Original source · versioned page text
Reference Document - Flora and Fauna Assessment - 132005.638.04
Native Foresters
Clearing of Category X vegetation (approximately 0.26ha) will not result in a significant
impact on the MSES – Regulated vegetation based on the criteria outlined in the SRI test-
criteria of the SRI guidelines for vegetation with a mid-dense structure as shown in Table 7
below.
TABLE 7: Significant residual impact test criteria
Clearing in an
Clearing in an RE Clearing in the
RE that is within
that is: portion of an RE
the defined
endangered, or of that lies within a
distance of a
concern mapped wetland
watercourse
For clearing other than clearing for linear
infrastructure:
- area greater than 5 ha where in a
1 grassland RE; or
N/A N/A N/A
- area greater than 2 ha where in
a sparse RE; or
- area greater than 0.5 ha in a
dense to mid-dense RE.
2 Clearing within 50m of the defining bank N/A N/A N/A
3 Clearing within 5m of the defining bank N/A N/A N/A
Threatened species and Koala habitat
The project will result in the loss of approximately 240 non-juvenile Koala habitat trees in a
Priority Koala Area. Clearing of a non-juvenile Koala habitat tree is considered a significant
residual impact to a matter of state environmental significance (MSES).
High value waterways and wetlands
Proposed works will not have a significant residual impact on declared high value
waterways or wetlands as the project is unlikely to result in environmental values being
affected in any of the following ways:
• “areas of the wetland or watercourse being destroyed or artificially modified;
• a measurable change in water quality of the wetland or watercourse—for example
a change in the level of the physical and/or chemical characteristics of the water,
including salinity, pollutants, or nutrients in the wetland or watercourse, to a level
that exceeds the water quality guidelines for the waters; or
• the habitat or lifecycle of native species, including invertebrate fauna and fish
species, dependent upon the wetland being seriously affected; or
• a substantial and measurable change in the hydrological regime or recharge zones
of the wetland, e.g. a substantial change to the volume, timing, duration and
frequency of ground and surface water flows to and within the wetland; or
• an invasive species that is harmful to the environmental values of the wetland being
established (or an existing invasive species being spread) in the wetland” (DEHP,
2014).
Noosa Landfill & Resource Recovery Centre Expansion – Site A, Rev 1 – Fauna & Flora Assessment 30
Document Set ID: 23617066
Version: 1, Version Date: 05/03/2025
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.