Skip to the record
Search everything, all in one place.

Council archive · source document

MCU12/0023 Application Receival Checklist

of 4

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Leanne Simpson

From:                          Kerri Coyle [[email protected]]
Sent:                          Wednesday, 22 February 2012 12:30 PM
To:                            'Leanne Simpson'
Subject:                       RE: Scanlon site - David Low Way, Peregian Beach


Hi Leanne,

I confirm that the minimum fee of $1,290 is appropriate for the proposed changes to include the balconies and the
outdoor dining for the development.

In respect to the proposed description I believe for completeness that you may need to include all the approved uses
in the description of proposal. This would be then supported by your planning report which clearly articulates that the
approval sought is only for the additional balconies and outdoor dining. I understand your reluctance and therefore
you may wish to seek a legal opinion given it is possible that any decision of council may be appealed. It would be
unfortunate if the matter failed due to a technicality.


regards


Kerri Coyle I Coordinator, Planning Applications (North)
Sunshine Coast Council
Poinciana Avenue, Tewantin QLD 4561
P 07 5449 5223 F 07 5441 8275
E [email protected]
W www.sunshinecoast.qld.gov.au




From: Leanne Simpson [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 3:47 PM
To: Kerri Coyle
Cc: Glen Conforti
Subject: Scanlon site - David Low Way, Peregian Beach




 W PLANNERS
 t!^ URBAN DEStGNERS
     iU ':,EYORS
 P   E`ivl`IElRS
     LSNOSCAPE AACH1 I CTS
                                                                                           URBAN CONSULTANT S
Hi Kerri,

As you are no doubt aware, the permissible change request which was heard by the Court last Friday was
unsuccessful with respect to the inclusion of the upper level juliette balconies and the ground level outdoor dining
areas. Our client now wishes to lodge a new impact assessable application for these components and I was seeking
your clarification on a few matters with respect to the application type and process:

     1.      We anticipate the application will be for a Development Permit for Material Change of use for an Extension
            to Visitor Accommodation Type 4: Conventional (balconies) and Extension to Entertainment & Dining
            Business Type 1: Food and Beverages (outdoor dining) - can you confirm this is correct?

     2.     Our client has requested a fee waiver given the majority of the assessment and preparation of conditions
            has already been carried out. Can you please advise if this would be supported? I note the fee schedule
                                                             i

Used in these records

About this file

File size
713 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

MCU12_0023 Application Receival Checklist.pdf · 713 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.