Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Original source · versioned page text

Meeting minutes

of 18

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES                                      13 NOVEMBER 2023


                  4. When read as a whole, the South East Queensland Regional Plan
                  2017 (SEQRP) does not lend support to the proposed use of the land, as:
                        4.1. the SEQRP sets a long term, 50-year vision, establishing
                        aspirations for the region up to 2067. Given this, the timing and
                        sequencing of urban development occurring within the Urban
                        Footprint is a finer grained detail, the planning for which is
                        implemented through local government planning schemes;
                        4.2. the designation of land as being within the Urban Footprint
                        does not imply that all that land with that designation can be
                        developed for urban purposes; and
                        4.3. when assessed against Noosa Plan 2020, the proposed
                        development is not suitable for urban development.

                  5.   The following relevant matters support refusal:
                        5.1. The proposed development will involve an unacceptable loss
                        of vegetation in a locality which is an ecologically important and
                        environmentally sensitive and serves as an important ecological
                        linkage,
                        5.2. There is no planning, economic or community need for the
                        proposed development on the subject land.
                        5.3. Approval of the proposed development would not be in the
                        public interest as reflected in the provisions of Noosa Plan 2020
                        referred to in these reasons for refusal.

            B. That the CEO be requested to review the zone and urban boundaries as part
            of a future review of the Planning Scheme; and

            C. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning
            Act 2016.
            Carried unanimously.

            Cr Wilkie returned to the meeting.


    5.2.    MCU21/0194.01 – APPLICATION FOR AN OTHER CHANGE TO A
            DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL FOR A ROADSIDE STALL TO INCLUDE A
            FOOD AND DRINK OUTLET AT 201 MARY RIVER RD, COOROY
            (REFERRED FROM PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE DATED 7
            NOVEMBER 2023 - ITEM 5.2)

            Committee Recommendation
            Moved:                Cr Frank Wilkie
            Seconded:             Cr Brian Stockwell
            That Council note the report by the Senior Development Planner to the Planning
            & Environment Committee Meeting dated 7 November 2023 regarding
            Application No. MCU21/0194.01 for an other change to a Development Permit
            for Material Change of Use (Roadside Stall) to include a Food and Drink Outlet,
            situated at 201 Mary River Rd, Cooroy and:

            A.   Approve, in part, only (with amended Condition 2) and part refusal.

            B.   Approve the change to Condition 2 as outlined in Attachment 1.
Log in to download the original file

78fb3697f9.pdf · 1.5 MB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.