Council archive · source document
Item 13 Appendix F - Traffic Impact Statement-1.0 · MCU22/0094
TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT
Noosaville Childcare Centre
Lot 4, Noosa Business Centre
Prepared for:
Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd
399 Montague Road
WEST END QLD 4101
SLR Ref: 620.30735-R01
Version No: -v1.0
May 2022
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 43 pages
Page 2
Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd SLR Ref No: 620.30735-R01-v1.0 Traffic Impact Statement
Traffic Impact Statement 20220520.docx
Noosaville Childcare Centre May 2022
Lot 4, Noosa Business Centre
PREPARED BY
SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd
ABN 29 001 584 612
Level 16, 175 Eagle Street
Brisbane QLD 4000 Australia
(PO Box 26 Spring Hill QLD 4004)
T: +61 7 3858 4800
E: [email protected] www.slrconsulting.com
BASIS OF REPORT
This report has been prepared by SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd (SLR) with all reasonable
skill, care and diligence, and taking account of the timescale and resources allocated to it
by agreement with Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd (the Client). Information
reported herein is based on the interpretation of data collected, which has been accepted
in good faith as being accurate and valid.
This report is for the exclusive use of the Client. No warranties or guarantees are
expressed or should be inferred by any third parties. This report may not be relied upon
by other parties without written consent from SLR.
SLR disclaims any responsibility to the Client and others in respect of any matters outside
the agreed scope of the work.
DOCUMENT CONTROL
Reference Date Prepared Checked Authorised
620.30735-R01-v1.0 20 May 2022 Brendyn Rheinberger Jeff Baczynski Jeff Baczynski
Page 2
Page 3
Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd SLR Ref No: 620.30735-R01-v1.0 Traffic Impact Statement
Traffic Impact Statement 20220520.docx
Noosaville Childcare Centre May 2022
Lot 4, Noosa Business Centre
CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 5
2 SUBJECT SITE ............................................................................................................... 5
2.1 Site Context ................................................................................................................. 5
2.2 Surrounding Road Network .......................................................................................... 6
3 DEVELOPMENT OVERVIEW .......................................................................................... 7
3.1 Yield............................................................................................................................. 7
3.2 Car Parking................................................................................................................... 7
3.3 Bicycle Parking ............................................................................................................. 7
3.4 Site Access ................................................................................................................... 7
4 DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS ........................................................................................... 8
5 CAR PARKING CONSIDERATIONS ................................................................................. 9
5.1 Located within Business Park Precinct .......................................................................... 9
5.2 Childcare Parking Rates Comparison ............................................................................ 9
5.3 Noosa Plan 2020 ........................................................................................................ 10
6 BICYCLE PARKING CONSIDERATIONS ......................................................................... 10
7 TRAFFIC CONSIDERATIONS ........................................................................................ 11
7.1 Development Traffic Demand .................................................................................... 11
7.2 Site Access ................................................................................................................. 11
8 PEDESTRIAN CONSIDERATIONS ................................................................................. 12
9 SERVICING CONSIDERATIONS .................................................................................... 13
10 CODE RESPONSE ........................................................................................................ 13
11 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 13
DOCUMENT REFERENCES
TABLES
Table 1 Key Surrounding Roads .............................................................................................. 6
Table 2 Proposed Childcare Centre Capacities ........................................................................ 7
Table 3 Design Compliance Assessment ................................................................................. 8
Table 4 Noosa Plan 2020 Probable Solution ........................................................................... 9
Table 5 Childcare Centre Parking Rate Comparison ................................................................ 9
FIGURES
Figure 1 Site Location .............................................................................................................. 6
Page 3
Page 4
Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd SLR Ref No: 620.30735-R01-v1.0 Traffic Impact Statement
Traffic Impact Statement 20220520.docx
Noosaville Childcare Centre May 2022
Lot 4, Noosa Business Centre
CONTENTS
Figure 2 Proposed Site Access Arrangements .......................................................................... 8
Figure 3 Sight Distance Desktop Assessment (Source: NearMap, dated 13 November
2021) ....................................................................................................................... 12
APPENDICES
Appendix A Development Plan
Appendix B Swept Path Assessment
Appendix C Code Responses
Page 4
Page 5
Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd SLR Ref No: 620.30735-R01-v1.0 Traffic Impact Statement
Traffic Impact Statement 20220520.docx
Noosaville Childcare Centre May 2022
Lot 4, Noosa Business Centre
1 Introduction
SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd (SLR) has been engaged by Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd (Stockwell) to
provide traffic engineering advice and prepare a Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) as part of a proposed childcare
centre to be located on Lot 4 within the Noosa Business Centre in Noosaville. Plans of the proposal are provided
at Appendix A for reference.
The intent of this TIS is to document this advice and assess the consistency of the proposed works against
relevant design standards and good engineering practice to inform Noosa Shire Council’s assessment of a
planning application to facilitate the subject development. Specifically, this document considers the car parking,
access and servicing treatments proposed for the subject site.
2 Subject Site
2.1 Site Context
The subject site is located on Lot 4 within the broader Noosa Business Centre development and fronts an
extension of Hofmann Drive which is currently under construction. Ultimately, Hofmann Drive will be extended
to connect with Walter Hay Drive to the east in addition to the current connection to Eenie Creek Road to the
north, with the site also bound by open space (protected via covenant) and a pedestrian access easement to the
northwest, Lot 3 to the north and Lot 5 to the east. It is understood that Lot 5 is intended to be developed to
provide a swim school, with the ultimate use of Lot 3 unknown at the time of writing.
The location of the subject site is shown in Figure 1, with the development within the local government
jurisdiction of Noosa Shire Council (Council). Accordingly, a review of Council’s Enterprise Mapping System
suggests that the subject site is located within Precinct 5A – Business Park Precinct of the Noosa Business Centre
Precinct.
Page 5
Page 6
Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd SLR Ref No: 620.30735-R01-v1.0 Traffic Impact Statement
Traffic Impact Statement 20220520.docx
Noosaville Childcare Centre May 2022
Lot 4, Noosa Business Centre
Figure 1 Site Location
2.2 Surrounding Road Network
Details of the key roads proximate to the subject site as shown in Figure 1 are summarised within Table 1.
Table 1 Key Surrounding Roads
Road Name Authority Classification Existing Form Speed Limit
Dual carriageway with 2 lanes in each direction
Eenie Creek Road Arterial plus bicycle lanes, mostly urban cross-section (kerb 60km/h
and channel)
North of Hofmann Drive: dual carriageway with 2
lanes in each direction plus bicycle lanes, rural 60km/h
Council cross-section (swales)
Walter Hay Drive Arterial
South of Hofmann Drive: 2 lanes undivided with
80km/h
bicycle lanes, rural cross-section
2 lanes divided with bicycle lanes, urban cross-
Hofmann Drive Collector/Local 50km/h
section
Page 6
Page 7
Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd SLR Ref No: 620.30735-R01-v1.0 Traffic Impact Statement
Traffic Impact Statement 20220520.docx
Noosaville Childcare Centre May 2022
Lot 4, Noosa Business Centre
3 Development Overview
3.1 Yield
Based on the plans prepared by Elevation Architecture dated 17 May 2022 (a copy of which is provided at
Appendix A), the subject development is proposed to consist of a childcare facility of a capacity as shown in
Table 2.
