Original source · versioned page text
2508-47877 SRA - Attachment 5 - Plans and docs referenced in SARA response
Attached to the e-mail SARA response with conditions - MCU25/0090 and OPW25/0136.
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Original PDF page 1, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
E( O
MH
LEGEND
H)
MH
S 2.4
7
9
11 2.1
E(O
MATCH INTO EXISTING FOOTPATH S 11
S
H)
W
W
S PIT
N MARK DESCRIPTION
SW
PIT
EXISTING CROSSOVER TO BE REMOVED.
SW
S
E(O
5 1
2.3 3 2.0
11
CADASTRAL PARCELS
H
11 .4
REINSTATE WITH B1 TYPE KERB AS PER
)
S
2
11
S 11
3.6
9
S 9
IPWEAQ STD DRG RSD-200 (RS-080)
E( O
2.9
W
<
11 6
PROPOSED BUILDING
W
H)
.4
S 12
<
5
S
1
3.6
< 11
SW
MY
S SW ROADWORKS & CARPARKING
E(O
< 7
3.8
H)
11 3
S 3.8
SW
<
11 3
1.9
S
11
AL
S
<
7
PROPOSED DRIVEWAY/CARPARK
W
6
SW .08 2.2
E(O
.3 .1 5
14 11 11
2 12
W
<
1 1
H)
2
4.0
S 11
LS
<
0SW
9
2.5
PROPOSED CROSSOVER
S
SW
4.3 11
<
S SW
E(O
11 0
112
3.7
11
NEW GENERAL WIDE
H)
<
TR
S
S
PROPOSED NEW KERB
<
W
CROSSOVER TO IPWEAQ
4
S
7 3.5 7
SW 4.5
S
<
1W 11
E( O
2.0
E
1S
W
3
17.6
4.5 4 11
H)
2.8
<
11
S STD DRGS. RSD-102
ET
11
<
8 CCJ CONTROL JOINT
8
2.2
SW
S SW 7
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.
Full text of sections 2 to 4 (of 18)
Section 2
2.1
8 11
E(O
<
1 11
S
4.8
11
H)
S 4.8
2
SJ SLAB CUT JOINT
<
11 1.8
11
1.80
W
1 2
3.6
<
9
S REFUSE AREA 11 3.3 2.8
SW
11 11
EXISTING POWER POLE TO BE
E(O
WS
<
S ELECTRICAL
H)
<
6
S 11
5.2 8
RELOCATED (BY OTHERS)
SWE(
2.0
<
0
11 2.2
SW
UNIT 1
11
POLES
<
OH
S
9
3.2 0
2.0
)
11
S
W
<
11
S 4
113
3.5 9
EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE LID TO BE LOWERED
<
1.7
11
PILLARS
WE(OH)
SW .05
11
S
UNIT 2
<
0 6
6 2.0 2.0
11 11 11
EXSL112.65
<
S
S
1.03
SW
SW
6.00
115
LINE NETWORK HV (OH)
< 1
.0 E(OH) E(OH)
S S1W MH
112
NEW SL112.36
W
<
6.9 2
1.50
11 6.0
11
LOWERED BY 290mm
<
UNIT 3 LINE NETWORK LV (OH)
1
E(OH)
6 2.1 3 E(OH) E(OH)
1
UP
.9
2
3.6 11 11
<
SW
3
3 1
4
11 3.0 6
5
6
11 2.6
7
<
11
6.30
7
11KV HIGH VOLTAGE CABLE (UG)
6
S
< .9
W
.9
SW
16 15
SW
1 1
NEW 2.0m FOOTPATH TO
E(OH)
SW .89 S
<
W
8
4.1 7
S
<
7 0 11 3.4 6
<
11
11
5.1
.10
11
11
2.9 113
11
1.9
4
FRONTAGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOW VOLTAGE CABLE (UG)
UNIT 8
15 7
S
1 1.9
2.50
SW 11
2
IPWEAQ DRAWING PCD-101
<
E(OH)
2.8
11
WATER
2
6.9 .02 6
3.2
<
11 1 16 11
117
6
SW
Section 3
6.4
SW (RS-065). 2.5% MAX CROSSFALL
<
SW
114
11
W
7
11
SW 118.4
0 1 9 1 3.1
S
5.1 3.9
EXISTING SYSTEM VALVE
2
<
11 4.7 11 11 7
E(OH)
11 1 .8
11
EXISTING CROSSOVER TO BE REMOVED.
