07/2521 - MCU - Detached House [As Published] · 132007.2521

Page 2

 

Our Reference: 00895 LO3 ZL

 

martoo

December 4, 2007 consu Iting a
pty Itd

town planners +

urban designers
Chief Executive Officer
Noosa Shire Council
P.O. Box 141
Tewantin Q 4565

ATTENTION: ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT

Dear Sir/Madam

«
RE: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE AND BUILDING
WORKS ASSESSABLE AGAINST THE PLANNING SCHEME - DETACHED HOUSE
OVER LOT 4 ON RP107639, LOCATED AT 26 MCANALLY DRIVE, SUNSHINE BEACH:
OR. S RACKEMANN

Please find enclosed a development application for the above proposal which has been prepared in
accordance with the Integrated Planning Act 1997 and lodged with your Council as the Assessment
Manager of this application.

The attached development application includes:

a letter of landowners consent to the application;
six (6) copies of the Proposal Report and associated proposal plans; :
a completed IDAS application Form 1 Parts A, D, E and Assessment Checklist; and

a cheque for $650.00 which is understood to be Council's application fee as the
Assessment Manager.

e@ Please contact our Noosa office if you require any further information and/or clarification.

Yours faithfully

8

  
      

  

   

Zana Larikka
Town Planning Intern
Martoo Consulting Pty Ltd
Enc (10) -A DEC 2007
OUNGL
QOSA SHIRE C
" FRONT COUNTER
SUNSHINE COAST OFFICE GYMPIE OFFICE
.—1199 GYMPIE TERRACE NOOSAVILLE - PO BOX 1684 NOOSAHEADS Q 4567 1/28 REEF STREET GYMPIE - PO BOX 391 GYMPIE Q 4570
TELEPHONE 07 54555425 - FACSIMILE 07 54555725 -°— TELEPHONE 0754827440 - FACSIMILE 07 54824952~ --—  —-. -

[email protected] [email protected]
2

Page 3

 

 

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997
an a ah

Part A, Version 3.0, 3 September 2007

 
  

velopment Application

Part A

Common details

 
 

 

 

Identification of the premises the subject of the application. ‘ |

1. Can any part of the premises be identified by a street address or lot on plan description?
(Z] No - Answer Qi{a)
Yes - Complete Table B and answer Q1(b) and Q1(c)

Table B

 

} Ye i Lot.on plan description
, Unit |) Street ; Officialsuburb |-. Post (place each description in'a separate sow) « x
number | number Strestname Nocalityname | code | ~ Lot Plan type Plan Local government area

? number (e.g. RP, SP) number

 

 

 

 

 

26 McAnally Drive Sunshine Beach 4567 4 RP 107639 Noosa

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14(b). Can the address be further described by shop/tenancy number or storey/level?

&) No

LJ Yes - Complete Table C

4(c). _ Is any part of the premises strategic port land under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994?
— No

(1 Yes - Complete Table O

2. Can the premises best be identified by coordinates (e.g. for development proposed in waters, or on a site within a large rural tot)?

e@ EX] No

(] Yes - Complete Table E

3. Are the premises within or adjacent to a water body or watercourse?
No
(J Yes - Complete Table F and answer Q3(a)

4. What is the total area of land that makes up the premises (ie. the area covered by the application)?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Area of land above high water mark/outside watercourse a Area in a water body or watercourse, .°:,
653.00 (Km? [_Jhectares (Tick applicable unit) | 0.00 []m? [hectares (Tick applicable unit)
|Existing use of the premises. - . <a . |

 

5. Are the premises currently used for any purpose?
(J No

Yes - Ensure details of any existing use of the premises are provided in plans and documentation submitted with this application, e.g. location
and nature of existing uses, buildings, structures and services

Page 4

a

ue

 

 

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 Part A, Version 3.0, 3 September 2007
6. Are there any existing easements on the premises (eg. for vehicular access, electricity, avertand flow)?
No

Yes - Complete Table H and ensure the location and dimensions of each easement are included in plans, submitted with the application

 

[Proposal details : ve ae
7. Are new uses proposed on the premises?

No
(D Yes - Provide details in Table!

8. Are new buildings or structures proposed to be erected on the premises?
[No

& Yes - Ensure the nature, location and dimensions of the proposed new buildings, structures or services are included in plans, submitted with the
application

 

[Applicant details . ]
9. Whois the applicant for the application?

 

 

Company/organisation name

(if applicable) Or S Rackemann (landowner)

 

 

 

 

Individual’ contact person details

Postal address [p.o Box 1684, Noosa Heads Q 4567

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contact telephone number [54 555 425

 

 

 

 

 

|
|
Facsimile number [54 555 725 _ |

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mobile phone number [n/a
e-mail address {[[email protected] |
{Owner's consent and resource entitlement . |

 

10. Does the application involve a State-owned resource prescribed by schedule 10 of the integrated Planning Regulation 1998 (IP Reg) or
any other regulation?

No
oO Yes - Complete a new Table J for each State-owned resource and submit, with the application evidence of resource allocation or entitlement

11, Does the application involve land other than State-owned land (i.e. privately owned land) and require owner's consent?
[No

Xl Yes - Complete Table K and submit, with the application, written documentation of all owner's consent

Table K

 

““Ownernamels.. | Street address or-lot on plan description .. Date written consen te
wig uaa w - was obtained"

1 Stephen Charles Rackemann Lot 4 RP107639 . 22/11/2007

Sat

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 5

w

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 Part A, Version 3.0, 3 September 2007

A

 

|Mandatory attachments and Supporting information. |

12. What are the other parts of IDAS Application Form 1 submitted with this application, and the other mandatory attachments and
supporting information accompanying this application, not identified in those other form parts?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

k len Par ofFam ones onsen. ewe of 1 (e.g. Cone Sahar ae eet Date Metin of ten a
fesource allocation/entitlement, plans, drawings, reports} Report) . .
1 Part D 04-Dec-2007 | over the counter
2 | Parte 04-Dec-2007 | over the counter
3 Landowners Consent 22-Nov-2007 | over the counter
4 Cover Letter , 04-Dec-2007 | over the counter
§ Survey Plan 07-Nov-2007 | over the counter
6 Proposal Plans 22-Nov-2007 | over the counter
7 Assessment Checklist 04-Dec-2007 | over the counter
@ [Portable Long Service Leave (PLSL) levy for building and construction work |

 

13. 1s payment of a Portable Long Service Leave (PLSL) levy required for building and construction work before a development permit for
the application can be given? .