Table 2 Proposed Childcare Centre Capacities
Development Metric Capacity
Number of children 94 children
Number of staff 15 staff
3.2 Car Parking
A total of 27 car parking spaces plus 1 SRV bay are proposed to be provided off-street, consisting of the following:
19 set down and pick up spaces for child drop off/pick up;
7 staff parking spaces, one of which is tandem;
1 persons with disability space;
1 SRV space.
In addition to the above, a designated turnaround bay is proposed to facilitate three-point turning manoeuvres
within the car park aisle. Refer to Appendix B for the swept path assessment of this manoeuvre.
3.3 Bicycle Parking
The site plan includes the provision of two bike racks located in close proximity to the secured entrance, with
capacity to house up to 10 bicycles simultaneously.
3.4 Site Access
Vehicular access to the site will be facilitated via a driveway crossover on Hofmann Drive as shown on Figure 2,
with a median break and auxiliary right-turn lane provided as part of the Hofmann Drive extension to
accommodate vehicles entering the site from the east.
Page 7
Page 8
Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd SLR Ref No: 620.30735-R01-v1.0 Traffic Impact Statement
Traffic Impact Statement 20220520.docx
Noosaville Childcare Centre May 2022
Lot 4, Noosa Business Centre
Figure 2 Proposed Site Access Arrangements
A separate pedestrian access will also be provided to Hofmann Drive as shown on Figure 2, to encourage active
transport use and to improve safety. Along the north-western boundary, a 3m shared path facility is proposed
to facilitate a future connection to the Noosa Civic Shopping Centre.
4 Design Considerations
The design of internal car parking and circulation facilities has been reviewed against the relevant requirements
of Council’s planning scheme and/or the AS2890 suite of Australian Standards as summarised within Table 3.
Table 3 Design Compliance Assessment
Design Component Proposed Design Applicable Standard Compliance
Visitor parking space dimensions (Class 3A) 2.6m x 5.4m Figure 2.2, AS2890.1
Staff parking space dimensions (Class 1) 2.4m x 5.4m Figure 2.2, AS2890.1
2.6m x 5.4m adjacent to a
PWD parking space dimensions Figure 2.1, AS2890.6
2.4x x 5.4m shared area
Parking aisle width 6.2m Figure 2.2, AS2890.1
Blind aisle extension 1.5m Figure 2.3, AS2890.1
The results of the design compliance assessment presented in Table 3 confirm that the proposed design of the
off-street car parking area is in compliance with relevant design standards.
Page 8
Page 9
Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd SLR Ref No: 620.30735-R01-v1.0 Traffic Impact Statement
Traffic Impact Statement 20220520.docx
Noosaville Childcare Centre May 2022
Lot 4, Noosa Business Centre
5 Car Parking Considerations
The car parking requirements for childcare centres of the size proposed herein as specified within Table 9.4.1.4
of Noosa Plan 2020 (the Plan) is summarised within Table 4.
Table 4 Noosa Plan 2020 Probable Solution
Land Use Probable Solution
Yield Probable Solution Parking Rate
Provision
15 staff 1 space per 2 employees 7.5 spaces
Childcare centre
94 children 3 spaces for every employee space 22.5 spaces
TOTAL 30 spaces
The proposed design consists of 27 parking spaces which is three (3) less than Council’s probable solution as per
Table 4 above. As such, the following information is provided to demonstrate the provision of slightly fewer
parking spaces will still provide an acceptable outcome for Council.
5.1 Located within Business Park Precinct
The proposed Childcare centre is located within a designated Business Park precinct as per the Plan. From SLR’s
practical experience it would be expected that a greater than typical proportion of parents would either work
within this precinct, or at the Noosa Civic shopping centre. In situations such as these, it is often the case that
parents will park at their work location, walk their children to the Childcare centre, leave the pram within the
designated pram room, then walk back to their workplace to commence work. This, in turn reduces parking
demand and provides reasonable justification for a slight reduction in car parking supply. Note, the proposed
site plan provides for a designated pram room to facilitate parents leaving their prams at the Childcare centre
while they work.
5.2 Childcare Parking Rates Comparison
SLR have undertaken a car parking rate comparison of five (5) south-east Queensland Council’s along with Noosa
Shire for Childcare centres. This comparison is presented at Table 5 below.
Table 5 Childcare Centre Parking Rate Comparison
SEQ Council Yield Parking Rate Provision
Noosa Shire 1 space per 2 employees + 3 spaces for every employee space 30 spaces
Brisbane City 1 space per 5 children 19 spaces
Ipswich City 1 space per 1 employee + 1 space per 8 children 27 spaces
94 children
Logan City 1 space per 1 employee + 1 space per 10 children 24 spaces
& 15 staff
Redland City 1 space per 1 employee + 1 space per 7 children 28 spaces
Sunshine Coast 1 space per 1 employee + 1 space per 5 children 34 spaces
- Average Provision 26.4 spaces
Page 9
Page 10
Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd SLR Ref No: 620.30735-R01-v1.0 Traffic Impact Statement
Traffic Impact Statement 20220520.docx
Noosaville Childcare Centre May 2022
Lot 4, Noosa Business Centre
Out of the five (5) Council’s outside of Noosa Shire, four (4) of these use a Childcare parking rate that equates
to less parking spaces required when applying a yield of 94 children and 15 staff. Across all five (5) Council
jurisdictions, the average car parking provision results in 26.4 spaces, which is also less than what’s proposed
for the subject site.
5.3 Noosa Plan 2020
The Noosa Plan 2020 (the Plan) sets out Council’s strategic intent, amongst other things, for shaping and growing
Noosa Shire in alignment with key values to preserve the Shire’s natural resources and landscapes. The strategic
intent for Transport within the Plan describes prioritising the movement of people and goods rather than cars,
with an immediate focus on delivering infrastructure to support the movement of pedestrians, cyclists, motor
scooters and public transport.
With the above in mind, by Council accepting a slight reduction in parking provision, this decision would be
considered to support the strategic intent for Transport, by further encouraging mode shift from single-
occupancy vehicle use to active and public transport use.
6 Bicycle Parking Considerations
The Plan sets out a probable solution for bicycle parking as follows:
Community activity:
a) one space per 50m2 up to 500m2; and
b) one space per 500m2 in excess of 500m2.
All uses where not in conflict with QDC MP4.1 for major developments:
Where five or more bicycle parking spaces is required, end-of-trip cycle facilities are provided at the
following rate-
a) one locker per two bicycle parking spaces; and
b) one shower cubicle with ancillary change room per ten bicycle spaces or part thereof.
The proposed childcare centre consists of approximately 684.2m2 of GFA. Therefore, approximately 10 bicycle
parking spaces are recommended as the probable solution. The site plan depicts two bike racks located near the
secured entrance with each rack having capacity for approximately three (3) to five (5) bicycles simultaneously.
Nevertheless, during the fit out design of the facility, if these bicycle racks are deemed as insufficient, they can
be replaced with slightly larger racks as the space available can accommodate this.
The site plans also show a shower, as well as an Indoor Store and Staff Room which will have available space to
provide the required five (5) lockers. The provision of these end-of-trip facilities satisfies the requirements of
the Plan.
