Council archive · source document
Approved Document OPW18-0319 · OPW18/0319
Consult Arborist
5 V ISU AL T REE R ISK A SSESSM ENT R ESULTS
The assessment commenced at the northern end of the Buffer Zone and preceded south along
the western edge. The subject trees were previously marked with flagging tape to aid
identification. To provide continuity, the trees were assessed in the same order as the previous
assessment, where possible with tree additional trees.
Tree attributes are approximately measured visually unless otherwise stated.
5.1 TREE 1 – SWAMP MAHOGANY
ID Genus & Species Common Name
1 Eucalyptus robusta Swamp Mahogany
Height Crown Spread [email protected] Age
18-20m 8-10m 600-700mm Over-mature
Health Structure
Fair to Poor with depleted canopy Fair to Poor with typical die-back in the main
branch structure
Target Occupancy Target Zone
Residential dwelling Constant Within 1 x height & Dripline
Comments
The tree is located within a bushland setting with no evidence of ground disturbance on the tree's
tension side. A main feature of the tree is a dominant lean to the main trunk, likely developed when
young and seeking light (phototrophic). No evidence of root plate failure/heave over the recent years
that would have contributed to the lean was confirmed.
The canopy displays typical decline for this species when in an advanced stage of life. Natural
retrenchment and regrowth creating twig/branch die-back and deadwood with responsive epicormic
growth creating new growth are evident throughout the main branch structure.
Tree 1 is directly targeting a Unit with the upper canopy encroaching over the roof.
This is a known Koala food tree and generally a good habitat tree.
The risk matrix has been calculated on branch failure as this has been deemed the most likely event
to occur within the next 12 months.
Likelihood of Failure Likelihood of Impacting Target Matrix 1 - Result
Probable High Likely
Consequence of Failure Matrix 2 – Overall Risk Rating Work Priority
Significant High Within 30 days
Recommendations
Canopy management is recommended to reduce the canopy away from the adjacent dwelling.
Pruning will likely exceed the recommended 20% removal of lost live foliage but will retain a more
stable tree and an acceptable height that will reduce the likelihood of further branch failure in the
near future and create a tree that can be managed into the future.
This species are known for being responsive to pruning with the creation of prolific regrowth formed
by epicormic shoots. These works will also reduce canopy sail area and, although unlikely, the
likelihood of total failure.
Re-inspect in 12 months.
Residual Risk on completion of Mitigation Options
Low
19_01_24_TRA_RACV Resort _Noosa_V3 Page 8 of 32
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Approved Document OPW18-0319.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 4.0 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.