Council archive · source document
07/2521 - MCU - Detached House [As Published] · 132007.2521
INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.0, 3 September 2007
ISTATE-CONTROLLED ROAD _ : yi cs sin eas eed
2.4.1 Is any part of the premises within 100m of a State-controlled road, or part of a future State-controlled road?
CO) Yes
[2] No
If no, is the proposed use listed in sched ule § of the integrated Planning Regulation 1998 and does it exceed the specified
threshold?
O Yes - This application must be referred to the Department of Main Roads (DMR) as Concurrence Agency.
[e] No
IP Regutation, schedule 2. table 3. tems 1(@) and 3
‘ACID SULFATE SOIL:
2.1.2 Is the use proposed in a local aI government area isted?| in State “Planning Policy 2/02: Planning ‘and Managing Development
Involving Acid Sulfate Soils?
{*] No
{] Yes
2 aurukun, Bowen, Brisbane, Broadsound, Bundaberg, Burdekin, Burke, Bumett, Caboolture, Caims, Calliope, Caloundra, Cardwell, Carpentaria, Cook, Cooloola, Douglas,
Fitzroy, Gladstone, Gold Coast, Hervey Bay, Hinchinbrook, Isis, Johnstone, Livingstone, Logan, Mackay, Maroochy, Maryborough, Mirium Vale, Momington, Noosa, Pine
Rivers, Redcliffe, Redland, Rockhampton, Sarina, Thuringowa, Tiaro, Torres, Townsville, Whitsunday
IP Regulation, schedule 2, lable 3. tam 4
State Planning Policy 2/02: Planning and Managing Development involving Acid Sulfate Soils, section 3.6
‘COASTAL MANAGEMENT DISTRICT “* "8G HB00 Sa ee cee
2.1.3 Does the proposed use involve the following?
¢ Carrying out operational work , completely or partly in a coastal management district f=] No CO Yes
© Carrying out building work, completely or partly ina coastal management district, that is the (=) No (Yes
construction of new premises with a gross floor area (GFA) of at least 1,000m?
Carrying out building work, completely or partly in a coastal management district, thatisthe [2] No Yes
enlargement of the GFA of existing premises by more than 1,000m?
if yes to any one - this application must be referred to EPA as Concurrence Agency.
IP Regulatton. schedule 2. lable 2, item &
. 5 oY OORT ne je he gs
[VEGETATION CLEARING i % |
2.1.4 Do the premises include a lot containing the following?
¢ Acategory 1, 2 or 3 area shown on a Property Map of Assessable Vegetation (PMAV) (2) No Yes
¢ Ifthere is no PMAV for a lot, remnant vegetation : f) No [Yes
IP Regutation, schedule 2, fable 3, item 11
{CONTAMINATED LAND - UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE * eee a
2.1.5 Is any part of the premises in an area for which an area management advice has been given for unexploded ordnance?
LI Yes- ‘Complete Part N) This application must be referred to the Administering Authority as Concurrence Agency.
{e] No
JP Requiation, schedule 2, table 3. item 12
iPUBLIC PASSENGER TRANSPORT ~ i . : : or
2.1.6 Is the proposed use listed in schedule 13C of the 3 integrated Pianning Regulation 1998 and does it exceed the he speci ied threshold?
C1 Yes - This application must be referred fo Queensland Transport (QT) as Concurrence Agency.
[e] No
IP Regulation, schedule 2, {abi
iRAILWAY SAFETY AND'EFFICIENCY —
2.1.7 Is the proposed use listed in schedule 13D of the integra Pranning Regulation 1 998 and does it exceed the 2 spout ied threshold?
oO Yes - This application must be referred to Queensland Transport (QT) as Concurrence Agency.
[e] No
IP Regulation, schedule 2. table 3. tem 75
) itgin 14
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
07/2521 - MCU - Detached House [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.3 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.