It is important to note, as the proposed site consists of a childcare centre, the proposed bicycle parking and end-
of-trip facilities would not be utilised by parents often, rather, they would more likely be used by staff. Therefore,
the probable solution stated within the Plan to provide 10 bicycle parking spaces are considered to be excessive
when considering only 15 staff members are planned as the total number of employees at the centre.
Page 10
Page 11
Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd SLR Ref No: 620.30735-R01-v1.0 Traffic Impact Statement
Traffic Impact Statement 20220520.docx
Noosaville Childcare Centre May 2022
Lot 4, Noosa Business Centre
7 Traffic Considerations
7.1 Development Traffic Demand
Peak hour traffic demands have been forecast for the subject development based upon survey data provided
from QLD Government’s Open Data portal. From this portal, there were 17 Childcare centres that were surveyed
between 2006 and 2010 across Queensland, resulting in an average trip generation rate of 0.63 trips per child
for the peak hour. This equates to approximately 59 vph being generated in a peak hour period. In the broader
context of the precinct including the Noosa Civic shopping centre, this level of traffic generation is insignificant,
and it is not expected that further upgrades to what are currently planned would be required.
7.2 Site Access
The driveway crossover has been designed in accordance with Council’s Standard Drawing for Heavy duty vehicle
crossing type B2.
Sight distance requirements for driveways used by commercial vehicles are prescribed within AS2890.2. For a
frontage road speed of 50km/h as per Hofmann Drive, a sight distance from the centre of the driveway to
oncoming traffic (either direction along Hofmann Drive) must achieve a minimum of 69m. A desktop assessment
has been undertaken utilising NearMap to check the available sight distance from the proposed access. Refer to
Figure 3 below.
Page 11
Page 12
Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd SLR Ref No: 620.30735-R01-v1.0 Traffic Impact Statement
Traffic Impact Statement 20220520.docx
Noosaville Childcare Centre May 2022
Lot 4, Noosa Business Centre
Figure 3 Sight Distance Desktop Assessment (Source: NearMap, dated 13 November 2021)
The above figure depicts the sight distance envelopes for a vehicle waiting stationary in the centre of the
driveway with a 3m setback from the Hofmann Drive kerb alignment. If a significant obstruction were to be
located within these envelopes, it would indicate a possible non-compliance to AS2890.2, particularly if that
obstruction could not be removed. Upon inspection of these envelopes on NearMap, it is evident that there are
no significant obstructions to driver sight lines located within the two envelopes and it can be concluded that
the site access is in compliance with AS2890.2.
8 Pedestrian Considerations
Access to the proposed Childcare centre for staff and/or parents walking can utilise the future 2m wide footpath
located on the north-eastern side of Hofmann Drive. For people catching public transport to Noosa Civic
shopping centre and then walking to the proposed site, a future 3m shared path is proposed along the western
boundary connecting Hofmann Drive with the shopping centre. This pedestrian and cyclist connection would
utilise the reserved pedestrian easement to the north.
Page 12
Page 13
Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd SLR Ref No: 620.30735-R01-v1.0 Traffic Impact Statement
Traffic Impact Statement 20220520.docx
Noosaville Childcare Centre May 2022
Lot 4, Noosa Business Centre
9 Servicing Considerations
The Plan does not specifically prescribe any refuse collection requirements. As such, it is proposed that the
collection of refuse occurs on-street, alleviating any conflicts with parents and children within the car parking
area.
Similarly, the Plan does not specifically prescribe any requirements to provide commercial vehicle parking, other
than to say: ‘the layout of the development provides adequate, clearly defined and easily accessible (b) loading
and manoeuvring areas for delivery and service vehicles’. This requirement is from the Driveways and Parking
Code under Performance Outcome 7 (PO7). In response to this requirement, the development proposes one
SRV parking space to facilitate the delivery of groceries which is anticipated to occur at most once per day during
operating hours, avoiding peak times during the drop-off and pick-up of children. Other deliveries that may be
required will occur outside of operating hours. Refer to Appendix B for swept paths demonstrating the safe
turnaround and manoeuvring of an SRV vehicle into and out of the proposed SRV parking space.
10 Code Response
The traffic and transport aspects of the proposed development have been assessed against the relevant
requirements of the following codes included within the Noosa Plan 2020:
Driveways and Parking Code.
Transport Code.
Responses to each of these codes are provided at Appendix C and confirm that the subject development is
generally consistent with relevant code requirements.
11 Summary
SLR has been engaged by Stockwell to provide traffic engineering advice and prepare a Traffic Impact Statement
as part of a proposed Childcare facility located on Hofmann Drive on Lot 4 within the Noosa Business Precinct in
Noosaville, as shown on development plans provided at Appendix A. Based on the assessment documented
herein, the following can be concluded:
Internal access, circulation and parking infrastructure is generally designed in accordance with relevant
standards and meets the functional requirements of the development.
The proposed supply of car parking is three (3) less than what’s prescribed within the Plan. However,
a slight reduction of parking supply can be justified based on:
the development is located within the Business Park Precinct which will likely attract parents who
also work within this Precinct and can park at their workplace and walk to/from the Childcare centre
and store their prams during the day.
A comparison of five (5) other SEQ Council’s resulted in an average parking supply of 26.4 spaces of
which this proposed development meets.
A slight reduction in parking supply aligns with the Plan’s Strategic Intent for Transport.
The subject development provides for a sufficient amount of bicycle parking, along with suitable end-
of-trip facilities, noting that the Plan’s requirement for 10 spaces is considered excessive.
Page 13
Page 14
Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd SLR Ref No: 620.30735-R01-v1.0 Traffic Impact Statement
Traffic Impact Statement 20220520.docx
Noosaville Childcare Centre May 2022
Lot 4, Noosa Business Centre
The proposed development’s traffic generation is considered insignificant and is unlikely to provide a
material impact on local traffic conditions relative to the traffic demands generated by the broader
Noosa Civic shopping centre. Consequently, a code-level assessment not including a detailed
operational assessment of the surrounding road network is considered to be acceptable.
The site access has been designed in accordance with Noosa’s Standard Drawing for Heavy duty vehicle
crossing type B2 and complies with the sight distance requirements of AS2890.2.
Pedestrian facilities have been designed to connect with the Noosa Civic shopping centre and to
encourage active transport and public transport use.
Refuse collection is proposed to be undertaken along Hofmann Drive to minimise interactions with
parents, children and heavy vehicles entering the site.
The subject development provides for one SRV parking space to facilitate the functional requirements
of the site.
The code responses provided at Appendix C confirm that the subject development is generally in
accordance with the relevant requirements of the Noosa Plan 2020.
