Council archive · source document
PM Submission - Nicole Noonan - MCU25/0118
From: "Nicole Noonan" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sun, 23 Nov 2025 21:47:46 +1000
To: "Mailbox Council Mail" <[email protected]>
Subject: 64 Lake MacDonald Drive. Attention: the assessment manager MCU25/0118
Attachments: Refined_Submission_MCU25_0118 NICOLE NOONAN (1).pdf
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important
CAUTION: This email originated outside of Council. Do not open links or attachments
if the email is unexpected or unusual.
Thanks for taking my submission.
Regards, Nicole Noonan
Document Set ID: 24329290
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/11/2025
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 4 pages
Page 2
To: Assessment Manager – Noosa Shire Council. Date: 23/11/25
Re: Application Number MCU25/0118
Description: Development Permit for Material Change of use by Coast2Bay for Multiple
Dwellings – Affordable Rental Premises 25 X small dwellings plus one community room
dwelling.
Site Address: 64 Lake Macdonald Drive, Cooroy Qld 4563 on Lot 2 (part) SP348613
To whom it may concern,
I make the following submission to Council and request the above mentioned application be
recommended for refusal on the following grounds:
1) Incorrect Premise of the RPS Town Planning Report (TPR)
The TPR appears to be based on a false premise. Coast2Bay’s purpose is to deliver social
housing, not affordable housing. The Development Application (DA) uses these terms
interchangeably, which is inaccurate and misleading.
2) Poor Proximity to Essential Services
Section 6.3.1of the TPR incorrectly states that the development is close to the Cooroy
township. In reality, the site is almost as far from Cooroy as possible while still
remaining within the urban footprint. The dwellings are not located “close to activity
centres” and do not have “ease of access to public and active transport networks.”
Section 3.7 of the Planning Report is misleading. The site is not close to the key services
of the Cooroy Town Centre.
⚫ There is no scheduled bus service on Lake Macdonald Drive (only a school bus).
⚫ No scheduled services are likely in the near future.
⚫ The nearest bus stop on Cooroy–Noosa Road is connected by a rough, dry-weather-
only bush track with no formal pedestrian crossing.
⚫ Walking access to town is unsafe: limited lighting, only one pedestrian crossing, and
an inclined rail pedestrian bridge unsuitable for older people.
⚫ Car speeds on Lake Macdonald Drive regularly exceed the posted 60 km/h, creating
unsafe pedestrian conditions.
1
Document Set ID: 24329290
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/11/2025
Page 3
3) Building Bulk and Density Inconsistent With Local Character
A) Overlooking and Privacy
Figure 5 of the TPR indicates a semi-underground carpark, and the report states the full 8
m building height will be used. On this sloping site, upper-level units will likely overlook
the windows and backyards of nearby Dianella Court properties. Privacy screening would
be required to protect existing residents.
D) Apparent Three-Storey Form
The building appears effectively three storeys high when viewed from the new
road/driveway (TPR Figure 5) and from Wilgee Court. This contradicts Council’s Noosa
Plan Performance Outcome PO17 for Cooroy.
Key issues:
⚫ The proposed buildings are inconsistent with the existing low-density residential
character and the surrounding open space and cemetery.
⚫ The development would visually dominate the area and significantly diminish
neighbourhood amenity.
⚫ The elevation and semi-underground parking create a visual effect equivalent to a
three-storey structure.
⚫ The proposal does not “maintain and reflect the form and scale of development in
Cooroy as a modern country town.” Cooroy has historically preserved its traditional
rural character.
⚫ Noosa’s Housing Choice strategy intends for diverse housing to be dispersed
throughout the urban area, not concentrated in visually intrusive clusters.
4) Negative Impacts on the Cemetery
There has been no explanation as to how Council determined this land is “surplus” to
cemetery needs. With an ageing population and limited cemetery capacity across the
shire, where will additional burial space be provided if Lots 1, 2, and 3 are developed?
Remediation works have already reduced the cemetery’s sense of enclosure, privacy, and
tranquillity. These impacts will worsen if a public housing complex is built directly
beside it.
5) Inadequate Stormwater Capacity and Increased Flooding Risk
2
Document Set ID: 24329290
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/11/2025
Page 4
On-site detention capacity is insufficient. Calculations suggest the current design can
hold less than 20 minutes of rainfall.
Recent storms (30 Oct and 15 Nov) were not major storms, yet Lake Macdonald Drive
became impassable after 64mm of rain.
Some storm events in this area last a week or more, delivering hundreds of millimetres of
rain, saturating the ground.
All stormwater from the 64 LMD subdivision flows under LMD at the nearby
intersection. This system is at high risk of blockage from debris (e.g., from the existing
dam), which would cut off neighbourhood access.
Removal of vegetation on the hill has eliminated natural retardation of runoff, increasing
flooding risks in the environmental reserve below Dianella Court.
6) Car-Parking, Traffic, and Safety Concerns
Insufficient Parking
The DA provides only 31 car parks (25 + 6 visitor spaces). This is inadequate for:
15 x 1-bedroom units
10 x 2-bedroom units
These could reasonably account for 35 cars before visitors or tradespeople, creating
overflow parking on Dianella Court and potential safety hazards near the new access road.
Poor Sight Lines
Vehicles exiting the new development will have limited visibility to the south due to the
location of No. 2 Dianella Court and potential parked cars. This creates a collision risk
for existing residents driving down to the corner.
Unwanted Cemetery Through-Traffic
The road reserve created under RAL25/0004 on the southern boundary appears to allow
cemetery traffic into Dianella Court. Residents were previously told by Council that this
corridor would be a green space footpath, not a road. It should remain as originally
represented.
Garbage Collection Issues
3
Document Set ID: 24329290
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/11/2025
Page 5
Servicing the 6 × 1100 L bins requires a truck to perform a three-point turn and manually
manoeuvre the bins. This is an impractical and unsafe design.
Final Question
If this land was originally acquired for cemetery expansion in 1999—when Noosa’s
population was significantly smaller—what evidence supports the claim that it is now
surplus to cemetery needs, and who made that determination?
Yours sincerely,
Submitter Name: Nicole Noonan
Address:3 Dianella Court Cooroy, Postcode:4563
Email Address: [email protected]
4
Document Set ID: 24329290
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/11/2025
Used in these records
PM Submission - Nicole Noonan - MCU25/0118Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 378 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.