Skip to the record
Accept no substitutions.

Original source · versioned page text

Meeting papers

of 31

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

                         AGENDA


              Ordinary Meeting

                Thursday, 20 July 2023

                    commencing at 5:00 PM
             Council Chambers, 9 Pelican Street, Tewantin




Crs Clare Stewart (Chair), Karen Finzel, Joe Jurisevic, Amelia Lorentson, Brian
Stockwell, Tom Wegener, Frank Wilkie




                      “Noosa Shire – different by nature”




                                                                          Page 1 of 31
Log in to download the original file

9c8b5ff685.pdf · 2.8 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

Full text of the other 30 pages

Page 2

ORDINARY MEETING                                                   20 JULY 2023




1.    ATTENDANCE & APOLOGIES

2.    CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES

3.    MAYORAL MINUTES

4.    PETITIONS

5.    NOTIFIED MOTIONS

6.    PRESENTATIONS

7.    DEPUTATIONS

8.    CONSIDERATION OF COMMITTEE REPORTS

      8.1.   PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE REPORT – 11 JULY 2023

      8.2.   SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE REPORT - 11 JULY 2023

      8.3.   GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING REPORT – 17 JULY 2023

9.    ORDINARY MEETING REPORTS

      9.1.   2023 LGAQ ANNUAL CONFERENCE MOTIONS

10.   CLOSED SESSION

11.   PUBLIC QUESTION TIME

12.   NEXT MEETING

13.   MEETING CLOSURE




                                                                           Page 2 of 31

Page 3

ORDINARY MEETING                                                                     20 JULY 2023




8.1     PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE REPORT – 11 JULY 2023

ATTENDANCE & APOLOGIES

COMMITTEE MEMBERS
Cr Tom Wegener
Cr Karen Finzel
Cr Brian Stockwell

NON COMMITTEE MEMBERS
Cr Joe Jurisevic
Cr Amelia Lorentson
Cr Frank Wilkie

EXECUTIVE
Director Strategy and Environment and Sustainable Development, Kim Rawlings
Acting Chief Executive Officer, Larry Sengstock
Director Development & Regulation, Richard MacGillivray

APOLOGIES
Cr Clare Stewart


RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE COMMITTEE TO COUNCIL


5.1. MCU21/0110 - APPLICATION FOR MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE - BAR, FOOD, AND
DRINK OUTLET, OUTDOOR SPORT AND RECREATION, RESORT COMPLEX AT 61 NOOSA
SPRINGS DRIVE, NOOSA HEADS
That Planning & Environment Committee Agenda Item 5.1 be referred to the General Committee
due to the significance of the issue.


5.2. 132001.210127.3 - CHANGE TO DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL - CHANGING SHARED
ROOMS TO SINGLE ROOMS - OZCARE - 100 COOYAR STREET, NOOSA HEADS
That Council note the report by the Development Planner to the General Committee Meeting dated
11 July 2023 regarding Application No. 132001.210127.3 to make a minor change to an existing
approval for a Development Permit for a Material Change or Use for Stage 3 – Aged Persons Home
(20 Beds) situated at 100 Cooyar Street, Noosa Heads and:
      1. Approve the change.
      2. Amend the development description to read as follows:
             o   Development Permit for a Material Change of Use - Residential Care Facility (130
                 beds)
      3. Amend conditions 15 and 26 as outlined in Attachment 1 - Proposed amended and
         additional conditions
      4. Delete conditions 1, 2, 23, 27 and 28.
      5. Include additional conditions as outlined in Attachment 1 - Proposed amended additional
         conditions.
      6. Agree to enter into an Infrastructure Agreement with Ozcare (the Owner) in respect of
         construction of access track crossing, maintenance of vegetation buffer one and access



                                                                                               Page 3 of 31

Page 4

ORDINARY MEETING                                                                          20 JULY 2023


           track (including crossing) for the Girraween Nature Refuge and the Residential Care
           Facility.
        7. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.


5.3. DBW21/0216 - APPLICATION FOR BUILDING WORKS FOR A DWELLING HOUSE AT 60
SEAVIEW TERRACE, SUNSHINE BEACH
That Council note the report by the Graduate Development Planner to the Planning and Environment
Committee Meeting dated 11 July 2023 regarding Application No. DBW21/0216 for a Development
Permit for Building Works – Dwelling House situated at 60 Seaview Terrace, Sunshine Beach and:
A.    Refuse the application for the following reasons:
1.       The proposal does not comply with Acceptable Outcome AO7.1 and corresponding
Performance Outcome PO7 of the Low Density Residential Zone Code as it:
  i.       Is proposed to exceed 8 metres in building height from finished ground level
  ii.      Will visually dominate the surrounding area; and
 iii.      Has the potential to obstruct views and cause overshadowing of dwellings within proximity
           of the site.
2.      The proposal does not comply with Acceptable Outcome AO8.1 and corresponding
Performance Outcome PO8 of the Low Density Residential Zone Code as it:
  i.       Exceeds site cover requirements of 50% for one storey and 30% for the other storey or
           40% for both storeys;
  ii.      Is not of a scale that is compatible with surrounding development;
 iii.      Has not included the opportunity for soft landscaping between buildings; and
 iv.       Presents an appearance of bulk to adjacent properties.
3.        The proposal does not comply with Acceptable Outcome AO9.3 and corresponding
Performance Outcome PO9 of the Low Density Residential Zone Code as:
i.    The northern side boundary setback does not comply with minimum side setback requirements;
ii.    The built to boundary garage and bin structures do not comply with minimum side setback
requirements;
iii.  Will impact on the visual and acoustic amenity of adjoining premises;
iv.    Has the capacity to cause issues of overlooking of private open space of adjoining premises;
and
v.    Does not provide adequate distance from adjoining land uses.
4.       The proposal does not comply with Acceptable Outcome AO16.3 and corresponding
Performance Outcome PO16 of the Low Density Residential Zone Code as the proposed rooftop
terrace will have the potential to obstruct views of dwellings within proximity of the site and create
issues of overlooking to neighbouring properties. the privacy walls associated with the proposed roof
top terrace will also create excessive bulk to neighbouring properties.
B.    Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.


5.4.   RAL22/0021 - RECONFIGURE A LOT (1 INTO 2 LOTS) AT 39-41 PICTURE POINT
CRESCENT, NOOSA HEADS
That Council note the report by the Acting Coordinator Planning to the Planning & Environment
Committee Meeting dated 11 July 2023 regarding Application No. RAL22/0021 for a Development
Permit for Reconfiguring a Lot – 1 into 2 lots, situated at 39-41 Picture Point Crescent Noosa Heads
and
A. Refuse the application for the following reasons:
1. The proposal is contrary to Overall Outcomes 2(a), (b), (c) & (d), Performance Outcomes PO5,
PO6, PO7, and Acceptable Outcome AO5.1, AO5.2, AO7.3, AO7.4, AO7.5, AO7.7 of the
Reconfiguring a Lot Code as:



                                                                                                    Page 4 of 31

Page 5

ORDINARY MEETING                                                                        20 JULY 2023


   a. The proposed lots are not consistent with the size and character of surrounding lots and are
      less than the required minimum lot size and width.
   b. The proposed lots are irregular in shape, with the proposed lot shape not necessitated by a
      curve in the road, topographical constraints, or the site’s vegetation, with the lot shape
      constraining their future development for multiple dwellings.
   c. The future development of the lots is likely to result in duplication of accessways and
      services, excessive earthworks and modification to the landform which will impact on the
      amenity and character of the area.
   d. The proposed development is not consistent with the Overall Outcome 2(o) of the Noosa
      Heads Locality Plan Code to accommodate a greater diversity in housing types as the
      proposed reconfiguring a lot will limit the opportunities for further multiple dwellings in
      Noosa Heads.
2.    The proposed lots are not consistent with the Overall Outcome 2(f) and Performance Outcome
PO1 of the High Density Residential Zone Code to accommodate multiple dwellings to the exclusion
of dual occupancy and dwelling houses, as the proposed lots are unlikely to be able to accommodate
multiple dwellings consistent with the code’s built form requirements.
3.      The proposed development is contrary to Overall Outcome 2(c), (d) & (h), Performance
Outcome PO2 and Acceptable Outcome AO2 of the Biodiversity, Waterways and Wetlands Overlay
Code as the proposed lot boundaries transect a wildlife corridor and no rehabilitation is proposed to
improve this ecological linkage.
4.      The proposed lots are in part located in a medium bushfire hazard area and the Bushfire
Management Plan does not make any assessment of the proposed development or identify any
bushfire mitigation measures, based on ecological principles, to minimise the risk to people and
property from bushfire hazard.
B. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.


