Original source · versioned page text
MCU18.0166 - Response to Information Request
Very large file: it may take a few minutes
The original of this document is very large (15.2 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
T ABLE 3.1 SERVICE & UTILITY T YPE 3 - TOWER (TABLE c) Loss of distinct character associated with
14-23) the various towns, villages or rural areas
Specific Probable solutions (if code of the Shire; or
Outcomes assessment)
d) Alteration to key landform and landscape
Visual Amenity
characters such that they become
O10 The tower is S10.1 The tower is—
visually a) not established in the dominated by the facility; or
integrated Detached Housing, Semi-
with its Attached Housing, Attached e) Impact on views to and from waterways,
landscape or Housing or Visitor Mixed Use beaches and riparian zones. (s.3.2)
townscape Zones;
setting so as b) camouflaged through the use Wherever practical towers should:
not to be of colours and materials
visually which blend into the a) Maintain the integrity of landmarks and
dominant or surrounding landscape; and
obtrusive. c) unobtrusive when viewed
places of significance;
from any part of the major
b) Avoid interrupting significant views;
road network (refer to
PSP23 Telecommunication c) Be architecturally integrated with the
Towers); or
S10.2 The tower is co- building/structure they are mounted on;
located on an existing
telecommunication tower; d) Be positioned to minimise clutter of
AND multiple facilities;
S10.3 The height of the
tower does not exceed— e) Be colour matched to their background,
a) 20 metres where on land
in the Community
using no reflective paint;
Services, Business Centre
f) Be at least partially screened by
or Industry Zones; or
b) 25 metres where on land vegetation; and
in the Rural Zone.
g) Be positioned and designed to be less
visible by pedestrians. (s. 3.4).
Noosa Planning Scheme Policy 23—
Telecommunication Towers
A key objective of this code is to ‘encourage
telecommunication towers to only be located in
areas that will not cause impact on existing
character’ (p.1).
‘Applications on sites containing environmentally
sensitive areas, such as native habitat, steep
slopes or ridgelines are unlikely to be supported,
if those areas are likely to be adversely impacted
upon by the proposed development’ (s.2.2).
Council is unlikely to support proposals that
would result in the following:
a) Loss of vegetation on steep slopes or
ridgelines; or
b) Visual scaring or the degradation of views
or vistas from the major road network; or
IRIS Visual Planning + Design Page 8
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.