Original source · versioned page text
2015-06-29 General Committee Meeting Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 29 JUNE 2015
Government Priority Comment
Moving the establishment and jurisdiction of the court to specific courts Seems reasonable.
legislation, along with procedural rules and fee regulation
Introducing exemption certificates that, in certain limited circumstances, exempt Seems reasonable, provided there are clear rules for exemption certificates, and
inappropriately categorised development the decision able to be appealed by the applicant and residents
Engaging local government and industry about the best method to ensure an Planning schemes need to be able to show best possible hazard mapping
appropriate degree of safeguard for councils from claims for compensation without an obligation to compensate land owners for any resultant change of
regarding natural hazards risk management, where a scheme amendment is value or additional costs (e.g. insurance premiums).
made to reduce the risk to persons or property from natural processes, including
flooding, bushfires, landslides or coastal erosion
Retaining the local government designation process using a planning scheme Agreed although we have not used it.
amendment under specific procedural arrangements included under the
guideline for making or amending planning schemes
Extending the current statutory timeframe for the making of a local government Agreed, many Councils will not be in a position to have a LGIP in place by June
infrastructure plan (LGIP) by a further two years, subject to an approved LGIP 2016. The process for having a LGIP in place by June 2016 is highly onerous
preparation program particularly in light of the fact we will be starting work on a new planning scheme
in 2016 and potentially doing consultation on that in mid-late 2016.
Working with local government to identify the assistance required to implement Assistance would be appreciated in transitioning a planning scheme, adopting
the new planning reform legislation, including support such as tools, training and new forms and processes, training staff, Councillors and local development
guidance sector, and engaging resources to modify electronic development assessment
systems.
Many Councils utilise a development assessment system which is fully computer
based and are totally reliant on it in assessing development applications.
Modifying this system to make it consistent with the new planning reform
legislation will require significant resources and time to prepare and implement.
The suggestion from the DILGP is that State support would be prioritised to
smaller Councils with fewer resources to set up their own systems or run their
own training.
Page 19 of 28
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.