PM Submission - Jon Kuiper - MCU25/0118

P

                                                                                               A.
                                                                                            Received    o
                                                                                  '^7
                                                                                  -1 ? 4 NOV 2525       O’,
    To: Assessment Manager                                                         \   ^’00sa Council
                                                                                    \ K Counter
    Noosa Shire Council                                                              \<?/
    PO Box 141                                                                               6
                                                         - .***
    Tewantin QLD 4565
    Email: [email protected]
                                                          •’ar
    Date:      I /// I

    1. Submitter Details


    Name:.

    Address:      <2^
    Email (Optional)


    2. Property & Application Description
    Application no.: MCU25/0118
    Location of proposed development: 64 Lake Macdonald Drive, Cooroy QLD 4563
    Proposal: Material Change of Use for multiple dwellings (25 units) for affordable housing.

    3. Grounds of Objection

    "1 object to the proposed development for the following reasons:

    a) Proximity to essential services - The site is far beyond accepted planning guidelines
    for access to shops, health services, and public transport.

    b) Incompatibility with surrounding character - The scale and density of 25 units
    conflict with the low-density residential nature of the area, negatively affecting amenity,
    privacy, and the overall environment.

    c) Traffic and safety concerns - The increase in vehicle movements will overload
    Dianella Court, Lake Macdonald Drive, and the Dianella Court/Wilgee Court
    intersection, compromising safety for residents, pedestrians, and school traffic.

    d) Insufficient buffer and amenity protection - Despite some buffer provisions, the
    proposal will still impact neighbouring properties with noise, overlooking, and loss of
    privacy, especially given the height and density near the cemetery.

    e) Misalignment with zoning intent - While affordable housing is important, the scale
    and form of the proposal contradict the zone's intent and the established character of the
    area."