No
LC] Yes

13(a). Indicate the reason PLSL is not applicable

&]_ The application is not for building and construction work under the Building and Construction Industry (Portable Long
Service Leave) Act 1991, section 3AA (e.g. the application is only for a change of use or for the following types of work carried
out solely for farming purposes: land clearing, site preparation, earthworks, fences, fodder harvesting, clearing of encroaching
vegetation, clearing of regrowth, thinning vegetation or controlling weeds or pests); OF

(1 Allcosts, that relate to the work both directly and indirectly, are less than $80,000, inclusive of GST; or

C1 The work is being carried out under an owner-builder permit issued under the Queensland Building Services Authority
Act 1991- Complete and submit a QLeave Notification and Payment Form (no payment required if owner-builder permit number
stated). The receipted form must be sighted by the assessment manager before a development permit can be given

 

@ OFFICE USE ONLY

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date Received (elo Reference Numbers o7 / 252} |

 

| FOR COMPLETION BY ASSESSMENT MANAGER ; |

Is a QLeave Notification and Payment Form required for this application?

(No

LD Yes - Complete Table M

 

{ : NOTIFICATION OF ENGAGEMENT OF PRIVATE CERTIFIER ™ |

 

 

To Council

 

 

| have been engaged as the private certifier for the building work referred to in this application

Date of
, engagement

 

Accreditation number Name _ . BSA Certification number Building classification

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 6

22. Wov, 2007 12:16 — MARTOO CONSULTING No. 0844 PD

he

ve

22.1.1{12007

Chief Executive Officer
Noosa Shire Council
P.O Box 141
TEWANTIN Q 4585

Dear Sir/Madam

RE: | LAND OWNERS CONSENT FOR A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION SEEKING A

DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR BUILDING WORKS ASSESSABLE AGAINST

@ THE PLANNING SCHEME - DETACHED HOUSE OVER LOT 4 ON RP107639,
LOCATED AT 26 MCANALLY DRIVE, SUNSHINE BEACH,

As the landowner of Lot 4 on RP107639, fronting McAnally Drive, Sunshine Beach, ! consent to the
making of the above development application seeking a development permit for building works
assessable against the planning scheme for a detached house,

Yours fajtffally

a
wa Hiniunnaninns DE Stephen Charles Rackemann ABN:

 

Page 7

 

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1897 Part D, Versicn 3.0, 3 September 2007

727 a

e Vevelooment Applicatio Ore

Part D

Material change of use assessable against a planning scheme

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Planning scheme identification = an : : - me Bw |
1. How is the premises identified / zoned in the applicable planning scheme? ,
Each lot making up the premises : List of applicable zonelprecincts/areas List of applicable overlays
1 Lot 4 RP107639 Detached House Zone Landslide, Bushfire, Coastal
[Nature of the material change of use (MCU) |
2. Is the application seeking approval for more than one MCU on the premises?

EX] No - Complete Table A
[1 Yes - Complete a new Table A for each proposed MCU

 

Table A

(i) Howis the proposed use defined in the applicable planning scheme? Also provide applicable details of the proposed use.

 

 

f Number of dwelling /] Days and hours-} Number of }
Planning scheme definition Explanation of the proposed use tenancy units of operation | employees |
__ _ @ applicabie) Gf applicable) (f applicable) |
Detached House new residential dwelling . 1 na

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(i) Whatis the nature of the material change of use?
LJ Start of a new use of the premises
IX] A material change in the intensity or scale of the use of the premises - Complete Table A(a)
LL] The re-establishment on the premises of a use that has been abandoned

 

 

Table Aa}
Bt at ee , ~ | Extent of change of intensity and scale (e.g, additional 100 square metres of
Intensity.and scale of the current use for area, 2dtional 2 dveling unis)
single storey dwelling additional floor area/site cover, two storey dwelling

 

 

 

 

(iii) What type of approval is being sought?
{X] Development Permit
(1) Preliminary Approval
(iv) Is there a current Preliminary Approval for this use on the premises?

No
1] Yes - Complete Table A(b)

{v) Does the proposed use involve the reuse of existing buildings on the premises?
No
(1) Yes - Complete Table A(c) and submit, with the application, plans showing the size and location of the buildings to be reused

 

 

 

Page 8

we

 

F

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997

Part D, Version 3.0, 3 September 2007

 

(vi); Does the proposed use involve new building work on the premises?

KK] No

x) No

(viii) Does the proposed use involve new operational work on the premises?

 

(vii) Does the proposed use involve the reuse of other existing works on the premises?

(Yes - Complete Table A(d) and submit, with the application, plans showing the size and location of the proposed new building work

[Yes - Complete Table A(e) and submit, with the application, plans showing the nature and location of the works to be reused

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—] No
Cl sYes - Complete Table A() and submit, with the application, plans showing the nature and location of the proposed new operational
works
(Mandatory Information
3. Confirm that the following mandatory information accompanies this application.
” Confirmation of "
lodgement Method of lodgement
For all applications, : _
(i) Plans showing the nature and location of the proposed use on the premises and a statement about the
intensity and scale of the proposed use (e.g. number of vistors, number of seats, capacity of storage area) [x] Confirmed over the counter
When the application involves reuse of existing buildings —
(ii) Plans showing the size and location of the buildings to be reused L] Confirmed
&X] Not applicable
When the application involves new building work
(iii) Plans showing the size and location of the proposed new building work (1) Confirmed
[X] Not applicable
When the application involves reuse of other existing works :
(iv) Plans showing the nature and location of the works to be reused (1 Confirmed
(X) Not applicable
When the application involves new operational work .
(v) Plans showing the nature and location of the proposed new operational works (1) Confirmed
EX] Not applicable

 

 

 

 

 

OFFICE USE ONLY

 

 

 

 

Date received Reference numbers

 

 

 

 

Page 9

r

wT

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997
Tk

Part E, Version 3:0, 3 September 2007

     
 
 
 

Form 1 Development Application

Part E

Building &/or operational works assessable against a planning scheme

1, Is the application seeking approval of building work assessable against the local goverment planning scheme?
(No
Yes
{(a) If yes, is the application seeking approval for more than one type of building work?
No - Complete Table A
(J Yes - Complete a new Table A for each type of building work

 

Table A

(i) What aspect of the building work is made assessable by the planning scheme (e.g. building height greater than 8.5m, building work
on high landslip risk area)?

 

setback less than 1.5m on ground level and less than 2m over 4.5 in height

 

 

 

(ii) Are the works subsequent to a previous Development Permit or Preliminary Approval for another aspect of development?
Bd No

[1 Yes - Complete Table A(a)

 

 

 

2. Is the application seeking approval of operational work assessable against a planning scheme?

XX] No
OD Yes

Mandatory Information

 

3. Confirm that the following mandatory information accompanies this application

 

Confirmation of J | =—————<.o— ame
16 | Method of lodgement,

Plans showing the nature and location of the proposed works (including the extent of any cut and fil} & Confirmed —_| mail

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OFFICE USE ONLY

 

 

 

Date Received Reference Numbers

 

 

 

 

Page 10

 

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.0, 3 September 2007

IDAS

Assessment Checklist

       
 

 

ei

 

PiDAS Application Form:

pnowering | the following questions will assist you in in determining which sections of the checklist must be completed for your application.
If unsure, phone or visit your local governm ent or log on to the IPA website for help.

