Council archive · source document
Noosa VMU RFI Response Lodged 23.11.23 · MCU23/0078
benchmark rate of 0.394 sqm/cap has been adopted. This is more appropriate to use as the figure
for Sunshine Coast is influenced by incoming spending from visitors (which is separately
addressed in the analysis in Table 9, p43). Moreover, application of the average for non-
metropolitan Queensland would lead to even higher supermarket floorspace demand.
(f) Known approved expansions, including at Peregian Springs and the opening of the IGA at Sunrise
Shopping Centre, have been included in the analysis at Table 7 of the Economic Impact
Assessment. Minor approved additions to retail floorspace have not been included but would not
alter the results of the analysis.
(g) The analysis demonstrates that the Noosa region is significantly undersupplied with retail
floorspace, reflected in high levels of escape spending. As noted in the report, NBC’s designation
as a Major Regional Activity Centre means that it has a primary role in capturing spending that
would otherwise escape from the region. Notwithstanding this, the analysis concludes that
additional retail development would also be supported at other locations within the region.
However, these minor additions to floorspace would be unable to alleviate the high escape
spending as they do not represent major shopping destinations.
(h) Although parts of the catchment to the south-west are more distant from NBC, this still
represents the closest higher-order centre, and it is appropriate to consider ways to retain retail
demand from this part of the catchment. Notwithstanding, the need analysis presented in the
Economic Impact Assessment recognises that 30% of retail demand generated by catchment
residents will continue to escape from the catchment. The approach adopted for the report does
not discount the potential for higher levels of escape ‘leakage’ from parts of the catchment more
distant from NBC.
(i) Detailed sales performance data for the NBC by store has not been presented in the report, and
the performance of the Bi W in particular is irrelevant to the analysis for the proposed Noosa
Village Mixed Use development. However, the economic analysis has been expanded to consider
overall supermarket sales performance across the catchment, with this exercise presented in
Table 10 at p44 of the Economic Impact Assessment.
(j) A sales forecast for the proposed supermarket within the VMU proposal has been prepared using
a market share approach, and is presented in Table 11 (p52) o the Economic Impact Assessment.
A similar detailed market share based analysis for the retail specialties has not been conducted as
the final tenant mix is unknown at this stage.
(k) As you are aware, in direct response to Council’s Information Request, the VMU proposal has
been amended to remove 6,500m2 of retail and a code assessable application has now been
lodged with Council to locate a 6,500m2 retail expansion on the existing Noosa Civic site (Noosa
Civic Stage 2) consistent with the provisions of the Noosa Plan. Accordingly, the Economic
Impact Assessment incorporates an examination of the potential cumulative effects associated
with the concurrent development of Noosa Civic Stage 2 (6,500 sqm code assessable) within the
Retail precinct.
(l) The potential loss of employment at other centres (or redistribution of employment has been
considered in the Economic Impact Assessment at section 8.3, where it is concluded that as the
impacts on existing centres are minor, the likelihood of staffing reductions at competing centres is
low.
33
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Noosa VMU RFI Response Lodged 23.11.23.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 671 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.