Page 14
Page 15
APPENDIX A
Development Plans
620.30735-R01-v1.0 Traffic Impact Statement
20220520.docx Page 1 of 1
Page 16
Indicative shade structure
locations min 5% coverage
SITE PLAN LEGEND
Boundary
to playscape
BDY Boundary
BDY COL Structural Column
FEN - 1 HR Handrail
Emt CB LOU Louvre
4,185
Tree 7
RW Retaining Wall
Tree 6 Outdoor Play
3,087 TOW Top of Wall
Tree 5 FEN - 4
Turning STAFF FENCE TYPES
FEN - 1 Non Combustible
STAFF Fence TBA
Carpark FEN - 2 Acoustic Fence
BDY
Shade Trees
STAFF TBA
Tree 4 FEN - 3 Acoustic Fence
TBA
Proposed 3.0m Public Thoroughfare Footpath
STAFF
FEN - 4 Pool Fence 1.5m
3,314
STAFF G-1 Gate type 1
Tree 3 STAFF
Carpark
FEN -
Environment (27 Place + SRV)
Covenant
1
Tree 2
Pedestrian Easement
CHILDCARE (94 PLACE)
4m SETBACK
BDY
ENTRY
PWD Shared
2m SE
STAFF
T
BACK
STAFF
Tree 1
Indicative shade structure
Emt CC locations min 5% coverage
to playscape
4m
S ET
BA
BDY
CK
Hofmann Dr
Outdoor Play
8,979
Entry Arbour Deep
4,069
Landscaping
Pedestrian hatched
Entry Access
7,445
Feature FEN
Fencing to -2
Front Facade
BDY
Emt CD
Revision Project Architect Stage Project No.
Proposed Site Plan
H Preliminary Issue 5/17/2022 Sanctuary Noosa Childcare Centre SC Development Approval 1187-05
I Preliminary Issue 5/17/2022 Lot 4 Noosa
Client
Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd
Drawn
HZ
Status
Not For Construction (#Notes)
Scale
1:250 at A3
A-DA-01.02 I
(07) 3251 6900 [email protected] Elevation Architecture Pty Ltd ACN 606 170 807 © Copyright reserved this document is and shall remain the property of Elevation Architecture. Unauthorised use of this document in any form whatsoever is prohibited. All information to be printed in colour. Figured dimensions take precedence over scale dimensions. Contractors must verify all dimensions on site before commencing any work or making shop drawings. P:\Data 1\1187-05 Sanctuary Noosa Childcare Centre\5.2 Development Application\5.2.1 ArchiCAD\1187-05 Master DA 24.pln
Page 17
APPENDIX B
Swept Path Assessment
620.30735-R01-v1.0 Traffic Impact Statement
20220520.docx Page 1 of 1
Page 18
LY
ON
T
EP
NC
CO
L16, 175 EAGLE STREET
Project No: 620.30735 SWEPT PATH LEGEND
Stockwell
BRISBANE 4000 Vehicle Path
AUSTRALIA Date: 18/05/2022 Vehicle Body
T: 61 7 3858 4800 Noosaville Hoffman Drive Childcare Centre
www.slrconsulting.com Drawn by: BR Body Clearance
N
Scale: AS SHOWN
Front Wheels
SRV Swept Path
The content contained within this document may
A3
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 Space at Front, Entry
be based on third party data. Sheet Size: METRES
SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd does not Projection: (GDA94) MGA Zone SCALE 1:100
guarantee the accuracy of any such information. FIGURE 3
Page 19
LY
ON
T
EP
NC
CO
L16, 175 EAGLE STREET
Project No: 620.30735 SWEPT PATH LEGEND
Stockwell
BRISBANE 4000 Vehicle Path
AUSTRALIA Date: 18/05/2022 Vehicle Body
T: 61 7 3858 4800 Noosaville Hoffman Drive Childcare Centre
www.slrconsulting.com Drawn by: BR Body Clearance
N
Scale: AS SHOWN
Front Wheels
SRV Swept Path
The content contained within this document may
A3
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 Space at Front, Exit
be based on third party data. Sheet Size: METRES
SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd does not Projection: (GDA94) MGA Zone SCALE 1:100
guarantee the accuracy of any such information. FIGURE 4
Page 20
LY
ON
T
EP
NC
CO
L16, 175 EAGLE STREET
Project No: 620.30735 SWEPT PATH LEGEND
Stockwell
BRISBANE 4000 Vehicle Path
AUSTRALIA Date: 18/05/2022 Vehicle Body
T: 61 7 3858 4800 Noosaville Hoffman Drive Childcare Centre
www.slrconsulting.com Drawn by: BR Body Clearance
N
Scale: AS SHOWN
Front Wheels
B85 U-Turn Manoeuvre
The content contained within this document may
A3
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 Carpark Circulation
be based on third party data. Sheet Size: METRES
SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd does not Projection: (GDA94) MGA Zone SCALE 1:100
guarantee the accuracy of any such information. FIGURE 6
Page 21
APPENDIX C
Code Responses
Driveways and Parking Code
Transport Code
620.30735-R01-v1.0 Traffic Impact Statement
20220520.docx Page 1 of 1
Page 22
Driveways and Parking Code
Table 9.4.1.3 – Criteria for assessment
Driveways Table 9.4.1.3 Criteria for assessment (part)
Performance outcomes Acceptable Outcomes Compliance Response
//NA
Assessable development
Driveways
PO1 AO1.1 Complies with AO1.1
Vehicular access does not adversely Vehicular access is located and The subject development’s vehicular access is
impact on safety, capacity and operations designed in accordance with the current located and designed in accordance with AS2890.
of the existing or planned road network, Australian Standards for Parking
cycleways or pedestrian pathway systems Facilities. Complies with AO1.2
The subject development proposes one new
AO1.2 driveway crossover across a singular footpath.
Only one footpath crossing is provided.
Complies with AO1.3
Editor’s Note — Justification for The proposed driveway has been designed in
additional driveways may need to be accordance with AS2890 and Council’s Standard
supported by a detailed Traffic Study. Drawing for Heavy Duty Vehicle Crossing Type B2.
AO1.3
Driveways, have a maximum grade in
accordance with Council’s standard
requirements
PO2 AO2.1 Complies with AO2.1
Driveways and crossovers Design and construction of driveways, The proposed driveway has been designed in
a) are suitable and safe for their intended including across the footpath, is in accordance with AS2890 and Council’s Standard
use; and accordance with Council Standard Drawing for Heavy Duty Vehicle Crossing Type B2.
b) match Council infrastructure. Drawings as appropriate for the
particular type of development as
annotated on the drawings.
AO2.2 Complies with AO2.2
The change of grades in driveways and The proposed driveway has been designed in
ramps is in accordance with Council’s accordance with AS2890 and Council’s Standard
Standard Drawings. Drawing for Heavy Duty Vehicle Crossing Type B2.
Page 23
PO3 AO3.1 Complies with AO3.1
The number of driveways across Design of multi-tenanted developments The development proposes a singular driveway
pedestrian footpaths is minimised. include shared driveways and parking crossover for all vehicular access.
areas.
AO3.2 Complies with AO3.2
Driveways are located so they abut The subject development is located off Hofmann
existing driveways of adjoining Drive in Noosaville and currently does not have
development where practicable and neighbouring developments present.
reciprocal easements are created to
reduce the sealed driveway width.
PO4 AO4 Complies with AO4.1
Vehicular access does not adversely Footpath and kerb crossings are Existing public footpath and kerb infrastructure is to
impact on the capacity, operations and located clear of existing stormwater generally remain unchanged with the subject
maintenance of the existing infrastructure. inlet structures, water and sewerage development in place, and therefore no new services
infrastructure fittings, any other exiting conflicts are created.
utility infrastructure, existing
landscaping and vegetation.