5.5. MCU22/0120 – DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE – HOME-
BASED BUSINESS (MECHANIC) AT 39 EUCALYPT WAY, COOTHARABA
That the Planning and Environment Committee Agenda Item 5.5 be referred to the General
Committee and request the CEO to liaise with the applicant regarding a range of matters that would
reduce the potential impact such as:
   •   Limiting the use to 3 days a week and the hours 9am to 5pm;
   •   Installing acoustic barriers around the compressor and any other noise making machinery
       likely to create a nuisance outside of the property boundaries;
   •   Adopting work practices that buffer and direct noise away from neighbouring properties;
       and
   •   Conducting all operations to comply with noise limits set by the relevant Environmental
       Protection Policy.


5.6. MCU23/0019 - SHORT TERM ACCOMMODATION AT 2A WOONGAR STREET, BOREEN
POINT
That Planning & Environment Committee Agenda Item 5.6 be referred to the General Committee for
further consideration and request the CEO to provide appropriate conditions considering the
environmental sensitivity of the site including the control of dogs and other activities that may impact
on environmental values.


5.7. MCU16/0090.02 - MINOR CHANGE TO THE EXISTING APPROVAL FOR THE PURPOSE
OF PROVIDING A CAFÉ FOR GUESTS OF THE COMMUNITY USE – WELLBEING – TYPE 2




                                                                                                   Page 5 of 31

Page 6

ORDINARY MEETING                                                                          20 JULY 2023


SOCIAL ON LAND AT 468 MCKINNON DRIVE, COOROIBAH
In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009, Cr Wegener provided the
following declaration to the meeting of a declarable conflict of interest in this matter:
I, Cr Wegener, inform the meeting that I have a declarable conflict of interest in this matter in relation
to the application by Sunshine Butterflies as on 23 October 2020 I provided them with a donation of
surfboard making equipment valued at approximately $1200. Although I have a declarable conflict
of interest, I do not believe a reasonable person could have a perception of bias because I do not
have any other association with that organisation. Therefore, I will choose to remain in the meeting
room. However, I will respect the decision of the meeting on whether I can remain and participate in
the decision.

That Council note the report by the Development Planner to the Planning & Environment Committee
Meeting dated 11 July 2023 regarding Application No. MCU16/0090.02 for a Minor Change to an
existing approval for Material Change of Use - Community Use – Wellbeing – Type 2 – Social,
situated at 468 McKinnon Drive, Cooroibah and:
   A. Approve the change.
   B. Amend conditions 1 & 2 to read as outlined in Attachment 1 – Proposed amended and
      additional conditions.
   C. Include 2 additional conditions as outlined in Attachment 1 – Proposed amended and
      additional conditions.
   D. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.


5.8. INTEGRATED WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM - BURGESS CREEK
In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009, Cr Stockwell provided the
following declaration to the meeting of a declarable conflict of interest in this matter:
I, Cr Stockwell, inform the meeting that I have a declarable conflict of interest in this matter due to
the fact that as President of the Noosa Lions Football Club (NLFC) I have land and water
management responsibilities for approximately 4.5 ha of the Girraween Sports Complex. This
involves the application of mainly organic, slow release and calcium-based fertilisers and herbicide
over what is a sizeable holding in terms of the catchment. The club also uses groundwater for
irrigation and has used surface water and recycled water in the past. The downstream impact of
sports fields are potential risk factors for the quality of surface waters in the catchment. Considering
the volunteer and community nature of my role with NLFC and the fact that the club is not likely to
gain or lose from the proposed monitoring program, I choose to remain in the meeting room.
However, I will respect the decision of the meeting on whether I can remain and participate in the
decision.

That Planning & Environment Committee Agenda Item 5.8 be referred to the General Committee
due to significance of the issue.


6.1. PLANNING APPLICATIONS DECIDED BY DELEGATED AUTHORITY MAY 2023
That Council note the report by the Manager, Development Assessment to the Planning &
Environment Committee Meeting dated 11 July 2023 regarding planning applications that have been
decided by delegated authority.


6.2. NOOSA ENIVIRONMENT STRATEGY - YEAR THREE (2021/2022) IMPLEMENTATION
PLAN ANNUAL UPDATED
That Planning & Environment Committee Agenda Item 6.2 be referred to the General Committee
due to the significance of the issue.




                                                                                                     Page 6 of 31

Page 7

ORDINARY MEETING                                                                          20 JULY 2023


7.1. ENVIRONMENT LEVY PROPOSED
LAND PURCHASE
In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009, Cr Stockwell provided the
following declaration to the meeting of a declarable conflict of interest in this matter:
I, Cr Stockwell, inform the meeting that I have a declarable conflict of interest in this matter as in my
sole trader consultancy (Watershed Australia), I commenced a contract with the Koala Action
Gympie Region Association (KAGR) in June 2023. The $28,000 agreement currently runs to the
end of the calendar year. As part of the contract I am assisting the not-for-profit group identify
potential programs and projects to enhance koala habitat and the sustainability of the group in the
Gympie Region including opportunities to link with other organisations to create inter-regional
corridors. As the subject land abuts the Gympie Regional Council area, and as it is part of a mapped
koala corridor in the SEQ Bioregion, KAGR may have a future interest in linkages across shire
boundaries in this locality. As there is currently no direct link, nor any current specific project or
proposal involving KAGR, or myself in a consultant capacity, and the lot in question, nor is it likely
that I will benefit directly from its acquisition, I choose to remain in the meeting room. However, I will
respect the decision of the meeting on whether I can remain and participate in the decision.

That Council note the Report by the Principal Environment Officer to the Planning & Environment
Committee Meeting dated 11 July 2023 regarding the proposed purchase of the property and:
A. Approve and authorise the CEO to:
   1. Proceed with negotiation with the owners or their agent to purchase the property detailed in
      the Report within the valuation range of $400,000 to $480,000;
   2. If agreement can be reached between Council and the owners or their agent, utilise
      Council's Environment Levy funds to proceed with the purchase of the property detailed in
      the Report within the valuation range of $400,000 to $480,000;
   3. If the property detailed in the Report is purchased by Council, proceed with the placement
      of a Nature Refuge over the property; and
   4. Utilise Council's Environment Levy funds to allow Environmental Services undertake initial
      management actions on the property including weed and pest management, fire
      management, and ecological restoration; and
   5. Utilise Council's Environment Levy funds to allow Environmental Services to undertake
      ongoing management actions on the property including weed and pest management, fire
      management, flora and fauna monitoring.
Committee Recommendation
That the report of the Planning & Environment Committee dated 11 July 2023 be received and the
recommendations therein be adopted except where dealt with by separate resolution.




                                                                                                     Page 7 of 31

Page 8

ORDINARY MEETING                                                                       20 JULY 2023




8.2     SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE REPORT – 11 JULY 2023
ATTENDANCE & APOLOGIES
COMMITTEE MEMBERS
Cr Joe Jurisevic
Cr Amelia Lorentson
Cr Frank Wilkie

NON COMMITTEE MEMBERS
Cr Karen Finzel

EXECUTIVE
Acting Chief Executive Officer, Larry Sengstock
Acting Director Infrastructure Services, Shaun Walsh

APOLOGIES
Cr Clare Stewart

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL


5.1 CN00375 - RETAINING WALL RECONSTRUCTION - ARKANA DRIVE
That Council note the report by the Project Officer to the Services & Organisation         Committee
Meeting dated 11 July 2023 and:
      A. Award contract no. CN00375 Retaining Wall Reconstruction - Arkana Drive to Sunshine Civil
         Solutions Pty Ltd for the lump sum price of $409,904.22 (excl. GST); and
      B. Authorise the CEO to negotiate the final contract with Sunshine Civil Solutions Pty Ltd.


Committee Recommendation
That the report of the Services & Organisation Committee dated 11 July 2023 be received and the
recommendations therein be adopted except where dealt with by separate resolution.




