Council archive · source document
MCU14/0087 Notice of Submission - Peter White
"
4. Connnn Ihallhe 101l0,,;n9 mandatory supporting inlonnallon .""o,"panies Ihls applica on
Mand.tory supportil1g infonniltiOn COnllJmatlon of Method of
lodge"",,,1 lodgemenl
All applications
A site plan drawn to an aP!YOpria\e scale (1:100, 1:200 or 1:500 ere [;}conftnned
recommended scal •• )_ shOW.lh. I_ng:
1M location and site area of the land 10wIlich the application rest.s
• (relevant Janel)
• Ihe nonn poln!
• the boundaries of lilt! relevenlland
• any location
road frontage. of the relevant land, Inc:fudingthe name of lhe mad
• the and use of any existillQor proposed b<Jitdlngsor $ltUClures
on the relevant land (nOle: wiler. extensive demollUon Of new blJlldings
ar. proposed, _ scpamte plans Ian existing Site plan and ~ site
I'lOnlm.y be appropriate)
• any exiStlng Of proposed easements on tne ",levant land and their
function
• Ihe location and use Ofbui1dil1gson land adjoinIng the relevan!land
• all vehlde access points and any existing or proposed car paltlng area •
on Ihe relevant lend, Car paltlng spa"'" for pelSO", wllh d••• bililies and
any service vehicle access and parklllQ should be clearly ma_ ,
I
• (or any new blJilciingon tho ",Iovanl land. the"'cotlon of refuse s1ora9O
• th.locatlon
heigh!
of arI'f proposed retairing walls 00 the relevant lana and their
.
• Ihe 100811011 of any proposed landscaping on the rel!vant land .
• the location 01 any SlOrmwater detention on the relevant land .
0
The Mandatory supporting information is lacking in its requirements in regards to the site
plan provided and there is lack of detail in particular to car parking areas, provision for those
with disabilities, service vehicle access etc.
The applicant confirmed that information provided demonstrated the onsite parking
provisions, yet the hand drawn plan (not numbered) merely shows a line demonstrating
where access would occur and no direct provision or plans of car parking spaces.
I ¥/hen the application involves new operational work
Plans shomg tne nalure,looallon. ""mber of new on-••te ellr parl<lng bays, ,0'COnfirmed
proposed area or new Iandsoaping, proposad type C)( new vel11c1ecross-over
(n",,"reSidentlal uses), proposed maximum new velll",l., 5lllViclng
o Not appllca~
arrangemant (non-residential =) .r Ihe proposed new operational wort.,
The applicant has also confirmed that plans have been submitted to meet this mandatory
re,quirement but those provided do not achieve this requirement.
Due to the poor material submitted it is not possible to ascertain the use area, how operation
will occur, and how car parking will be provided,
Size and Scale of development
The submitted plans suggest a use area of 9m2 yet this makes no provisions for how the
boards will be loaded and unloaded of trailer. These boards are up to 35m in length and
require to be removed from the trailer to provide to customers. This will in effect make the
use area of the business expand out from the footprint proposed of 3.6m x 2,4m to approx.
75m x SAm (40m2). This is in estimation what will be required to service customers as they
chose the hire equipment from the trailer.
•
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
MCU14/0087 Notice of Submission - Peter WhiteRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.1 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.