Skip to the record
For the highest quality transcripts.

Council archive · source document

Response to Council's Further Advice · 51988.2740.02

of 3

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

                                                             DANYA COOK TOWN PLANNING
                                                           M: 0422 051 263      E: [email protected]
                                                                             ABN: 65 945 966 479 | DANYA ELIZABETH COOK

                                                                                                          10 August 2023



The Chief Executive Officer
Noosa Council
PO Box 141
TEWANTIN           QLD          4565

Correspondence Sent Via Email: [email protected]

Attention: Tara Norley

Dear Tara,

                                       RESPONSE TO COUNCIL’S FURTHER ADVICE

Property Description:                  Lot 2 on BUP10798
Property Address:                      "Parkwood" 2/21 Parkedge Road, Sunshine Beach QLD 4567
Development Approval:                  Multiple Dwelling (Two (2) Dwelling Units)
Proposed Development:                  Minor Change Application
Local Government:                      Noosa Council
Council’s Reference:                   51988.2740.02 / TPC 2129
DC Town Planning Reference:            2023-34
On Behalf Of:                          Warren and Adele Jackson

1.0       PREAMBLE

With reference to the above development application, we hereby provide a response to Council’s Further Advice, dated 29
June 2023.

2.0       INFORMATION PROVIDED

Owner’s Consent

The proposed works are located within common property. Owner’s consent from the Body Corporate has not been provided
with the application material.

Advice Required

1. Provide owner’s consent for the works proposed within the common property.

Applicant’s Response

In response to Item 1 of Council’s Further Advice, please refer to the Adjoining Landowner’s Consent Form, signed by Jenny
Marie Kenny and Gregory James Treadgold Kenny, being the landowners of adjoining land described as Lot 1 on BUP10798,
situated at "Parkwood" 1/21 Parkedge Road, Sunshine Beach QLD 4567, included at Appendix A.

Issue – Rear Setback

Acceptable Outcome AO12.1 of the Medium Density Residential Zone Code requires a minimum setback of 6m from the rear
boundary. The proposal includes a minimum setback of 3m from the rear boundary and as such does not comply with AO12.1.
The proposed setback is not consistent with development in the zone and is not supported.




                                                            1


Response to Council’s Further Advice                                                                          August 2023
Full text of the other 2 pages

Page 2

                                                                DANYA COOK TOWN PLANNING


Advice Required

2. Provide amended plans increasing the rear setback to a minimum of 6m.

Applicant’s Response

In response to Item 2 of Council’s Further Advice, the applicant proposes to maintain the 3m rear setback. It is noted that
the original Decision Notice does not condition a 6m rear setback, however, we acknowledge Council can consider the
current Noosa Plan 2020 whilst assessing an application for Minor Change. It is worthy to note that the adjoining rear
property, situated at 2/16 Solway Drive, Sunshine Beach QLD 4567, likewise included within the Medium Density Residential
Zone, features a structure within 6m of the rear boundary setback, so the proposed 3m rear setback is not inconsistent with
development in the Medium Density Residential Zone.

The proposed 3m rear setback is 3.073m in external length, which is 16.2% of the boundary length. The proposed single
storey addition does not feature windows in the rear, so creates minimal impact to the rear neighbour in the way of shading
etc. and presents no privacy issue without any outlook from windows in that direction. It is noted that there is an existing
pergola in a similar place and size to the proposal, so the change is extremely minor.

In support of maintaining the rear setback, Landscaping Plans have been prepared by Anembo Consultants Pty Ltd, included
at Appendix B, which demonstrate the existing backyard planting schedule to assist with site integration and blending of
building bulk. It is noted that the backyard is currently heavily landscaped, which provides a dense vegetated buffer between
the site and adjoining residential properties.

Issue – Car Parking

The proposed garage extension and visitor car space do not include sufficient detail to fully assess the application. No internal
dimensions for the garage have been provided and the car space appears to be wider than required.

Information Required

3. Provide the internal dimensions of the garage and demonstrate that the proposed works will be in accordance with
   AS/NZS2890.1:2004.

Applicant’s Response

In response to Item 3 of Council’s Further Advice, please refer to the amended Design Plans prepared by Kieron James Design
included at Appendix C, which show the internal dimensions of the proposed garage extension.

It should be noted that the proposed garage extension is intended to continue functioning as a single garage. Contour
Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd have undertaken an Engineering Assessment of AS/NZS2890.1:2004 to determine that the
proposed works are generally in accordance with the standards.

4. The proposed car space appears to be wider than required and wider than AS/NZS2890.1:2004. Provide justification for
   the proposed width.

Applicant’s Response

In response to Item 4 of Council’s Further Advice, Council are advised that the proposed visitor car space is designed to a
width of 4m to accommodate the turning movements of a B99 vehicle, as demonstrated by the Engineering Assessment,
Plan No.: 3548 – SK02, prepared by Contour Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd included at Appendix D.

5. Provide vehicle swept path plans for both the garage and the car space. The swept path must be for a B99 vehicle as
   described in AS/NZS2890.1:2004 and assume that the adjoining space in the garage is occupied.




                                                               2


Response to Council’s Further Advice                                                                                 August 2023

Page 3

                                                              DANYA COOK TOWN PLANNING


Applicant’s Response

In response to Item 5 of Council’s Further Advice, the proposed extended garage will continue to function as a single garage,
therefore a compliant swept path plan has been provided for a single B99 vehicle, as demonstrated by the Engineering
Assessment, Plan No.: 3548 – SK02, prepared by Contour Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd included at Appendix D.

A review of the Noosa Plan 2020 indicates that the requirements for off-street parking spaces for a Dual Occupancy are two
(2) covered spaces and one (1) uncovered space (three (3) spaces total). The existing parking spaces at the property are two
(2) covered and two (2) uncovered spaces. The current parking arrangement will be maintained post development.
Therefore, the proposed extended garage has no requirement to function as a double garage.

Issue – Stormwater Management

There is no detail included to demonstrate where stormwater runoff from the garage and the new hardstand will be
controlled, directed, and discharged.

Information Required

6. Provide additional detail on where stormwater runoff from the garage and the new hardstand will be controlled, directed,
   and discharged. Please note that runoff must not be directed on to any adjoining property.

Applicant’s Response

In response to Item 6 of Council’s Further Advice, Contour Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd conducted a site visit and review of
stormwater runoff under the existing conditions and the proposed post developed conditions.

Under the existing conditions, roof water discharges to existing kerb adaptors in Parkedge Road. Stormwater runoff from
the driveway and surrounding surfaces generally falls toward a stormwater pit within the existing driveway and outlets to an
existing stormwater manhole in Parkedge Road.

Under post development conditions the stormwater runoff will continue to function as in the pre-development state. Roof
water will discharge via the existing kerb adaptors in Parkedge Road, and the driveway and uncovered parking spaces will
fall toward the internal drainage pit.

Please refer to the Engineering Assessment, Plan No.: 3548 – SK01, prepared by Contour Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd
included at Appendix D.

3.0       SUMMARY

I trust Council will issue a favourable Development Permit in due course and should Council have any questions with respect
to the above, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Kind regards,




Danya Cook B.Urb.Reg.Plan
Director / Principal Town Planner

M: 0422 051 263
E: [email protected]




                                                             3


Response to Council’s Further Advice                                                                             August 2023

Used in these records

About this file

File size
284 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Response to Council's Further Advice.pdf · 284 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.