PO5 AO5 Complies with AO5.1
Vehicular access does not adversely Vehicular access avoids disturbance to Vegetation considerations are beyond the scope of
impact on the health and integrity of the tree protection zone of trees on this traffic assessment; however the proposed site is
existing landscaping or native vegetation, public land. situated within a new development area of Noosaville
where possible. and is clear of existing trees and vegetation.
Parking and manoeuvring Table 9.4.1.3 Criteria for assessment (part)
Performance outcomes Acceptable Outcomes Compliance Response
//NA
Assessable development
Parking and manoeuvring
Page 24
PO6 AO6.1 Does not comply with AO6.1
Sufficient parking The number of car parking spaces, The subject development provides
(a) is provided having regard to the specifics of the use motor cycle spaces, bicycle spaces sufficient parking for bicycles and service
including— and loading bays is not less than the vehicles for the functional requirements of
minimum number specified in Table the land use. Car parking has been
(i) the type and intensity of land use; 9.4.1.4 Minimum parking requirements provided with a deficit of three spaces to
including end of trip facilities. what’s prescribed within Table 9.4.1.4,
(ii) any existing parking available on the site; however, justification is provided within the
(iii) hours of operation; attached Traffic Assessment report.
Editor's note— with regard to the
(iv) likely numbers of users; provision of end of trip facilities, where
there is a conflict with the QDC MP 4.1
(v) accessibility to the site by means other
for major developments the QDC
than private motor vehicle; applies. For all other development
(vi) the peak parking demand periods of uses on Table 9.4.1.4 applies.
the site; and AO6.2 N/A AO6.2 not applicable
(vii) the availability of alternative car parking; and Where appropriate, motorcycle spaces The subject development is a childcare
can be provided on site in lieu of centre and there’s no requirement to
(b) is provided to accommodate the number and type provide motorcycle spaces.
required car parking spaces, excluding
of vehicles and motorcycles likely to be generated
industry activities, at the following
by the development.
rates:
(a) 2 motorcycle spaces provided for
0.5 car parking space; or
(b) 4 motorcycles spaces provided
per 1 car parking space; and
(c) up to a maximum of 4 car parking
spaces.
AO6.3 Complies with AO6.3
Secure and convenient parking spaces Bicycle parking has been provided in
for bicycles are designed and provided accordance with AS2890.3 and Austroads.
on site in accordance with—
(a) AS2890.3 Bicycle Parking
Facilities; and
(b) Cycling aspects of Austroads
Guides (AP-G88-14).
Page 25
AO6.4 Complies with AO6.4
Bicycle spaces and end of trip facilities Bicycle spaces and end of trip facilities are
need to be accessible to all users. accessible for all users.
PO7 AO7.1 Complies with AO7.1
The layout of the development provides adequate, Parking bays, manoeuvring areas, The design of the proposed developments
clearly defined and easily accessible queuing areas, loading, set down, parking facilities are in accordance with
(a) on-site vehicle parking and manoeuvring areas; pickup areas and driveways are AS2890.
designed in accordance with the
and
Australian Standards for Parking
(b) loading and manoeuvring areas for delivery and Facilities.
service vehicles.
AO7.2 N/A AO7.2 not applicable
Development includes purpose
designed spaces for motorcycles and
motor scooters, which are easily
identified from the driveway of the
property and located as close as
practicable to the entrance of the
building on site.
PO8 AO8.1 Complies with AO8.1
Parking and manoeuvring areas are designed to Parking, service areas and Parking, service areas and manoeuvring
(a) not unduly conflict with pedestrians; and manoeuvring areas are setback a areas are setback a minimum of 2 metres
(b) be sufficiently setback from road frontages to not minimum of 2 metres from road from road frontages.
frontages to allow for landscaping, with
dominate the streetscape or surrounding areas;
the exception of Walter Hay Drive,
(c) allow for landscaping to reduce the visual impact of Eenie Creek Road and Holts Road
the parking, servicing and manoeuvring areas; frontages, where no development
Page 26
(d) complement the future planned character of the occurs within the landscaped frontage
area; and setbacks.
(e) avoid development within the Walter Hay Drive, N/A AO8.2 not applicable
AO8.2 The subject development is not located
Eenie Creek Road and Holts Road frontage
In Centre zones, parking, service and within a Centre zone.
setbacks. manoeuvring areas are either
integrated within or under buildings and
sleeved by usable floor space, or
located to the rear of buildings.
Editor's note— Refer to Figure AP3-
11A and Figure AP3-11B for outcomes
for car parking in centres.
N/A AO8.3 not applicable
Vehicular access via a rear lane is not
AO8.3
practical in this instance.
Where practicable vehicle access is
from rear laneways
PO9 AO9 Complies with AO9
On-site car parking spaces are identified and reserved Car parking spaces are provided for AS2890.6 defers to the Building Code of
for people with disabilities. people with disabilities at the rate Australia with regard to the provision of
specified in the current Australian parking for Persons with a Disability
Standards for Parking Facilities (PWD). Section 4 of the attached traffic
assessment confirms that the proposed
PWD parking provision aligns with the
requirements specified therein.
PO10 AO10 Complies with AO10
Access and egress points do not impact on the safety Vehicle manoeuvring areas are Vehicle manoeuvring areas have been
and operations of the road system. provided in accordance with the current provided in accordance with AS2890.
Australian Standards Australian
Standards for Parking Facilities so
vehicles enter and leave the site in a
forward gear, excluding dual occupancy
or detached dwellings on local roads.
PO11 AO11 Complies with AO11
Parking areas are designed to At locations where pedestrian and The subject development proposes
vehicle conflicts are likely to occur: separate pedestrian and vehicle accesses.
Page 27
a) provide a progressive reduction in speed between a) sight distances of at least 2.5 Where conflicts may occur, these areas are
the external road and internal parking spaces; seconds travel time at the clear of any obstructions and encourage
b) ensure lower speeds near areas of high pedestrian designated speed are provided; slow vehicle speeds.
activity through the use of appropriate road b) splayed corners on structures are
geometry or devices designed to limit speed; and incorporated;
c) maintain sight distances which are appropriate for c) landscaping is designed to allow
the likely operating speeds in all areas of potential clear views; and
pedestrian/vehicle conflict. d) sign placement ensures that sight
distance requirements are not
impeded.
PO12 AO12.1 N/A AO12.1 not applicable
A clearly defined pedestrian network is provided that – In large open carparks with greater than The subject development does not
(a) is located in areas where people will choose to walk; 200 car parking spaces, a pedestrian propose a large open carpark with greater
(b) ensures that pedestrian movement through car path between parking spaces is than 200 car parking spaces.
provided on every second aisle.
parking areas or structures are along aisles rather
than across them. Complies with AO12.2
AO12.2 Approximately 12 of a total of 27 car
. For a minimum of 50% of car parking parking spaces are located so that people
spaces, pedestrian access to buildings
accessing the buildings may need to cross
is not across or through driveways,
the centre parking aisle, which is less than
carparks, setdown or manoeuvring
areas. 50%.
PO13 No acceptable outcome provided Complies with PO13
Provision is made for pedestrian and vehicular queues at Sufficient space is provided to
conflict points. accommodate pedestrian and vehicular
queuing at conflict points.
