ae : ‘ x il ; / j a . : / ; at. /
oe + tte 4 i. e. . = 7 ed Sd : ~~) / =r Gi
2 > a se, + 3 ’ i Aj j ‘ ‘>
“ 4 - ' u 7 ¥ _ —_ o-
»~ a Ay } Ja f
a 7 . Jan /)
NOTES:
1. REFER ALSO TO DESIGN & EXISTING LEGENDS ON SHEET C01.
2. REFER TO SHEET C06 FOR DESIGN SETOUT TABLES.
Se 3. REFER DEMOLITION PLANS ON SHEETS C07 & C08 FOR FURTHER DETAILS.
Scale 1200 GAT 4. REFER TO SHEET C15 FOR CONCRETE JOINT DETAILS
_.... Zz = Se oy ae
, NOOSA COUNCIL INFRASTRUCTURE ns MAPLE STREET - COOROY
PO Box 141 Tewantin, TEWANTIN QLD 4565 als ~ UPGRADE WORKS [Sheet No ~ Revelon No
A peraamse | woven ronsermows __{ur_fes | onwmi| survuuen os/aer 1 107)$829 6500 | emait mail@nocsa qld gov au Mi Ji RSENS DESIGN FEATURES - CARPARK AREA 3[DA07_ A
Page 36 of 41Section 37
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 37 of 41
COOROY HINTERLAND PLAYGROUND | *7Ackwent2
CARPARKING UPGRADE WORKS
2" Ee
peg Oe SS
er a ae j —— a) 2
ge 8 ALI sto PS eee
oe ie ee SS)
“sy MES ri an. ee Oe Fos en gl exors xe)
ey ee he as at pe _~ s = &
Te ee Wiese,
Peay | ea a) PLAYGROUND Be * f I
Lg : ae ea 5 | P| we a \ ‘ F Fs 2
A ple A AS gE AUS em,
as = | . 5 EN ae ie
ae =| ee Ke (ieee | i
QO CARPARK AREA 4 - 12 SPACES ty, LEO ‘a ¥/ COORoy
LOCALITY PLAN
(LS a
Phe Se ee ep = fo 58200500 mat reQrocee tory Mi MARSTON PROJECT COVER SHEET
oO Page 37 of 41Section 38
Page 38 of 41
DESIGN FEATURES LEGEND
a.
REPRESENTATION DESCRIFTION
PROJECT INDEX
SHEET DESC! ROADWAY PAVEMENT - TYPE A
DAOO A PROJECT COVER SHEET ee) Ee ei oows couse TR
DAO01 A PROJECT INDEX AND LEGEND MIN. 100mm TYPE 2.1 (MRTSOS) PAVEMENT
DAO2 A TYPICAL SECTIONS OOOO SO] MIN. 150mm TYPE 2.3 (MRTSOS) PAVEMENT
DAO3 A PROPOSED CARPARKING - AREA 1 tunpateDioesc
A " 2 ROADWAY PAVEMENT - TYPES
DAO5 A PROPOSED PATHWAY CONNECTION —
DAO6 A LIBRARY CARPARK RECONFIGURATION PLAN SSR DSHS ASPHALT QUREAGE “TO Se DESIGNED SY
DAO7 A PROPOSED CARPARKING - AREA 3 on . necro ao E21 imtoo) woos e COUN
MIN. 150mm TYPE 2.3 (MRTSOS) PAVEMENT
eg] Serre,
bee)
| | 126mm THICK CONCRETE PATHWAY
32MPA, GL72 MESH CENTRALLY PLACED
PLAIN GREY - BROOM FINISH
[| 126mm THICK CONCRETE PATHWAY
32MPA, SL72 MESH CENTRALLY PLACED
CCS BISCUIT - BROOM FINISH
ee 176mm THICK CONCRETE RAMP “CHECKERBOARD”
SOMPA, SL72 MESH CENTRALLY PLACED
CCS BLACK 21 OXIDE (Angular Nominal 10-1Smm 50%
Write | 50% Blue Metal) - MEDIUM WASH FINISH
| | 176mm THICK CONCRETE DECK “BLACK
SOMPA, SL72 MESH CENTRALLY PLACED
CCS BLACK 44 - BROOM FINISH
[| 175mm THICK CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
32MPA, GL72 MESH CENTRALLY PLACED
PLAIN GREY - BROOM FINISH
(MIN. CBR 5 TO BE CONFIRMED FOLLOWING GEOTECH)
———__ KERB AND CHANNEL
—_——-_ 51450 KERB AND CHANNEL
TRANSITIONS
[| GENERALLY 1.0m AROUND NEW WORKS.
