Original source · versioned page text
2603-51047 SRA Response with conditions
Attached to the e-mail SARA response with conditions.
RA6-N SARA reference: 2603-51047 SRA Council reference: RAL26/0002 Applicant reference: 26017 13 March 2026 Chief Executive Officer Noosa Shire Council PO Box 141 TEWANTIN QLD 4565 [email protected] Dear Sir/Madam SARA referral agency response—49 Overlander Avenue, Cooroy (Referral agency response given under section 56 of the Planning Act 2016) The development application described below was confirmed as properly referred by the State Assessment and Referral Agency (SARA) on 3 March 2026. Response Outcome: Referral agency response – with conditions Date of response: 13 March 2026 Conditions: The conditions in Attachment 1 must be attached to any development approval Advice: Advice to the applicant is in Attachment 2 Reasons: The reasons for the referral agency response are in Attachment 3 Development details Description: Development permit Reconfiguring a lot for 1 Lot into 2 Lots & Access Easement SARA role: Referral agency SARA trigger: Schedule 10, Part 9, Division 4, Subdivision 2, Table 1, Item 1 - (Planning Regulation 2017) SEQ (North) Regional Office PO Box 1129, Maroochydore Page 1 of 5 QLD 4558
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 4 pages
Page 2
2603-51047 SRA
SARA reference: 2603-51047 SRA
Assessment manager: Noosa Shire Council
Street address: 49 Overlander Avenue, Cooroy
Real property description: Lot 57 on RP180653
Applicant name: Evelyne Atkinson
C/- Project Urban Pty Ltd
Applicant contact details: PO Box 6380
MAROOCHYDORE BC QLD 4558
[email protected]
Human Rights Act 2019 The decision has been assessed for compatibility with human rights
considerations: under the Human Rights Act 2019. The decision was found not to limit
human rights under the Human Rights Act 2019 therefore it is
reasonable to conclude the decision is compatible with human rights.
Representations
An applicant may make representations to a concurrence agency, at any time before the application is
decided, about changing a matter in the referral agency response (s.30 Development Assessment
Rules). Copies of the relevant provisions are in Attachment 4.
A copy of this response has been sent to the applicant for their information.
For further information please contact Helen Reilly, Planning Officer, on 4037 3239 or via email
[email protected] who will be pleased to assist.
Yours sincerely
Jamaica Hewston
Manager
cc Evelyne Atkinson, [email protected]
enc Attachment 1 - Referral agency conditions
Attachment 2 - Advice to the applicant
Attachment 3 - Reasons for referral agency response
Attachment 4 - Representations about a referral agency response provisions
State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 2 of 5
Page 3
2603-51047 SRA
Attachment 1—Referral agency conditions
(Under section 56(1)(b)(i) of the Planning Act 2016 the following conditions must be attached to any development
approval relating to this application)
No. Conditions Condition timing
10.9.4.2.1.1 – Reconfiguring a lot near a state transport corridor—The chief executive administering
the Planning Act 2016 nominates the Director-General of the Department of Transport and Main Roads
to be the enforcement authority for the development to which this development approval relates for the
administration and enforcement of any matter relating to the following condition(s):
1. Stormwater management of the development must not cause At all times.
worsening to the operating performance of the state transport
corridor, such that any works on the land must not:
create any new discharge points for stormwater runoff onto the
state transport corridor
concentrate or increase the velocity of flows to state transport
corridor
interfere with and/or cause damage to the existing stormwater
drainage on the state transport corridor
surcharge any existing culvert or drain on the state transport
corridor
reduce the quality of stormwater discharge onto the state
transport corridor
impede or interfere with any overland flow or hydraulic
conveyance from the state transport corridor
reduce the floodplain immunity of the state transport corridor.
State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 3 of 5
Page 4
2603-51047 SRA
Attachment 2—Advice to the applicant
General advice
1. Terms and phrases used in this document are defined in the Planning Act 2016, its regulation
or the State Development Assessment Provisions (SDAP) (version 3.5). If a word remains
undefined it has its ordinary meaning.
Transport noise corridor
2. Mandatory Part (MP4.4) of the Queensland Development Code (QDC) commenced on 01 Sep
2010 and applies to building work for the construction or renovation of a residential building in a
designated transport noise corridor. MP4.4 seeks to ensure that the habitable rooms of Class 1,
2, 3 and 4 buildings located in a transport noise corridor are designed and constructed to
reduce transport noise. Transport noise corridor means land designated under Chapter 8B of
the Building Act 1975 as a transport noise corridor.
For further information on Transport Noise Corridors and assistance with the Queensland
Development Codes, please refer to the website below:
https://www.business.qld.gov.au/industries/building-property-development/building-
construction/laws-codes-standards/queensland-development-code/transport-noise-corridors
Public utility works and connection approval
3. The applicant is advised that if any works and/or connections are required to public utility
services within a state-controlled road reserve, approval must be given by the Department of
Transport and Main Roads (DTMR) under the relevant public utility legislation (electricity,
water/sewer, telecommunication), and in accordance with DTMR technical standards (Non-
Transport Utility Management and Design Manual).
Approvals must be obtained prior to commencing any utility works within the state-controlled
road reserve. Please contact the public utility team via [email protected] for further
information on the application and approval process.
State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 4 of 5
Page 5
2603-51047 SRA
Attachment 3—Reasons for referral agency response
(Given under section 56(7) of the Planning Act 2016)
The reasons for the SARA’s decision are:
SARA assessed the development against the following code(s) of the State Development
Assessment Provisions (SDAP), version 3.5:
o State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment.
The development complies with the assessment benchmarks of State code 1 of SDAP in that the
development:
o does not increase the likelihood or frequency of accidents, fatalities or serious injury for users
of a state-controlled road
o does not adversely impact the structural integrity or physical condition of state-controlled
roads, road transport infrastructure, public passenger transport infrastructure or active
transport infrastructure
o does not adversely impact the structural integrity or physical condition of state-controlled
roads, road transport infrastructure, public passenger transport infrastructure or active
transport infrastructure
o does not adversely impact the state’s ability to plan, construct, maintain, upgrade or operate
state-controlled roads, future state-controlled roads or road transport infrastructure
o protects community amenity from significant adverse impacts of environmental emissions
generated by road transport infrastructure or vehicles using state-controlled roads.
Material used in the assessment of the application:
the development application material and submitted plans
Planning Act 2016
Planning Regulation 2017
the SDAP (version 3.5), as published by SARA
the Development Assessment Rules
SARA DA Mapping system
State Planning Policy mapping system
section 58 of the Human Rights Act 2019
Attachment 4—Representations about a referral agency response
provisions
(page left intentionally blank)
State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 5 of 5