<
FH
W
5.40
SW SW
118
<
SW 8
EXISTING HYDRANT (FH)
7
6 6.8 2 11
1.8
REINSTATE WITH B1 TYPE KERB AS PER
112
1 7.5 11 3.4
S
11 5 6 8
8.8 3W 11 3.1
E(OH)
0
11S
5.9 .9
11 .4 8
<
11
5.7
16 11 9
SW
2.5
4.6
IPWEAQ STD DRG RSD-200 (RS-080)
1
W
3 11
11
SW EXISTING WATER MAIN
SW
8.2
SW W
115
11
1
W
7
<
SW
2.50
W5 3.0
11S
4.4 11
S
E(OH)
5.2
6
SW 8
SEWER
6.30
.7 6
11 12 MH
UNIT 9
1.8
<
2 1 6 11
6.3 2.5
11 SW SW
11
W
9
7.3 2 4
EXISTING MAINTENANCE HOLE (MH)
S
3.1
E(OH)
11 2 4.7
<
6.8 6 11 11
W
11 5.9 8
8 11 1.8
11
SW
8.9
SW
11
SW 2
EXISTING MAINTENANCE SHAFT (MS)
S<W
1 2.8
116
5 .1 11
15
8.2 1
SW
11
E(OH)
S
8 2
6.2 1.8
11
11 .15
EXISTING SEWER MAIN
6 S S
<
UNIT 4
W
SW
3 .5
11 112
117 8
W
5.5
SW
6
11
UNIT 10
2.8
SW
11
<
COMMUNICATIONS
S
7.4
3
7 .13 PIT
11 11 PIT
SW
5 3
<
UNIT 5
3.1
6.2
MATCH INTO EXISTING FOOTPATH
113
3
.18 11 5.1 11
NBN EXISTING COMMUNICATIONS
SW
1 18 11
7 8
W
2.5
S
2.8 11
SW
<
Section 4
4 11
5.1
11
STORMWATER
UNIT 6
W
<
6
6.30
3.6
S
5 11 1
SW EXISTING STORMWATER PIPE
SW
.8 9 .11 3.2
9
17 6.8 15 11
11
1 1 11 1
<
8.1
SW
11
SW PROPOSED STORMWATER PIPE
UNIT 11 W
3
0S
W
0
4.3
<
S
5
7.0
SW
5.1
UNIT 7
11 11 .7
11 11
3
LEVELS & RETAINING
W
5
<
2 6.8 2
7.7 11 5.1
11
SW
8 11 1 3
118
6.6 4.2
S
8.2 11 SW 11
11
EXISTING RETAINING WALL
W
<
7 4
.2
1 19 4.8
11
8
W
8.2
+ 23.750
SW
EXISTING SURFACE LEVEL
<
11
.15
S
0 15 3
6.6
1 4.9
11 11
116
W
0
SW
<
6.3
11
15
.2
7
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL
UNIT 12
1
SW
9
W
9.3
S
11
<
7 8
6.5 6.0
+ FSL 23.750
4
11 11
11
5.2
PROPOSED FINISHED SURFACE LEVEL
<
5
9.1 6
11
6.1
4 5.6
FFL 24.00 PROPOSED FINISHED FLOOR LEVEL
S
11 11
W
SW
1 5
117
7.8 6.6
<
6 11 11
9.5 5
11 8
SW
8.6 8.1
11 11
<
S
9
9.1
11
6.30
<
MAINTAIN 1m CLEARANCE FROM CROSSOVERS
UNIT 13
6
4 8.2
9.7 11
11 0
SW
S
.8
17
TO POWER POLES, PRAM RAMPS, KERB LINTELS
<
1
As detailed in conditions 1 and 3 of SARA AND OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS TYPICAL
<
S
response with reference 2508-47877 SRA: 1.5m
UP
| 2.5%
<
1
2
3
4
5
- relocation of utilities, infrastructure and services
1.0
6
SW
7
1.5m
7
S
SW
.2
<
18
PRELIM. PAVEMENT DETAILS
1
| 12.5
118
- road access location CROSSOVER AS PER %
<
3 9
11
9.5
11 SW
IPWEAQ STD DRGS RSD-100
S
LAYER DESCRIPTION
<
& RSD-101 TYPICAL
SW
SW
6
9.9
11
CONC. 125mm THK 32MPa CONCRETE SL82
<
MESH 40mm COVER
<
SW
S
BASE 100mm TYPE 2.2 BASE COURSE
S
<
LAN
PER P FINAL PAVEMENT DEPTH TO BE
<
FOOTPATH AS REQ'D AS
8
9.8
11
S
AS PER IPWEAQ STD DETERMINED FOLLOWING SOIL TESTS BY
<
J. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.
DRG The text continues on section 5.