Skip to the record
Search everything, all in one place.

Original source · versioned page text

2017-11-13 General Committee Meeting Notes

of 22

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

RECOMMENDATIONS ONLY – NOT THE FINAL DECISION OF COUNCIL
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING                                                   13 NOVEMBER 2017


        3.    The outdoor dining areas must not exceed 30m2 and 35m2 as shown on the
              approved plans and must not be used after 10pm each night.
        4.    The approved uses must not cause nuisance as a result of noise emission.
        5.    Entertainers or speakers used to amplify noise must not be located in any
              outdoor, verandah, patio, footpath or beer garden area of the premises.
              Building Appearance
        6.    Ground floor shopfront glazing along the frontages must be fully transparent to a
              minimum of 6550% of the street frontage to allow passive surveillance and
              encourage social interaction, and must be provided at full height (floor to ceiling).
        7.    The external finishes of the building must include a mix of materials, variation in
              roof form and extensive eaves as shown on the Approved Plans.
        8.    All mechanical equipment and other service infrastructure located on the site
              must be:
              a.    located not less than 2 metres from a property boundary
              b.    fully enclosed or screened such that they are not visible from the street
                    frontages nor adjoining properties. Where screened by landscaping,
                    landscaping beds must be at least 1.5 metres wide.
              Soil Contamination
        9.    As part of any Operational Works application for the site a detailed site
              contamination assessment report prepared by a suitably qualified and
              experienced person in accordance with the procedures and practices detailed in
              the National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination)
              Measure 1999 (NEPM) is required. The report must conclude:
              a.    whether the site is suitable for the proposed new use/development (with
                    and without remediation and/or management);
              b.    whether any site contamination is causing, or is likely to cause,
                    ‘environmental harm’ (as defined under the Environmental Management
                    and Pollution Control Act 1994); and
              c.    whether any site contamination presents an occupational health and safety
                    risk to workers involved in redevelopment of the site.
        10.   If the site contamination assessment report concludes that remediation and/or
              management strategies are necessary to avoid risks to human health or the
              environment, a proposed remediation and/or management plan must be
              submitted to Council prior to the commencement of building works. Any
              remediation or management plan involving soil disturbance must include a
              detailed soil and water management plan to prevent off-site transfer of
              potentially-contaminated soil or stormwater.
              NB: It is mandatory for any contaminated land investigation documents, including
              investigation reports, validation reports and draft site management plans to be
              certified by an approved auditor and must have approval from the Department of
              Environment and Heritage and Protection (DEHP). DEHP have list of approved
              auditors.




                                                                                    Page 8 of 22
Log in to download the original file

2017-11-13 General Committee Meeting Notes(PDF, 692KB).pdf · 708 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.