Skip to the record
Mmm.. taste the original NoosaWatch™

Council archive · source document

Further Advice Response_050820 · 51901.3614.01

of 5

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

The pergolas proposed on the roof terraces, although not constituting a storey by definition, result in
the building presenting as 4 storeys to the beach.

Advice required:
    3.   The proposed pergolas are to be peer reviewed by Noel Robinson (refer to below item for
         further information).

Item 4 – Peer Review
Issue:
Due to the prominence and locality of the subject site, the proposal plans are required to be peer
reviewed by NRA Collaborative. The peer review is to be at the expense of the applicant, as per
Council’s Fees and Charges.

Information required:
The proposal plans are to be peer reviewed, with the review to be provided to Council.

Response to Items 3 & 4:

An architectural peer review was undertaken by NRA Collaborative and as Council is aware, we had a
meeting with Noel Robinson and Tara Norley to discuss the key areas of interest raised by Noel. Noel’s
review included a number of recommendations, which have been considered by Sprout Architects and
the applicant. Accordingly, Sprout Architects has made a number of consequential changes to the
proposal plans – refer Attachment 1 for an amended set of plans for this application.

Sprout Architects has also provided the attached detailed response to the matters raised by Noel
Robinson – refer Attachment 2. This detailed response addresses each item in turn and provides written
and visual responses showing how the applicant has addressed Noel’s recommendations.

In summary, Sprout’s response shows that Noel’s recommendations have, for the most part, been
incorporated into the proposed development.

Should you have any questions with respect to the above, please do not hesitate to contact me direct.

Yours faithfully
PROJECT URBAN




Peter Folker
Director
Email: [email protected]




                                                   3

Used in these records

About this file

File size
372 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Further Advice Response_050820.pdf · 372 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.