                                                                                                    Page 8 of 31

Page 9

ORDINARY MEETING                                                                      20 JULY 2023




8.3    GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING REPORT – 17 JULY 2023


ATTENDANCE & APOLOGIES


COMMITTEE MEMBERS
Deputy Mayor Cr Frank Wilkie (Chair)
Councillor Cr Karen Finzel
Councillor Cr Joe Jurisevic
Councillor Cr Amelia Lorentson
Councillor Cr Clare Stewart
Councillor Cr Brian Stockwell
Councillor Cr Tom Wegener


EXECUTIVE
Acting Chief Executive Officer Larry Sengstock
Director Development & Regulation Richard MacGillivray
Director Strategy and Environment and Sustainable Development Kim Rawlings
Director Corporate Services Trent Grauf


APOLOGIES
Nil.


COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL


5.1. MCU21/0110 - APPLICATION FOR MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE - BAR, FOOD, AND
DRINK OUTLET, OUTDOOR SPORT AND RECREATION, RESORT COMPLEX AT 61 NOOSA
SPRINGS DRIVE, NOOSA HEADS
(Referred from Planning & Environment Committee Meeting dated 11 July 2023 - Item 5.1)


In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009, Cr Stewart provided the following
declaration to the meeting of a declarable conflict of interest in this matter:
I, Cr Stewart, inform the meeting that I have a declarable conflict of interest in this matter as,
unbeknownst to me at the time, my mother signed a petition against the development for the
proposed Noosa Springs Hotel. Subsequently to finding this out, I have since removed myself from
all workshops and discussion on this application. My parents also live in Noosa Springs. I also
understand that JFP Urban Consultants on behalf of Altum Property Group, who are the Developers
of Park Ridge Noosa Springs, made a submission against the Noosa Springs Hotel Development.
Leigh McCready, who is associated with Altum, is a friend. As a result of my conflicts of interest, I
will now leave the meeting room while the matter is considered and voted on.




                                                                                                Page 9 of 31

Page 10

ORDINARY MEETING                                                                           20 JULY 2023


In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009, Cr Finzel provided the following
declaration to the meeting of a declarable conflict of interest in this matter:
I, Cr Finzel, inform the meeting that I have a declarable conflict of interest in this matter as I have
come to understand that JFP Urban Consultants on behalf of Altum Property Group, who are the
Developers of Park Ridge Noosa Springs, made a submission against the Noosa Springs Hotel
Development. Leigh McCready, who is associated with Altum, was involved as a volunteer with my
2020 election campaign with Future Noosa which is no longer an entity. As a result of my conflict of
interest I will now leave the meeting room while the matter is considered and voted on.


In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009, Cr Stockwell provided the
following declaration to the meeting of a declarable conflict of interest in this matter:
I, Cr Stockwell, inform the meeting that I have a declarable conflict of interest in this matter as I have
come to understand that JFP Consultants on behalf of Altum Property Group, who are the
Developers of Park Ridge Noosa Springs, made a submission against the Noosa Springs Hotel
Development. Leigh McCready is associated with Altum Property Group. On 24 February 2020 I
sought a review by the Independent Council Election Observer (ICEO) as to the public claims of the
Future Noosa Team in regard to Ms Leigh McCready. Although I have a declarable conflict of
interest, I do not believe a reasonable person could have a perception of bias because the ICEO
review was an advisory service and my queries at that time were in the public interest. Therefore, I
will choose to remain in the meeting room. However, I will respect the decision of the meeting on
whether I can remain in the meeting room while the matter is considered and voted on.


That Council note the report by the Development Assessment Manager to the Planning &
Environment Committee Meeting dated 11 July 2023 regarding MCU21/0110 development permit
for material change of use for resort complex (106 rooms), food and drink outlet, bar and outdoor
sport and recreation at Links Drive, Noosa Heads and
A.           Refuse the Application for the following reasons:
1. The proposed development of the subject land is inappropriate, in circumstances where:
        a. Part of the proposed land use is a resort complex, in circumstances where part of the subject
           land is outside of the urban growth boundary in Noosa Plan 2020;
        b. The proponent seeks to utilise the land for Resort Complex, which is an inconsistent use in
           the Recreation and Open Space zone;
        c. The proposed development is an overdevelopment of the land, at the expense of the natural
           values of the land and involves a reduction of land in the Recreation and Open Space zone;
        d. The proposed development would result in the overdevelopment of the subject land, at the
           expense of its environmental values, as it proposed that an area of existing open space be
           developed;
        e. It results in the unacceptable clearing of vegetation in an ecologically important area and an
           environmentally sensitive area;
        f.    The built form and density of the proposed development is unacceptable.
In these respects, the proposed development is inconsistent with the following provisions of Noosa
Plan 2020:
     i.       Strategic Framework – 3.2.2, 3.2.5, 3.3.2(g), 3.3.1(b) and 3.3.4(b)(p);
  ii.         Biodiversity, Waterways and Wetlands Overlay Code – 8.2.2.2(2)(a), (b) and (c), Table 8.2.23
              PO1, PO3, PO5 and PO12;
 iii.         Recreation and Open Space Zone Code– 6.6.1.2(2)(a)(c)(f)(g) and(s), Table 6.6.13 PO1,
              PO2, PO3, PO4, PO15, PO16, PO17, PO18, PO19 and PO38;




                                                                                                    Page 10 of 31

Page 11

ORDINARY MEETING                                                                        20 JULY 2023


 iv.      Noosa Heads Local Plan Code – 7.2.5.2(2)(b)(e), Table 7.2.5.3 PO5, PO26 and PO27
2. It has not been demonstrated that the proposed development will not involve unacceptable
acoustic amenity impacts, as:
     a. the acoustic impacts of plant, equipment and services associated with the proposed
        development have not been adequately assessed;
     b. if it is the case there are indeed acoustic impacts, no measures have been proposed to
        ameliorate those impacts.
3. The proposed development conflicts with the State Planning Policy, State interest - emissions and
hazardous activities as it is in proximity of an existing Sewage Treatment Plant and risks inhibiting
the sewage treatment plant from functioning safely and effectively due to potential reverse amenity
impacts.
4. When read as a whole, the South East Queensland Regional Plan 2017 (SEQRP) does not lend
support to the proposed use of the land, as:
     a. the SEQRP sets a long term, 50-year vision, establishing aspirations for this region up to
        2067. Given this, the timing and sequencing of residential developments occurring within the
        Urban Footprint is a finer grained detail, the planning for which is implemented through local
        government planning schemes;
     b. the designation of land as being within the Urban Footprint does not imply that all that land
        with that designation can be developed for urban purposes; and
     c. when assessed against Noosa Plan 2020, the proposed development is not suitable for urban
        development.
5. Noosa Plan 2020 appropriately integrates and advances the South East Queensland Regional
Plan 2017, as set out in section 2.2 of the planning scheme.
6. The proposed development has failed to demonstrate a significant planning need to develop
outside of the urban boundary, particularly at the density and intensity proposed and where
inconsistent with the local landscape character. Nor has any overriding community benefit been
demonstrated, which would justify approval despite its conflict with the planning scheme.
7. Many valid planning grounds have been raised by submitters that the proposal represents an
unacceptable level of impact on the amenity of the locality. Further, the development exceeds what
a community member could reasonably expect because of the change to the Tourism
Accommodation Zone when the Noosa Plan 2020 was advertised.
B.       Note that Council resolves to deviate from the staff recommendation on the following grounds:
1. Council is of the view that there is a clear delineation of zone and urban boundaries on the Noosa
Plan 2020 maps. Further, that:
     a. Council is of the opinion that the demarcation of the split zone over the lot took into account
        a range of factors, over and above the acceptable line of odour nuisance. During the
        development of the Noosa Plan 2020, as would be the case in any future potential scheme
        amendment, avoidance of areas mapped in the Biodiversity Overlay and protection of
        vegetated and noise buffers to adjacent residences were/would be important factors when
        determining the appropriate development footprint;
     b. There is a long-standing position of Council that it doesn't facilitate development applications
        that drive the need to amend the Planning Scheme.
2. The proposal represents an excessive use of Recreation and Open Space Zone land for an
inconsistent use, and does not adequately achieve the Desired Outcomes for the zone, including
those listed below:
     •    Development does not adversely impact on the Shire’s environmental values or reduce the
          quality of recreational experiences provided by land or waterways within this zone;




