Council archive · source document
MCU14/0087 Notice of Submission - Lynley Tierney
4. Co""nn lhatthe following milOdatory supporting!nformatlon accomponiesthls appliution
Mandatory supporting infQll1Iation Connnnadon of Method of
lodgement lodgement
All applications .
A sile plao drawn to an appropriate scale (1:100.1:200 or 1:500 are ~nftnned
recommended scales) which shC>W$lhe fOllOwing:
• the locallon and s~e area of the land 10 which the applicati<l<l relates
(re/e"""r IancI)
• lhe norlh point
• lhe boundaries of the relevanf land
• any road 'rontages of the relevant land, Including Ill. name of the mad
• tilt> Jocallon and •••• 01 any existing or proposed Widing. or struClure •
on tha relevant land (note: wIlere extanslve demoliUon or new buDdings
are proposod. two separate plans Ian existing slta plan and prop<)S(ld sile
plsnl may b& appropOate)
• any existing or proposed easements on the relevanlland and their
futletlon
• the locatioo and use 01 buildings on land adjoining the relevant land
• all vehicle access points and any e,isling or proposed car parldng ""'a'
00 the relevant land. Car parong spact!S kJr person. with disabililies an<!
any so",lce vehicle a=ss and partling should be clearly ma~
• lor any new building on the "'Ie""nlland. the location at refuse storage
• the location of"f'Y proposed retairing walls 00 the relevant land and thel,
heigh!
• the l008l1on of any proposed landscaping on the rel,vant lana .
• the location 01 any Slormwa1er detention on the relevant land .
The Mandatory supporting information is lacking in its requirements in regards to the site
plan provided and there is lack of detail in particular to car parking areas, provision for those
with disabilities, service vehicle access etc.
The applicant confirmed that information provided demonstrated the on site parking
provisions, yet the hand drawn plan (not numbered) merely shows a line demonstrating
where access would occur and no direct provision or plans of car parking spaces.
i When the application involves new operatJornll work
Plan. Showing tM naMe. location. number of new on-Site Cllr p.rl<lng bays, .0'CMfirmed
proposed area of new landscaping, proposed type at new vehicle cross-over
(noo-re5identl.1 usos), proposed m9J<lmum new vehloular selViang
o Not applicable
Str.ng.ment (noo-resldenll.1 uses) 01 the proposed new operation.1 wort.
The applicant has also confirmed that plans have been submitted to meet this mandatory
requirement but those provided do not achieve this requirement.
Due to the poor material submitted it is not possible to ascertain the use area, how operation
will occur, and how car parking will be provided.
Size and Scale of development
The submitted plans suggest a use area of 9m2 yet this makes no provisions for how the
boards will be loaded and unloaded of trailer. These boards are up to 35m in length and
require to be removed from the trailer to provide to customers. This will in effect make the
use area of the business expand out from the footprint proposed of 3.6m x 2.4m to approx.
75m x SAm (40m2). This is in estimation what will be required to service customers as they
chose the hire equipment from the trailer.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
MCU14/0087 Notice of Submission - Lynley TierneyRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.1 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.