PO14 AO14 N/A AO14 not applicable.
Parking areas are lit to provide security for night-time Lighting is provided in accordance with Lighting considerations are beyond the
users. the Australian Standard for Road scope of this traffic assessment.
Lighting - Vehicular Traffic (Category
V) Lighting - Performance Installation
and Design Requirements.
PO15 AO15 N/A AO15 not applicable
Site facilities encourage users and employees End-of-trip facilities are maintained and End-of-trip facilities are provided for
to access the site by means of foot or bicycle through accessible to all users of the premises childcare centre staff while bicycle parking
as part of common property. is provided for all users. Parents dropping
Page 28
provision of appropriate end of-trip facilities including off their children are likely not to require
bicycle parking and shower/change rooms. end-of-trip facilities.
PO16 No acceptable outcome provided N/A PO16 not applicable
Development with the potential to generate significant The subject development is not considered
traffic and parking impacts gives appropriate to be of a use and size which would
consideration to transport and land use issues. generate significant traffic and parking
impacts relative to those generated by the
Editor’s Note—A detailed Traffic Impact broader Noosa Business Centre in which it
Assessment Report may be required.
is located.
PO17 AO17.1 N/A AO17.1 not applicable
Parking and manoeuvring areas are designed to ensure Development providing less than five Stormwater management considerations
run-off is treated to remove pollutants prior to leaving the car parking spaces is designed so that are beyond the scope of this traffic
premises. the driveway, parking and manoeuvring assessment.
areas are formed to drain to
landscaped areas.
AO17.2
N/A AO17.2 not applicable
Development providing five or more car
parking spaces is designed to Stormwater management considerations
incorporate stormwater treatment are beyond the scope of this traffic
methods to remove water contaminants assessment.
likely to runoff from the general
operation of the of the driveway,
parking and manoeuvring areas.
Editor’s Note—Further details are
provided in the Water Quality and
Drainage Code.
PO18 No acceptable outcome provided N/A PO18 not applicable
Parking areas are designed to ensure drainage without Stormwater management considerations
the use of pumps or other electrical apparatus. are beyond the scope of this traffic
assessment.
Page 29
PO19 AO19 N/A AO19 not applicable
Site layout and building design provides for soft Below ground components of buildings, Landscaping considerations are beyond
landscaping to be established. including carparks, do not extend the scope of this traffic assessment.
beyond the above ground footprint to
allow for the provision of landscaping,
particularly within building setbacks.
Page 30
Transport Code
Table 9.4.7 – Criteria for Assessable development
Strategic transport network Table 9.4.7.3 Criteria for assessable development (part)
Performance outcomes Acceptable Outcomes Compliance Response
//NA
Strategic Transport Network
PO1 AO1.1 Complies with PO1
Traffic generation from development is Where the development leads to the The attached traffic assessment prepared by SLR
considered in a localised and a Shire wide need to increase transport Consulting suggests that the peak traffic generation
context to ensure that— infrastructure in the Shire, the potential of the subject development is expected to
development contributes to the be immaterial relative to that generated by the
(a) the transport network has the capacity transport network in accordance broader Noosa Business Centre. Consequently, no
to safely and efficiently accommodate with Council’s infrastructure network transport infrastructure upgrades are considered
projected movements; planning.
necessary to support the subject development.
(b) development does not have an adverse
Editor’s Note— Council may require
impact upon the functioning of the road the preparation of a Transport Impact
network; and Assessment Report.
(c) development includes measures to
improve transport options rather than AO1.2
relying on the widening of roads. Development provides for high trip
generating land uses, such as higher
density residential development and
employment generators, to be located
in and around activity centres and
around major public transport hubs.
PO2 AO2.1 Complies with PO2
Development respects the road hierarchy and Arterial and distributor roads are The subject development makes use of existing
supports the intended function of adjacent designed so they can operate with road accesses and therefore does not impact on the
and nearby roads. acceptable volumes of traffic during function of any public roads.
peak times.
Editor’s Note — The Noosa Shire road
hierarchy is depicted on Regional AO2.2
Infrastructure Overlay Maps. Collector and local streets are provided
to support short trips for local traffic
Page 31
moving in and between
neighbourhoods.
AO2.3
Local streets are designed to
discourage through traffic and traffic is
channelled towards collector streets to
ensure that traffic volumes on local
streets are kept low.
AO2.4
A collector street is provided parallel to
arterials particularly where they pass
through centres.
AO2.5
Appropriate width of road and verge is
provided to allow streets to perform
their designated functions in the street
network.
PO3 No acceptable outcome provided Complies with PO3
Development access does not compromise The subject development’s proposed access does
the functions of particular roads as indicated not compromise the function of Hofmann Drive, nor
in the road hierarchy, and does not adversely does it impact on safety, capacity and operations.
impact on the safety, capacity and operations
of the road system.
Transport Connectivity Table 9.4.7.3 Criteria for assessable development (part)
Performance outcomes Acceptable Outcomes Compliance Response
//NA
Strategic Transport Network
PO4 No acceptable outcome provided Complies with PO4
The transport network, including roads
and pathways, has high levels of
Page 32
connectivity, both within the The subject development provides direct vehicular,
development site and to the surrounding pedestrian and cycle connections to the external
area. network.
PO5 AO5.1 Complies with A05.1
Development is designed to facilitate Development is designed and arranged to: The subject development includes provision of
efficient, safe and accessible bus direct pathway connections to the site’s road
services that connect to existing and (a) provide on-site or off-site public frontages.
future public passenger transport transport facilities, having regard to the
facilities. specific nature and scale of
development, and the number of
people involved in the use;
(b) provide convenient and attractive
linkages to existing and proposed
public transport facilities; and
(c) maximise accessibility for all
anticipated users.
AO5.2
N/A AO5.2 not applicable
Roads catering for buses are:
The subject development proposes to utilise existing
(a) arterial, distributor, or collector roads; road infrastructure.
(b) roads which provide highly accessible
routes;
(c) roads that provide for the shortest and
most direct route for an efficient public
transport service; and
(d) roads that can efficiently service
adjoining development areas.
AO5.3 N/A AO5.3 not applicable
Roads catering for buses provide convenient The subject development proposes to utilise existing
connections to existing and future public road infrastructure.
passenger transport facilities.
ss
Page 33
AO5.4 N/A AO5.4 not applicable
Bus routes are located to maximise patron The subject development does not propose any
catchment and to consider personal safety, changes to existing public transport operations.
lighting and traffic management.
Complies with AO5.5
AO5.5 The subject development does not modify existing
Development on bus routes does not impact
public transport infrastructure or hinder public
on bus stop infrastructure or the efficient
transport operations.
running of bus services.
AO5.6 N/A AO5.6 not applicable
Roads catering for buses are designed and The subject development proposes to utilise existing
constructed in accordance the relevant State road infrastructure.
government standards.
Editor’s Note — Queensland’s Department
of Transport and Main Roads, and the
TransLink division within the Department
have design standards for public transport
networks and infrastructure
PO6 AO6.1 Complies with AO6.1
Development enhances connectivity Development provides direct and convenient The subject development includes provision of
between existing and future public pathway linkages between existing and direct pathway connections to the site’s road
passenger transport facilities and other future public passenger transport facilities. frontages.
transport modes.
