Original source · versioned page text
PM Submission - Philip Dauphin - MCU21/0110
BUSHFIRE CONSIDERATIONS One significant concern is what will happen under bushfire conditions. The Oasis Body Corporate met with representatives from Council, Emergency Services and the Police about 2 years ago. The Council had provided The Oasis Body Corporate with a procedure for Emergency Services and Council vehicles to access Links Drive if the bridge over Eenie Creek Road was closed. This route made use of Wallum Lane and the track to the Noosa Lions Football Club grounds. The Oasis Body Corporate were greatly concerned about potential bushfire impacts on the Estate, and the availability and suitability of evacuation routes. From what we told at the meeting, we concluded that evacuation was unlikely, but we were also told that if it was necessary Emergency Services would door knock and ensure that everyone evacuated. If the bridge over Eenie Creek Road was blocked, we assume the evacuation route would be along Wallum Lane and the track to the Noosa lions Football Club grounds. At the time this track was not suitable for ordinary vehicles, and it remains so. In parts it is a rough track and it is not wide enough to allow incoming and outgoing vehicles to pass safely and does pass by, or through, some high potential bushfire impact zones. We were advised that the most likely bushfire scenario was for a bushfire with a south or south easterly wind behind it, but because the fire would come down the hill to Links Drive, the speed of the fire would be reduced and the most impact for The Oasis would be burning embers and smoke. However, Parkridge and the hotel effectively sit at the top of the ridge and would be subject directly to any bushfire in that vicinity. The evacuation process for the hotel is not known given the early stage of development, but there should be some consideration of how such an evacuation could be safely managed under different scenarios e.g. Parkridge and the hotel have to evacuate at the same time, Parkridge only etc. before any approval is given for the development to proceed. It is hard to see how this development could be approved without an overall Bushfire Management and Evacuation being developed and available for comment by Owners in the adjacent developments. We were also advised by Council that there would be backburns in the National Park and Garrigal Nature reserve to reduce the fuel load – there have been none in the two years since, and there has been no explanation of why, or when they might happen. The only work that has been carried out since the meeting is that Council organised a clean-up of the land to the east of Links Drive after we had complained about the large amount of fallen timber and dead vegetation. This occurred after we were told the council had no budget to do the work. The residents of this area want to know that their safety is being properly considered, planned for and those plans communicated to them in a timely manner, which is not what is currently happening. [OCR of page images] BUSHFIRE CONSIDERATIONS One significant concern is what will happen under bushfire conditions. The Oasis Body Corporate met with representatives from Council, Emergency Services and the Police about 2 years ago. The Council had provided The Oasis Body Corporate with a procedure for Emergency Services and Council vehicles to access Links Drive if the bridge over Eenie Creek Road was closed. This route made use of Wallum Lane and the track to the Noosa Lions Football Club grounds. The Oasis Body Corporate were greatly concerned about potential bushfire impacts on the Estate, and the availability and suitability of evacuation routes. From what we told at the meeting, we concluded that evacuation was unlikely, but we were also told that if it was necessary Emergency Services would door knock and ensure that everyone evacuated. If the bridge over Eenie Creek Road was blocked, we assume the evacuation route would be along Wallum Lane and the track to the Noosa lions Football Club grounds. At the time this track was not suitable for ordinary vehicles, and it remains so. In parts it is a rough track and it is not wide enough to allow incoming and outgoing vehicles to pass safely and does pass by, or through, some high potential bushfire impact zones. We were advised that the most likely bushfire scenario was for a bushfire with a south or south easterly wind behind it, but because the fire would come down the hill to Links Drive, the speed of the fire would be reduced and the most impact for The Oasis would be burning embers and smoke. However, Parkridge and the hotel effectively sit at the top of the ridge and would be subject directly to any bushfire in that vicinity. The evacuation process for the hotel is not known given the early stage of development, but there should be some consideration of how such an evacuation could be safely managed under different scenarios e.g. Parkridge and the hotel have to evacuate at the same time, Parkridge only etc. before any approval is given for the development to proceed. It is hard to see how this development could be approved without an overall Bushfire Management and Evacuation being developed and available for comment by Owners in the adjacent developments. We were also advised by Council that there would be backburns in the National Park and Garrigal Nature reserve to reduce the fuel load — there have been none in the two years since, and there has been no explanation of why, or when they might happen. The only work that has been carried out since the meeting is that Council organised a clean-up of the land to the east of Links Drive after we had complained about the large amount of fallen timber and dead vegetation. This occurred after we were told the council had no budget to do the work. The residents of this area want to know that their safety is being properly considered, planned for and those plans communicated to them in a timely manner, which is not what is currently happening.
Preview the original
The page text is free to read. Previews and downloads of original files need an account.
Log in to previewLog in to download the original (PM Submission - Philip Dauphin - MCU21_0110.msg)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.