Original source · versioned page text
2021-01-18 GC - Item 3 - Attachment 3 - Cost Benefit Analysis for Coastal Erosion Options
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Appendix C: Sensitivity Analysis
The results for the Eastern Beaches and Teewah were also tested using a 7 per cent discount rate, in
line with standard CBA guidelines. Using a 7 per cent discount rate does affect the findings, with
option 3 (Beach Nourishment) going from a strongly positive NPV to close to zero. Other key
assumptions have also been tested but do not significantly affect the findings. The results are
provided in Table C1 and C2.
Table C1 Eastern Beaches results (Net present value)
Dune Nourish Seawall Acquisition Leaseback Planning
(O2) (O3) (O4) (O5) (O6) (O7)
Central results 63 239 -2773 -222 -70 73
7% discount rate 7 0.4 -370 -60 -5 19
20% increase in
implementation
and
63 195 -2784 -222 -70 73
management
costs for all
options
Increase
frequency of
beach
nourishment 63 106 -2773 -222 -70 73
from every 5
years to every 3
years (option 3)
20% reduction in
tourism,
63 239 -2138 -256 -83 73
recreation and
non-use values
Time period 36 114 -1851 -192 -40 50
2020-2080
AITHER | Final Report 30
Noosa Shire Council – Coastal Hazard Adaptation Plan
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.