                                                                                                  Page 11 of 31

Page 12

ORDINARY MEETING                                                                      20 JULY 2023


   •   Adverse impacts on ecologically important areas, including natural habitats, bushland,
       wetlands and waterways are avoided or minimised;
   •   Impacts are managed with landscape buffering and appropriate design, siting and operation
       of facilities and infrastructure:
3. The proposal does not adequately manage impacts within areas under the Biodiversity Overlay
and, amongst other things, does not meet Performance Outcome 3 with respect to the following
requirements:
Development is designed and sited to manage adverse impacts on ecologically important areas by:
   a. minimising the total footprint within which all activities, buildings, structures driveways and
      other works are contained;
   b. locating development in existing cleared areas or areas of low ecological value over other
      areas to the greatest extent possible; and
   c. incorporating siting and design measures to protect and retain ecological values and
      ecosystem processes within or adjacent to the development site.
4. A large number of valid planning grounds have been raised by submitters and Council is satisfied
the proposal represents an unacceptable level of impact on the amenity of the locality. Further, the
development exceeds what a community member could reasonably expect as a result of the change
to the Tourism Accommodation Zone when the Noosa Plan 2020 was advertised.
5. A valid submission from Unitywater identifies potential risks and flow on costs associated with the
proposed development of additional sensitive receptors within the Recreation and Open Space Zone
in proximity to the Noosa Sewage Treatment Plant.


5.2. MCU22/0120 – DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE – HOME-
BASED BUSINESS (MECHANIC) AT 39 EUCALYPT WAY, COOTHARABA
(Referred from Planning & Environment Committee Meeting dated 11 July 2023 - Item 5.5)
That Council note the report by the Development Planner to the Planning & Environment Committee
Meeting dated 11 July 2023 regarding Application No. MCU22/0120 for a Development Permit for
Material Change of Use - Home-based business (Mechanic), situated at 39 Eucalypt Way,
Cootharaba and defer the matter to the Ordinary Meeting dated 20 July 2023 to allow further
discussion with the applicant regarding the provision of an acoustic report.


5.3. MCU23/0019 - SHORT TERM ACCOMMODATION AT 2A WOONGAR STREET, BOREEN
POINT
(Referred from Planning & Environment Committee Meeting dated 11 July 2023 - Item 5.6)
That Council note the report by the Development Planner to the Planning & Environment Committee
Meeting dated 11 July 2023 regarding Application No. MCU23/0019 for a Development Permit for a
Material Change of Use - Short-term accommodation situated at 2a Woongar Street, Boreen Point
and:
   A. Approve the application in accordance with the proposed conditions as outlined in
      Attachment 1 to the Minutes - Final Conditions.
   B. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.


5.4.   INTEGRATED WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM - BURGESS CREEK
(Referred from Planning & Environment Committee Meeting dated 11 July 2023 - Item 5.8)




                                                                                                Page 12 of 31

Page 13

ORDINARY MEETING                                                                        20 JULY 2023


In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009, Cr Stockwell provided the
following declaration to the meeting of a declarable conflict of interest in this matter:
 I, Cr Stockwell, inform the meeting that I have a declarable conflict of interest in this matter due to
the fact that as President of the Noosa Lions Football Club (NLFC) I have land and water
management responsibilities for approximately 4.5 ha of the Girraween Sports Complex. This
involves the application of mainly organic, slow release and calcium-based fertilisers and herbicide
over what is a sizeable holding in terms of the catchment. The club also uses groundwater for
irrigation and has used surface water and recycled water in the past. The downstream impact of
sports fields are potential risk factors for the quality of surface waters in the catchment. Considering
the volunteer and community nature of my role with NLFC and the fact that the club is not likely to
gain or lose from the proposed monitoring program, I choose to leave the meeting.


In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009, Cr Lorentson provided the
following declaration to the meeting of a declarable conflict of interest in this matter:
I, Cr Lorentson inform the meeting that I have a declarable conflict of interest in this matter as my
brother Gabriel Cerasani lives approximately 3 kilometres from Burgess Creek. Also, until recently,
my brother was on the executive of the Eastern Beaches Protection Association who have made
submissions regarding issues with Burgess Creek, including raising a petition on the matter.
Considering recent advice given to Councillors by the Office of Independent assessor, that is, to
exercise an 'abundance of caution', I believe it is prudent to declare a conflict of interest. It is
important to note, that I have taken myself off the CHAP and the Eastern Beaches Foreshore
Management Plan because of my brother’s involvement on the EPBA. An Integrated Catchment
Management Plan for Burgess Creek is not part of the CHAP nor part of CHAP solutions. It is part
of a broader, Noosa Catchment strategy of waterways. What I have been requesting since June
2022, is an analysis and review of environmental monitoring and impacts for the Noosa Sewage
Treatment Plant releases into Burgess Creek and the catchment. Matters regarding Water Quality
Issues affecting Burgess Creek catchment, and environmental impacts of Wastewater Treatment
Plant outflows into the Burgess Creek catchment. Burgess Creek catchment covers roughly 545
hectares, it drains from the back of residential developments in Noosa Head, through bushland and
community facilities near Eenie Creek Road, and then through a Council-managed Bushland
Reserve and National Park. It affects and impacts thousands and thousands of people in the Shire.
The disposal of liquid waste into our waterways, including freshwater, oceans and rivers creates
social and environmental problems for the whole of Noosa Shire. This issue is a significant issue for
the whole community. Water quality has political, environmental, and legal implications for the whole
of shire of council. Many of these implications include risks to Council infrastructure such as
stormwater, open spaces and roads. In October 2022: I moved a Council resolution at the LGAQ
Conference: Regions becoming more Resource Independent through efficient use and re-use of
Wastewater. I called on the LGAQ to advocate to the State Government of Qld to undertake a state-
wide analysis of recycled water reuse that values the protection of local ecosystems and provides
suitable data to assist councils and water authorities and retailers in producing business cases for
water reuse. Supported (almost unanimously). In June 2023, I moved another Council resolution at
the Australian Local Government Association (ALGA) calling on the Australian Government to
formulate a National Policy on Ocean Sewerage Outfalls that aims at:
   •   No new ocean and estuarine sewerage outfalls to be built/developed along the Australian
       coastline, and
   •   Dedicated funding to be provided to support local regional governments and wastewater
       providers with existing ocean and estuarine outfalls, to develop new methods/technologies
       and make every effort to recycle 100% of all treated wastewater generated within their
       localities and avoid the need to discharge in the ocean.
It was carried unopposed by 357 Councils in Australia. Both motions were supported unanimously
by this Council. I have also put forward a motion for Council approval for this year’s LGAQ
Conference in Gladstone calling for LGAQ to advocate to the State for a State Policy on Ocean
Sewerage Outfalls because we need to develop a standard, wastewater diversion targets and



                                                                                                  Page 13 of 31

Page 14

ORDINARY MEETING                                                                         20 JULY 2023


wastewater recycling and reuse targets that can be replicated across all the States in Australia. I
believe that my intention cannot be questioned. The outcome I am seeking to achieve is:
   •   Cleaner oceans
   •   Cleaner wastewater
   •   Reducing the impact of liquid waste on the environment and communities
   •   Transitioning towards a circular economy for liquid waste
   •   Environmental best practices
For the whole of Noosa Shire. An Integrated Catchment Management Plan for the Burgess Creek
Catchment that will form part of a broader, Noosa Catchment Strategy of waterways will help us plan
to achieve this outcome. For nearly two years this issue has become one of my passion projects. I
have knowledge and expertise that I bring to this table and integrity. Although I have a declarable
COI, I believe I could consider the matter impartially and in the public interest. I choose to remain in
the meeting room. However, I will respect the decision of the meeting on whether I can remain and
participate in the decision.


That Council note the report by the Environment Officer – Rivers & Coast to the Planning &
Environment Committee Meeting dated 11 July 2023 and:
   A. Note staff will continue liaising with Unitywater regarding the Burgess Creek STP data and
      aspects of Burgess Creek management;
   B. Continue scoping and development of a Burgess Creek Integrated Catchment Management
      Plan in partnership with Unitywater and key stakeholders;
   C. Note the continued development of Council’s Integrated Water Quality Monitoring Program
      including potential expansion to include additional monitoring sites; and
   D. That this report responds to previous Council Notice of Motions.


