Original source · versioned page text
2020-02-20 Ordinary Meeting Minutes
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 20 FEBRUARY 2020 GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING RECOMMENDATIONS 17 FEBRUARY 2020 - Crs. Frank Wilkie (Chair), Jess Glasgow, Ingrid Jackson, Joe Jurisevic, Brian Stockwell and Tony Wellington 1 MCU18/0166 - DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE SERVICE AND UTILITY - TYPE 3 TOWER, SITUATED AT 244 TABLELANDS ROAD, COORAN Council Resolution Moved: Cr Jurisevic Seconded: Cr Stockwell That Council note the report by the Development Planners to the Planning & Environment Committee Meeting dated 11 February 2020 regarding Application No MCU18/0166 for a Development Permit for Material Change of Use Service and Utility - Type 3 Tower, situated at 244 Tablelands Rd, Cooran and: A. Refuse the application for the following reasons: 1. The proposed infrastructure will compromise the scenic amenity and regional landscape in an area identified by the SEQ Regional Plan as being of regionally significant scenic amenity contrary to the strategies referred to in Element 4 of Chapter 3 Goal 4: Sustain. 2. The proposed development is inconsistent with Desired Environmental Outcome 3.1.3 m) viii of the Noosa Plan as the proposed development is visually prominent in the view from premises along Tablelands Road. 3. The development application proposes a use that is inconsistent in the Rural Zone of the Mary River Catchment Locality; 4. The proposal is inconsistent with the Mary River Catchment Locality Code in the following respects: 4.1 The visual amenity enjoyed by users of nearby premises is adversely impacted contrary to Overall Outcome 8.7.2 a)iii; 4.2 The scale and form of the structure is not integrated into the landform and landscape contrary to Overall Outcome 8.7.2 k)iii; 4.3 The siting of the proposed structure does not protect significant views to Mt Cooroora, Mt Cooran and Mt Pinbarren contrary to Overall Outcome 8.7.2 v) and Specific Outcome O2; 4.4 The scenic values and rural amenity of the locality are adversely impacted contrary to Overall Outcome 8.7.2 mm)ii; 5. The proposal is inconsistent with the Infrastructure Uses Code because it, 5.1. Detracts from the rural and residential visual amenity enjoyed by residents and visitors to the area and does not satisfactorily visually integrate with the landscape contrary to Overall Outcome 14.37.2 b) and Table 1 of Planning Scheme Policy 23; and 5.2. Fails to co-locate with the nearby existing telecommunications facility contrary to Overall Outcome 14.37.2 c). 6. The proposed tower, if approved, would be afforded immunity under the Telecommunications Act 1997 enabling further extension of up to 5 metres without further reference to Council which, if implemented, would further exacerbate the adverse visual and rural amenity impacts; Page 9 of 20
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.