Skip to the record
Accept no imitations.

Council archive · source document

08/310 - Referral Agency Response - EPA [As Published] · 132008.310

of 6

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

IDAS C-6

Concurrence agency response
Integrated Planning Act 1997 ss3.3.16 and 3.3.18

Applicant: Noosa Council
C/- Peter Balmer
PO Box 141
TEWANTIN QLD 4565
Application no.: 2008/3 10
Date received by EPA: 19 March 2008
Jurisdiction: Environmental Protection Act 1994
Role: Concurrence
Description: Material Change of Use
1 Woodland Drive, PEREGIAN BEACH
Lot nos.: 150 & 151 Registered Plan no.: P93132
1 Type of development
wi Material change of use
O Reconfiguration of a Lot
where:
0 the existing use of the land is, or if the land is vacant land with no existing use the most

Oo

4

2

recent use of the land was, for a notifiable activity under the Environmental Protection Act
1994.

the proposed use of the land is for child care, educational, recreational, residential or
similar purposes and the existing use of the land is, or if the land is vacant land with no
existing use the most recent use of the land was, for an industrial activity.

the land is on the Environmental Management Register or Contaminated Land Register
under the Environmental Protection Act 1994.

the land is wholly or partly within an area for which an Area Management Advice for
industrial activity or natural mineralisation has been issued and the proposed use of the
land is for child care, educational, recreational, residential or similar purposes.

the land is wholly or partly in an area for which an Area Management Advice for
unexploded ordnance (UXO) has been issued.

Response to development application

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), acting as a concurrence agency under the /ntegrated
Planning Act 1997, provides the following response to the application detailed above -

DOOOoOg

3

conditions must attach to any approval of the development
any approval must be for part only of the development
any approval must be a preliminary approval only

there are no concurrence agency requirements

the application must be refused

Reasons for including condition(s) or refusal

The site (the subject lot/s) is part of an area of land within which the Department of Defence
(Defence) has assessed a ‘substantial’ risk of residual UXO contamination exists. Visit the Defence

website ht

//www.defence.gov.au/uxo/ for details.

 

Defence advises that development or land use rezoning proposals for land within a ‘substantial’ zone
should only proceed following the conduct of UXO investigation and clearance activities. Defence

VER 2

Used in these records

About this file

File size
306 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

08_310 - Referral Agency Response - EPA [As Published].pdf · 306 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.