Original source · versioned page text
Meeting minutes
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES 13 NOVEMBER 2023
(ii) Biodiversity, Waterways and Wetlands Overlay Code –
8.2.2.2(2)(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h) and (i) Table 8.2.23 PO1,
PO3, PO6 and PO11;
(iii) Water Quality and Drainage Code – 9.4.82(2)(a) and (b) and
Table 9.4.8.3 PO6;
(iv) Noosa Heads Local Plan Code – Overall Outcomes (2)(b)(d)(e)
and (ad) and Table 7.2.5.3 PO4, PO5, PO6 and PO26;
(v) Environmental Management and Conservation Zone Code –
Overall Outcomes (2)(a) and (b), Table 6.7.1.3 PO1, PO5, PO7,
PO8, PO9, PO11 and PO13;
(vi) Tourist Accommodation Zone Code - Table 6.3.4.3 PO9 and
PO10.
4. When read as a whole, the South East Queensland Regional Plan
2017 (SEQRP) does not lend support to the proposed use of the land, as:
4.1. the SEQRP sets a long term, 50-year vision, establishing
aspirations for the region up to 2067. Given this, the timing and
sequencing of urban development occurring within the Urban
Footprint is a finer grained detail, the planning for which is
implemented through local government planning schemes;
4.2. the designation of land as being within the Urban Footprint
does not imply that all that land with that designation can be
developed for urban purposes; and
4.3. when assessed against Noosa Plan 2020, the proposed
development is not suitable for urban development.
5. The following relevant matters support refusal:
5.1. The proposed development will involve an unacceptable loss
of vegetation in a locality which is an ecologically important and
environmentally sensitive and serves as an important ecological
linkage,
5.2. There is no planning, economic or community need for the
proposed development on the subject land.
5.3. Approval of the proposed development would not be in the
public interest as reflected in the provisions of Noosa Plan 2020
referred to in these reasons for refusal.
B. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning
Act 2016.
Amendment
Moved: Cr Brian Stockwell
Seconded: Cr Amelia Lorentson
That Item B be added to read (and the current Item B be subsequently changed
to Item C):
B. That the CEO be requested to review the zone and urban boundaries as part
of a future review of the Planning Scheme.
Carried unanimously.
Committee Recommendation
Moved: Cr Joe Jurisevic
Seconded: Cr Tom Wegener
That Council note the report by the Development Planner to the Planning &
Environment Committee Meeting dated 7 November 2023 regarding Application
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the original