 

Does the application seek approval to materially change use of the premises? .

 

ifyes - complete Section 2 of this checklist [2] Yes |CJNo
Does the application seek approval to reconfigure a lot? .
ff yes - complete Section 3 of this checklist and Part F of IDAS Application Form 1 Yes |(-]No

Assessment is by the local government

Does the application seek approval to carry out operational work?
if yes - complete Section 4 of this checklist . (Yes |{e)No

 

 

Does the application seek approval to carry out building work requiring assessment against the Fisheries Act 1994?
ifyes - complete Section 5 of this checklist

Does the application seek approval to carry out building work requiring assessment against a local government planning
scheme?

if yes - complete Part E of IDAS Application Form 1 C1 Yes jf]No
Assessment is by the local government

DYes |[-]No

 

 

Does the application seek approval to carry out building work requiring assessment against the Building Act 1975?
if yes - go to Appendix 1 of this checklist for advice on building referrals, Complete Part B of {DAS Application Form 1 0 Yes |[e]No
Assessment is by a building certifier

 

 

 

 

 

 

      
  
  

 

       

i Of thé IDAS ASséssrtiont. Checklist

 

 

eee a <= ST
SECTION 4 Section 4 must be coinpieted {oral Spplcatons that tequite Somnplatia
HERITAGE) Gay aa. chen toa oe

    

14 Is any part of the proposal intended to be carried out on a registered place under the Queensland Heritage Act 1992?

[fe] No
CI) Yes

« IPA, schedule 8, part 1, fable 5, tern 2
JP Regulation, schedule 2. table 2. tem 18
IPA, section 1 3.5 (Definitions for terms used in development}

 

  
 

[REMOVING QUARRY MATERIAL; WILD RIVERAREA.

1.2 Does the proposal involve removing quarry material from a watercourse or lake as defined under the Water Act 20007
[e] No
[ Yes

Page 11

 

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.0, 3 September 2007
IPA, scheduie , part 1, table 5, item 1

 
   
  

iP Regul

 

 

 

Water Act 26 oth
Wad Rivers Act 2605,
|ENVIRONMENTALLY RELEVANT ACTIVITY; WILD RIVER AREA. we tc he ie . See
13 Does the proposal involve an environmentally relevant activity (ERA), other than a mining activity or a petroleum activity?
[=] No .
LC] Yes

IPA, schedule 2, part 1, fable 2, tent f
IPA. schedule 8. part 1. tabla 5. tems 3
iP Regulation. schedule 2, table 2, dems 7 and 23

Environmentat Protection Act 1994. seciion 73A4 (wild river area)
Wid Rivers Act 2005, section 43A

 
  

 

    

 

 

 

WITHIN THE LIMITSOFAPORT = Zo oe ae ~
14 Is any part of the premises within the limits of a port under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994?
[e] No
(Yes
IP Regulation, scheduta 2, tabie 2, dems 15 and 16
(DECLARED FISHHABITATAREA Se “ed
1.5 Does any part of the premises adjoin a declared fish habitat area under the Fisheries Act 1994?

[e] No

O Yes - if answers to questions in other sections of this checklist indicate that the proposed development is assessable under IPA,
schedule 8, this application requires assessment by the Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries (DPI&F). If DPI&F is not
the Assessment Manager for the application, the agency has iursciction as Advice Agency.

IP Reguialion, schedule 2, table 2, tem 26

 

(COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE " ° ~ ee

 

1.6 Is any part of the premises designated for community infrastructure?

[2] No
( Yes

JP Regulation. schedule 2. table 2. item 7

 

 

WASTEWATERMANAGENENT

     

17 Does the proposal involve the establishment or expansion of a waste water disposal system?

[2] No
CI Yes

JP Regulation, schedule 2. table 3, tem §

 

 

 

 

 

[PLANNING SCHEME, iii Hi ioe . es l
2.1 Is the proposed use assessable under the planning scheme?

oO No - (Go to Question 2.2) :
[e] Yes - (Complete Part D of IDAS Application Form 1 and answer Questions 2.1.1 - 2.1.14 below)

If yes, does the application request that the proposal be assessed against a superseded planning scheme?
(] Yes- (Compiete Attachment 1)

[2] No

Page 12

 

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.0, 3 September 2007
ISTATE-CONTROLLED ROAD _ : yi cs sin eas eed
2.4.1 Is any part of the premises within 100m of a State-controlled road, or part of a future State-controlled road?

CO) Yes
[2] No
If no, is the proposed use listed in sched ule § of the integrated Planning Regulation 1998 and does it exceed the specified
threshold?
O Yes - This application must be referred to the Department of Main Roads (DMR) as Concurrence Agency.
[e] No
IP Regutation, schedule 2. table 3. tems 1(@) and 3

‘ACID SULFATE SOIL:

2.1.2 Is the use proposed in a local aI government area isted?| in State “Planning Policy 2/02: Planning ‘and Managing Development
Involving Acid Sulfate Soils?

{*] No
{] Yes

2 aurukun, Bowen, Brisbane, Broadsound, Bundaberg, Burdekin, Burke, Bumett, Caboolture, Caims, Calliope, Caloundra, Cardwell, Carpentaria, Cook, Cooloola, Douglas,
Fitzroy, Gladstone, Gold Coast, Hervey Bay, Hinchinbrook, Isis, Johnstone, Livingstone, Logan, Mackay, Maroochy, Maryborough, Mirium Vale, Momington, Noosa, Pine
Rivers, Redcliffe, Redland, Rockhampton, Sarina, Thuringowa, Tiaro, Torres, Townsville, Whitsunday

  

 

IP Regulation, schedule 2, lable 3. tam 4
State Planning Policy 2/02: Planning and Managing Development involving Acid Sulfate Soils, section 3.6

 

 

‘COASTAL MANAGEMENT DISTRICT “* "8G HB00 Sa ee cee
2.1.3 Does the proposed use involve the following?
¢ Carrying out operational work , completely or partly in a coastal management district f=] No CO Yes

© Carrying out building work, completely or partly ina coastal management district, that is the (=) No (Yes
construction of new premises with a gross floor area (GFA) of at least 1,000m?

Carrying out building work, completely or partly in a coastal management district, thatisthe [2] No Yes
enlargement of the GFA of existing premises by more than 1,000m?

