Council archive · source document
MCU14/0087 Notice of Submission - Mary Pringle
"
4. Conlirm that Ule lollowing 'mandatory supporting Inlormation accompanies this appllUtion
Mandatory supporting inloonation confirmation 0' Method 01
lodgement 'odgement
All applications
A >it. plan drawn to an appropriate scale (1:100.1:200 or 1:500 are 9conftrmed
recommended .cales) which shows the follo'Mog:
• the le>callonand s~e a,ea of Ibe land to which the applic.ation relates
(reIeV01Jf land)
• the north poin!
• the boundaries of the ,elevant land
• any road frontages 0' the relevant land, including the name cltho mad
• the 1<>031100 and IlOO01any exi5tlog or proposed buildltlgs or stNelu"'S
on the ",levant land (note: Where extenslve dernolillon 0<new buildjogs
ar. proposed. two soparote plans 'an exIsIIog site plan and PlOPOS<'dsite
plan. may Ill>aPl'fopriata)
• any e>istiog or proposed easements on the relavarlliand and l/\eir
funcllon
• the locetion and use 0' buildings on land adjoining the relevant land
• all vehlcre aceeS5 polots and any existing or proposed car parldog area •
on the relevant land, Car parldog spaces lor petso", with dlsabililies and
any ,olVice vehicle acres. and parklog should be cleady marked
• 10<any n ••••building on tM ",lovaOl land. the Ioc:atloo 01 ",fuse storage
• the location of any proposed rel.iring walls 00 the relevant '000 and their
heigh' '
the location of any proposed landscaping on the rel!Vallllan<l .
I
I
•
• th81oeatlon of any stormwa1er detentIon on the relevant land . I
I
The Mandatory supporting information is lacking in its requirements in regards to the site
plan provided and there is lack of detail in particular to car parking areas, provision for those
with disabilities, service vehicle access etc.
The applicant confirmed that information provided demonstrated the on site parking
provisions, yet the hand drawn plan (not numbered) merely shows a line demonstrating
where access would occur and no direct provision or plans of car parking spaces.
l When the application involves new opcrntional work
PI.n. showing mit nature. location. number of ne" oo-sito car pSf!<iogDays, .12rConfirmed
proposed ore' of new landscaping. proposed type 01 new vehicle cross-over
(non-re3ideoll:ll use,), propos<>dma>dmum new veiliwiar """,icing
o Not .ppllcatle
arrangement (tlO'Hasldenlial uses) of the P"'POSe<l new operational wo~.
The applicant has also confirmed that plans have been submitted to meet this mandatory
requirement but those provided do not achieve this requirement.
Due to the poor material submitted it is not possible to ascertain the use area, how operation
will occur, and how car parking will be provided.
Size and Scale of development
The submitted plans suggest a use area of 9m2 yet this makes no provisions for how the
boards will be loaded and unloaded of trailer. These boards are up to 305m in length and
require to be removed from the trailer to provide to customers. This will in effect make the
use area of the business expand out from the footprint pro'posed of 3.6m x 204m to approx.
7.5m x SAm (40m2). This is in estimation what will be required to service customers as they
chose the hire equipment from the trailer.
•
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
MCU14/0087 Notice of Submission - Mary PringleRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.1 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.