Skip to the record
Mmm.. taste the original NoosaWatch™

Original source · versioned page text

PA3660-Coastal Hazard Assessment - 4 arakoon

of 132

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

                                                   Project related




Figure 6-1 shows a conceptual representation of the erosion and accretion zones associated with storm
induced erosion predicted by Vellinga (1983).




Figure 6-2 Sketch of pre-storm and predicted post-storm profiles based on Vellinga (1983)


The Department provides the following recommendation in relation to defining a storm event:

           “For a tide-dominated coast where storm tide levels can be large, the parameters
           adopted for the minimum design storm are:

                   storm tide level corresponding to an average recurrence interval of 1-in-100 years; and,
                   wave height for a moderate storm using the 1-in-20-year significant wave height (Hs).

           However, for wave-dominated coastlines where extreme storm tide levels can be
           relatively minor, such as the Gold Coast, the significant wave height and duration
           of the storm event are major factors influencing short-term erosion, rather than
           storm tide. Hence it may be necessary to consider a larger wave event (for
           example, a storm event with a 1-in-100 ARI) and a moderate storm tide level.
           Decisions on appropriate parameters to be used must be based on local
           conditions and the experience of the coastal engineer undertaking the
           assessment.”

In relation to the probability of such an event occurring the Department of Environment and Heritage
Protection (2013) states:

         “Although the abovementioned probability of occurrence may appear to be fairly
         high, it is considered that this choice is reasonable when considered in
         conjunction with the method used to determine erosion prone area widths. This
         method implies that the erosion prone area has sufficient width to accommodate
         the design storm erosion in 100 years’ time, when all of the estimated long-term
         erosion has occurred. Therefore, it also follows that for much of the 100-year
         planning period, the erosion prone area is sufficient to accommodate a larger

11 April 2024         4-6 ARAKOON CRESCENT, SUNSHINE BEACH                        PA3660-RHD-XX-ZZ-RP-Z-0001   27

Log in to download the original (PA3660-Coastal Hazard Assessment - 4 arakoon.pdf)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.