09/1682 - Multiple Housing Type 1 - Relative [As Published] · 132009.1682

‘INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997

IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 22

 

 

|

 

LEYRELEVANT-ACTIVITY; WILD RIVER AREA (confused Sak (ae

 

 

 
 

fo, is any ERA an extraction ERA intended to be located outside waters?

No — Unless the application is consistent with any property development plan applying to the tand, and the applicetiod is accompanied by
an allocation notice, the Assessment Manager must refuse to receive it. (Complete Form 1, Part G). This application requires
assessment by the Administering Authority for the purposes of both the Environmental Protection Act 1994 and the Wild Rivers Act
2005, if the Administering Authority is not the Assessment Manager for the application, the agency has jurisdiction as Concurrence

Agency.

C1 Yes

if yes, does the ERA meet the following?. : :

(i) __ the activity is located inside a flood management area and a borrow pit of not Ono/( Yes
more than 10,000m°for- a :
« — Specified works under the Wild Rivers Act 2005; or
« ‘residential complexes, as defined under the Environmental Protection Act 1994

(i}__ the activity is located outside a flood management area
If yes to either (i) or (ii) above - Unless the application is consistent with any property development plan applying to the tand, and

the application is accompanied by an allocation notice, the Assessment Manager must refuse to recelve it (Complete Form 1,

Part G). This application requires assessment by the Administering Authority for the purposes of both the Environmental
Protection Act 1994 and, subject to the declaration for the relevant wild river area, the Wild Rivers Act 2005, ff the Administering
Authority is not the Assessment Manager for the application, the agency has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency.

fo be not properly made and the Assessment manager must

 

 

 

 

(No|C) Yes

 

 

 

 

Hf no to both (i) and (ii), above - An appiication for the ERA will be token
. refuse to receive it,
IPA schecie & part |, tabla 2, dem ; IPA, sehadule B part 1, ta 5, dams 3 and 4; IP Reguiatin.scivecke 2, lable 2. tants 1 and 23: Enwronmnental Projection Act 1994, saction 734A (wild

oa ni Bip

 

   

   

aaa

 

 

 

 
   

 

its of a port under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1 994?

 

No-Gotoars {1 Yes :
If yes, is that part of the premises below: high water mark? > ‘

‘No
(Yes - ifanswers to questions in other sections of this checklist indicate that the proposed development is assessable under IPA, schedule
8— Answer (a) to (c) below. This application requires assessment by the Port Authority for the land. If you answer no to (a), (b) and
(c) below, the Port Authority for the Port has jurisdiction as Advice Agency. .
. <
(a) Is any part of the proposal within 200m of a shipping channel or an entry and exit shi
O No Yes ~ The Port Authortty for the Port has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency.
(b) 1s any part of the proposal within 1,000m of a swing basin, a commercial fishing wharf, a mooring, anchorage or spoil grounds?
.CINo (71 Yes - The Port Authority for the Port has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency, .

{c)_ ‘Is any part of the proposal within 1,000m of a planned port facility identified in aland use plan?

9 No O Yes - The Port Authority for the Port has Jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency.

Is

ipping corridor for the Fort?

   
   

  

eae

 

 

 

 

AREDIESH ARE

Dapeany part of the premises adjoin a declared fish habitat area under the Fisheries Act 1994?
N .

O-GotoQ16- . .
Yes - if answers to questions in other sections of this checklist indicate that the proposed development is assessable under IPA, schedule 8,
this application requires assessment by the Department of Primary industries and Fisheries {DPI&F). If DPI&F is not the Assessment

Manager for the application, the agency has jurisdiction as Advice Agency.

   

 

(P Regulation. scusiile 2 lable 2 itent 26,

 

 

Page 4