5.5. NOOSA ENVIRONMENT STRATEGY - YEAR THREE (2021/2022) IMPLEMENTATION
PLAN ANNUAL UPDATED
(Referred from Planning & Environment Committee dated 11 July 2023 - Item 6.2)
 In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009, Cr Wilkie provided the following
declaration to the meeting of a declarable conflict of interest in this matter:
I, Cr Wilkie, inform the meeting that I have a declarable conflict of interest in this matter as in early
2020, I received an electoral donation of $750 from Peregian resident Susan Francis. Susan Francis
is the partner of Peregian resident Barry Cotterell. Mr Cotterell is the president of the Peregian Beach
Community Association (PBCA). The Environment Strategy Update mentions the progress of the
Eastern Beaches Foreshore Reserves Management Plan. The PBCA has provided feedback on the
Eastern Beaches Foreshore Reserves Management Plan. The Office of the Independent Assessor
and legal advice has indicated the Eastern Beaches Foreshore Reserves Management Plan is not
Ordinary Council business because it relates to a specific geographical area and that links to groups
who have made submission to it ought to be declared. Although I nor the PBCA, which is a volunteer
community group, stand to gain personally or materially through noting this report, I make this
declaration out of "an abundance of caution" and commitment to transparency. I believe I can make
an impartial decision in the public interest in this matter and l therefore choose to remain in the
meeting room. However, I will respect the decision of the meeting on whether I can remain and
participate in the decision.


In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009, Cr Stockwell provided the
following declaration to the meeting of a declarable conflict of interest in this matter:



                                                                                                   Page 14 of 31

Page 15

ORDINARY MEETING                                                                        20 JULY 2023


I, Cr Stockwell, inform the meeting that I have a declarable conflict of interest in this matter as in
early 2020, I received an electoral donation of $500 from Peregian resident Susan Francis. Susan
Francis is the partner of Peregian resident Barry Cotterell. Mr Cotterell is the president of the
Peregian Beach Community Association (PBCA). The Environment Strategy Update mentions the
progress of the Eastern Beaches Foreshore Reserves Management Plan. The PBCA has provided
feedback on the Eastern Beaches Foreshore Reserves Management Plan. The Office of the
Independent Assessor and legal advice has indicated the Eastern Beaches Foreshore Reserves
Management Plan is not Ordinary Council business because it relates to a specific geographical
area and that links to groups who have made submission to it ought to be declared. Although I nor
the PBCA, which is a volunteer community group, stand to gain personally or materially through
noting this report, I make this declaration out of "an abundance of caution" and commitment to
transparency. I believe I can make an impartial decision in the public interest in this matter and l
therefore choose to remain in the meeting room. However, I will respect the decision of the meeting
on whether I can remain and participate in the decision.


In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009, Cr Lorentson provided the
following declaration to the meeting of a declarable conflict of interest in this matter:
I, Cr Lorentson, inform the meeting that I have a declarable conflict of interest in this matter because
my brother Gabriel Cerasani, who until recently, was on the Executive of the Eastern Beaches
Protection Association who have made submissions to the Eastern Beaches Foreshore
Management Plan. The report references the Plan as part of the Noosa Environment Strategy.
Although I have a declarable conflict of interest, I do not believe a reasonable person could have a
perception of bias because I believe my brother nor I stand to receive a personal benefit or loss in
relation to this matter. Therefore, I will choose to remain in the meeting room. However, I will respect
the decision of the meeting on whether I can remain and participate in the decision.


That the matter be deferred to the Ordinary Meeting.


6.1.   FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE REPORT – JUNE 2023
That Council note the report by the Manager Financial Services (Acting) to the General Committee
Meeting dated 17 July 2023 outlining the interim 2022/23 full year financial performance against
budget, including key financial sustainability indicators.


Committee Recommendation
That the report of the General Committee Meeting dated 17 July 2023 be received and the
recommendations therein be adopted except where dealt with by separate resolution.




                                                                                                  Page 15 of 31

Page 16

ORDINARY MEETING                                                                     20 JULY 2023


9.1     2023 LGAQ ANNUAL CONFERENCE MOTIONS


Author             Acting Chief Executive Officer, Larry Sengstock
                   CEO Office Department
Index              ECM/Subject/LGAQ
Attachments         1.   Attachment 1 - MOTION A - Cr Lorentson - Support of Noosa Council’s
                         ALGA motion for a National Policy on Ocean Sewerage Outfalls
                    2.   Attachment 2 - MOTION B - Cr Lorentson - State Policy on Ocean
                         Sewerage Outfalls
                    3.   Attachment 3 - MOTION C - Cr Wilkie - Shaping SEQ Review Process
                    4.   Attachment 4 - MOTION D - Cr Finzel- Psychosocial Risk Reduction
                         Training


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Local Government Queensland Conference is held annually and provides a forum for all
Queensland Councils to come together to table and debate contemporary issues of importance to
their local areas and communities as well as identify issues that are likely to be relevant to other
local Councils. This report proposes Noosa Council put forward motions for consideration at the
LGAQ conference to seek support from other Councils to advocate for the required legislative
changes.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council note the report by the Chief Executive Officer (Acting) to the Ordinary Meeting dated
20 July 2023 and approve the submission of the following motions to the Local Government
Association of Queensland (LGAQ) Annual Conference 2023 for consideration and debate:

A. "The LGAQ advocate to the State Government of Queensland recommending that a submission
made by Noosa Council to NGA at the ALGA Conference 2023 is developed and agreed to by the
ALGA board for Federal Policy priority and implementation. The motion was carried unopposed by
357 Councils across Australia."

B. "The LGAQ advocate to the State Government of Queensland to formulate a State Policy on
Ocean Sewerage Outfalls that aims at:
      1. No new ocean and estuarine sewerage outfalls to be built/developed along the Queensland
         coastline, and
      2. Dedicated funding to be provided to support local regional governments and wastewater
         providers with existing ocean and estuarine outfalls, to develop new methods/technologies
         and make every effort to recycle treated wastewater generated within their localities and
         avoid the need to discharge in the ocean."

C. "The LGAQ calls on the State Government to respect the dwelling and population growth
projections as advised, and planned for, by each South-East Queensland Local Government and
provide adequate funding for infrastructure to match any increase in dwelling and population
projections imposed by the State Government during the Shaping SEQ Review process."

D. "The LGAQ calls on the Qld State and Federal Governments to allocate Funding for a Pilot
Program to enable the LGAQ to co-ordinate ‘Psychosocial Risk Reduction Training’."




                                                                                              Page 16 of 31

Page 17

ORDINARY MEETING                                                                         20 JULY 2023



REPORT
MOTION A - Cr Lorentson - Support of Noosa Council’s ALGA motion for a National Policy on
Ocean Sewerage Outfalls

"The LGAQ advocate to the State Government of Queensland recommending that a submission
made by Noosa Council to NGA at the ALGA Conference, 2023 is developed and agreed to by the
ALGA board for Federal Policy priority and implementation. The motion was carried unopposed by
357 Councils across Australia."

