Original source · versioned page text
2020-02-20 Ordinary Meeting Minutes
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 20 FEBRUARY 2020
1. The proposal is contrary to schedule 11, part 2, section 7 of the Planning
Regulation 2017 as the development is situated in a koala assessable
development area and does not avoid clearing non-juvenile koala habitat trees in
circumstances in which any significant residual impact of the clearing is unable to
be offset.
2. The proposal is contrary to the State Planning Policy as the proposed development
will adversely impact on koala habitat, with koala populations recognised as being
matters of both national and state environmental significance.
3. The proposal is contrary to the State Planning Policy as the proposed development
does not facilitate an appropriate disaster management response and recovery
capacity and capabilities as the emergency access points are unable to be
implemented.
4. The proposed development is contrary to the Overall and Specific Outcomes of the
Noosaville Locality Code as:
i. The proposal does not provide a satisfactory pedestrian and cycle network
for the future development of the area and fails to provide satisfactory
linkages with the existing development in the Shire Business Centre as these
are unable to be implemented.
ii. The proposal fails to ensure a high level of residential amenity as it does not
provide for acoustic fencing to lots 17, 18 and 19 or provide any noise
mitigation measures to existing plant equipment and loading dock areas. The
proposal also fails to address the future amenity of Lot 21.
iii. The proposal fails to provide for suitable retention of existing vegetation to
allow for future development to be within a park like setting.
iv. The proposal will adversely impact on the site’s environmental values.
5. The proposed development is contrary to the Biodiversity Overlay Code as the
proposal will adversely impact on koala habitat, does not maximise the retention of
existing vegetation, and proposes to prematurely clear significant vegetation
inconsistent with the needs of the community.
6. The proposed subdivision is contrary to the Reconfiguring a Lot Code as:
i. Insufficient provision has been made for walking and cycling linkages with
the existing development in the Shire Business Centre as the proposed
network and linkages are unable to be implemented.
ii. The proposed lot will have a significant adverse impact on the natural
environment and will not retain the sites natural environmental values.
7. The proposed development is contrary to the Natural Hazards Overlay Code as
bushfire mitigation measures do not satisfactorily address the risk of bushfire as
they are not envisaged by the Shire Business Centre Map and are unable to be
implemented.
8. The proposed development is contrary to the draft Noosa Plan provisions, which
reinforce the current Noosa Plan’s requirements for pedestrian/cycle links, an
appropriate response to the site’s natural hazards and protection of the site’s
environmental values including vegetation retention.
B. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.
The motion was withdrawn.
Page 13 of 20
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.