LANDSCAPING WORKS
TOPSOIL 5mm AND TURF
4 |, esse] , easels esate OM IRTOIO RI rene nce rm none 500557
| _FoMNo| 1388751 iss! #1 = NOOSA COUNCIL INFRASTRUCTURE . MAPLE STREET - COOROY 500557
PO Box 141 Tewantin, TEWANTIN QLD 4565 = = UPGRADE WORKS Teen
zanaaeza | 1eaueD FOR APPROVAL [ORAWN] BLMULUER o8/ao18 | » TEW.
fed oars | Rewarona | nec [arp] ceeoneol SS] Pn(07) 5329 6500 | email: [email protected] 4 mn eee DESIGN AND EXISTING LEGENDS DAOi A
Page 38 of 41Section 39
Page 39 of 41
ig / 4 ~S SS ao oN Poo OO E-¥ NM us Uy, , i’ 1 5 ZO, \y } :
sey 2 : ~ ~ —= —_ ) - Vase -O 4A et / a i ™
a Je / \ af I — New OO SET 7 ETS TN ; CO _ i -! Ve ~ s % . i
y 4 eee ae Woe Wy SRE ---- 7 ~~. ~_ NGS wiz Ye ar / rm)
Za fs NA! eS bad — fT WN ot / Gis a th \% ee SS, .
ha NDA ~~ \ aS mse \Y / « Ae \ ;
od Me ¢ ~ i y, ~*~ —— x YS
LS A AG eo TSS S454 ~----rH > 1’
. i 1] a} * ~~ jJoe= ~~ Le i x ?
ee Net ¢ O of eee ae puncnanagnennqnnne mane eI een etre ronnmamencnopanonnnatena Triton occ cen nnn nnnnnenennnnnennenennnnd
_— 7 ee - Tle apenw erent on een ea p—_— J ~— La - A hi Pan t
ee he eee IS a Soe OS
es ~ ee a ee Fe 4 ae 1 r yr Tt , SS NN 7 _\ PolMm...
eee “—_-“"_BROPOSED LANDSCAPING AREA WITH LOW 8 : >. - Js A
eee he TT / - LEVEL PLANTING. PROVIDE SUB SOIL | er
et i 7 DRAINAGE AND CONNECT TO SUBSOIL DRAIN | 600mm WIDE CONCRETE
a BENEATH CONCRETE INVERT IN CARPARK 3 MAPLE STREET | \
Serr | S
. : : KERB ONLY TYPE SMIAS PER ] ;
IPWEAQ STD DRG RS-060 WITH _|REFER SHEET CO1 FOR rn
eee eee 8 / |PAVEMENT TYPE B DETAILS] | p-iitng eae o numer | QW /
) / { | WN | |BOARD-D42.28 / I
y = i Sepp E TT ER PE TERRE INET ILD IF TLTSEY ERATE - |
\'/ 8 A eT OLE gE ESE RN OT RT rare S
ons ee a RR ELEN RE OT RE Sc re
<2 Fe ee "EE Sr eR RS OL RES im 0mm WIDE ID AI RAT lai aa
s PSO teem ne caves maps CHANNEL = CONCRETE NvERT| \ Seems ea —
= AW El Sameer a Ba a AR RRR al “
3 ete ee ee ee eee ee” =
\. Pe ree IR a ERP a a PS
Se PR Ne TM LETT IO LL APOE PTE EE eR IR i LLL LIE I al Ne tt
is Om GF GOL LOIS Le ene, ff 7 FN 6 OA Meh Le ef LA PX eee ee
Se Bo ce Re RN eR ‘al / / (a f (2 x fly p Peers ts 7 |S) , Sf Bl, Cay ‘ i) 44 FN Ph.