Background
In June 2023: Noosa Council moved a motion at the Australian Local Government Association
(ALGA) calling on the Australian Government to formulate a National Policy on Ocean Sewerage
Outfalls that aims at:
1. No new ocean and estuarine sewerage outfalls to be built/developed along the Australian
coastline, and
2. Dedicated funding to be provided to support local regional governments and wastewater providers
with existing ocean and estuarine outfalls, to develop new methods/technologies and make every
effort to recycle 100% of all treated wastewater generated within their localities and avoid the need
to discharge in the ocean.
It was carried unopposed by 357 Councils in Australia. Water scarcity, extreme weather events,
droughts, and population growth require efficient water management and sustainable sewerage and
stormwater management. It demands that we start valuing the worth of water and start using potable
water for better use. It is unacceptable that in 2023, that treated sewage, untreated sewage is still
being discharged into our oceans. A practice that commenced in Australia in the 1960s. Whilst it
might not be currently possible to do away with marine outfalls completely, we must set ambitious
targets, be forward thinking and do what we can to look at alternatives and new technologies to
lessen the environmental impact to the receiving environments ie aquatic and coastal
ecosystems. Our beaches and coastline are some of our most important public places and must be
a key priority for this country. Facts: Data gathered in 2016 from 165 of the 175 ocean and
estuarine outfalls provide the first national snapshot of wastewater discharges to Australia's coastal
environment. The total volume of wastewater discharged to Australia's oceans in 2016 was 1350
gigalitres: equivalent to 2.7 Sydney harbours. The potential value of this water would have been
more than more than $1 billion, had as little as 20% been recycled*. A large proportion 64% of
Australia’s 176 coastal outfalls are currently contributing to poor water quality for Australia’s coastal
waterways and ocean environments because, wastewater is treated to only a lower level of quality,
referred to as a primary or secondary treatment.*
 *Clean Ocean Foundation, Outfall Database

MOTION B - Cr Lorentson - State Policy on Ocean Sewerage Outfalls

"The LGAQ advocate to the State Government of Queensland to formulate a State Policy on Ocean
Sewerage Outfalls that aims at:
   1. No new ocean and estuarine sewerage outfalls to be built/developed along the Queensland
      coastline, and
   2. Dedicated funding to be provided to support local regional governments and wastewater
      providers with existing ocean and estuarine outfalls, to develop new methods/technologies
      and make every effort to recycle treated wastewater generated within their localities and
      avoid the need to discharge in the ocean."
Background
In October 2022: Noosa Council moved a motion at the LGAQ Conference: Regions becoming
more Resource Independent through efficient use and re-use of Wastewater.
I called on the LGAQ to advocate to the State Government of Qld to undertake a state-wide analysis
of recycled water reuse that values the protection of local ecosystems and provides suitable data to



                                                                                                   Page 17 of 31

Page 18

ORDINARY MEETING                                                                       20 JULY 2023


assist councils and water authorities and retailers in producing business cases for water
reuse. Supported (almost unanimous).
In June 2023: Noosa Council moved a motion at the Australian Local Government Association
(ALGA) calling on the Australian Government to formulate a National Policy on Ocean Sewerage
Outfalls that aims at:
   •   No new ocean and estuarine sewerage outfalls to be built/developed along the Australian
       coastline, and
   •   Dedicated funding to be provided to support local regional governments and wastewater
       providers with existing ocean and estuarine outfalls, to develop new methods/technologies
       and make every effort to recycle 100% of all treated wastewater generated within their
       localities and avoid the need to discharge in the ocean.
It was carried unopposed by 357 Councils in Australia. It also attracted over 12,000 signatures
This motion supports and aligns with intent and the outcomes sought by ALGA, 2023 and LGAQ,
2022 motions.
Queensland coastline and rivers are some of our most important places. They are not rubbish tip.
It is time to take a stance to stop new ocean and estuarine sewerage outfalls to be built/developed
along the Australian coastline.
It is time to reduce the impact of not just solid waste but also liquid waste on our environment and
communities.
It is time to transition towards a circular economy for wastewater and building economic opportunity.
And uncertainty around emerging contaminants such as PFAS and micro plastics and
toxins requires improved systems and investment to manage WWTP for cleaner oceans.
We need to transition to cleaner wastewater, for cleaner oceans, for all of Queensland.

MOTION C - Cr Wilkie - Shaping SEQ Review Process

"The LGAQ calls on the State Government to respect the dwelling and population growth projections
as advised, and planned for, by each South-East Queensland Local Government and provide
adequate funding for infrastructure to match any increase in dwelling and population  projections
imposed by the State Government during the Shaping SEQ Review process."

Background
The State government is undertaking a review of the SEQ Regional Plan and appears to be
drastically increasing population and dwelling projections for SEQ councils, regardless of whether
they are attainable or realistic.

MOTION D - Cr Finzel- Psychosocial Risk Reduction Training

"The LGAQ calls on the Qld State and Federal Governments to allocate Funding for a Pilot Program
to enable the LGAQ to co-ordinate ‘Psychosocial Risk Reduction Training’"

Background
LGAQ has capacity to co-ordinate a Pilot program with the provision by way of resourcing from the
State Government and creating the opportunity to collect data and establish key findings as
supported evidence. To upscale the Pilot Program to a State Wide initiative in the future. Councils
as duty holders are obligated to ensure that adequate information, training and instruction is provided
to workers about the nature of these psychosocial risks and control measures. Promoting a culture
of reporting psychosocial hazards. Facilitating Managers alongside workers to model these
behaviours requires education and training including but not limited to Trauma Informed Care given
Council workers are increasingly on the front line responding to unprecedented natural disasters in
the past five years. The associated costs back to Government, private sectors and communities
when it comes to reasonably ensuring the mental health and wellbeing of our people is borne by us
all. Improving health outcomes through education and prevention with a focus on early intervention
with contributions made by a wide range of partners to include all levels of government in addressing



                                                                                                 Page 18 of 31

Page 19

ORDINARY MEETING                                                                         20 JULY 2023


the health of women and girls is identified in the principle objectives and actions of ‘The National
Women’s Health Strategy 2020-2030’. Steps forward support the notion that investment into training
local Council workers has a ripple affect with our people being seen as ‘Ambassadors’ in sharing
learned knowledge through informal pathways. Contributing value towards the advancement of
human rights, sustainable development and peace as recognised by UNESCO. Collectively, now
more than ever we need to fast track initiatives to find practical ways to minimize impacts of COVID
recovery and natural disaster management now and into the future. Building resilience to improve
mental health and well-being of our people now living in our communities with the impacts of natural
disasters, climate change, rising cost of living, access to affordable housing, and job security is
essential.
Link to Corporate Plan

Theme No 1. - Environment
Focus areas include the natural environment, built environment, waterways and coasts and
conservation and heritage.
Theme No. 2. - Liveability
Liveability encompasses housing, facilities and services, transport, health and wellbeing to enable
an inclusive, connected and vibrant community.
Theme No. 4. - Future
This theme is focused on our future, strengthening our relationship with First Nations peoples and to
ensure our community is prepared and resilient to change. A focus on youth, climate resilience and
adaptation, sense of place and destination management.
Theme No. 5. - Excellence
This theme focuses on customer experience, financial sustainability, innovation and technology,
levels of service, governance, our employees and volunteers, funding streams and asset
management practices.


Previous Council Consideration
Nil.
Finance
Nil associated directly - seeking consideration of a potential LGAQ motion and advocacy.
Risk & Opportunities
As noted in each proposed motion template.
Consultation
External Consultation - Community & Stakeholder
As noted in each proposed motion template.
Internal Consultation
Departments consulted:

       Office of the CEO, Mayor &       Community Services                Corporate Services
               Councillors
  x       Mayor & Councillors       x   Director                    x   Director
  x       Chief Executive Officer       Community Development           Financial Services
          Executive Officers            Sport & Active Lifestyles       Fleet
          Community Engagement          Arts & Culture                  Revenue Services
          People & Culture              Community Connection            ICT
          Governance                    Customer Experience             Commercial Property




                                                                                                Page 19 of 31

Page 20

ORDINARY MEETING                                                                          20 JULY 2023


     Strategy & Environment &            Development & Regulation        Infrastructure Services
     Sustainable Development
 x     Director                      x     Director                 x   Director
       Strategic Land Use Planning         Development Assessment       Infrastructure Planning, Design
                                                                        and Delivery
       Economic Development &              Local Laws                   Civil and Asset operations
       Destination Management
       Environmental Services              Environmental Health         Asset Management
       Innovation & Digital Hub            Building & Plumbing          Building & Facilities
                                           Property / Permits           Disaster Management
                                                                        Waste




                                                                                                     Page 20 of 31

Page 21

ATTACHMENT 1 - MOTION A




 2023 LGAQ Annual Conference – Motions template


 Who is the key contact for this motion?      Cr Amelia Lorentson
 (required)
 Submitting council (required)                Noosa Council
 Supporting organisation (if applicable)      n/a
 Council resolution # (required)              20 July 2023


 Date of council resolution                   20/07/2023
 (required)

 Does this motion have state-wide relevance? (This is a required field)
 YES

 Title of motion (required)                   Support of Noosa Council’s ALGA motion for a
                                              National Policy on Ocean Sewerage Outfalls
 Motion                                       The LGAQ advocate to the State Government of
 (required)                                   Queensland recommending that a submission made
                                              by Noosa Council to NGA at the ALGA Conference,
                                              2023 is developed and agreed to by the ALGA board
                                              for Federal Policy priority and implementation. The
                                              motion was carried unopposed by 357 Councils
                                              across Australia.




