Council archive · source document
07/0466 - Modification to Alternative Siting Provisions [As Published] · 132007.466
INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997
State-controlied road matters -
For more information refer to Guide 3.
Unless you answered “none of the above" to 02,
the application triggers referral to the Department
of Main Roads {OMR) as a referral agency.
in certain circumstances DMR will be an advice
agency, while In other circumstances DMR will
be a concurrence agency.
Schedule 2 of the IP Requiation wilt assist you to
delermine where DMR is an advice or
concurrence agency for the application.
IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 19.0, 2 March 2007
2. The application involves: (tick appicable box/es)
C1 (i) development on land contiguous’ to a State controlled road and for -
C1 (a) material change of use assessable against the planning scheme;
(1 (b) reconfiguring a fot unless -
« the total number of lots is not increased; and
« the total number of lots abutting the State-controlied road is not increased;
1 (©) operational work (not associated with a material change of use assessable against the
planning scheme or reconfiguring a lot mentioned in (b) above)-
* associated with access to a State-controlled road; or
« for filling or excavation; or .
« involving the redirection or intensification of site stormwater from the land, through a
pipe with a cross-sectional area greater than 625 cm? that directs stormwater to a
State-controlled road.
. D1 fi) development on land not contiguous to a State-controlled road and -
[1 (a) material change of use -
« assessable against the local government's planning scheme; and
« mentioned in schedule 5 of the IP Regulation and exceeding the thresholds set by
that schedule;
(1) (b) reconfiguring a fot for a purpose mentioned in schedule 5 of the IP regulation
and exceeding the thresholds set by that schedute;
(1 (c)_ operational work (not associated with a material change of use assessable against the
planning scheme or reconfiguring a lot mentioned in (b) above)—
‘+ assessable against the local government's planning scheme; and
* mentioned in schedule 5 of the IP Regulation and exceeding the thresholds set by
that schedule.
(J (ili) none of the above
Clearing vegetation
For more information refer to Guide 12.
Unless you answered “none of the above" to Q3,
tho application requires assessment by the
Department of Natural Resources and Water
(NRW).
If an agency other than NRW is the assessment,
manager for the application, NRW is a
concurrence agency for the application in relation
fo this matier.
Vf you ticked Q3{i) of (ii}, your application requires
referral to NRW for assessment regardless of
whether vegetation ¢learing is proposed or not.
3. The application involves: (tick applicable bowes)
Oi _ material change of use —
(a) assessable against the planning scheme;
(b) on a lot containing —
* acategory 1, 2 or 3 area shown on a property map of assessable vegetation; or
« if there is no property map of assessable vegetation for the lot - remnant vegetation;
(c) where the existing use of the land is a rural or environmental use; and
(d) where the size of the land is 2 hectares or larger - complete Part J of Form 1
Dil) reconfiguring a lot -
(a) ona lot containing a category 1, 2 or 3 area shown on a property map of
~~ assessable vegetation or, if there is no property map of assessable vegetation for
the lot, remnant vegetation;
(b} where the size of the lot before the reconfiguration is 2 hectares or larger:
(c) where 2 or more lots are created; and
(d) where the size of any lot created is 25 hectares or smaller - complete Part J of Form 1
LA (iii) operational work -
(a) for the clearing of native vegetation where the vegetation clearing is made
assessable under Schedule 8 of the IPA; and
{b) not associated with a material change of use assessable against the planning
scheme mentioned in (i) or reconfiguring a lot mentioned in (ii) - complete Pat J of
Form 1
LJ (iv) none of the above.
Strategic port land
For more information refer to Guide 11.
If you ticked {i} - the relevant Port Authority is ihe
assessment manager for the application. .
If you ticked (i) Queensland Transport is a
concurrence agency for the application.
4. The application involves:
C1 (i) development on strategic port land as defined in the Transport infrastructure Act 1994 (TI
Act) - complete Part ! of Form 1
(1 (i) a material change of use that is inconsistent with the land use plan approved under the
Ti Act for the strategic port land - complete Part ! of Form 1
LC (ili) none of the above
4 Land contiquous to a State-controlied saad is defined in schedule 14 of the tP Regulation to mean land - if part of the land is wilhin 100m of the State-contolied road; or that is part of a future State-
controlled road. .
Page 2
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
07/0466 - Modification to Alternative Siting Provisions [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 1.7 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.