Skip to the record
For the highest quality transcripts.

Council archive · source document

PM Submission Object - Graham Sharp - MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041

of 3

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

                 From:                 Graham Sharp
                 Sent:                 25 Apr 2017 22:15:39 +1000
                 To:                   Mailbox Council Mail
                 Subject:              Submission to Oppose Development Application MCU 16/0153 & REC 16/0041
                 Attachments:          Essence25042017.pdf


                 Please see my submission attached.

                 Graham Sharp


                                       Virus-free. www.avast.com




Document Set ID: 20307950
Version: 1, Version Date: 26/04/2017
Full text of the other 2 pages

Page 2

ice of Submissi der th
jefe) NOOSA COUNCIL ‘Sustainable Planning Aot 2008

To ensure your submission is properly made you must ensure that:
be made to the assessment manager

be in writing

be signed by each person who made the submission unless the submission is made electronically
state the name and residential or business address of each person who made the submission
state what aspects of the plan or proposed development your support or oppose and why

6. be received by Council during the formal public notification period

As required by the Sustainable Planning Act, all submissions, including individual details, are published an Council's website and
therefore will be accessible to intemet search engines. All submissions are published, irrespective of whether or not they are properly
made.

1. Application details

[File No MCU16/0153 and REC16/0041

‘Postal address of Land (as advertised) 215 David Low Way, Peregian Beach 4573. oo
| Nature of Proposed Development Essence of Peregian

A PFONs

 

 

 

2. Submitter details

Full name of Submitter Graham Sharp
‘Email Address [email protected]
Postal address 201 David Low Way
Suburb Peregian Beach
|Signature(s) GRAHAM SHARP

'N.B. This form has been designed for the convenience of the public, and any persons wishing to lodge a submission are not obliged to use this form. |

 

 

 

 

 

 

"| State Qld

Postcode 4573

 

 

3. Details of Submission

| (We), make the following submission: / ee

- Noosa Plan: it is essential that the open space recreation zoning of the site under the Noosa Plan is
adhered to and that only limited short term VISITOR accommodation be permitted. Maybe something
along the lines of Glamping tents would be more appropriate for the area.

- The suggested sale prices of the units/apartments suggested by Tony Scantion are not in line with
current real estate trends in Peregian Beach and are not likely to be achieved.

- Construction issues: We live just down from the new IGA shopping centre and are already impacted
by noise from the loading docks. The extensive earthworks for new development will necessitate mass
importation of fill material with major, adverse traffic and environmental impacts especially as
Sandpiper Lane will be the only access for traffic during and after construction.

- Traffic impacts: the additional traffic and the restricted access and egress to the development will
significantly aggravate existing traffic congestion and safety issues and negatively impact the amenity
of Peregian village in the long term. Currently, DLW has become a bottle-neck with the pedestrian
crossing to IGA and this will get worse when the IT hub & new community centre is built with the
northern crossing. Whether or not there has been an increase in traffic, there is no denying the
bumper to bumper traffic that currently blocks our driveway and often extends from the IGA crossing

i down to the petrol station & garden centre (south of the village). Traffic leaving IGA & the hardware
1 store already has to negotiate the uphill exit on Sandpiper Lane into DLW and bumper to bumper

  

 

 

 

Privacy

Council will use any personal information provided for the intended purpose only and for remaining in contact with you. Council is authorised to collect
this information in accordance with the Local Goverment Act 2009 and other Local Government Acts. Your personal information is only accessed by
persons authorised to do so. Your personal information is dealt with in accordance with councit's Privacy policy.

www.noosa.qid.gov.au [email protected] T 07 §329 6500
PO Box 141 Tewantin Qld 4565 ABN 97 969 214 121

Page 1 of 2

 

Page 3

traffic. This will only get worse with the amount of traffic generated by the proposed development
application. At the very least, the Scanlon development application should include a pedestrian
overpass to replace the crossing at IGA to alleviate the traffic bottle-neck in both directions of DLW.

- Services, ecology, water and noise issues. | have already mentioned the issue of noise from the IGA
loading dock which impacts us now. This will only get worse with the increased amount of traffic and
residents in the proposed development application. Not only resident cars, but the ongoing service
trucks from cleaners to garbage collection. Another major concern of mine as a resident of DLW
backing onto the national park (wallum), is the displacement of water during rain/flooding. The water |
table is very close to the surface in this area, and the proposed development area is mostly on swamp |
(as indicated on the plans) which feeds into Lake Weyba and supports a diverse eco-system. With the
proposed retaining walls for the development, no consideration has been given to where the natural
water courses will be diverted. In times of heavy rainfall, our backyard floods quite rapidly. This will
only get worse once a development of this size occurs as the water will naturally find it's own way
downhill (south) - towards our residential area. We also have swamp wallabies and other wildlife
including many bird species which will be threatened by over-development as proposed. Tony Scanlon |
told me himself, that the trees were of no consequence & that they would be replaced with other
plantings. This is not acceptable! As a local, | do not want the natural watercourses & wallam
destroyed by the unnecessary development of a permanent housing estate!

- Non-compliance with Council requirements: density, site cover, gross floor area and building heights
are ail excessive. We live in this area because we believe that Noosa Council will protect all that we
hold valuable in our quality of life and environment. That's why | also voted for de-amalgamation.

‘Ifa development like Tony Scanlon proposes goes ahead, the area will fast become over-crowded with people
and cars - for which there is no infrastructure. David Low Way cannot cope with any further increase in
traffic. That's why Sunshine Motorway was built - to divert through traffic away from the coast. Our house
_actually shakes when the big Coles trucks & double decker Australia Zoo buses pass by our house. Speed limit
of 40km in front of our house is rarely adhered to and nothing permanent has ever been done about it.
Getting out of our driveway by car or trying to cross the road is becoming increasingly dangerous. The speed
‘of traffic and the traffic bottle-neck at the IGA crossing needs to be addressed now - long before any new
development applications are approved.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 2 of 2

 

Used in these records

About this file

File size
225 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

PM Submission Object - Graham Sharp - MCU16_0153 & REC16_0041.pdf · 225 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.