Council archive · source document
MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object - Petition - D Strong (Principal Submitter)
2. The proposed Development has, as a significant component, a use which is an inconsistent use
for the zone and inappropriate in all of the circumstances.
3. The proposed development is of a type, scale and intensity that is inconsistent with any
reasonably anticipated development on this Property.
4. The application DOES NOT demonstrate compliance with all relevant local and state provisions
including all relevant codes.
Name Address Signature
I '/""7 C, e- ~
•.•..•
fml'YlCt whiff 1/1 ,)horp J,lllJdn f)r
PI'W\... A-'It •.~ ~ Bn \{w\"''''' ~
. ~.
Melly fl~C~MPil'\ '5 i3eS;~S '// ""11
lO<..I\.VJaJ (L~ CV~OJh J \2J ,~~:~ ~
27
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object - Petition - D Strong (Principal Submitter)Related documentApplication case desk ↗
MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object - Petition - D Strong (Principal Submitter)Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 9.9 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.