Original source · versioned page text
Appendix A_2008-18430 SPL - Pre-lodgement advice (1)
2008-18430 SPL
- Marine plants do not include:
a plant that is prohibited matter or restricted matter under the Biosecurity Act 2014,
or
a plant that is controlled biosecurity matter or regulated biosecurity matter under the
Biosecurity Act 2014.
Marine plant protection applies irrespective of the tenure (e.g. unallocated state land and all state
tenured lands, including private freehold and leasehold lands) of the land on which the plant occurs,
the time the plant has been growing at the location, or the degree of or purpose of the disturbance.
Under the Planning Regulation 2017, works involving the removal, destruction or damage of marine
plants must be undertaken in accordance with the relevant accepted development requirements
(ADR) or under a development approval (assessable development).
The proposed works will not comply with the ADR as the proposal does not constitute any of the
prescribed work types. A development approval will be required for assessable development that is
the removal, destruction or damage of marine plants.
If possible, avoiding marine plant disturbance would remove the need for an approval and potential
fees for this component of the works.
If the works require marine plant disturbance but cannot comply with the ADR, the applicant will need
to provide the following in an application for a development approval:
- Completed copy of DA form 1
- A full response to the relevant sections of State code 11 of SDAP. Particular attention should
be paid to the following POs:
All development – PO1 to PO15 and PO31
Erosion control structures and beach replenishment – PO17 to PO22
Dredging – PO23 to PO25
Temporary works – PO26 to PO28, and
- Relevant plans as per SARA’s DA Forms guide: Relevant plans, including:
the total amount of marine plants that will be disturbed, identifying portion of
permanent and/or temporary disturbance (in square meters or hectares)
the location of the marine plants to be disturbed in relation to the development works
the level of HAT, mean high water spring tide, and low water spring tide, and
location and extent of fish habitat within the development area, including creeks,
sand and/or yabby banks, drainage lines, lagoons and marshes.
Note: All plans should be able to be read to scale at A3 size.
16. PO1 to PO25 of State code 11, address critical issues relating to coastal development proposals
which create the need to remove, destroy or damage marine plants. The applicant will need to
respond to all relevant PO’s. Particular attention should be paid to the following PO’s.
PO1 - The proposal must be justified in terms of need and alternative designs or locations that avoid
or have a lesser impact on marine plants. Within an application it is recommended to provide
evidence that demonstrates the utility of the dog beach is threatened and alternative solutions have
been considered. Where an options analysis is used, provide a discussion detailing why the
proposed works are the preferred solution.
PO4 – the spatial extent of disturbance to marine plants is minimised. To meet this PO provide
evidence that demonstrates the dredging and nourishment works have been designed to minimise
the spatial extent of marine plant disturbance. Provide a marine plant disturbance plan that clearly
shows all marine plant communities in the vicinity of all aspect of the works, the extent and area of
permanent and temporary marine plant disturbance in relation to the construction footprint, and the
level of HAT.
State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 7 of 10
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the original