 

if yes to any one - this application must be referred to EPA as Concurrence Agency.
IP Regulatton. schedule 2. lable 2, item &

 

  

 

. 5 oY OORT ne je he gs
[VEGETATION CLEARING i % |
2.1.4 Do the premises include a lot containing the following?
¢ Acategory 1, 2 or 3 area shown on a Property Map of Assessable Vegetation (PMAV) (2) No Yes
¢  Ifthere is no PMAV for a lot, remnant vegetation : f) No [Yes

IP Regutation, schedule 2, fable 3, item 11

{CONTAMINATED LAND - UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE * eee a

2.1.5 Is any part of the premises in an area for which an area management advice has been given for unexploded ordnance?
LI Yes- ‘Complete Part N) This application must be referred to the Administering Authority as Concurrence Agency.
{e] No
JP Requiation, schedule 2, table 3. item 12
iPUBLIC PASSENGER TRANSPORT ~ i . : : or
2.1.6 Is the proposed use listed in schedule 13C of the 3 integrated Pianning Regulation 1998 and does it exceed the he speci ied threshold?
C1 Yes - This application must be referred fo Queensland Transport (QT) as Concurrence Agency.

[e] No

IP Regulation, schedule 2, {abi
iRAILWAY SAFETY AND'EFFICIENCY —

2.1.7 Is the proposed use listed in schedule 13D of the integra Pranning Regulation 1 998 and does it exceed the 2 spout ied threshold?
oO Yes - This application must be referred to Queensland Transport (QT) as Concurrence Agency.

[e] No

IP Regulation, schedule 2. table 3. tem 75

 

 

 

 

 

) itgin 14

 

 

 

Page 13

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997

 

IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.0, 3 September 2007

 

 
  

 

 

IKOALA CONSERVATION ven .

2.1.8 Is any part of the premises in a koala conservation area or koala sustainability area?
[e] No
0 Yes

If Regulahon, schedule 2, fable 3, dem 18

    

'EASEMENTS AND SUBSTATIONS -

   

2.1.9 Is the use associated with reconfiguring a lot?

( Yes

[e] No - Answer both (a) and (b) below

(a) Will any part of any structure or work that is the natural and ordinary consequence of the use, be located in an
easement?

[2] No

( Yes - Answer both (i) and (ii) below

(b) 1s any part of the premises situated within 100m of a substation site under the Electricity Act 1994?
[2] No .
oO Yes - This application must be referred to the entity responsible for the substation as Advice Agency.
iP Reg \gulaticn. schedule 2, fable 2, item 8 (electricity easement)

n, schedule 2, table 3, tem 16 (pipeline easement}
ladon. schédule 2, fable 3 item 9 (substation)

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.1.10 Is any part of the premises in a wild river area declared under the Wild Rivers Act 2005?
[e] No
CO Yes
IP Reguiation. schedule 1, part 2, table §, item {fa} .
Wild Rivers code (Nola: the code does rot currently contain applicable provisions fur residential. industria! or commercial development inside a designated urban
area)

WETLAND © 8 oe Be go Pe Ghee Pe Fee ee

2.1.11 Is the proposal only for the construction or use of a single residence on a lot and any reasonably associated building or structure?
[e] Yes
(] No

JP Requiation, scheduia 2. table 3. tem 20
(HERITAGE, ss.

2.1.12

oa wi ;

Do the premises include a lot sharing a common boundary with a protected area or régistered place under the Queensland
Heritage Act 1992?

[2] No

(]_ Yes - This application must be referred to the Queensland Heritage Council {QHC) as Advice Agency.
IP Regulation. schedule 2. lable 3. tem 22

ICERTAIN PRELIMINARY APPROVALS

   

2.1.13 Is preliminary approval sought for the application under the IPA, section 3.1.6?
[+] No

oO Yes - (Complete Attachment 2) This application must be referred to the Department of Local Government, Planning, Sport and Recreation
(DLGPSR) as Advice Agency.

IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 3. em 23

Page 14

 

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.0, 3 September 2007

 

    

 

 

 

 

    

 

[BROTHEL,.. . en oe ee or
2.2 ls the proposed use a brothel as defined under the Prostitution Act 1999?
[e] No
( Yes
IPA, schodute 8. part 1. table 2. item 2
Presiitution Act 1999, section 64.
:STRATEGIC PORT LAND ; Wigoee <&: Sig ene
23 ls any part of the use proposed on Strategic Port Land under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994?
[e] No :
CI Yes

 
 

ule 8. part 1. fable 2. iter 3
jation, schedule 2, table 2, item 6

 

      

 

[MAJOR HAZARD FACILITY * Ba Boy ye . Wet

24 \s the proposed use a major hazard facility or possible major hazard facility under the Dangerous Goods Safety Management Act
2001?
[e] No

(Yes - (Complete Part L) This application requires assessment ty the Department of Emergency Services (DES). If DES is not the
Assessment Manager for the application, the agency has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency.

IPA, schedule 8 part 1, table 2. item 4
JP Regulation, schedule 2, table 2, ten: ?

(CONTAMINATED LAND - REGISTERED LAND

25 Is any part of the land forming the premises on the Environmental Management Register or Contaminated Land Register under the
Environmental Protection Act 1994?

[e] No
CO Yes

IPA, schedule & part 1, (able 2, item §
IP Raquiation, scheduta 2, table 2, lem 22

 

 

CONTAMINATED LAND - NOTIFIABLE ACTWITY PRE 2s

   

 

Se AR ee FR A we Beg,
2.6 is any part of the land forming the premises currently used for a notifiable activity, or if there is no existing use was it last used for
a notifiable activity?
[2] No
(1 Yes
IPA, & part 1. taba 2. item 6

 

JP Regulation. schedure 2, table 2, item 22

 

 

 

[CONTAMINATED LAND - INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY, oo. ocx - ~ of . " |
27 Is any part of the premises currently used for an industrial activity ‘other than for a mining activity or + petroleum activity), or if there
is no existing use was it last used for an industrial activity (other than for a mining activity or petroleum activity)?
[e] No
Lo. Yes

IPA, schedule 8, part 1, table 2, item 6
IP Regulation, schedule 2. table 2. item 22

 

(CONTAMINATED LAND - AREA MANAGEMENT ADVICE (NATURAL MINERALISATION OR INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY) 33

 

 

iB
28 \s any part of the premises in an area for which an area management advice has been given for natural mineralisation or industrial
activity (other than for a mining activity or petroleum activity)?
[e} No
( Yes

IPA, schedule 8. part 1. table 2. tem 7
IP Regutation. schedule 2, table 2. item 22

Page 15

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.0, 3 September 2007
(AQUACULTURE; WILD RIVER AREAS

29 Is the proposed use for aquaculture as defined under the Fisheries Act 1994?

[e] No
CI Yes

IPA, scheduia &. par 1, table 2. tem 8

JPA, schediute 8, part 2, table 2, tem t {self-assessable aquaculture)
IP Reguitati edule 2, table 2. item 27

Fisierios Act 1994, section 76DA fwild river area}

Wild Rivers Act 2005. section AA

 

 

 

 

 

‘AGRICULTURAL AND ANIMAL HUSBANDRY ACTIVITIES IN A WILD RIVER AREA

 

2.10 Is any part of the premises in a wild river area declared under the Wild Rivers Act 2005?

[e] No
[] Yes

IPA. scheduie 8, part 1, table 2, len: 17
IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 2. item 36
. Wid Rivers Act 2005. sections 42. 43A
[SEQREGIONAL PLAN 2. % ok ee

2.11 ls any part of the premises within the South East Queensland 5 (SEQ) Regional Plan area?

