Council archive · source document
Minor Change Report - 51983 3225 22 - Amended Report (As Published) · 51983.3225.22
• the development would not result in substantially different development as the proposal does
not:
o involve a new use; or
o result in the application applying to a new parcel of land; or
o dramatically change the built form in terms of scale, bulk and appearance; or
o change the ability of the proposed development to operate as intended; or
o remove a component that is integral to the operation of the development; or
o significantly impact on traffic flow and the transport network, such as increasing traffic
to the site; or
o introduce new impacts or increase the severity of known impacts; or
o remove an incentive or offset component that would have balanced a negative impact
of the development; or
o impact on infrastructure provisions.
• the change does not include prohibited development;
• the change would not require the application to be referred to an additional referral agency
or cause a referral agency to have regard to new matters prescribed by regulation;
• the original application was impact assessable and the proposed changes would not likely
cause a person to make a properly made submission because the proposal is minor.
3.3. Statutory Instruments – Planning Scheme
The original application was lodged and assessed under the now superseded 1973 Planning
Scheme. Pursuant to s81 of the Planning Act 2017, Council must consider the planning scheme in
effect when the original development application was lodged, however Council may give weight to
Noosa Plan 2020 as the planning scheme in effect at the time of the minor change application
being lodged.
The following codes from Noosa Plan 2020 are applicable to this development:
• Tourist Accommodation Zone Code;
• Noosa Heads Local Plan Code;
• Dual Occupancy and Multiple Dwelling Code;
• Works Codes;
• Flood Overlay Code.
The overall height above ground remain unchanged in accordance with what is existing. The
proposed changes include the slight raising of the floor to ceiling heights on levels 1 and 2.
Setbacks
Generally, the setbacks throughout the existing Hastings Street development are non-compliant
with the QDC acceptable solutions, with setbacks varied throughout, dependant on the lot size,
shape and lot location, and whether adjacent to Bay Village or the site’s easement along its eastern
boundary. Existing units are also not all built fully within the group title lot boundaries, with several
decks hanging over the lot boundaries, which are allowable under exclusive use provisions in the
developments Community Management Statement.
In terms of the proposal’s setbacks, there is no variation made other than the altering the existing
structural framing to suit the adjusted stair configuration. The lower storage room remains the same
size, but has alterations to include the lift, a storage area and a toilet. These alterations remain
compliant with the side boundary setback requirements under the Noosa Plan 2020 and the QDC.
Site Cover
The corresponding PO11 contains performance criteria that applies for development in the Hasting
Street Mixed Use Precinct, which states that a maximum site cover of 45% applies. The site cover
Page 8 of 17
Document Set ID: 23825275
Version: 0, Version Date: 01/01/1900
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Minor Change Report - 51983 3225 22 - Amended Report (As Published).pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.7 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.