AO6.2 Complies with AO6.2
Development provides wayfinding
The subject development provides a 3m shared
information for existing public transport
facilities and interconnecting transport path providing connections to the existing Noosa
modes. Civic shopping centre to the north. Wayfinding
signage will be located along this shared path.
Editor’s Note— Council has design
standards that apply to wayfinding signage
Page 34
Pedestrian and cycle infrastructure Table 9.4.7.3 Criteria for assessable development (part)
Performance outcomes Acceptable Outcomes Compliance Response
//NA
Pedestrian and cycle infrastructure
PO7 No acceptable outcome provided Complies with PO7
Road planning and development designs The subject development provides connecting
for pedestrian and cycle movements and active transport facilities to the existing external
provides for future connectivity and network. It does not hinder, rather accommodates
integration with adjoining sites. future active transport linkages.
PO8 AO8 N/A PO8 not applicable
Development provides for cyclists on Roads provide for on-road cycling in The subject development does not propose any
roads as required for each category of accordance with the standards specified in new public roads.
road as identified in the Noosa Road Council’s Planning Scheme Policy PSP6
Hierarchy. Engineering Design Standards – Roads,
drainage and earthworks.
PO9 AO9.1 Complies with AO9.1
Development is designed to encourage Pathway planning and design is in Pedestrian and cycling facilities are designed in
walking and cycling wherever possible accordance with pedestrian and cycling accordance with Austroads Guidelines.
over the use of private vehicles aspects of Austroads Guides.
AO9.2 N/A AO9.2 not applicable
Attractive and safe pedestrian and cycle Architectural considerations are beyond the scope
connections to and through the site are of this traffic assessment.
provided with shade trees, graded walking
and cycle paths and lighting.
AO9.3 Complies with AO9.3
Pathways are provided to cater for shared A shared path is proposed as part of the
use and cater for both commuting and development to cater for shared uses.
recreational usage.
AO9.4 N/A AO9.4 not applicable
Pathways have ramps at all kerbs designed Subject development does not propose new roads.
for wheelchair and pram access across
roads.
Page 35
AO9.5 Complies with AO9.5
Development has convenient and prominent Subject development proposes a direct pedestrian
pedestrian entrances that: entrance from Hofmann Drive and caters for
universal access.
(a) are oriented towards the street; and
(b) cater for universal access.
AO9.6 N/A AO9.6 not applicable
Pathways are adequately lit and have Architectural considerations are beyond the scope
navigational signs. of this traffic assessment.
AO9.7 N/A AO9.7 not applicable
Pedestrian and cycle pathways are Civil engineering design is beyond the scope of this
designed and constructed to: traffic assessment.
(a) provide a stable, smooth surface,
including across driveways, sections
and joins;
(b) be easily maintained;
(c) have a width with longitudinal gradient
to cater for projected usage;
(d) provide clear sight-lines for safe use;
and
(e) be free of any obstructions such as
fences, signage and bollards
Complies with AO9.8
AO9.8
Pedestrian routes are designed to avoid where
Pedestrian routes border the frontages of
possible travelling through car parking areas and at
residential land, public parks and business
the rear of the lot.
uses with routes through parking lots or at
the rear of lots avoided.
Page 36
Road Design and Construction Table 9.4.7.3 Criteria for assessable development (part)
Performance outcomes Acceptable Outcomes Compliance Response
//NA
Road Design and Construction
PO10 AO10 N/A AO10 not applicable
Roads and pathways are planned and Road planning and design is in accordance Civil engineering design is beyond the scope of this
designed to support the function of with Council’s Planning Scheme Policy PSP6 traffic assessment.
the road hierarchy and ensure that— Engineering Design Standards – Roads,
drainage and earthworks.
(a) design and alignment of roads,
intersections and all associated
works —
(i) convey the primary function
of each type of street;
(ii) provide a safe environment
for all users;
(iii) are adequate for the design
speed environment;
(iv) are adequate for predicted
traffic volumes;
(v) maintains the safe and
efficient functioning of the
road network incorporating
roundabouts as a preference
to T intersections;
(vi) are compatible with existing
infrastructure;
(vii) are easily maintained by
Council equipment; and
(viii) where appropriate, have the
ability to accommodate public
transport services;
(b) road pavement surfaces —
(i) are durable enough to carry
estimated wheel loads of
Page 37
travelling and parked
vehicles;
(ii) provide for the safe passage
of vehicles, pedestrians,
cyclists, and discharge of
stormwater run-off from
contributing catchments and
the preservation of all-
weather access;
(c) kerb and channel—
(i) controls vehicle movement by
delineating the carriageway
for all users;
(ii) conveys road pavement run-
off to stormwater drainage in
a manner that allows the road
to be trafficable in 1%AEP
local rainfall events; and
(d) verges and footpaths provide—
(i) safe access for pedestrians
and cyclists clear of
obstructions;
(ii) an access area for vehicles
onto properties;
(iii) a corridor allocated for
services and utilities; and
(iv) additional amenity for minor
roads.
Page 38
Activity Centres and Community Facilities Table 9.4.7.3 Criteria for assessable development (part)
Performance outcomes Acceptable Outcomes Compliance Response
//NA
Activity Centres and Community Facilities
PO11 AO11.1 Complies with AO11
All key destinations such as activity Adjoining and within 200 metres of activity The subject development proposes pathway
centres, educational establishments, centres, educational establishments, networks designed for pedestrians and cyclists, that
community facilities, aged car facilities, community facilities, beaches and sports provide direct access to transit opportunities to the
beaches and sports grounds can be grounds: north at the existing Noosa Civic shopping centre.
reached by a range of travel modes
including public transport, walking, (a) road and pathway networks are
cycling, taxis, and shared and private designed for safe pedestrian and cyclist
vehicles. movement;
(b) pathways provide direct pedestrian and
cyclist access to focal points and transit
opportunities;
(c) designated bus stops, taxi and shared
vehicle set down facilities are provided.
AO11.2 Complies with AO11.2
On-street parking, drop-off, access to parking Walking and cycling safety and amenity is not
and loading facilities and vehicle compromised by the subject development.
manoeuvring do not compromise walking and
cycling safety and amenity.
AO11.3 N/A AO11.3 not applicable
Roads that function as main streets within an The subject development does not propose any
activity centre are designed to facilitate active new roads.
frontages through means such as wide
footpaths and slow speed environments.
AO11.4 N/A AO11.4 not applicable
Commercial sites fronting main streets, The subject development does not propose a
including Sunshine Beach Road, Poinciana commercial use.
Avenue, Maple Street and Diamond Street,
Page 39
are provided with access from rear lanes or
other access streets for service vehicles and
to parking areas, to reduce potential conflicts
with pedestrians and cyclists by having
driveways to these streets.