                                                                                             Page 21 of 31

Page 22

  2




What is the desired outcome sought?   Advocacy and support by LGAQ of an ALGA Motion
(required) 200 word limit             calling on the Australian Government to formulate a
                                      National Policy on Ocean Sewerage Outfalls, that
                                      was carried unopposed at the National Gallery of
                                      Australia in June 2023. Desired outcomes:
                                       • Stop the use of the ocean as a rubbish dump
                                       • Reduce the impact of liquid waste on the
                                          environment and communities
                                       • Transition towards a circular economy for liquid
                                          waste
                                       • Build economic opportunity
                                       • Set Wastewater diversion targets from all
                                          waterways, including freshwater, oceans and
                                          rivers
                                       • Set Wastewater reuse and recycle targets with
                                          economic incentives to drive reform
                                       • Pollution caps and
                                       • Investment in wastewater reuse and
                                          infrastructure.
                                      The disposal of liquid waste into our waterways,
                                      including freshwater, oceans and rivers creates
                                      social and environmental problems for Queensland
                                      and the country.
                                      Wastewater reuse solutions and technologies exist.
                                      And some Councils around Australia including WA,
                                      SA and Qld are leading the way. Our environment,
                                      community and country demand a better way of
                                      managing waste that does not destroy what we love,
                                      our beaches and coastline.
Background                            In June 2023: Noosa Council moved a motion at the
(required) 350 word limit             Australian Local Government Association (ALGA)
                                      calling on the Australian Government to formulate a
                                      National Policy on Ocean Sewerage Outfalls that
                                      aims at:
                                      1. No new ocean and estuarine sewerage outfalls
                                          to be built/developed along the Australian
                                          coastline, and
                                      2. Dedicated funding to be provided to support
                                          local regional governments and wastewater
                                          providers with existing ocean and estuarine
                                          outfalls, to develop new methods/technologies
                                          and make every effort to recycle 100% of all
                                          treated wastewater generated within their
                                          localities and avoid the need to discharge in
                                          the ocean.
                                      It was carried unopposed by 357 Councils in
                                      Australia.
                                      Water scarcity, extreme weather events, droughts,


                                                                                       July 23
                                                                               Wilson Crawley


                                                                                      Page 22 of 31

Page 23

  3




                            and population growth require efficient water
                            management and sustainable sewerage and
                            stormwater management. It demands that we start
                            valuing the worth of water and start using potable
                            water for better use.
                            It is unacceptable that in 2023, that treated sewage,
                            untreated sewage is still being discharged into our
                            oceans. A practice that commenced in Australia in
                            the 1960s.
                            Whilst it might not be currently possible to do away
                            with marine outfalls completely, we must set
                            ambitious targets, be forward thinking and do what
                            we can to look at alternatives and new technologies
                            to lessen the environmental impact to the receiving
                            environments i.e. aquatic and coastal ecosystems.
                            Our beaches and coastline are some of our most
                            important public places and must be a key priority for
                            this country.
                            Facts:
                            Data gathered in 2016 from 165 of the 175 ocean
                            and estuarine outfalls provide the first national
                            snapshot of wastewater discharges to Australia's
                            coastal environment.
                            The total volume of wastewater discharged to
                            Australia's oceans in 2016 was 1350 gigalitres:
                            equivalent to 2.7 Sydney harbours.
                            The potential value of this water would have been
                            more than more than $1 billion, had as little as 20%
                            been recycled*
                            A large proportion 64% of Australia’s 176 coastal
                            outfalls are currently contributing to poor water
                            quality for Australia’s coastal waterways and ocean
                            environments because, wastewater is treated to only
                            a lower level of quality, referred to as a primary or
                            secondary treatment. *
                            *Clean Ocean Foundation, Outfall Database
Case study/ Example         n/a
(optional) 350 word limit




                                                                               July 23
                                                                       Wilson Crawley


                                                                              Page 23 of 31

Page 24

ATTACHMENT 2 - MOTION B




2023 LGAQ Annual Conference – Motions template


 Who is the key contact for this motion?     Cr Amelia Lorentson
 (required)
 Submitting council (required)               Noosa Council
 Supporting organisation (if applicable)     n/a
 Council resolution # (required)             20/07/2023


 Date of council resolution                  20/07/2023
 (required)


 Does this motion have state-wide relevance? (This is a required field) YES


 Title of motion (required)                  State Policy on Ocean Sewerage Outfalls


 Motion                                      That the LGAQ advocate to the State Government
 (required)                                  of Queensland to formulate a State Policy on
                                             Ocean Sewerage Outfalls that aims at:
                                             1.    No new ocean and estuarine sewerage
                                                   outfalls to be built/developed along the
                                                   Queensland coastline, and
                                             2.    Dedicated funding to be provided to
                                                   support local regional governments and
                                                   wastewater providers with existing ocean
                                                   and estuarine outfalls, to develop new
                                                   methods/technologies and make every
                                                   effort to recycle treated wastewater
                                                   generated within their localities and avoid
                                                   the need to discharge in the ocean.
 What is the desired outcome sought?
                                             •     Stop the use of the ocean as a rubbish
 (required) 200 word limit                         dump.
                                             •     Set State recycling targets with economic
                                                   incentives to drive reform.
                                             •     Reduce the impact of liquid waste on the
                                                   environment and communities
                                             •     Transitioning towards a circular economy for
                                                   liquid waste
                                             •     Building economic opportunity
                                             The disposal of liquid waste into our waterways,
                                             including freshwater, oceans and rivers creates




                                                                                                 Page 24 of 31

Page 25

  2




                            social and environmental problems for
                            Queensland.
                            We need to develop a standard that can be
                            replicated across all the States in Australia.
Background                  In October 2022: Noosa Council moved a
(required) 350 word limit   motion at the LGAQ Conference: Regions
                            becoming more Resource Independent through
                            efficient use and re-use of Wastewater.
                            I called on the LGAQ to advocate to the State
                            Government of Qld to undertake a state-wide
                            analysis of recycled water reuse that values the
                            protection of local ecosystems and provides
                            suitable data to assist councils and water
                            authorities and retailers in producing business
                            cases for water reuse. Supported (almost
                            unanimous).
                            In June 2023: Noosa Council moved a motion at
                            the Australian Local Government Association
                            (ALGA) calling on the Australian Government to
                            formulate a National Policy on Ocean Sewerage
                            Outfalls that aims at:
                            •    No new ocean and estuarine sewerage
                                 outfalls to be built/developed along the
                                 Australian coastline, and
                            •    Dedicated funding to be provided to
                                 support local regional governments and
                                 wastewater providers with existing ocean
                                 and estuarine outfalls, to develop new
                                 methods/technologies and make every
                                 effort to recycle 100% of all treated
                                 wastewater generated within their
                                 localities and avoid the need to discharge
                                 in the ocean.
                            It was carried unopposed by 357 Councils in
                            Australia. It also attracted over 12,000
                            signatures
                            This motion supports and aligns with intent and
                            the outcomes sought by ALGA, 2023 and
                            LGAQ, 2022 motions.
                            Queensland coastline and rivers are some of
                            our most important places. They are not
                            rubbish tip.
                            It is time to take a stance to stop new ocean
                            and estuarine sewerage outfalls to be
                            built/developed along the Australian coastline.



                                                                                 July 23
                                                                         Wilson Crawley


                                                                                Page 25 of 31

Page 26

  3




                            It is time to reduce the impact of not just solid
                            waste but also liquid waste on our environment
                            and communities.
                            It is time to transition towards a circular
                            economy for wastewater and building economic
                            opportunity.
                            And uncertainty around emerging contaminants
                            such as PFAS and micro plastics and toxins
                            requires improved systems and investment to
                            manage WWTP for cleaner oceans.
                            We need to transition to cleaner wastewater,
                            for cleaner oceans, for all of Queensland.
Case study/ Example         South Australia: Urban Water Directions
(optional) 350 word limit   Statement
                            Europe: New EU rules to protect better the health
                            of Europeans.
                            For example:
                            ‘Make the wastewater sector energy-neutral and
                            move it towards climate neutrality by reducing
                            energy use, using the larger surfaces of some
                            wastewater treatments plants to produce
                            solar/wind energy, encouraging water reuse and
                            using sludge to produce biogas.
                            Make industry responsible for treating toxic
                            micropollutants (“polluter pays” principle) that are
                            released into the environment from the use of
                            their products, especially harmful residues from
                            pharmaceutical and cosmetics sector.
                             “This will reduce direct emissions of organic
                            matter, nitrogen and phosphorus to water bodies,
                            but also litter and microplastics captured by urban
                            runoff.”