 

 

es eae

     

(1) No
{e} Yes
If yes, are the premises within one or more of the following areas?
© A Major Development Area in the Urban Footprint (.}No [) Yes - (Answer (a) to (c) below)
e The Regional Landscape and Rural Production Area (JNo [ Yes - (Answer (d) below)
e The Rural Living Area (_)No [) Yes - (Answer (e) below)
© The Investigation Area No Yes - (Answer (f} and (g) below)

SEQ Regional Plan 2005-2026, Amendment 1, Regulatory Provisions, division 2
IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 3, item 13
IPA, section 2.5A 12 (3)

 

 

‘CONSERVATIONESTATE . ns oo ™ a a "]
2.12 ls the proposal for urban purposes, as defined under the IPA?

[2] No

(C Yes

IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 2. item 40

 

 

REMOVAL, DESTRUCTION OR DAMAGE OF A MARINE PLANT - this question oly on for of applications not also

carry out operational work.” ‘ SSF Gatwke

 

  

 

 

2.13 Does the proposed use involve the removal, destruction or damage of marine plants under the Fisheries Act 1994?

{2} No
[Yes

PA, section 3 2.24

IPA, schedule 8, part 1, iable 4, item 8 (assessable davelopinent)
IPA. schedule 8. part 2. fable 4, item 4 (self-assessable development}
JP Regulation. schedule 2, fable
iP Regulation, schedule 7. part 3, table 4. item 8
Fisheries Act 1994. section 76DA (wild river area}
Wild Rivers Act 2065, section 43A

 

   

  

Page 16

 

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.0, 3 September 2007

 

Disclaimer:

While the Department of Local Government, Planning, Sport and Recreation (DLGPSR) believes that this information contained on this
form and provided as part of this process will be of assistance to you, it is provided on the basis that you will not rely on the information
without first making your own enquiries regarding the interpretation and application of the applicable legislation to your circumstances.

To the full extent permitted by law DLGPSR expressly disclaims all liability (including but not limited to liability for negligence) for errors
or omissions of any kind or for any loss (including direct and indirect losses), damage or other consequence which may arise from your
reliance on this process and the information contained.on this form

 

 

 

 

Proposal ID

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 17

 

Our Reference: 00895 L02 ZC

 

martoo

December 4, 2007 consulting a
pty ltd
town planners +
Chief Executive Officer urban designers
Noosa Shire Council
P.O. Box 141 -

TEWANTIN Q 4565
Attention: Planning and Development Section
Dear Sir/Madam

RE: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE AND BUILDING
WORKS ASSESSABLE AGAINST THE PLANNING SCHEME - DETACHED HOUSE
OVER LOT 4 ON RP107639, LOCATED AT 26 MCANALLY DRIVE, SUNSHINE BEACH:
DR. S RACKEMANN

Martoo Consulting has been engaged by Or. S Rackemann, as the applicant for the above proposal to
submit a development application to Noosa Shire Council. This application seeks approval for
relaxation of setback requirements for a new Detached House proposed to be located at Lot 4
RP107639, 26 McAnally Drive, Sunshine Beach.

This letter details the proposal and provides an assessment of the development against the relevant
code provisions contained within The Noosa Plan.
1. THE SUBJECT SITE

The subject site comprises a site which contains an existing detached house and has an area of 653m?
@ The site is located on a site fronting McAnally Drive, Sunshine Beach as shown below.

The site slopes away from the road and enjoys spectacular views of the ocean from Noosa National Park
fo Coolum Mountain and beyond.

The subject site is included in the Detached House Zone under The Noosa Plan, and the Landslide,
Bushfire end-GeastetPretection overlays are applicable.

 

SUNSHINE COAST OFFICE GYMPIE OFFICE
14199 GYMPIE TERRACE NOOSAVILLE - PO BOX 1684 NOOSAHEADS Q 4567 = 1/28 REEF STREET GYMPIE - PO BOX 391 GYMPIE Q 4570
TELEPHONE 07 54555425 - FACSIMILE 07 54555725 TELEPHONE 07 54827440 - FACSIMILE 07 54824952

[email protected] [email protected]

Page 18

 

Page-2

2. THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION

This application seeks a relaxation for a siting variation for the proposed new Detached House at 26
McAnally Drive, Sunshine Beach

The following setbacks are proposed for the upper ground floor (entrance level):

Northern side boundary: minimum 1.34 metres (less than 1.5 metres) and average
of 1.93 metres;

Eastern rear boundary: minimum 6 metres;
Southern side boundary: minimum 1.7 metres; and,
Western frontage: minimum 6.15 metres.

The following setbacks are proposed for the first floor (over 4.5 metres in height):

Northern side boundary: minimum 1.66 metres (less than 2 metres);
Southern side boundary: minimum 2 metres.

Proposal plans are included in Attachment 1.

In support of these proposed relaxations the following points are provided for consideration:

The proposed design incorporates a total site coverage which is consistent with the
requirements of the Noosa Plan;

The site is constrained in that it slopes away from the road, has a cross fall to the
north, and has an angled northern boundary;

The proposed set backs are well within the limits of the standard requirements of
the Building Code of Australia; :

The dwelling house has been sited and designed to maximise the easterly views
and northerly aspect to living areas;

All windows are located on walls which comply with the minimum requirements for
dwelling setbacks in this locality;

The siting and design of the dwelling maintains internal privacy for residents and the
amenity of adjoining dwellings;

The proposed relaxation is only requested for one small area of the north-western
corner of the building;

Existing on-site vegetation and proposed additional landscaping will conceal the
north-western corner of the building, where the setback relaxation is proposed;

Surrounding residential development has a similar bulk and built form to that
proposed; and,

The proposed design provides articulated elevations and a stepped layout,
improving the visual relationship between the dwelling, streetscape and natural
environment.

It is noted that the proposed design incorporates a total of three levels; however, these levels are stepped
down the site in respect to the natural ground level such that the building appears to have only two storeys
from the street frontage. The proposed design has a total height less than 8 metres above natural ground
level in any one location.

