Original source · versioned page text
2018-07-10 P&E Agenda Attachment 1 to Item 8 - Draft Noosa River Plan
The original of this document is very large (11.3 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawnThe most affected vegetation groups in these areas are anticipated to be mangrove and saltmarshes,
followed by paperbark woodlands. In addition, rainforests, wetlands and heath communities would be
significantly susceptible to saline incursion and storm tide inundation – refer Table 4 below.
Broad Vegetation Groups (BVGs) Area at risk from sea level rise % of total area of this
(ha) vegetation type
Rainforest/scrubs 8 0%
Wet Eucalypt 37 0%
Eucalypt woodland 498 4%
Eucalypt woodland on floodplains 36 4%
Paperbark woodlands 2,973 41%
Heaths and other coastal communities 580 10%
T
Wetlands 42 18%
F
Mangroves and Saltmarsh 418 98%
TOTAL 4,592
A
Table 4. Vegetation vulnerability to sea level rise (Noosa Biodiversity Assessment Report, 2017)
R
Low risk climate change adaption in catchment management
It is Council’s intention to adopt an ecosystem-based approach in preparing the Noosa River catchment for
D
the impacts of climate change.
Important findings by Lukasiewicz, Finalyson and Pittock, 2013 recognised many existing catchment
management activities represent an ecosystem-based approach to climate change adaptation but are usually
undertaken in response to existing pressures with their climate change adaptation potential not considered.
Six (6) catchment management actions were identified as the lowest risks and highest benefits under a
variety of climate change scenarios. These include:
• Restoration of riparian vegetation.
• Management of weed and pest species.
• Freshwater habitat connectivity.
• Conservation of more resilient habitats.
• Conservation of gaining reaches.
• Geomorphic restoration (Lukasiewicz et al, 2013).
Resilient habitats refer to the capacity of an ecosystem to
respond to a disturbance by resisting damage and recovering
quickly without changing or losing function or services. A
‘gaining stream’ is where groundwater flows into a river
channel from a local aquifer and increases water volume farther downstream. ‘Geomorphic restoration’
relates to restoring the processes which form landscapes (Lukasiewicz et al, 2013).
Other low-risk, high-benefit adaptation options for consideration include water management throughout the
catchment. These include scenarios that intervene in the water or flow regime of a wetland or river such as
farm dam management, groundwater water extractions and waste water treatment (Lukasiewicz et al, 2013).
This is an important focus for the Noosa River Wetlands and Lake Weyba, which constitutes a groundwater-
fed connected system.
All these approaches demonstrate best practice and aim to maximise and optimise the river catchment’s
natural values and ecosystems services (Lukasiewicz et al, 2013).
Page 48 l Noosa River Plan
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.