Skip to the record
For the highest quality transcripts.

Original source · versioned page text

2020-02-20 Ordinary Meeting Minutes

of 20

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES                                                       20 FEBRUARY 2020


            6.    The proposed subdivision is inconsistent with the Reconfiguring a Lot Code as:
                  i.    Insufficient provision has been made for walking and cycling linkages with
                        the existing development in the Shire Business Centre as the proposed
                        network and linkages are unable to be implemented contrary to Overall
                        Outcomes 14.181.2f), Specific Outcomes O8 and O9.
                  ii.   The proposed lots will have a significant adverse impact on the natural
                        environment and will not retain the sites natural environmental values
                        contrary to Overall Outcomes 14.181.2g), Specific Outcomes O21b and O22.
            7.    Bushfire mitigation measures do not satisfactorily address the risk of bushfire
                  contrary to Overall Outcomes 13.30.2a), 13.30.2c), Specific Outcomes O4, O7,
                  O8, O9, O11 and O12 of the Natural Hazards Overlay Code.
            8.    Bushfire mitigation measures result in the removal of vegetation contained within
                  OS3 as detailed in Schedule 4 (Shire Business Centre Map) of the Noosa Plan.
            9.    The proposed development is contrary to the draft Noosa Plan provisions, which
                  support the refusal of the development application for the same reasons as those
                  applicable under the current Noosa Plan because of non-compliance with
                  requirements for pedestrian/cycle links, an appropriate response to the site’s
                  natural hazards and protection of the site’s environmental values including
                  vegetation retention.
            10.   The proposed development cannot be conditioned to comply with the above
                  assessment benchmarks.
            11.   There are no matters that would warrant approval of the development application
                  notwithstanding the noncompliance with the assessment benchmarks.
     B.     Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.


     For:         Crs. Jurisevic, Stockwell, Wilkie, Glasgow and Wellington
     Against:     Cr Jackson
                                                                                          Carried.



The following Recommendations from the General Committee were adopted without
discussion or further amendment.

Council Resolution
Moved:            Cr Wilkie
Seconded:         Cr Stockwell
The General Committee recommendations dated 17 February 2020 be adopted except where dealt
with or held over by separate resolution.
                                                                              Carried unanimously.




                                                                                     Page 15 of 20
Log in to download the original file

2020-02-20 Ordinary Meeting Minutes(PDF, 586KB).pdf · 600 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.