An assessment against the relevant parts of the Detached House Code is provided on the following page:

Page 19

 

 

 

 

 

Page-3 3
t
‘
Column Column 2
ES sree Ole erent, acest)
Siting
Setbacks

 

01 Buildings and other structures
are appropriately designed and sited to

a} provide amenity for users of the
premises as well as preserve the
visual and acoustic privacy of
adjoining and nearby land uses;

b) preserve any existing vegetation
that will buffer the proposed
building from adjoining uses;

¢) allow for landscaping to be
provided between buildings; and

d) maintain the visual continuity and
pattem of buildings and landscape
elements within the street.

SBR altemative provision to QDC Parts
11 and 12, P1, P2 and P7

$1.1 The minimum setback of the
Detached house and associated
buildings and structures from boundaries
is not less than the minimum specified in
Schedule 1; or

$1.2 Where there is a conflict between
boundary setbacks in Schedule 1, the
greater of the setbacks prevails;

AND

$1.3 If there are no applicable setbacks
shown in Schedule 1, the siting provisions
of Part 11 or 12 of the Queensland
Development Code apply.

SB8R alternative provision to QDC Parts
11 and 12, Al, A2 and A7

Complies — The proposed design:

* preserves the visual and acoustic.
Privacy of adjoining and nearby
land uses by situating living and
entertaining areas an appropriate
distance fram common
boundaries;

* preserves a substantial amount of
existing vegetation within the
frontage of the site to conceal the
location of the reduced setback
along the northem boundary,

* allows for additional landscaping
to be provided within the frontage
and along ail boundaries; and,

¢ is consistent with the character of
the existing streetscape.

 

Buitt form

 

 

Site cover

Q8 The site cover of buildings and

other roofed structures -

a) Is of a scale that is compatible with
surrounding development;

b) does not present an appearance of
bulk to adjacent properties, roads

or other areas in the vicinity of the

site;

¢) maximises the retention of existing
vegetation and allows for
additional soft landscaping
between buildings;

d) allows for adequate area at ground
level for outdoor recreation,
entertainment, clothes drying and
other site facilities; and

e) facilitates on-site stormwater
management and vehicular
access.

SBR alternative provision to QDC Parts
11 and 12, P3

 

 

$8.1 With the exception of Ancillary
Dwelling Units, the site cover of class 1
and class 10 buildings and other roofed
structures does not exceed 50% for a
single storey buikding and 40% for a
building of 2 or more storeys

SBR atternative provision to QDC Parts
11 and 12, A3

AND

$8.2 Ifin the Eastem Beaches,
Noosaville, Noosa Heads or Noosa North
Shore Locality and in the Detached
Housing or Semiattached Housing Zone-
Soft landscaping is provided and retained
over a minimum of 20% of site area.

 

Complies — The proposed Detached
House has a site cover of 39.7% on the
ground level and a total site cover of
less than 80% including all levels.

The building is stepped down the site in
respect of natural ground levels and the
form is considered to be consistent with
Council preferences and the character
of surrounding Detached Houses.

The scale of the proposed design is
compatible with surrounding
development and due to the slope of
the site; the dwelling will not present a
bulky appearance to the road frontage
or adjacent properties.

The design maximises and provides for
the retention of existing vegetation and

allows for additional soft landscaping to
be provided.

The design provides adequate area at
ground level for outdoor recreation, and
entertainment including two covered
pergola areas.

Other essential site facilities such as
clothes drying, rain water collection
tanks and garbage enclosures are also
conveniently provided for at the ground
level.

The proposed design is considered to
facilitate adequate on-site stormwater
management and convenient vehicular
access.

Complies — Soft landscaping Is
provided over a minimum of 24% of the
total site area.

 

 

oe ee

Page 20

 

Page

 

Roof form

012 Roof forns—

a) contribute positively to the local
skyline;

b) complement the low density
character of the locality;

¢) do not present an appearance of
excessive bulk to side neighbours
(eg. avoid low pitched roofs or box
profiles/parapets);

d) use simple traditional roof designs;

$12.1 The main roof of the Detached
house or Ancillary dwelling unit has—
a) a roof pitch no less than—

ifin Kin Kin village or Boreen Point
village - 12 degrees;
otherwise - 5 degrees; and
b) if not in Precinct C or D of Noosa
Springs ~ roof overhangs a

Complies — The main roof of the
proposed Detached House has a roof
Pitch of 18 degrees with eaves a
minimum of 600mm.

 

013 Detached houses and
Ancillary dwelling units are designed
to provide adequate visual privacy for
people using the building and buildings
on adjoining premises.

SBR alternative provision to QDC Parts
11 and 12, PS.

_ minimum of 600mm wide;
e) do not create opportunities for AND
residents to overlook the private | $42.2 Buildings and structures do not
open space areas of neighbouring | include roof top terrace areas.
properties.
Privacy

$13.1 The Queensland Development
Code, Part 11, A5 applies

Complies — The proposed Detached
House has been designed with
consideration for the privacy and
residential amenity of adjoining
premises.

Very few windows are located along
the northem and southern elevations
and these windows will be dressed to
maintain privacy for residents and
adjoining premises.

 

Streetscape character
014 Buildings and structures provide

$14.1 If in the Detached Housing Zone,

Complies - No wail lengths greater

 

017 Detached houses and
anclilary dwelling units provide
opportunity for casual surveillance to
and from the street to protect the
personal safety and security of
residents and visitors.

$17.1 Ifin the Detached Housing, Semi-
attached Housing, Attached Housing or
Village Mix Zone — the main entrance of
the Detached house or Ancillary
dwelling unit is clearly defined and visible
from the street.

for visual amenity by-- for buildings and structures— than 15 metres are proposed. All
a) staggering or separating a) the maximum wail length is 15m; extemal planes incorporate horizontal
continuous walls into smaller and and vertical articulation and other
sections to vary the elevation; and | b) each external wall plane elements to create visual interest.
b) providing well articulated building incorporates at least one design
forms with strong vertical design element to add visual interest and
features. amenity (such as windows,
pergolas, sun shading devices,
balconies or a change of building
material).
Streetscape - Casual surveillance

Complies ~ The main entrance is
Clearly defined and visible from the
street.

 

Garages and carports - other than Kin
Kin or Boreen Point villages

018 Within the Detached Housing,
Semi-Attached Housing, Attached
Housing and Visitor Mixed Use Zones,
garages and carport structures are
designed and sited to visually integrate
with the dwelling unit and avoid

dominating the street by—

a) minimising the width of the
structure;

b) minimising projection of the
structure forward of the main face
of dwelling unit, and

¢) ensuring the roof form, materials
and detailing complement that of
the associated dwelling unit.

