2211-31930 SRA_Response with conditions_OPW22-0251

                                                                                           2211-31930 SRA




Attachment 3—Reasons for referral agency response
(Given under section 56(7) of the Planning Act 2016)

The reasons for the SARA’s decision are:
 The proposal is for a development permit for operational works below high-water mark, prescribed
   tidal works: revetment wall reconstruction and stabilization of eroded backfill and foreshore terrace
   subgrade soils.
 The subject site is located in an area of coastal protection, high risk maritime development zone and
   marine plants.
 SARA assessed the development application against State code 7: Maritime Safety, State code 8:
   Coastal development and tidal works and State code 11: Removal, destruction or damage of marine
   plants of the SDAP, version 3.0 and determined that with conditions, the development achieves
   compliance with the performance outcomes of the State codes.

Material used in the assessment of the application:

      the development application material and submitted plans
      Planning Act 2016
      Planning Regulation 2017
      the SDAP (version 3.0), as published by SARA
      the Development Assessment Rules
      SARA DA Mapping system
      section 58 of the Human Rights Act 2019



Attachment 4—Representations about a referral agency response
provisions
(page left intentionally blank)




    State Assessment and Referral Agency                                                      Page 8 of 9