AO11.5 not applicable
AO11.5 N/A The subject development does not propose any
Taxi or shared vehicle infrastructure is new road infrastructure.
provided parallel to the kerb, conveniently
located to minimise passenger walking and
designed in accordance with:
(a) AS2890.5–1993 Parking facilities –
on-street parking and AS1428.1–
2009 Design for access and mobility
– general requirements for access –
new building work;
(b) AS1742.11–1999 Parking controls –
manual of uniform traffic control
devices;
(c) AS/NZS 2890.6–2009 Parking
facilities – of-street parking for
people with disabilities;
(d) Disability standards for accessible
public transport 2002 made under
section 31(1) of the Disability
Discrimination Act 1992; and
(e) AS/NZS 1158.3.1 – Lighting for
roads and public spaces, Part 3.1:
Pedestrian area (category P) lighting
– Performance and design
requirements.
Page 40
Environmental Protection Table 9.4.7.3 Criteria for assessable development (part)
Performance outcomes Acceptable Outcomes Compliance Response
//NA
Environmental Protection
PO12 AO12.1 N/A PO12 not applicable
Road infrastructure is located and Roads follow the edge of existing disturbed The subject development does not propose any
aligned so as to— areas, or alternatively, these works are co- new road infrastructure.
(a) minimise disturbance to located with other services within a combined
native vegetation and/or utility corridor.
other habitat areas;
(b) protect and maintain wildlife AO12.2
corridor movements and the Low impact construction techniques are used
safety of native fauna; around areas of vegetation to be retained to
(c) provide for compensatory minimise interference with the vegetation.
habitat establishment and
maintenance; AO12.3
(d) minimise changes to the Roads avoid native vegetation and provide
hydrological regime, appropriate fauna movement corridors and
including drainage patterns,
protection measures.
run-off and water quality;
(e) avoid crossing
Editor’s Note— Measures may include fauna
watercourses, drainage lines
underpasses, ropes, fencing and the like.
and wetlands, but where
such crossing are
unavoidable, disturbed AO12.4
areas are reinstated and Road infrastructure within or adjacent to
revegetated on completion native habitat incorporates fences which allow
of works; and for protected wildlife movement and controls
(f) minimise bulk earthworks. unrestricted access of domestic cats and
dogs.
AO12.5
Native vegetation is protected
from clearing or construction activities by—
(a) clearly marking vegetation to be
retained with flagging tape;
Page 41
(b) installing protective fencing around
the dripline of vegetation; and
(c) ensuring stock pling, storage and
vehicle parking occur outside the
areas of vegetation to be retained.
AO12.6
Where clearance of habitat is unavoidable,
once the area disturbed by the works is re-
established, replacement habitat is planted
in proximity of the works to create native
fauna habitat suitable for the area and
maintained for the life of the works.
PO13 AO13 N/A PO13 not applicable
Road infrastructure is constructed to Road infrastructure is constructed in The subject development does not propose any
minimise adverse environmental accordance with Council’s Planning new road infrastructure.
impacts, including from run-off and Scheme Policy PSP6 Engineering Design
erosion Standards – Roads, drainage and earthworks
External Works and Infrastructure Table 9.4.7.3 Criteria for assessable development (part)
Performance outcomes Acceptable Outcomes Compliance Response
//NA
External Works and Infrastructure
PO14 AO14 N/A PO14 not applicable
Development is provided with external Where not already existing, the following Civil engineering design is beyond the scope of this
works— infrastructure components are provided at traffic assessment.
(a) along the full extent of the the frontage of the site—.
frontage of the site to an
appropriate standard having (a) full width sealed road;
regard to the specified (b) concrete kerb and channel where
function of the road; and appropriate;
(b) provided beyond the site’s (c) forming and grading to footpaths;
frontage if required. (d) vehicular kerb and footpath
crossing;
(e) a constructed bikeway;
Page 42
(f) a constructed footpath;
(g) a constructed carriageway;
(h) required alterations to public utility
mains, services or installations;
(i) construction of any required
alterations to public utility mains,
services of installations;
(j) stormwater drainage works; and
(k) installation of electrical condults.
PO15 No acceptable outcome provided N/A PO15 not applicable
Any alterations or repairs to Civil engineering aspects are beyond the scope of
infrastructure as a result of the this traffic assessment.
development are made at no cost to
Council.
PO16 No acceptable outcome provided N/A PO14 not applicable
Road infrastructure is proven to be Civil engineering aspects are beyond the scope of
suitable for its use prior to Council this traffic assessment.
accepting the dedicated asset.
Staged development Table 9.4.7.3 Criteria for assessable development (part)
Performance outcomes Acceptable Outcomes Compliance Response
//NA
Staged development
PO17 No acceptable outcome provided N/A PO17 not applicable
Staged development is planned, Civil engineering aspects are beyond the scope of
designed and constructed to ensure this traffic assessment.
that—
(a) each stage of the development
can be constructed without
interruption to services and
utilities provided to the previous
stages;
Page 43
(b) the infrastructure provided is
capable of servicing the
entire development; and
(c) the materials used are
consistent throughout the
development.
Page 44
ASIA PACIFIC OFFICES
ADELAIDE BRISBANE CAIRNS CANBERRA
60 Halifax Street Level 16, 175 Eagle Street Level 1 Suite 1.06 GPO 410
Adelaide SA 5000 Brisbane QLD 4000 Boland’s Centre Canberra ACT 2600
Australia Australia 14 Spence Street Australia
T: +61 431 516 449 T: +61 7 3858 4800 Cairns QLD 4870 T: +61 2 6287 0800
F: +61 7 3858 4801 Australia F: +61 2 9427 8200
T: +61 7 4722 8090
DARWIN GOLD COAST MACKAY MELBOURNE
Unit 5, 21 Parap Road Level 2, 194 Varsity Parade 21 River Street Level 11, 176 Wellington Parade
Parap NT 0820 Varsity Lakes QLD 4227 Mackay QLD 4740 East Melbourne VIC 3002
Australia Australia Australia Australia
T: +61 8 8998 0100 M: +61 438 763 516 T: +61 7 3181 3300 T: +61 3 9249 9400
F: +61 8 9370 0101 F: +61 3 9249 9499
NEWCASTLE CBD NEWCASTLE PERTH SYDNEY
Suite 2B, 125 Bull Street 10 Kings Road Grd Floor, 503 Murray Street Tenancy 202 Submarine School
Newcastle West NSW 2302 New Lambton NSW 2305 Perth WA 6000 Sub Base Platypus
Australia Australia Australia 120 High Street
T: +61 2 4940 0442 T: +61 2 4037 3200 T: +61 8 9422 5900 North Sydney NSW 2060
F: +61 2 4037 3201 F: +61 8 9422 5901 Australia
T: +61 2 9427 8100
F: +61 2 9427 8200
TOWNSVILLE WOLLONGONG
12 Cannan Street Level 1, The Central Building
South Townsville QLD 4810 UoW Innovation Campus
Australia North Wollongong NSW 2500
T: +61 7 4722 8000 Australia
F: +61 7 4722 8001 T: +61 2 4249 1000
AUCKLAND NELSON WELLINGTON
Level 4, 12 O'Connell Street 6/A Cambridge Street 12A Waterloo Quay
Auckland 1010 Richmond, Nelson 7020 Wellington 6011
New Zealand New Zealand New Zealand
T: 0800 757 695 T: +64 274 898 628 T: +64 2181 7186
SINGAPORE
39b Craig Road
Singapore 089677
T: +65 6822 2203
Used in these records
Item 13 Appendix F - Traffic Impact Statement-1.0.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 5.3 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.