 

 

$18.1 Within the Detached Housing,
Semi-Attached Housing, Attached
Housing and Visitor Mixed Use Zones,
garages and carports—
a) have a front boundary setback of
at east 6m; and
b) adopt a roof form and use building
materials that are the same as that
of the building; and
c) if the front elevation is visible from
toad frontages ~
i present a minimum width to
the streetscape (the total
width of garage doors is no
more than 6m or 50% of the
frontage width, whichever is
the lesser, where the structure
faces the street); or
fi for more than a 2 car garage -
additional garages are set
back from the frontage not
less than the width of the
additional garage door.

 

Complies - The proposed garage has
a setback of more than 6 metres from
the frontage, integrates with the form
and materials of the building and the
garage door has a maximum width of 6
metres which is considerably less than
50% of the frontage.

 

 

Page 21

 

Pages

3. CONCLUSION

The development proposal is considered to represent a high quality residential development, which
respects the characteristics of the site, incorporates varying design elements to create visual interest and
allows a significant amount of existing vegetation to be retained within the frontage of the site to maintain
the visual amenity of the streetscape. As such, the proposed: Detached House is considered to integrate
well with the existing character of the Sunshine Beach locality.

This application can be supported on a number of grounds as previously detailed. These grounds include:

» The proposed relaxation for a reduced setback along the northern boundary are
consistent with the siting and form of surrounding development;

+ The proposed design incorporates horizontal and vertical articulation and a stepped
design which reduces the bulk appearance of the building and complies with
requirements for height;

+ The proposed siting maximises the retention of existing vegetation within the
frontage of the site, allows for additional landscaping to be provided and provides
adequate privacy for adjoining residences; and

+ The proposed design is consistent with the style and appearance of adjoining
architecturally designed Detached Housing and incorporates characteristics which
are typical of the Sunshine Beach locality.

The Assessment Manager's favourable consideration of the above development application is therefore
recommended. Please contact our Sunshine Coast office if you require any further information and/or
clarification with respect to the above application.

Yours sincerely
Zana Larikka

Town Planning Intem
Martco Consulting Pty. Ltd.

Page 22

 

Pageé

Attachments

 

Attachment 1 — Proposal Plans

Page 23

 

 

 
  
   
 

AGO NMS ew

eS

tO REIOTESD |. PANE CIE

SHE AGEA = GEG MZ oe
Sire cca = BEG IT B..As82.

 

 

 

 

 

iL. Saimin \\
i Peo \

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

wre |

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HE] 9
Hay ty,
hah o
tik a
fi A Lat
4 | ra
tel the “,
HE 7 i ©

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dy
™ “Y

 

 

  

AM
GRAnoepar erat
. f REMAN

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

tie re a ron mn rt enw

ee

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
  

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

PERO i TAS y a i Te
SR Oh ad PO Ta Se Oe
ghana’.

  
 

 

 

SE Ba So” I C Began BCce cance Rae a
wo, TUPPER GROUND Face “STE PLAN HRORES 6D) NEW HOUSE AT Mo 2Z
MeAMACLY DRIVE VWOOSA FOR.

 

 

 

| :

© Oe oH. fh

0 “pees , BORE ARS) SEVE RACKERMA

, ARCHITECT - DAVID H. DENHAM - 07,553301))
- | ss J, . | SCALE 13100 NOM 2007 Ra /-

 

Page 24

   

   

Re. =
eee 4a a

    
   

 

 

 

 

arte nor

TOWER GROUND Face PUNT EW WOUSE &i Mo Be
| | MentIaua 6 BrRIVe= | FOR
| 7 DES Wiles! SHEVE ACKERMAN

° ARCH ITECT - DAVID H. DENHAAA - 07.55330}})
es te 1 LALE 12100 NOV. 2007 — DRG-2-8

Page 25

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

=

 

 

 

se a lemme, _

= " RROROE) RY WC A wea.

Me ANWAR RIVE WOCRA [FrOlk
DRE AARS 3! SIEVE RACKUROAAATE

. 7 ARCH Tecr ~ DAVID 4. DENHAM - 07,5533011)

QALE 121M NOM, 279077 ror. 27_2..

Page 26

 

|
!
i
i

. _ log 1%
rr Arex g
A ae “ : [02:90 8
wnt fem dee lg Wet he 22 ee neem
fh he fr Wane
"PANS ART
: Sd g
% i \ wp” x
_ 1 /0l-00 0 ogi H N
AND RAIL f Wp
[ Ay 3 /00:00
Eo FPL

F600

 

NGL a
Bolin Oaghy

 

"WEST ELEVATION’

oo ee

~pursnes:— © oO

= PONE HED BOE Be COCR EONO— WIMIDSERAY. "Geen 2
=e Ae Wt SS ~ GeriPEcen- COE OEM PAAR.

Ein, pace: “Taure save“ anp TOE - wit ne:
O.AULZ MW IMARIS | D008 37 AAR SOA, aT
TiC sea o-tTngek = CIEW OO At Stan)
SEALE DLIMAVAMS., PAROS tl PANDO OR TEP

  

    
 
  
   
    
        
   

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

> WFO
me Neigh Ave NGL AT sounenney

AT BOUN CARY,

 

 

 

> MWY HOHE AT 28
Me AMAL DRIVE HOOSA [Folk
ORE MRS SIEVE RACKELEAVATE

ARCHITECT - DAVID H. DENHAAA - O7.553301))
LALE=1 F 1CO NOM 20207) prr-ala |

 

Page 27

 
  
 

i E
4
os,

i ~ S000 UNE AB OVE-N-G.b 7

 

 

   
  
  
 
   
 

; (AI CERI Rea OF SB tet ke

if

| |
B000- LINES “A BOVE NES

™ KS, AT SOUTHERN WA eo,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7
if
op BPH 8 ca ™ ~—

At, 2 . ~

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

XZ B0COLUNE- ABOVE Nak
AT NOR TEEIEM- Bt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ot

_ SOUTH ELEVATION

 

 

 

 

—BoooluNe ate wae [7
NE i

7 1

 

 

 

 

we FACE. —

 

      

 

 

 

 

ee
—

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

= °
a s _
fapd 9; [2eHO
ae
eee. \ He. ey Free Gh '
eel \ LPT = El Er |
A jell ae
\ " aN ves

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

= NL Ata BouMomect: i
em ee

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

cee wy EA
Bee DRIVE WOSSA FOIe
DLS MES STEVE RACK ELOM VANE

ARCHITECT - DAVID H. DENHAM - 07.553301))
GALE 13100, NOM. 2007 DRG 5-8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

vibe oe J

Page 28

 

yy:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sy uy , 3 a
“ an crane aoa aio)" “NR * ee ae os ty
BOS AL “N *. eee So NE
4 = es Oe eS) (AB OLSE WIG-EY
? m i u et ee
H -& : LS”
Tee ' gS | an
a5 0% ¢ q \
—Ge\ (2°? ‘ ° ,Q *
n c id cs aa
\ % ‘ ns ray *.
% > +7: A
" ;