                                                                                 July 23
                                                                         Wilson Crawley


                                                                                Page 26 of 31

Page 27

ATTACHMENT 3 - MOTION C




  2023 LGAQ Annual Conference – Motions template


   Who is the key contact for this motion?   Frank Wilkie
   (required)
   Submitting council (required)             Noosa Shire Council
   Supporting organisation (if applicable)   n/a
   Council resolution # (required)           20/07/2023

   Date of council resolution                20/07/2023
   (required)

    Does this motion have state-wide relevance? South East Queensland Councils only


   Title of motion (required)                Shaping SEQ Review Process

   Motion                                    The LGAQ calls on the State Government
   (required)                                to respect the dwelling and population
                                             growth projections as advised, and
                                             planned for, by each South-East
                                             Queensland Local Government and
                                             provide adequate funding for infrastructure
                                             to match any increase in dwelling and
                                             population projections imposed by the
                                             State Government during the Shaping
                                             SEQ Review process.

   What is the desired outcome sought?       That the State respect the population and
   (required) 200 word limit                 dwelling targets as planned for by each
                                             SEQ council to maintain liveability,
                                             amenity and enable properly funded
                                             infrastructure to keep pace with
                                             development.
   Background                                The State government is undertaking a
   (required) 350 word limit                 review of the SEQ Regional Plan and
                                             appears to be drastically increasing
                                             population and dwelling projections for
                                             SEQ councils, regardless of whether they
                                             are attainable or realistic.
   Case study/ Example                       Please include any relevant local case
   (optional) 350 word limit                 studies or examples to support this motion
                                             that effectively demonstrate and
                                             communicate the importance of the
                                             matter.




                                                                                           Page 27 of 31

Page 28

ATTACHMENT 4 - MOTION D




  2023 LGAQ Annual Conference – Motions template


   Who is the key contact for this motion?     Councillor Karen Finzel
   (required)
   Submitting council (required)               Noosa Shire Council
   Supporting organisation (if applicable)     Fair Work Australia
   Council resolution # (required)             20 July 2023

   Date of council resolution                  20/07/2023
   (required)

   Does this motion have state-wide relevance?
   Yes. State wide relevance is recognized in relation to the Psychosocial Safety Code of
   Practice approved by the Minister, taking effect from 1 April, 2023 under Work Health
   and Safety Act 2011 (Qld) s26A.
   Title of motion (required)                  Psychosocial Risk Reduction Training

   Motion                                      The LGAQ calls on the Qld State and
   (required)                                  Federal Governments to allocate Funding
                                               for a Pilot Program to enable the LGAQ to
                                               co-ordinate ‘Psychosocial Risk Reduction
                                               Training’.
   What is the desired outcome sought?         Supporting Local Councils in meeting the
   (required) 200 word limit                   State’s mandated requirements to achieve
                                               compliance and discharge their duty of
                                               care in relation to the Psychosocial Safety
                                               Code of Practice approved by the Minister,
                                               taking effect from 1 April, 2023 under
                                               Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Qld)
                                               s26A.
                                               Proposing LGAQ undertake consultation in
                                               collaboration with 15 Queensland Local
                                               Councils ranging in size small to large.
                                               Co-ordinating the delivery of a targeted
                                               Pilot of ‘Educational Training Programs’
                                               addressing the management of
                                               psychosocial risks in the workplace.
                                               Collecting evidence with the view of
                                               collating data to measure the impacts,
                                               benefits, productivity, funding and
                                               capacity with the goal of testing and
                                               adjusting Pilot materials used in the trial.
                                               Considering the Council Employee Code of
                                               Conduct Legislative Principles Public
                                               Sector Ethics Act 1994 (Qld) for all workers




                                                                                              Page 28 of 31

Page 29

  2




                            with the aim of fostering culturally safe
                            workplaces and addressing the
                            reasonable risks of psychosocial harms in
                            the 15 Local Councils participating in the
                            Pilot.
                            Progressing from Pilot to a State wide
                            capacity across 77 Local Government
                            Councils with State Funded Resources
                            into the future to prioritise the proactive
                            management of psychosocial risks and
                            hazards including links to vicarious
                            trauma and employee burnout in Local
                            Council workplaces.
Background                  LGAQ has capacity to co-ordinate a Pilot
(required) 350 word limit   program with the provision by way of
                            resourcing from the State Government and
                            creating the opportunity to collect data
                            and establish key findings as supported
                            evidence.
                            To upscale the Pilot Program to a State
                            Wide initiative in the future.
                            Councils as duty holders are obligated to
                            ensure that adequate information, training
                            and instruction is provided to workers
                            about the nature of these psychosocial
                            risks and control measures.
                            Promoting a culture of reporting
                            psychosocial hazards.
                            Facilitating Managers alongside workers
                            to model these behaviours requires
                            education and training including but not
                            limited to Trauma Informed Care given
                            Council workers are increasingly on the
                            front line responding to unprecedented
                            natural disasters in the past five years.
                            The associated costs back to Government,
                            private sectors and communities when it
                            comes to reasonably ensuring the mental
                            health and wellbeing of our people is
                            borne by us all.
                            Improving health outcomes through
                            education and prevention with a focus on
                            early intervention with contributions made
                            by a wide range of partners to include all
                            levels of government in addressing the
                            health of women and girls is identified in
                            the principle objectives and actions of



                                                                                  July 23
                                                                          Wilson Crawley


                                                                                 Page 29 of 31

Page 30

  3




                            ‘The National Women’s Health Strategy
                            2020-2030’
                            Steps forward support the notion that
                            investment into training local Council
                            workers has a ripple affect with our people
                            being seen as ‘Ambassadors’ in sharing
                            learned knowledge through informal
                            pathways.
                            Contributing value towards the
                            advancement of human rights, sustainable
                            development and peace as recognised by
                            UNESCO.
                            Collectively, now more than ever we need
                            to fast track initiatives to find practical
                            ways to minimize impacts of COVID
                            recovery and natural disaster
                            management now and into the future.
                            Building resilience to improve mental
                            health and well-being of our people now
                            living in our communities with the impacts
                            of natural disasters, climate change, rising
                            cost of living, access to affordable
                            housing, and job security is essential.
Case study/ Example         “Council A” fails to participate in the LGAQ
(optional) 350 word limit   Pilot Program and misses the opportunity
                            to introduce reasonable measures and
                            educational training programs minimizing
                            psychosocial hazards in the workplace
                            and leading to non-compliance
                            consequences.
                            Furthermore Codes of Practice are
                            admissible in court proceedings as
                            evidence of whether or not a duty or
                            obligations have been complied with.
                            The impact of “Council A” failing to
                            participate in the LGAQ pilot program
                            leads to reduced data collection designed
                            to adequately inform the State
                            Government of the need to upscale and
                            commit funding into the future.
                             “Council A” also runs the risk of
                            reputational damage and not being
                            recognized as an employer of choice
                            leading to:
                             • Falling retention rates with added
                                 pressure on recruitment budget.
                             • Declining attraction rates


                                                                                   July 23
                                                                           Wilson Crawley


                                                                                  Page 30 of 31

Page 31

4




    •   Local government seen as a less
        desirable employer with poor
        workplace culture, increasing
        workload, reduced resources and
        younger people unable to identify
        career progression.
    •   Economic costs increasing for
        “Council A” as Work Cover premiums
        continue escalating due to the lack of
        psychosocial safety.
    •   Increased absent days as work place
        mental health suffers from the
        impacts of outward social pressures
        such as rising cost of living and
        declining access to affordable
        housing.




                                                         July 23
                                                 Wilson Crawley


                                                        Page 31 of 31

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.