Judgement.pdf [As Published] · 132007.1259

 

eS , ~  s IDAS C-6-

Concurrence ageney response
integrated Planning Act 1997 53.3.16 and 3.3.18

   
 

  
    
      
 

Applicant: Scanlon Property Group
. C/- PMM Group Pty Lid A:
PO Box 1559
FORTITUDE VALLEY QLD 4006 . RECEIV ED
Application no. 2007/1259 - 4 AUG 2007
Date received by EPA: (7 July 2007 " NOOSA
Jurisdiction: Environmental Protection Act 1994. “\, Seid GQUNGHL
Role: . Concurrence ;
Description: Material Change of Use

215, 215A, 217 & 219 David Low Way; PEREGIAN

Lotino.;8 ‘Registered Plan no.: RP9315
Lot no. 9 Registered Plan no.: RP9315
Lotno.: 10 Registered Plan no: KP9315
Lotno.: 76 Registered Plan no.: MCH2969

1 Type of development
Material change of use Lo
“oO Recorifiguration of a Lot : '

where; .

0 the existing use of the land is, or if the land is vacant land with no existing use the most
recent use of the land was, for a notifiable activity under the Environmental Protection Act
1994, ° , : , ‘

a the proposed use of the Jand is for child care, educational, recreational, residential or

similar-purposes and the existing use of the land is, or if the land is vacant land with no

=

existing use the most recent use of the land was, for an industrial activity,

Oo the land is on the Environmental Management Register or Contaminated Land Register
under the Zaviroumental Protection Act 1994.

oO the land is wholly or partly within an area for which an Area Management Advice for -
industriat activity or natural mineralisation has been issued and the proposed use of the-
land is for child care, educational, recreational, residential or similar purposes.

the land is wholly or’partly in an area-for which an Area Management Advice for
unexploded ordnance (UXO) has been issued, .

2 Response to development application
The Environmental Protection Agency (BPA), acting as a concurrence agency under the Integrated
Planning Act 1997, provides the following response 6 the application detailed above -
conditions must attdch to any approval of the development
"any approval must be for part only of the development
any approval must be a preliminary approval only
there are no concurrence agency requirements -
the application must be refused

OOCOOR

3 Reasons for including condition(s) or refusal . .
The site (the subject lot/s) is part of an area of land within which the Department of Defence’:
ox efence) has assessed a ‘substantial’ risk of residual UXO contamination exists, Visit the Defence

ve http: www.defence.gov.aufuxo for details.

   
  

pe EVE

5%.
“ . .
) VER2
aa .
3
Si