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

aja

 

 

 

 

 

\

\

 

 

 

 

| MEW WOUSE AT Wo 2G

<1

BROROS ED)
[he AMAIKU|
ORS MRS\
ARCH ITEcr -

DRC- 6-3

BRIVE= VOOSA TROIZ

VID H. DENHAAA - 07.553301))
NOM. 20207

DA

DALE. 13100

75014 mae

-CFA=

 

 

 

UPPER GROUND FLOR DIMENSIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 29

 

10700

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ay

MEW HOUSE AT We 26

Fe

FOR

mnt =

ALG AW. OO 77

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SS
SE ee

a Paes SS
!
\
I
{

l

 

 

 

 

 

 

aa 2)

enone
een
vet
deena .
1

 

 

 

 

 

 

RIT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

                 

 

 

 

 

  

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

N

2s00.|.

VN
i
?

[
=

 

 

1/8409.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

pee

i a!
VETTT

|

 

l 20rg

 

 

iff

i
eee

 

ai

77oo

AACIROSED

12 typ

ARCHITECT - DAVID H. DENHAAA - 07,553301}) ©
QnA .

DACAMAULA DRIVE= OOSA
DRE MRS, SIEVE RACKERMAM

 

A = ° 165-344

DIMENSIONS — GI

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GROUND FiooR

 

 

 

Page 30

 

 

 

 

RMOP-O-2a

MID H. DENHAAA - 07,55330)1)
NOM. 20007

DA

SIRVE RACKERMVAN

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MAIK 121°%°

HROKOSED! NEW HOUSE AT Mo 2G
DRIVE VOOSA FOR

ORE MRS!

ARCHITECT -

103-70 m*

 

 

Rel FIR DWMENSINS — GEA ©

 

 

Fi

Page 31

 

Page 7

Attachments

 

Attachment 2 — Survey Plan

Page 32

 

 

 

i

i odnald James Colston Cadastral Surveyor

 

{—

 

 

 

 

 
   

 

DONALD JAMES COLSTON

 

CONTOUR AND DETAIL SURVEY

of
Lot 4 on RPIO7639
Orig Section 5

Town of NOOSA
Parish WEYBA
qeu“w ty March.

Nail i Biturnen \\ Seg
RL 100.00 \&" &R,

  

>

”

3

=

m 39 5
3/Banksias~

0.206H es

   

Site Area ......054

 

 

 

 

 

Banksia ;
0.306H Banksia Ganksia
0.205H 0.205H

~

 

FEL
GARAGE
RL 96.43

 

by

| &
bo

o

 

RP107639

OP FFL “
UPPER LEVEL ! -
DWELLING

2

m

RL 96.65

RP107639

 

3

FFL ,

LOWER LEVEL
DWELLING
RL 93.98

35245
271°29° |

POBox 500

HO Yandina—Coolum Road

enr Yungar Street, Coolum Beach
Queensland 4573

Phone (07) 547171 44

Fax (07) 54717133

Mobile 0407 761369

email [email protected]

DONALD JAMES COLSTON B.apbse—Surv(with Dn)

af nas

5 erent is Pte tet a a ET,

   
   

 

 

 

|
|
|

 

 
   
   
   
 
       

 

chent

STEVE RACKEMANN
c/- GABRIEL POOLE

 

project

PROPOSED DWELLING —

\_ 26 MCANALLY DRIVE, NOOSA

J

 

C

drawing title

CONTOUR and DETAIL PLAN

issue)

Cc

 

 

 

 

scale date
ik : Wed 7 November 2007
i 12200 )
4
)
, [ ofice drawn checked
Mt ajc og dje
17.5.2005 18.85.2005 18.5.2005
§ drawing no. file oO
| McAnallyNatSurtwithoutProfiles.dwg
y \ 2 1049—2 ArchiveDise 30/9 Jf

 

 

14

 

surveyed vertical datum
dje 6.12.0! Arbitrary
fieldbook datum origin
CCO08 7BM

Nail in Bitumen

RL 100.00 ARBITRARY

~\

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

\ contour interval 0.25 metre J
{
\ (revisions
i issue] revision date jouthy
A original issue 18.5.2005
8 | existing terrain ond features only |25 10,2005
C | trees on footpath added 7.2007

 

 

 

 

 

     
  
    
     

3

RPI79371

SCALE 1:

Metres at scale 1: 200

Qo
2
| {

o millimetres

4
i

 

& 16
6

1 | 1 i 1 ~ | 1

40 80

200

2om

 

Page 33

 

 

 

 

SALE OF DOCUMENTS .
Superseded Planning Scheme‘Documentation
Copy of Permit/Approval Letter
The Noosa Plan Documentation

APPLICATION FEES:

Material Ch of Use “Codelimpact ,
Cass Shsisten bs 521

az | =~ LAND USE SECTION FEES
@ NOOSA es

RECEIPT TYPE

§20
110
1141

 

 

 

 

 

Aconsistent §21
- Assessment under Superseded Planning Scheme _ 521
Modification to a Development Permit 521
: Extension of a Currency Period 521
@ Operational Works - Landscaping 521
’ Bldg Work assessable against the Planning Scheme 521
PRE LODGEMENT REVIEW
Half Hour 522 |
One Hour 522
ADVERTISING
Purchase Advertised Applications §23
JETTIES
Jetty Application Fee 524
' Jetty Bond . 51
; (Category 4)
BONDS : ‘
Performance Bond 51
(Category 9)
SIGNS / .
@ Registration Fee 222
SEARCH FEE .
Search of Land Use Section file 112
Liquor Licensing Request 113
Tota. $ 6SO
NAME: Mattoo Car gutpn =e
ADDRESS: (QO. Ben Mose
ee Neogea HEARS 567
FILENO:  -7/. 252+ DATE: | 7 f2/or
- i
RECEIPT NO: 7 2 eS Signature of TP Officer:

 

Z
wz) CoO
AUTHORITY NO: “ ce

13[2e07 [252 | ,

05 Kucera
7

v

Page 34

CALCULATION OF FEES

 

APPLICATION

FEE

TOTAL
FEES

 

MCU - CODE ASSESSMENT
Details of Development

- IConsistent 1.0°
Inconsistent 3.0

FEE CALCULATION ——

 

MCU - IMPACT ASSESSMENT -
Details of Development

Consistent 1.0
‘Inconsistent 3.0

FEE CALCULATION

 

OPERATIONAL WORKS
Details of Development

FEE CALCULATION

 

 

 

 

TOTAL FEES