te Nita ate att ee 2 peor nie as Cr OOP el Fg fT SF ff fe laa Fert ese th
peer Nhe fh 7 ff HF ff 7 GF / >
ee PRR TL at SF nN os ea rel BEA SOL TS INT Nal Ef ~ ince: HA) nt
LE CPL LID POL ON POE Pen PT Te i A pe eR PER LE MRE ole PLS lal - - > —_f| Tea
reece Po i a aa aaa laf fl / © f' ) | FI iT th 2 d
PS |KERBAND CHANNEL [OP fl ff PTO LLM LMR EL LL PEELE ee / . '~f-RereR My]
3 E24 IPWEAQ STD DRG RS-080 Ze 4 # — . —
pee ern see existing overnead 7 piri \ 1,
SS power oe ¢ / rae
SS f ——S Hint, | } 1}
a ae
rome erm ony Tee BE ASPEN fewenasro ons aco | +11
= | jb yu
|
CONCRETE PATHWAY LINK TO. [mL 222 Confirmed by potholing) t Oo ) / rae
CARPARKING AND MARY RIVER ~ } / BR) \\\ 1) )
— \ Serco mare | \\ | bo
aa Me / APEX PARK toe vy ) yyy ty ys 11) 1 \ h 4
: av | ) | ) | it) | AS
o 2 4 6m
a _!
Scale 1:100 @At
DANGER !!
OVERHEAD
ELECTRIC CABLES
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
we . Me LOCATIONS D I A L Y Istra SERVICE PROVIDERS
is the responsibility of the Contractor to =>
energex Soreast he Teva senoe aumories BEFORE YOU DIG WARNING: OPTIC FIBRE geisra,
OVERHEAD Prior to construction. && EXTREME CARE TO SE TAKEN WHILE EXCAVATING IN THE NOTE SERVICE LOCATIONS ARE APPROAIMATE ONLY FROM
EXISTINTHS VIENITY CONTACT ng 3 SE CONFRMED PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. Fron To stato ConaTCTon one OO"
CLEARANCE IN COMPROMISED BY fraser F
MACHINERY, een
Se NOOSA COUNCIL INFRASTRUCTURE MAPLE STREET - COOROY Seseregeineee
K PLANNING, DESIGN & DELIVERY = ” © @ yee vtencano PLaycROUNn - APEX PARK AND MILL PLACE 500557
z2ra020 | ISSUED FOR APPROVAL ur. |ce. [orawn| ecnuLueR onan | PO Box 141 Tewantin, TEWANTIN OLD 4565 mt MRCOONCIE apes aan
DATE [REVISIONS SY REC.JAPPR] CHecreD[ SS __‘jph(07) 5329 6500 | email: [email protected] # MAPLE ST - CARPARK AREA 1 DAO3 A
Page 39 of 41Section 40
Page 40 of 41
J \hk PROPOSED PAVEMENT.|
AND CHANNEL | [.WAX GRADE 456) | [CONNECT TO EXISTING TURFED SWALE PLAIN GREY -BROOM FINISH] |
/ 20 \ ee SS | oy x > / \
| WA ~~ 2 a, ; / \
7 | SSE SS oo Ep)
as -~ is :
Ls M] RRR
~ Fy |}
ee j So &
> 1 \
. rt Ce ee
~$e- -—— mp ASPHALT PAVEMENT & oo «, ps i ST. NE OS.
fae bh lala|ea 7 fal | (en | ca | cea | | | oe el | | | | | |
fe oH. ' § x 5 of me : | os ~, ‘y mS ‘, ‘ \fs NS 9 =
Lah > pd | * bi
f= —— * on : _*s® IN AISLE OF CARPARK o 1 al
2 < . i a . - j
2) = | - gy
|s g | / =a] We m
¥ 8 fa =
PS a 9
ft “ates, ‘Sy 7 ‘ = a
\ x \ \ \ \ \ \ \- ‘ \ , ae — by
7 LOWER MILL SITE ! |__pT oe M4
COOROY CAMPHOR - THE KILNS 4 Dy
LAUREL CLUB J - t~ COOROORA WOODWORKERS CLUB
a \ . _ lo <1
a 2 4 6m
a —
Scale 1:100 @At
DANGER !!
