Skip to the record
Beware of cheap imitations.

Council archive · source document

08/0252 - Referral Agency Response - EPA [As Published] · 142008.252

of 6

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

ecoaccess

environmental licences and permits
Response

Concurrence Agency Response

 

Plans:

Drawing Numbers:
Drawing No: JSP-CP-490 prepared by Cardno (Qld) Pty Ltd dated 20/08/01
Drawing No: JSP-CP-491 prepared by Cardno (Qid) Pty Ltd dated 20/08/01
Drawing No: JSP-CP-492 prepared by Cardno (Qld) Pty Ltd dated 20/08/01

Reasons for the inclusion of development conditions

In accordance with Section 3.3.18(7) of the Integrated Planning Act 1997 and Section 27B of the Acts
Interpretation Act 1954, the reasons for the inclusion of development conditions are:

. The Environmental Protection Agency is recognised as a concurrence agency under the Integrated _
Planning Amendment Regulation (No. 1) 1998 for coastal management, other than amenity and aesthetic
significance or value. Development conditions placed on the development approval for the application are
in accordance with section 106 of the Coastal Protection and Management Act 1995.

Additional information for applicants

It is a requirement of the Environmental Protection Act 1994 that if the owner or occupier of this site
becomes aware a Notifiable Activity (as defined under Schedule 2 of the Environmental Protection Act 1994)
is being carried out on this land or that the land has been affected by a hazardous contaminant, they must,
within twenty two (22) business days after becoming aware the activity is being carried out, give notice to the
Environmental Protection Agency. A list of Notifiable Activities is provided within Schedule 2 of the
Environmental Protection Act 1994.

This concurrence response pursuant to the Integrated Planning Act 1997 and assessed against section 104
of the Coastal Protection and Management Act 1995 does not remove the need to obtain any further
approvals for this development which may be required pursuant to this or other legislation, both State and
Commonwealth. Applicants are advised to check with all relevant statutory authorities for such approvals as
may be required. :

Additional information for the Assessment Manager:

The Environmental Protection Agency referral agency jurisdiction for the development application is confined
to that aspect of the application involving the triggers identified in the response. EPA has no referral
agency jurisdiction in relation to other aspects of the development application.

In this regard it should be noted that the State Coastal Management Plan 2001 and SEQ Regional Coastal
Management Plan 2006 which, for the purposes of making a statutory decision, has the same effect as a
state planning policy. The assessment manager is required to give due consideration to the relevant State
planning policies when deciding the application.

Additional comments or advice about the application
Values

A Biodiversity Planning Assessment undertaken by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) identified the
following values for Lot 603 on Plan SP188270:

 

Page 2 of 4 » 09/03 Version 1.1 Environmental Protection Agency

Used in these records

About this file

File size
287 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

08_0252 - Referral Agency Response - EPA [As Published].pdf · 287 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.