OVERHEAD
ELECTRIC CABLES
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
w SERVICE LOCATIONS D I A L ys tra SERVICE PROVIDERS
[tts the responstity of the Contractor to oa Testa
energex son teciot comen aes” BEFORE YOU DIG RS ET BRE anaetareoneamerncarns
OVERHEAD ELECTRICITY CABLES: prter fo. consteaction. ym sds VICINITY OF OPTIC FIERE CABLES. LOCATIONS ARE TO SRDS UNS, LOCA AS RESCIND
EXIST IN THIS VICINITY. CONTACT aoe | 1 BE CONFIRMED PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. CUE OAM CNSEROORCRTAE
DERGEX WHERE CARE sy Se IG) cm
MACANERY: SEES
R PLANNING, DESIGN & DELIVERY x yy CTO heya fxteRLann PLaycROUND - APEX PARK AND MILL PLACE 900557
NOOSA COUNCIL INFRASTRUCTURE MAPLE STREET - COOROY
zveane | maucpronerecee. wr. eae PO Box 141 Tewantin, TEWANTIN QLD 4565 COUNCIL eae ao
fey DATE | REVSIONS | RE ape] Gece] (07) $329 6500 | email: [email protected] @ DESIGN FEATURES - CARPARK AREA 2}DA04_ A
Page 40 of 41Section 41
Page 41 of 41
i
s Pw a TS
7s : fy
re : - Qa “ALL / f
‘ MS \ fl
SES w y : ——_— 175mm THICK CONCRETE PATHWAY CROSSING !
\ . y a aa SLOPED AT 2.5% MAXIMUM. '
—_ 1 a y 32MPA, SL72 MESH CENTRALLY PLACED
EH! - { : Ss PLAIN GREY !
1 s w | ] \ i / :
: = ; )
gi a] ~ |
| 5 e- C
o . 4.50) ?
| — PATHWAY WITH 2.5% CROSSFALL
SERVICE LOCATIONS a
D I A L Itls the responsibility of he Contractor to {
contact the relevant service authoties to
BEFORE YOU DIG ascertain the exact location of services 7
Sie peor to construction. 5 . . . {
a tw : : 4% \
POOR { : NL
Fran a ep a
[Riven sorceress") 3.00
ENSURE PLACEMENT OF FILL BEHIND PATHWAY IS
|
| /— EXISTING SURFACE .
VARIES l / 4 (3.00)
/ 1.0% X\ typ
| / someone Sy j
17Smm THICK CONCRETE PATHWAY / A
SLOPED AT 2.5% MAXIMUM. / . (cy j
CCS "BISCUIT OXIDE _ JM
SECTION “c om
scaLerso \ - / \
o 1 2 am }
a! i
Scale 1:50 @A1 —
JOIN SMOOTHLY TO EXISTING
Secer em Sete EXISTING CONCRETE
CONCRETE PATHWAY. DOWEL
TO PLAYGROUND AND 0 2 4 &m
COOROY LIBRARY) |
‘Scale 1:100 @A1
!
- !
|__PSMNo| 138873) ts866¢ | NOOSA COUNCIL INFRASTRUCTURE MAPLE STREET - COOROY
fsoevereo| a CRANSTON Se SSE A PLANNING, DESIGN & DELIVERY BE TI ernesescen perenne seek ren snnun ever 500557
[janopre| vossso 1 ws277 | /
22/10/2020 | ISSUED FOR APPROVAL PO Box 141 Tewantin, TEWANTIN QLD 4565 COUNCIL UPGRADE WORKS Sheet os Reman bie
| DRAWN] BLHUILUER 08/2019 | ’ Sess — Beeson No.
Ry DATE | REVISIONS | REC. [APPR] ph:(07) 5329 6500 | email: [email protected] mm mu a DESIGN FEATURES - PATHWAY CONNECTION | DAO5 D
Page 41 of 41